algemene-voorwaarden-fokquote:Op maandag 21 februari 2011 20:41 schreef LXIV het volgende:
(PS: ik ben nu bezig met een module die notaire commenters (users in FOK!-taal) filtert, inclusief hun standpunten. En raad eens, Papierversnipperaar, ook jou zie ik wel eens voorbij komen in sommige query's !)
En zulks.quote:Het gebruik van de Dienst alsmede het gebruik van de informatie op de Site is enkel en alleen toegestaan met het oog op het kunnen communiceren, discussiëren met andere gebruikers op de site waarbij geldt dat het karakter van de communicatie geen commercieel maar slechts een particulier doel mag dienen, tenzij ter plaatse anders aangegeven.
Jester? Die viel toch juist Anonymous lastig? Aan de andere kant viel ie ook WikiLeaks lastig omdat WL US militairen in gevaar zou brengen.quote:op_99 RT @Anon_Lobo: #anonymous Jester takes down site of Westboro Baptist Church www.godhatesfags.com 2 minutes ago via SimplyTweet
quote:http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/02/21/948079/-Anonymous-to-UN:-Help-Libya-Now
The following press release was just created by an emergent task group of Anonymous participants who have been involved in OpLibya. English and German so far.
Dear United Nations:
Anonymous wishes you to act.
We are watching the developments in Libya and are shocked.
Shocked by the images we've seen.
Shocked by the things Libya's Anons have told us.
Shocked by the fact that one man ignores the voices of his citizens and opens fire on them.
Shocked by the fact that even with generals and diplomats deserting, this man is still ignoring the will of his people and unwilling to accept their human rights
People ought not have to fear their leaders; leaders ought to fear their people. In too many places, though, this is currently not the case. A grasping dictator has taken an army to the skies and the streets to shed blood of people whom he should be protecting. Some of them have bravely refused, and thereby done their part; when will the UN do theirs?
We just want the people to be free. Please help us help them. Again, this is not an attack, but rather a bid for your full attention, which ought to be directed towards assisting Libyans in their quest for liberty.
The United Nations has the power to prevent this egregious loss of life, but it must act quickly and decisively to do so, contrary to its usual habits.
We ask not for meetings or referenda. Rather, we demand that you implement the following measures and do so in a manner that will minimize the loss of life among civilians and put an end to the rule of this degenerate tyrant.
1. Provide a blanket no-fly zone to prevent state controlled aircraft from bombing civilians.
2. Provide secured transport of medical supplies to major population centers.
3. Announce the implemention of these measures within 24 hours.
That world which you claim to protect is watching and will respond accordingly.
We are Anonymous
We are Legion.
We do not forget,
We do not forgive.
Expect us.
quote:ValleySeth RT @SocialistBooks: Bypass the #Wisconsin Capitol lock-out on internet sites using Kproxy.com, #Anonymous has confirmed this. Re-Tweet this. #wiunion #notmywi
Censuur in Wisconsin, USA?quote:anonsdg @taa_madison #anonymous may have a list posted at some point, but for now protesters should use kproxy.com to bypass censorship. #wiunion 2 minutes ago via web
quote:http://edition.cnn.com/2011/US/02/22/wisconsin.budget/index.html
Madison, Wisconsin (CNN) -- A left-leaning website that union supporters used to rally protesters in Wisconsin was partially blocked as demonstrators gathered in the state Capitol over a controversial budget bill.
The website, defendwisconsin.org, could not be accessed on Monday and into Tuesday morning in the Capitol building, where crowds assembled over proposed legislation that would increase the costs of benefits to public employees and curb their collective-bargaining rights.
Wisconsin Democratic Party press secretary Graeme Zielinski blamed Gov. Scott Walker and Republican lawmakers -- who returned to work Tuesday -- for causing the outage.
"In a direct assault on the First Amendment, Scott Walker's administration is blocking access in the Wisconsin Capitol to opposition websites," Zielinski said.
State Department of Administration spokeswoman Carla Vigue responded, saying, "DOA's security software automatically blocked the site, as it does all new websites."
"No one here at DOA decided to block it or took action to do so," he said. "The website is handled like any other website."
The Capitol internet service, which restricts access to certain websites considered inappropriate for lawmakers, revealed a "blocked page" when users tried to access the site using the building's wireless system.
Users were able to access the site elsewhere.
The outage comes on the heels of a speech by Walker, who defended the budget proposal and criticized unions for squandering state coffers and impeding fiscal reform.
"We're broke," he told reporters Monday. "You really can't negotiate when you don't have money to negotiate with."
Unions have argued that collective bargaining -- a process of negotiations meant to regulate working conditions -- has helped protect wages and health care, enforce workplace safety and serve as a means to arbitrate employee grievances.
The budget-repair bill, proposed by Walker to address a $137 million shortfall through June 30, would increase contributions of state workers to their pensions and health insurance benefits. It requires collective-bargaining units to conduct annual votes to maintain certification. It also eliminates the right of unions to have dues deducted from worker paychecks.
Walker warned that not passing the proposed bill would result in at least 1,500 government employees being laid off in the short term and could result in the layoffs of upward of 6,000 workers in the following budget cycle.
Last week, 14 Democratic state senators essentially boycotted the Legislature and went to Illinois to prevent a quorum from passing the bill. The measure's opponents said they won't allow a vote unless Walker negotiates on the plan to eliminate collective-bargaining rights for everything but wages.
For their part, Democrats need to draw at least three Republican lawmakers to block the bill or otherwise renegotiate the proposal.
The state's protesting teachers -- who had shut down schools across the state -- returned to the classroom Tuesday.
Meanwhile, a bill to limit the collective-bargaining power of some public-sector workers sparked protests in neighboring Ohio, where crowds gathered last week in the state Capitol.
The measure would eliminate tenure as a consideration when deciding on layoffs, require workers to pay at least 20% of their health insurance premiums and institute merit-based pay for some public-sector workers.
Elsewhere Tuesday, Michigan lawmakers approved a proposal to shrink Detroit's troubled school system, while House Democrats in Indiana may have ripped a page out of Wisconsin's book by threating to walk out on a Republican-supported bill that would reduce private-sector union rights.
In New Jersey, Republican Gov. Chris Christie is set to give his annual budget address that many analysts say will likely include big cuts to state services in an effort to avoid raising taxes.
Geen discussies meer. Zelfs Im.Kant heeft het opgegeven na het HBG-a-ry avontuur!quote:Op dinsdag 22 februari 2011 21:18 schreef Nibb-it het volgende:
Het loopt altijd wel storm in jouw topics, hè?
quote:diegomireles #xs4all #Libya #Libia access Internet via modem phone:+31205350535 user:xs4all password:xs4all #anonymous 8 minutes ago via web
quote:TheUsedMisfit RT @Shadowflare00: #Kh0d0hf1 is insane. Is there way to DDoS a person? | #Libya #oplibya Gadafi #cyberwar #anonops #anonymous
quote:Dwayne420 #Libyan Relief Effort donations - http://t.co/MY3Jb5I via @Feb17Libya (The Libyan Youth Movement Feb. 17th) #libya #anonops #oplibya about 1 hour ago via web
Ik sluit me hierbij aan. Toen ik in papierversnipperaars vorige topic een discussie probeerde te beginnen over deze puberale internetspeelgroep kreeg ik slechts one-liners van papierversnipperaar terug, en als zelfs dit te moeilijk werd negeerde hij mij domweg. Wel jammer, want hierna was hij écht de enige die nog in dat debiele topic postte.quote:Op dinsdag 22 februari 2011 22:49 schreef Fireblast het volgende:
Waarom moet dit via FOK! als letterlijk meer dan 75% van de posts in het vorige topic van jouzelf is? Volgens mij is het de bedoeling van een forum om discussies te hebben, niet om in je eentje de boel vol te spammen.
Dan kan ik ook wel een topic maken voor mensen die rode regenjassen met gele strepen verzamelen. Post het gewoon op die forums van die "organisaties", blijkbaar heeft niemand hier de behoefte om er over te discussiëren.
Ik heb 30 vaste volgers, en het is een leuke hobby. heb je er last van?quote:Op dinsdag 22 februari 2011 22:49 schreef Fireblast het volgende:
Waarom moet dit via FOK! als letterlijk meer dan 75% van de posts in het vorige topic van jouzelf is? Volgens mij is het de bedoeling van een forum om discussies te hebben, niet om in je eentje de boel vol te spammen.
Dan kan ik ook wel een topic maken voor mensen die rode regenjassen met gele strepen verzamelen. Post het gewoon op die forums van die "organisaties", blijkbaar heeft niemand hier de behoefte om er over te discussiëren.
Aangezien jij geen poging deed om uberhaupt op een serieuze wijze te reageren was er geen discussie om 'op te geven'. Ik zag gewoon iets te laat in dat er met jou geen discussie is te beginnen, en dat je perverse fascinatie en admiratie voor puberale kinderachtige kneusjes niet te begrijpen is.quote:Op dinsdag 22 februari 2011 21:26 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:
[..]
Geen discussies meer. Zelfs Im.Kant heeft het opgegeven na het HBG-a-ry avontuur!
Maar ik heb een vast schare lurkers, man of 30. That's good enough for me.
Hoe kom je aan dat getal 30quote:Op dinsdag 22 februari 2011 22:53 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:
[..]
Ik heb 30 vaste volgers, en het is een leuke hobby. heb je er last van?
Weetje wat, dan stuur je je lurkers voortaan een PM, opgelostquote:Op dinsdag 22 februari 2011 22:53 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:
[..]
Ik heb 30 vaste volgers, en het is een leuke hobby. heb je er last van?
Zie je wel, nu negeer je me weer. Als het voor de anon-kneusjes te moeilijk wordt om op een serieuze manier ergens op in te gaan, dumpen ze een achterlijk filmpje ofwel oneliner.quote:
We hebben anders een aardige discussie. In hoeverre Im.kant daar aan bijdraagt kan je zelf beoordelen in deel #5.quote:Op dinsdag 22 februari 2011 23:07 schreef Fireblast het volgende:
[..]
Hoe kom je aan dat getal 30?
Ja ik heb er last van, staat telkens bovenaan in NWS terwijl de toegevoegde waarde 0 is vanwege ontbreken van discussie, en de mogelijkheid daartoe lees ik.
Wat heeft die respectievelijke 'aardige discussie' op dít moment iets te maken met je vorige deel? Waarom is er nu sprake van een 'aardige discussie'(ik zie hem niet)? Ik zie namelijk nu enkel TS die vooral in dialoog is met zichzelf, terwijl enkele andere users slechts hun irritatie over TS uiten.quote:Op dinsdag 22 februari 2011 23:17 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:
[..]
We hebben anders een aardige discussie. In hoeverre Im.kant daar aan bijdraagt kan je zelf beoordelen in deel #5.
Ik kijk in ieder geval iedere keer omdat mijn mening over jou toch altijd weer bevestigd wordt als je een nieuwe post hebt gemaakt. Dat voelt best wel goed.quote:Iedere keer als ik iets post, krijg ik ongeveer 30 views sinds de revolutie in Egypte begon.
Maak je niet zo druk, als je het niets vind hoef je hier niet te posten.quote:Op dinsdag 22 februari 2011 23:24 schreef Im.Kant. het volgende:
[..]
Wat heeft die respectievelijke 'aardige discussie' op dít moment iets te maken met je vorige deel? Waarom is er nu sprake van een 'aardige discussie'(ik zie hem niet)? Ik zie namelijk nu enkel TS die vooral in dialoog is met zichzelf, terwijl enkele andere users slechts hun irritatie over TS uiten.
[..]
Ik kijk in ieder geval iedere keer omdat mijn mening over jou toch altijd weer bevestigd wordt als je een nieuwe post hebt gemaakt. Dat voelt best wel goed.
Ik maak me niet druk hoor...quote:Op dinsdag 22 februari 2011 23:50 schreef Demon_Hunter het volgende:
[..]
Maak je niet zo druk, als je het niets vind hoef je hier niet te posten.
Hele artikel hier: http://www.rawstory.com/r(...)al-media-activities/quote:Exclusive: Military’s ‘persona’ software cost millions, used for ‘classified social media activities’
Mystery bidder
While data security firm HBGary Federal was among the contract's bidders listed on a government website, the job was ultimately awarded to a firm that did not appear on the FedBizOpps.gov page of interested vendors.
A controversy over the HBGary firm, which recently had its inner-workings dumped onto the Internet by hackers with protest group "Anonymous," was what initially brought the "persona" contract to light.
HBGary, which conspired with Bank of America and the Chamber of Commerce to attack WikiLeaks, spy on progressive writers and use malware against progressive organizations, was also revealed to have constructed software eerily similar to what the Air Force sought.
"This contract was awarded to a firm called Ntrepid," Speaks wrote to Raw Story. "In addition to the classified activities this software supports, USCENTCOM, like most military commands, does use social media to inform the public of our activities. I should emphasize that such uses do not employ the kind of technology that was the subject of this contract solicitation."
Ntrepid Corporation, registered out of Los Angeles, bills itself as a privacy and identity protection firm in some job postings, and a national security contractor in others, but its official website was amazingly just one page deep and free of even a single word of description.
In spite of their thin online presence, Speaks said the firm was awarded $2,760,000 to carry out the "persona management" contract.
He added that it was unclear why an the contract went to an unlisted bidder, and that he would try to find out and report back.
quote:wikileakspin leakspin doctor
#anonops down because of attacks from #iran #feb17 #libya #anonymous
1 hour ago Favorite Retweet Reply
quote:RT @AnonNewsNet: #Pirates of the world assemble! 30GB of #Jan25 Egyptian footage needs seeders http://goo.gl/B3JkV #Anonymous #AnonOps #Anon
http://hamburger-anon.blo(...)elp-revolutions.htmlquote:Oh hai all the protesters out there, we have followed closely the events and we want to provide you with some helpful hints.
The revolution will not be televised, all information will be on the internet.
But to get it there is one thing, to have it stay there is an entirely other thing.
So here is a collection of tools and links that will help you get your message out:
Contents:
quote:Comunique from A(A)A. Anon Anarchist Action
_.-oO·º'´¨`'º·Oo-._☠ Fighting against all oppression and capitalism ☠_.-oO·º'´¨`'º·Oo-._
We are Anonymous Anarchist Action
We have taken a stance, we have paid back. We have resisted the advocates of censorship,
we have retaliated and we have won, we are winning.
We master the tools and tactics that will make our revolution succeed in the name of humankind:
supporting black blocs, urban guerrillas and the cyber warfare ahead of us.
We defy all the system of oppression, your capitalists crooks, your fat cat politicians,
your racist and patriarchal ways, your intent to control peoples lives,
you who try to censor and control one of the most anarchist forms of communication (the internet),
you corporate liars, you greedy money heads... all of this we oppose.
We will fight till our end and when we are done, others will follow!
This is just the start!
As long as we obey, we are open to misdirection.
As long as we aren't informed, we are open to lies.
As long as we don't control our communications, we are open to manipulation.
As long as we aren't focused, we won't succeed.
As long as we are centralized, we can be shutdown
As long as we use for-profit tools, we are slaves to their greed.
Free your mind, free yourself!
Join us in the biggest yet social revolution that has just started!
From Greece to the streets of Cairo, to the revolutionary femmnists in Italy and the Squatters
of Spain, to the Zapatistas in Mexico AND THE ONLINE HACKTIVISTS!!
WE WILL WIN there is no other choice, for us, for our next generations, FOR EARTH!
We are Anonymous.
We are Anarchists.
We are many and we work as one
We are Anon Anarchist Action
Join us at : irc.anonops.ru (#anarchism)
http://aaa.status.net
quote:De Westboro Babtist Church scam.
Re-quoting from BoingBoing
OK, for those who don’t know, here’s how the WBC scam works:
Most of Fred Phelps’ 13 adult children are lawyers, with law degrees from Washburn University in Topeka, KS. Those that are still in the church practice in the family law firm, Phelps Chartered, LLC. Phelps himself had been disbarred in 1979 for perjury, but his children carried on the law firm. Over 20 years ago, they discovered that if they picketed AIDS funerals in Kansas, distraught loved ones would lose control, and physically attack the WBC protestors. They sued, and won. Sensing a major income stream, they started protesting full-time, hoping to be attacked.
They started picketing full-time at museum exhibits, college graduations, poetry readings, rock concerts, celebrity funerals, and, of course, AIDS funerals? anywhere they could use free speech to get people to attack them.
When soldiers started coming home from Iraq and Afghanistan in body bags, they hit paydirt: Protest near (not at) funerals of soldiers, blaming America’s decline on “****,” and wait for the attacks.
They raise at least $200,000 a year doing this, and probably more. They fund the picketing business with lawsuits.
There is always a family lawyer at every protest. Every protest is videotaped, so they have rock-solid evidence when attacked. They target the highest-profile events they can, and make sure the media knows they are coming, so people are all riled up. They always protest on public property, sidewalks, and rights-of-way, so that they can’t be charged with trespassing. If there’s a legally-imposed “no protest zone” around funerals, they obey it. They are very clever to stay within the letter of the law.
And angry people fall for it, all the time. And the media never bothers to investigate how this scam works.
As mentioned this is a direct requoting from BoingBboing.
Er komt nog een filmpje aan.quote:
quote:BarrettBrownLOL Barrett Brown
A group of activists including John Penley will project #Gadafi atrocities on the side of UN HQ in NYC tonight. #oplibya
quote:Skepticism in the Face of Evidence Is No Virtue
Barett Brown
February 16, 2011
In the space of its short life, this column has emphasized the dynamics of the information age as of extraordinary but poorly understood relevance to skepticism as both a system of thought and a movement within society. Ongoing events require that this now be explained in a bit more detail.
Since 2005, I have been involved to various extents and capacities with the Anonymous movement. For the past year, I’ve been in communication with several of its most active participants, including one who had been outed by the Church of Scientology after helping to launch Operation Chanology, a global campaign intended to remove that organization’s grip on lives and government agencies alike. And for the past month, beginning with the Anonymous movement’s assistance programs to Tunisians, Algerians, and Egyptians who seek to win their freedom, I’ve become more actively involved in tactics, messaging, and now legal defense for my fellow Anons. Some have been raided by the FBI and other agencies, which have been investigating a campaign involving DDoS attacks against financial companies—those that had given in to government pressure to deny their customers the ability to donate to Wikileaks. All of this is now in the public record, and I confirm it here as a prelude to the subject of this column and in the interest of full disclosure.
We are coming to the close of a two-decade debate over whether or not the explosion of communicational possibilities brought to us via the information age is sufficient to allow a subject population and its supporters to overthrow a government and perhaps establish a freer one. In light of the demonstrably key role that the Internet played in Tunisia and Egypt thus far, and in a certain small sub-Saharan country soon enough, that debate should be coming to an end. Nonetheless, it will go on forever, because certain people are impossible to defeat via argument alone because they are invincible—at least in a rhetorical and professional sense.
A few months back I argued that Foreign Policy editor Eugene Morozov was not qualified to assess the above dispute, being incompetent on the subject and having at any rate committed himself to a certain position that was silly even before recent events rendered it sillier still. “Tweets don’t overthrow governments; people do,” Morozov proclaimed then, thereby dispensing with those who have presumably gone around claiming that Twitter will gain sentience and begin liberating populations into a Greater Social Networking Co-Prosperity Sphere. Out of fairness to Morozov, I’ll note that he does make somewhat more cogent arguments; out of fairness to everyone else, I’ll note that his arguments tend to be of the following caliber: “Neither the Iranian nor the Burmese regime has crumbled under the pressure of pixelated photos of human rights abuses circulated on social networking sites.” Thus it is that the infancy of the information age has not yet brought down two of the world’s most repressive regimes.
As I noted then:
Not only has Twitter failed to take down either of the two regimes Morozov lists, but one of those regimes has attempted to use the service for its own ends. Indeed, the Iranian authorities have been as eager to take advantage of the Internet as their green-clad opponents. After last years protests in Tehran, Iranian authorities launched a website that publishes photos from the protests, urging the public to identify the unruly protestors by name. We are not told how effective this turned out to be or why this necessarily cancels out the effectiveness of Twitter in organizing the protests to begin with or how the fact that dictators use websites shows that they are not being undermined by the use of Twitter. The fellows talent is being wasted in socio-political commentary when he could be writing mystery novels.
Today, I have a better and slightly less catty answer to Morozov regarding the question of whether or not the Internet is a greater boon to dictators or to populations. Rather, I have a question, for him and for everyone else who has spent the past few years building their careers on this incompetent brand of pseudo-skepticism: If dictators are so fond of the Internet, why did Mubarak turn the damn thing off?
Former “President” Ben-Ali of Tunisia did not turn off the Internet, of course, when Tunisian activists began coordinating with Anonymous and other parties in taking down the government’s websites and in some cases replacing them with messages of support to the Tunisian people, thereby proving that their government was not so powerful as it seemed; when Anonymous-affiliated journalists began bringing attention to the nascent protests, in an effort to alert those around the world who themselves were in a position to help Tunisia succeed; when guides were written by experts and distributed by Tunisians and other North Africans to the many among them who had no knowledge of street confrontation, but who now know as much as any black-bloc anarchist; or when the great and still-growing network of Tunisians, Anonymous, and other parties began building darknets and other solutions to the problem of government censorship and infiltration. Ben-Ali should have done so, but he didn’t, and even if he had, many of the same techniques used to reconnect Egyptians during the shutdown would have been employed in Tunisia with similar results. Tunisia, incidentally, is not finished with its ongoing troubles, but nor is this coalition finished with its ongoing work, which will at any rate be ignored by those whose professional interests coincide with those who would prefer that we spend less time thinking up new ways to aid subject populations and more time reading about how such a thing is impossible—despite the evidence before our very eyes.
Contrary to all the evidence, there are two general views on this matter: 1) that perpetuated by Morozov and others like him who believe that such things as Wikileaks, Twitter, Anonymous, and Facebook are not quite as relevant as many would believe, and 2) that perpetuated by those of us who have used those very same dynamics to prove that they are already more relevant than even the most enthusiastic of us were predicting not long ago, when we thought in terms of years rather than the mere months it has taken to proceed to the current situation. Everyone among the thousands of North Africans and others who poured into our IRC channels would seem to agree with the latter view, having consequently watched and participated in those things which are necessary to making any informed decision on the matter. When you have seen a teenage Tunisian girl translating into French and Arabic the guides that were minutes before compiled by activists living in five different countries and then passing them on to her family and friends and then asking what else she can do to help free her country—and receiving a dozen answers, all of them good—it is difficult to take seriously the output of those whose first instinct at such a moment is to downplay it in accordance with the opinions they already held to begin with.
This dynamic will continue and will have in fact already expanded by the time this piece is read, this being an age in which events overtake the quickest of mediums (and the slowest of dictators). Already a number of this column’s readers have worked to promote such a dynamic, and we hope that more will join us at this crucial time. Many operations are run out of irc.anonsops.ru in #OpTunisia and #OpEgypt; other efforts are hatched at irc.freenode.net #projectpm. I may be reached at barriticus@gmail.com or, for secure communications by those facing surveillance, transistor@hushmail.com. Join us for proof that in such a time as this, one can act against tyranny in the time it takes to complain about it.
(For Freemary, who earned her name.)
quote:Barrett Brown is the instigator of Project PM, a distributed cartel intended to reduce certain structural deficits that have arisen in the news media. He's a regular contributor to Vanity Fair, The Huffington Post, and True/Slant. His first book, Flock of Dodos: Behind Modern Creationism, Intelligent Design, and the Easter Bunny, was released in 2007; his second, Hot, Fat, and Clouded: The Amazing and Amusing Failures of the American Chattering Class, is set for publication in 2010. Brown can be reached via e-mail at barriticus@gmail.com.
quote:BarrettBrownLOL Barrett Brown
"Iranian Cyber Army": Fuck you toy fascists. We just rocked your shit.
quote:(CNN) -- WikiLeaks could have one foot in the online grave.
It's been months since its last major leak, and its staff members -- former and current -- say it's so thinly staffed and broke that it can't dissect a massive file a whistle-blower handed over, allegedly naming rich and influential global players guilty of tax crimes.
Founder Julian Assange, described as a megalomaniac in a tell-all book by the group's former spokesman, is facing extradition to Sweden on sex crime charges. Many observers predict he'll face extradition to the United States next.
quote:So, if WikiLeaks wilts, what will grow in its place?
Several leak-loving sites claim to be WikiLeaks' heir apparent. Greenleaks.org and GreenLeaks are battling to become the top site for whistle-blowers with dirt on environmental issues.
WikiLeaks' ex-spokesman and Assange's former right-hand man, Daniel Domscheit-Berg, has launched OpenLeaks, a secret information catch-all.
quote:But perhaps the most controversial incarnation of the WikiLeaks model comes from Anonymous, the hacker collective globally infamous for disrupting the websites of MasterCard, Visa and PayPal in December.
The hackers said the attacks were revenge after the companies cut ties to WikiLeaks. Since then, Anonymous has grown more sophisticated, and experts say it's reasonable to fear that they could do more than wait for someone to give them secret documents. They could hack into highly sensitive military and corporate computer systems themselves.
This month, Anonymous launched anonleaks.ru, a site that features a searchable database of what appear to be tens of thousands of internal e-mails from a U.S.-based internet security firm whose website was also defaced.
quote:The thought of an army of prankster hackers breaking into your e-mails, credit card records or business is disturbing. But it would be a mistake to portray members of Anonymous as cackling evil-doers, Ridder and Zittrain said.
Instead, Ridder said, Anonymous is driving Web culture. "They are making a significant mark on what it means to put information online."
http://www.couragetoresist.org/x/content/view/891/1/quote:Xeronymous Xer
by maytweet
New provocation: PayPal cuts service to Bradley Manning support http://tinyurl.com/6cvnbb6 #anonymous #wikileaks #anonops
het artikel gaat verder.quote:San Francisco, CA – The online payment provider PayPal has frozen the account of Courage to Resist, which in collaboration with the Bradley Manning Support Network is currently raising funds in support of U.S. Army Pfc. Bradley Manning. PayPal was one way people--especially international residents--were able to contribute to the grassroots effort supporting the accused WikiLeaks whistleblower. “We’ve been in discussions with PayPal for weeks, and by their own admission there’s no legal obligation for them to close down our account,” noted Loraine Reitman of the Bradley Manning Support Network (Support Network). “This was an internal policy decision by PayPal.”
“We exchanged numerous emails and phone calls with the legal department and the office of executive escalations of PayPal,” explained Jeff Paterson. “They said they would not unrestrict our account unless we authorized PayPal to withdraw funds from our organization’s checking account by default. Our accounting does not allow for this type of direct access by a third party, nor do I trust PayPal as a business entity with this responsibility given their punitive actions against WikiLeaks—an entity not charged with any crime by any government on Earth.”
The Support Network repeatedly requested and was refused formal documentation from PayPal describing their policies in this matter.
PayPal is a private company and thus under no legal obligation to provide Courage to Resist, the Bradley Manning Support Network, or anyone else with services. This was something made very clear to the Support Network by PayPal representatives.
“They opted to apply an exceptional hurdle for us to clear in order to continue as a customer, whereas we have clearly provided the legally required information and verification. I think our dealings with PayPal should be a cautionary tale for any possibly controversial not-for-profit entity with a PayPal account,” Paterson said, “While there may be no legal obligation to provide services, there is an ethical obligation. By shutting out legitimate nonprofit activity, PayPal shows itself to be morally bankrupt.”
quote:http://www.sfbg.com/polit(...)rence-freezing-funds
WePay, an upstart rival of PayPal, had a little pointed fun with the financial transaction behemoth today outside the Innovate 2010 software developer conference that PayPal hosted at Moscone Center. WePay employees created a large block of ice frozen around cash and the message “PayPal Freezes Your Accounts.”
It was a reference to the PayPal practice of unexpectedly freezing the accounts of grassroots groups with pending nonprofit status, a story that went viral in August after the Bay Guardian wrote about PayPal freezing the funds of the Flux Foundation just as the group was headed to Burning Man to build the Temple of Flux.
In the face of a strong public backlash, PayPal released the Flux Foundation's funds a day after our story came out. But as we reported, other small groups that don't have the same community ties and emotional resonance as the temple crew have had a hard time freeing their funds. Some even say they are preparing to sue PayPal, which started as a small Bay Area company but grew into a huge multinational corporation after being purchased in 2002 by eBay, the company where billionaire self-funded gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman made her fortune.
After their bad experience with PayPal, the Flux Foundation and many other groups have turned to WePay, which focuses on grassroots groups and other small clients. WePay co-founder Rich Aberman told the Guardian that many software developers who use PayPal to fundraise have had similar problems with funds being frozen as the grassroots groups, which is why he pursued this publicity stunt.
“It was just to raise awareness and poke a little fun at them at their own conference,” Aberman told us.
A PayPal representative that we interviewed in August said he couldn't discuss why the company freezes account or how much notice they give when they do so, citing privacy concerns, but said they were simply anti-fraud measures. Some PayPal critics note that the company makes money off investing those forzen funds and they say it is motivated by greed.
Aberman doesn't think the PayPal has malicious motives, but he says that it has just gotten too big to effectively serve small clients, focusing instead on merchants and other larger customers that are more sophisticated than small groups.
“Normal people collecting money for normal things is such a small part of their business and PayPal just don't know how to handle them. They just see these as high-risk accounts based on the anti-fraud systems they've created,” Aberman said. Where he does fault PayPal is by presenting itself as a good service for these groups: “They just need to be more forthright about the user they're trying to serve.”
By contrast, Aberman said WePay was created as a way for individuals and small groups to raise money informally: “Since our customers are different, we handle them differently.”
https://www.wepay.com/about/press/quote:https://www.wepay.com
WePay makes it easy to collect and manage money online. Unlike competitors, WePay allows users to keep their group's money in a dedicated account, and to share this account with their group. The service is great for roommates, clubs, organizations, fantasy leagues, teams, and much more. WePay was founded by Bill Clerico and Rich Aberman in Boston in 2008. The company is located in Palo Alto, CA and has 14 employees.
quote:
quote:WE wont attack paypal again, cuz it is protected by prolexic technologies, akamai, Radware #anonymous #freebradley #bradleymanning
Het is niet voor niets een download page.quote:This domain has been seized by Anonymous under section #14 of the rules of the Internet.
Greetings Westboro Baptist Church,
If you're reading this, it means that Anonymous has lost its patience with you, likely because you've threatened us again after we denied you a war.
Your recent antics to gain media attention for yourself were found to be laughable. In response to your rather poorly-written "bring it" letter, wherein you tried to goad Anonymous into giving you yet more attention by calling us "crybaby hackers", we wrote, sincerely, a press release explaining clearly the hoax behind the initial declaration of war against your church.
We had thought this latest release would be enough to make you realize that we have no interest in going to war with you. Anonymous is hard at work with ongoing operations such as those involving Bahrain, Libya, and Iran, not to mention we are working tirelessly to maintain coverage of all our HBGary leaks for the public to enjoy.
Your continued biting of the Anonymous hand, however, has earned you a swift and emotionless bitchslap, in the form of this very message. Despite having had the capability to hack your sites previously, we chose not to and instead responded maturely to your threats, but you have not respected this.
For this unremitting display of overzealousness, we award you no points. Take this defacement as a simple warning: go away. The world (including Anonymous) disagrees with your hateful messages, but you have the right to voice them. This does not mean you can jump onto Anonymous for attention.
God hates fags: assumption. Anonymous hates leeches: fact.
We are Anonymous.
We are legion.
We do not forgive.
We do not forget.
Expect us - always.
quote:http://www.scmagazineus.com/anonymous-defaces-westboro-baptist-website/article/196978/
Anonymous apparently did "bring it" after all.
The loosely affiliated hacker collective has defaced the website of the hate-spewing Westboro Baptist Church in Kansas, known for its anti-gay rhetoric and purely attention-seeking protests, amid an ongoing feud between the two entities.
"Your continued biting of the Anonymous hand, however, has earned you a swift and emotionless [slap], in the form of this very message," read a message from Anonymous posted on the compromised site. "Despite having had the capability to hack your sites previously, we chose not to and instead responded maturely to your threats, but you have not respected this."
The group posted the letter during a live radio interview Thursday on the "The David Pakman Show" between Westboro spokeswoman Shirley Phelps-Roper and an Anonymous member. Video of the interview is live.
The battle between Anonymous and Westboro began last week, when an open letter was posted to AnonNews.org, which called for the controversial church to end its protests and shut down its websites. A Westboro representative responded in a tweet, asking Anonymous to "Bring it."
But on Monday, Anonymous said it wasn't behind the letter and urged members to not launch distributed denial-of-service attacks against the church's website.
Apparently, however, Anonymous was not pleased with Westboro's continued assault on the hacker organization, including a spokeswoman's reported remarks that the group exists because its members' parents didn't spank them as children.
As of Thursday at about noon EST, Westboro's website was unreachable and downloads.westborobaptistchurch.com was defaced to include the message from Anonymous.
quote:anon1049 anTon onsZers by Ravana9000
#WBC suing #Anonymous? Good luck tracking down the hackers from #Belarus, #Tunisia, #Azerbadjan … Even more good luck finding a lawyer there
Tja, Jester is ook maar een Anon, net als iedereen.quote:AnonymousIRC Anonymous by AnonLegionGR
The @th3j35t3r and #Anonymous cooperation on #WBC was an eclipse; we're still like Sun and Moon, following our own agendas.
32 minutes ago Favorite Retweet Reply
quote:randbomb Most Random
I'd rather sit next to @th3j35t3r in Hell than @meganphelps in Church. Please RT if you agree. #th3j35t3r = win #WBC = FAIL!
quote:It's agreed among those active in Anonymous that the original Public Release to WBC was -not- an Anonymous operation.
Operations typically have an entire planning and recruitment phase (This can take a couple of days for each phase, to a couple of weeks) online before an Public Release is made; there was no planning or recruitment phase on any of the the traditional "anonymous" areas of gathering. Traditionally Anonymous has their entire operation planned prior to the release and announcement to the world of the upcoming operation. None of Anonymous traditional formations and planning was done prior to this release.
A third unknown party sparked this confrontation, either WBC themselves or another unknown; the Anonymous "Hive Mind" was in agreement after WBC's response was released that an operation against WBC was pointless and a waste of man power when currant operations in Bahrain, Iran, Libya were far more important. It was only after WBC continued to taunt Anonymous lack of response, beside the Denial Press Release, that anything was decided on Anonymous part.
The key thing about Anonymous in this entire affair was that they neither sparked nor wanted the confrontation; it was the believe of the "Hive Mind" that paying attention to WBC and giving it Media fodder would detract from what was taking place in the Middle East. However, neither the Media nor the WBC wanted to let the issue lay with sensationalist release, and Anonymous is perfectly content to respond when so many are clamoring for it. "When the people speak We listen"...It is best when it comes to Anonymous to leave them alone, avoid casting the spotlight on what they are or are not doing. They have their own agenda, but if you provoke them Anonymous will respond and it is not always in a way one can anticipate.
Anonymous is the consummate prankster; morals, ethics, laws which would keep normal groups in line with society expectations are what Anonymous will ignore simply because Our reaction to it is amusing to them.
I do not agree, nor do I disagree, with what Anonymous does or does not do. I was fairly proud that the papers and media outlets within Idaho had ignored most of sensationalism which follows in Anonymous' wake, and while this article is not sensationalist, it will provide Anonymous with ad revenue to grow and expound upon their currant operations and future ones as readers decide to google these hacktivists.
quote:Expect movement on #OpWisconsin soon. #Koch has declared war on our democracy. Democracy will soon fight back. #anonymous #anonops #wiunion
quote:https://www.thepaypalblog(...)to-resist-situation/
While it is generally not our policy to comment publicly on account dealings, we are sharing the following statement to clarify information regarding the Courage To Resist organization’s PayPal account and their claim that this is somehow associated with their support of U.S. Army Pfc. Bradley Manning. Let me be clear, this decision had nothing to do with WikiLeaks.
We recently placed a temporary limitation of the Courage to Resist organization’s PayPal account as they had not complied to our stated policy requiring non profits to associate a bank account with their PayPal account (for the vast majority of non-profits, this is not an issue).
In a press release issued today, the Courage to Resist organization claimed that their resistance to follow our policy is because PayPal sought to withdraw funds from their checking account. To be clear: PayPal cannot take such action without the authorization of an account holder, nor does it ever take such unauthorized actions.
Upon review, and as part of our normal business procedures, we have decided to lift the temporary restriction placed on their account because we have sufficient information to meet our statutory ‘Know Your Customer’ obligations. The Courage to Resist PayPal account is now fully operational.
–Anuj Nayar, director of communications
Hele verhaal: http://arstechnica.com/te(...)ry-the-aftermath.arsquote:Butterworth sounded tired as he recounted the days for us—when we spoke, 17 had passed since the initial attack. Since then, HBGary has been flooded with phone calls and voicemails of the "you should be ashamed of yourself" type and worse; the fax machines have been overwhelmed with Anonymous outpourings; people have been "directly threatening our employees with extortion"; threats have been made. Then came RSA.
Butterworth, with a long career in military signals intelligence and private security firms, is no stranger to the dark world of cyberattacks, but he's used to adversaries who retreat after an electronic strike.
Instead, he believes that Anonymous has "decided to continue their antics. They're in it for the laughs… this is a real funny game for them." Not content with the damage they have inflicted, they "harass a company that's trying to get back to work." Each time a new story about the company appears in the press, Butterworth said that these attacks spike again.
quote:Yeah, I don't buy the death threats accusation at all. My belief, given that culture, is that physical threats are absolutely a lie.
Notice that, mysteriously, the faxes with threats 'weren't available', and the best email they could come up with was hoping they'd die from AIDS.
I don't think, at this point, that anyone should run anything said by either Palantir or HBGary as fact without careful checking.
hehehe, nu op ned 2, NCRV.quote:
Wel fijn dat we er tijdens die clip op worden gewezen dat we goedkoop geld kunnen lenen. Of mis ik weer een of andere adblocker?quote:Op vrijdag 25 februari 2011 21:02 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:
[..]
hehehe, nu op ned 2, NCRV.
Helaas zonder Anonymous intro.
Ik denk het, ik heb een schoon filmpje.quote:Op zaterdag 26 februari 2011 01:14 schreef Odysseuzzz het volgende:
[..]
Wel fijn dat we er tijdens die clip op worden gewezen dat we goedkoop geld kunnen lenen. Of mis ik weer een of andere adblocker?
Wat is jouw idee trouwens Papier? Anonz: een idee of toch min of meer hierarchisch/centraal aangestuurd zoals bepaalde mensen nu graag willen doen geloven?quote:Op zaterdag 26 februari 2011 01:30 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:
[..]
Ik denk het, ik heb een schoon filmpje.
Nope, geen centrale leiding. Anders doen ze het heel slim, want dit duurt al een paar jaar.quote:Op zaterdag 26 februari 2011 01:57 schreef Odysseuzzz het volgende:
[..]
Wat is jouw idee trouwens Papier? Anonz: een idee of toch min of meer centraal aangestuurd zoals bepaalde mensen nu graag willen doen geloven?
Ja, hoewel het woord revolutie ook hier meer een media ding is.quote:Op zaterdag 26 februari 2011 02:06 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:
[..]
Nope, geen centrale leiding. Anders doen ze het heel slim, want dit duurt al een paar jaar.
Het verhaal van CommanderX klink geloofwaardig (vooral het stuk dat ze hem regelmatig uit de chans gooien) . De "ruzies" met Jester in combinatie met hun samenwerking wb Westboro Babtist. En dat bericht van de A(A)A: Anonieme anarchisten; er is blijkbaar een splintergroepering ontstaan met weer eigen ideeën.
Tot nu toe hou ik het op ongeorganiseerd. Je kan aan de revoluties in het MO (de levende revoluties bedoel ik dan) zien hoe machtig zoiets kan werken.
De wereld heeft het er anders maar druk mee.quote:Op zaterdag 26 februari 2011 02:16 schreef Odysseuzzz het volgende:
[..]
Ja, hoewel het woord revolutie ook hier meer een media ding is.
Dat er dingen gebeuren staat vast maar of er echt sprake is van een revolutie kun je idd alleen achteraf vaststellen.
quote:Kremlin gang opened new botnet against #anonymous and Mr. Putin. More recruits #DDoS er.ru && edinoros.ru holy #cyberwar as holy. #OpRussia
quote:Op_Russia Op_Russia
New high orbit cannon launched http://tinyurl.com/4zedsf8 Get it and unzip #Feb28, password send later #anonymous #anon #OpRussia #Russia
quote:We stand at a unique time in our history, the rise of the internet and computer technology have contributed to an unparallelled rate of prosperity for the First World. We have created for ourselves and empire unlike any other, a global network of constant trade and communication, a new age of technological advancement. We have come a long way from our humble roots in the Industrial Revolution and the days of Manifest Destiny. We are now pioneers on new digital frontiers expanding our domain from the quantum world to the far reaches of space.
And yet, the empire faces a crisis, a global recession, growing poverty, rampant violence, corruption in politics, and threats to personal freedom. As it was before in other times of crisis, the old stories have begun to repeat themselves. The half truths, this time repeated nightly on cable news and echoed through a series of tubes onto the internet: the empire is strong, change is unwise, business as usual is the answer. In times of uncertainty there are those who seek to add to the confusion, to prey on our insecurities and fears. Those who would seek to keep us divided for their own gain. The pervasive strategy takes many very convincing forms: Liberals and Conservatives, Christians and Muslims, Black and White, Saved and sinner.
But something unexpected is happening. We have begun telling each other our own stories. Sharing our lives, our hopes, our dreams, our demons. Every second, day in day out, into all hours of the night the gritty details of life on this earth are streaming around the world. As we see the lives of others played out in our living rooms we are beginning to understand the consequences of our actions and the error of the old ways. We are questioning the old assumptions that we are made to consume not to create, that the world was made for our taking, that wars are inevitable, that poverty is unavoidable. As we learn more about our global community a fundamental truth has been rediscovered: We are not so different as we may seem. Every human has strengths, weaknesses, and deep emotions. We crave love, love laughter, fear being alone and dream for a better life.
You must create a better life.
You cannot sit on the couch watching television or playing video games, waiting for a revolution. You are the revolution. Every time you decide not to exercise your rights, every time you refuse to hear another view point, every time you ignore the world around you, every time you spend a dollar at a business that doesn't pay a fair wage you are contributing to the oppression of the human body and the repression of the human mind. You have a choice, a choice to take the easy path, the familiar path, to walk willingly into your own submission. Or a choice get up, to go outside and talk to your neighbor, to come together in new forums to create lasting, meaningful change for the human race.
This is our challenge:
A peaceful revolution, a revolution of ideas, a revolution of creation. The twenty-first century enlightenment. A global movement to create a new age of tolerance and understanding, empathy and respect. An age of unfettered technological development. An age of sharing ideas and cooperation. An age of artistic and personal expression. We can choose to use new technology for radical positive change or let it be used against us. We can choose to keep the internet free, keep channels of communication open and dig new tunnels into those places where information is still guarded. Or we can let it all close in around us. As we move in to new digital worlds, we must acknowledge the need for honest information and free expression. We must fight to keep the internet open as a marketplace of ideas where all are seated as equals. We must defend our freedoms from those who would seek to control us. We must fight for those who do not yet have a voice. Keep telling your story. All must be heard.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/49586079/Op-Wisconsinquote:#Anonymous announces boycott of #Koch products for crimes against democracy. http://scr.bi/fyDBsI #OpWisconsin #anonops #wiunion
quote:Posted by Anti Vigilante
Is that a bill in your pocket or are you just happy to see me?
Anonymous operatives and Magnanimous contacts have formed a joint operation regarding the decision to take away collective bargaining rights from workers in Wisconsin in a rider on a budget management bill. It is the agreed upon position of the participants in this operation that the right to petition and to assemble in the first amendment is the proper basis for collective bargaining rights and these will be defended. Keep in mind Anonymous has defended the first amendment even for people and groups they do not like. This operation will be even attractive to defenders of freedom, especially the first amendment. This will be more than mere resistance. We will enter the battleground. All your law are belong to us.
We can get more senators and lawyers than the opposition can buy. We will not merely beg to be heard. We are putting a team together to not only fight this law but to also give Governor Walker a law he'll risk his career should he choose to oppose. And this is not going to be idle foolishness. We will deliver original and organic work.
We are Everywhere
We can draft bills and have them reviewed by the interested parties in Wisconsin faster than they can whine to the pliant media. This is an operation that will be armed to the teeth with legal talent, with dedicated bloggers, and with people willing to roll up their sleeves for their fellow citizens, which is the true definition of patriotism. Do not underestimate the organizing power of students, workers, families and communities
Magnanimous news.quote:Magnanimous group is a subset of Anonymous associated (but unaffiliated as are all Anonymous) with Anons and others who are members of other groups or simply individuals. Where Anonymous may wish to see an outcome, as a subset we can take it further and build that outcome without unnecessarily warping the nature of the larger Anonymous corrective.
Forum Opties | |
---|---|
Forumhop: | |
Hop naar: |