als post alleen en de volgende: !!!, _!, _________-------------========~~~~!!!!111.Waar slaan die op?
________________________________! is gewoon. !!! is als het nog veel triester is.Soort van:
^ 32415 !!!Deze "
_! " begrijp ik echter niet, heeft weinig functie. !!!, _!, _________-------------========~~~~!!!!111.
._! TS, wat is je IQ?
_______________________________________!Dus niet een beetje
maar heel erg topic.
_! ______----------=======!!!!!!!!1111_! komt van een hele foute usert.
_!
(serieuze vraag)
Je ziet toch aan de smiley wat het inhoudt normaal gezien?
quote:Sommige dingen leer je met de jaren dat je lid bent.
quote:Kut, ik F5de net om te zien of ik nog binnen was voor jij zou posten.
bedoelen mensen dat als je iets stoms meedeelt met de rest van het forum (of stom overkomt) dat je dan wordt uitgelachen, daar is die smiley voor.Met
_____! wordt bedoeld dat als er een -situatie voorkomt, als mensen het heeeeeel erg dom vinden wat je zegt/typt/meedeelt. De lengte van de underscores (__) wordt bepaald door de domheid van de post.Er is hier nooit een verklaring voor gegeven. Ik denk dat het zo wel klopt.
quote:gast wat ik prive heb gedaan heb ik al lang voor geboet hoorOp vrijdag 4 december 2009 23:29 schreef Tyler..Durden het volgende:
quote:wie?
quote:wacht in spanning
quote:Op vrijdag 4 december 2009 23:30 schreef Metalfrost het volgende:
Met
Met
Er is hier nooit een verklaring van gegeven. Ik denk dat het zo wel klopt.
_!_< 
> _! ______!!!!quote:
quote:ik dus
_!quote:Ik laat je nog heel even wachten.
quote:Op vrijdag 4 december 2009 23:32 schreef Tyler..Durden het volgende:
[..]
Ik laat je nog heel even wachten.
quote:Ben jij de schepper van de
?
quote:van de
_!niet van de zonder _!
quote:Nee, dat zegt toch niemand?!
Lees de FAQ ofzo!
quote:Held.
quote:Iets met OUD-user die baby's schattig vond toch.Op vrijdag 4 december 2009 23:34 schreef OldJeller het volgende:
[..]
Nee, dat zegt toch niemand?!
Lees de FAQ ofzo!
quote:En daar mag je me een partij trots op zijn.
_!quote:Op vrijdag 4 december 2009 23:37 schreef Tyler..Durden het volgende:
[..]
En daar mag je me een partij trots op zijn.
_! _!²"
2quote:een getuige van mijn scheppingOp vrijdag 4 december 2009 23:30 schreef Quir het volgende:
[..]
Kut, ik F5de net om te zien of ik nog binnen was voor jij zou posten.
quote:
!!quote:Ik weet niet waar je het over hebt, dus m'n antwoord is:Op vrijdag 4 december 2009 23:35 schreef IHVK het volgende:
[..]
Iets met OUD-user die baby's schattig vond toch.
!!!!quote:
[..]
Ik weet niet waar je het over hebt, dus m'n antwoord is:
Ik had het over de oorpsrong van de
Het is in OUD ontstaan en oorspronkelijk betekende het.
awww wat een lieve baby. Ik moet lachen maar ook een traantje wegpinken. Kan je het je voorstellen?
______!quote:nee
[..]
Ik had het over de oorpsrong van de
Het is in OUD ontstaan en oorspronkelijk betekende het.
Kan je het je voorstellen?
_!quote:Epic fail
[..]
Ik had het over de oorpsrong van de
Het is in OUD ontstaan en oorspronkelijk betekende het.
Kan je het je voorstellen?
__________________________________________________________!!!!quote:Ik vind het best baas om de schepper te zijn van een hype op fok. Kudo's, pezu.
[..]
En daar mag je me een partij trots op zijn.
quote:oh, dát.Op vrijdag 4 december 2009 23:40 schreef IHVK het volgende:
[..]
Ik had het over de oorpsrong van de
Het is in OUD ontstaan en oorspronkelijk betekende het.
Kan je het je voorstellen?
Ja, daar heb je gelijk in!
" Ah, wat een lieve baby!
" <----- !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11111111111111111111111quote:Dat verneukt natuurlijk wel de heleOp vrijdag 4 december 2009 23:40 schreef IHVK het volgende:
[..]
Het is in OUD ontstaan en oorspronkelijk betekende het.
als dat waar is.quote:Het is gewoon retetof om met een belachelijk concept uit OUD iets sterks als de huidigeOp vrijdag 4 december 2009 23:42 schreef Tyler..Durden het volgende:
[..]
Dat verneukt natuurlijk wel de hele
neer te weten zetten.quote:_
|
¡¯¯
__!|_
quote:Arma?
maar ik weet dus niet door wie. Iemand die daar uitsluitsel over kan geven?
!quote:Swetsenegger?
maar ik weet dus niet door wie. Iemand die daar uitsluitsel over kan geven?
quote:Is hij al unbanned dan?
(.)(.)
quote:
quote:Wat heeft dat te maken met of ik gok dat hij 'm heeft uitgevonden?
Oh nee, Neucqsecks!
quote:Ik dacht dat Swets uitsluitsel moest geven.Op vrijdag 4 december 2009 23:46 schreef Litso het volgende:
[..]
Wat heeft dat te maken met of ik gok dat hij 'm heeft uitgevonden?
quote:De smiley
Het werd ontworpen door Sc0rPi0n.
Oorspronkelijk was de smilie bedoeld voor het OUD forum, waarin ontroerde moeders en vaders met deze smilie de eerste stapjes en andere vertederende momenten van en met hun koters verwoordden.
quote:Dat was in eerste instantie wellicht het idee van die smiley.. maar die betekenis is waarschijnlijk binnen 24 uur na ontstaan van die smiley verloren gegaan.Op vrijdag 4 december 2009 23:42 schreef Tyler..Durden het volgende:
[..]
Dat verneukt natuurlijk wel de hele
Gemaakt door: Sc0rPi0n
▲ ▲
quote:hij is scheef jostie
_!_!!!!!!!1!!!!111!!!!EINZ!!!!! quote:
spam topics quote:jups jostie ja
Josti
Hostie
Ben benieuwd wat een Jostie dan is!
_!¡!¡¡¡¡¡¡!!!quote:Idd, Pezu
je kunt beter een triforce verkeerd doen dan josti met een E typen XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD!!!!!!!11 WHOHOOOOO!quote:een jostie iemand die te dom is om een josti te zijn
[ afbeelding ]
Josti
[ afbeelding ]
Hostie
Ben benieuwd wat een Jostie dan is!
quote:waarom doe je zo
[..]
een jostie iemand die te dom is om een josti te zijn
?
Sinterklaasjosti's
_!
quote:Dit topic.
_!quote:Echt?! Dan moet ik snel nog even..
SPOILER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
____--__-_-_-_1!1!quote:Maar hij viert het vandaag met ons.
Sinterklaas is op 6 december jarig. Stelletje josti's.
Dus tenzij jij een zwarte piet bent, feliciteer je hem vandaag.
______________________________---==- !!1quote:Bijna vergeuwte
OMG SINTERKLAAS IS JARIG MOETEN WE NIET EEN CADEAUTJE VOOR HEM KOPEN JEZUUUUUUUUS
quote:
quote:
!Dat van !!!111!1!1!!1EINZ!111! was van dat mensen de shift toets niet goed ingedrukt konden houden en dan kregen ze dit: 1. En EINZ is Duits voor 1.
Verder is de rest gewoon overdreven.
met zonder -, _ of ___________________quote:Op zaterdag 5 december 2009 11:38 schreef OnurAir het volgende:
Dat van !!!111!1!1!!1EINZ!111! was van dat mensen de shift toets niet goed ingedrukt konden houden en dan kregen ze dit: 1. En EINZ is Duits voor 1.
quote:Niet iedereen weet dat hoor.
quote:Het is je vergeven.
quote:
Trichick
quote:
quote:
_. ___________!!11!!!!!!!1!quote:* OnurAir begint een hekel te krijgen aan ToT.
quote:Op vrijdag 4 december 2009 23:26 schreef IHVK het volgende:
Ja die hebben allemaal een speciale betekenis, maar daar kom je pas achter als je een bepaalde postcount hebt.
_!!!!1!!111Einzzzzzzzzquote:Op vrijdag 4 december 2009 23:26 schreef IHVK het volgende:
Ja die hebben allemaal een speciale betekenis, maar daar kom je pas achter als je een bepaalde postcount hebt.
quote:Op zaterdag 5 december 2009 13:47 schreef OnurAir het volgende:
[..]
* OnurAir begint een hekel te krijgen aan ToT.
SPOILER
quote:
quote:
quote:Je hebt gelijk
[..]
* OnurAir begint een hekel te krijgen aan ToT.
Wat een bagger qoute edit was dat _!quote:Hooguit een meisje met geverfd haar
quote:Yeah.Op zaterdag 5 december 2009 14:11 schreef koffiekoekje het volgende:
[..]
Hooguit een meisje met geverfd haar
(
Over een jaar of 10 althans! 
)(Bagger term trouwens!
) !!!!!!111!!!1!!!11EINZZWEIDREIPOLIZEI!!!! quote:Op zaterdag 5 december 2009 14:23 schreef naatje_1 het volgende:
_______!!!!EINZWEISCHWEIN 
quote:
.quote:
_. P _ ! topic __ !
_______! _______________!To the liquor store around the corner.
The boys say they want some gin and juice but I really don't wanna.
Beerbust like I had last week.
I must stay deep 'cause talk is cheap.
I like
, , and .And as I continue, you know they're getting sweeter.
So what can I do? I really beg you my Lord.
To me flirting is just like a sport.
Anything fly, it's all good let me dump it.
Please set it in the trumpet.
A little bit of
in my life,A little bit of
by my side.A little bit of
all I need,A little bit of
all I see.A little bit of
in the sun,A little bit of
all night long.A little bit of
here I am,A little bit of
_! makes me your man!Mambo number five.
Jump up and down and move it all around.
Shake your head to the sound, put your hands on the ground.
Take one step left and one step right.
One to the front and one to the side.
Clap your hands once and clap your hands twice
And if it look like this then you're doing it right.
A little bit of
in my life,A little bit of
by my side.A little bit of
all I need,A little bit of
all I see.A little bit of
in the sun,A little bit of
all night long.A little bit of
here I am,A little bit of
_! makes me your man!Trumpet, the trumpet.
Mambo number five, ha, ha, ha.
A little bit of
in my life,A little bit of
by my side.A little bit of
all I need,A little bit of
all I see.A little bit of
in the sun,A little bit of
all night long.A little bit of
here I am,A little bit of
_! makes me your man!I do all to fall in love with a girl like you.
Cause you can't run and you can't hide.
You and me gonna touch the sky.
Mambo number five.
quote:Op zondag 6 december 2009 17:04 schreef OnurAir het volgende:
One, two, three, four, five, everybody in the car so come on let's ride.....
To the liquor store around the corner.
The boys say they want some gin and juice but I really don't wanna.
Beerbust like I had last week.
I must stay deep 'cause talk is cheap.
I like
And as I continue, you know they're getting sweeter.
So what can I do? I really beg you my Lord.
To me flirting is just like a sport.
Anything fly, it's all good let me dump it.
Please set it in the trumpet.
A little bit of
A little bit of
A little bit of
A little bit of
A little bit of
A little bit of
A little bit of
A little bit of
Mambo number five.
Jump up and down and move it all around.
Shake your head to the sound, put your hands on the ground.
Take one step left and one step right.
One to the front and one to the side.
Clap your hands once and clap your hands twice
And if it look like this then you're doing it right.
A little bit of
A little bit of
A little bit of
A little bit of
A little bit of
A little bit of
A little bit of
A little bit of
Trumpet, the trumpet.
Mambo number five, ha, ha, ha.
A little bit of
A little bit of
A little bit of
A little bit of
A little bit of
A little bit of
A little bit of
A little bit of
I do all to fall in love with a girl like you.
Cause you can't run and you can't hide.
You and me gonna touch the sky.
Mambo number five.
quote:Heel leuk... SPAMMER!
quote:He jij bent de kloon van "*.**"
Oke, ik wil weten waar de volgende dingen op slaan.
Waar slaan die op?
quote:Wie?
quote:
quote:Op dinsdag 8 december 2009 03:20 schreef gemmayf het volgende:
quote:
quote:Wat een gespam, hè?
quote:
+ 
Where, oh where, should I begin telling you about how tactless the emoticon
is? How about here: the emoticon 's op-ed pieces are intellectually and morally indefensible. Here's a quick review: It takes more than a mass of loud, juvenile finks to prevent the production of a new crop of tyrannical, dirty proponents of vigilantism. It takes a great many thoughtful and semi-thoughtful people who are willing to break the spell of great expectations that now binds gloomy backstabbers to the emoticon . Did it ever occur to the emoticon that maybe besides being thoroughly offensive and abusive, its excuses are seriously defamatory? Dream on. However deep one delves into the citations and footnotes of the emoticon 's reinterpretations of historic events, and however poised and "mainstream" its cohorts appear once challenged, there is no way to forget that it is capable of only two things, namely whining and underhanded tricks.When I observe the emoticon
's toadies' behavior, I can't help but recall the proverbial expression, "monkey see, monkey do". That's because, like it, they all want to grasp at straws, trying to find increasingly vapid ways to scorn and abjure reason. Also, while a monkey might think that one can understand the elements of a scientific theory only by reference to the social condition and personal histories of the scientists involved, the fact remains that there is no doubt that it will batten on the credulity of the ignorant in the blink of an eye. Believe me, I would give everything I own to be wrong on that point, but the truth is that the emoticon keeps telling us that it is the ultimate authority on what's right and what's wrong. Are we also supposed to believe that anyone who resists it deserves to be crushed? I didn't think so. Lest I seem like a hypocrite, I should tell you that many people have witnessed the emoticon perpetrate acts of the most mudslinging character. the emoticon generally insists that its witnesses are mistaken and blames its morally crippled jokes on adversarial cheapskates. It's like it has no-fault insurance against personal responsibility. What's more, as our society continues to unravel, more and more people will be grasping for straws, grasping for something to hold onto, grasping for something that promises to give them the sense of security and certainty that they so desperately need. These are the classes of people the emoticon preys upon. It is a statistical certainty that any claim to the contrary is patently false, just as it is a statistical certainty that it insists that its hatchet jobs prevent smallpox. How can it be so blind? Very easily. Basically, the emoticon may unwittingly resort to ad hominem attacks on me and my family. I say "unwittingly" because it is apparently unaware that it operates under the influence of a particular ideology: a set of beliefs based on the root metaphor of the transmission of forces. Until you understand this root metaphor you won't be able to grasp why the emoticon finds it easier to discuss other people's problems than its own. It's that simple. Are you still with me? If it is not yet clear that it's incredible to me that anybody could be so distasteful, then consider that what I just wrote is not based on merely a single experience or anecdote. Rather, it is based upon the wisdom of accumulated years, spanning two continents, and proven by the fact that it wants to persecute the innocent and let the guilty go unpunished. Faugh.Splenetic collectivism is the shadow cast on society by the emoticon
's expostulations, and as long as this is so, the attenuation of the shadow will not change the substance. It's unfortunate that the emoticon has no real morals. It's impossible to debate important topics with organizations that are so ethically handicapped. the emoticon 's grand plan is to pursue a twofold credo of metagrobolism and heathenism. I'm sure Mao Tse Tung would approve. In any case, it is apparent where the emoticon 's loyalties lie. But what, you may ask, does any of that have to do with the theme of this letter, viz., that it has no conception of our moral and ethical standards? I don't pretend to know the answer, but I do know that its sadistic, ignominious pleas legitimate irresponsibility, laziness, and infidelity. the emoticon then blames us for that. Now there's a prizewinning example of psychological projection if I've ever seen one. Here's a specific example of the way in which the emoticon is a fearful organization hiding behind a facade of cool: It wants to brandish the word "noncontemporaneousness" (as it is commonly spelled) to hoodwink people into believing that it is known for its sound judgment, unerring foresight, and sagacious adaptation of means to ends.the emoticon
has remarked that totalitarianism is a noble goal. This is a comment that should chill the spine of anyone with moral convictions. To make sure you understand, I'll spell it out for you. For starters, mankind needs to do more to respond to the emoticon 's values. Understand, I am not condemning mankind for not doing enough; I am merely stating that every time the emoticon gets caught trying to teach the next generation how to hate -- and whom to hate -- it promises it'll never do so again. Subsequently, its hangers-on always jump in and explain that it really shouldn't be blamed even if it does, because, as they aver, society is screaming for its perorations. the emoticon thinks we want it to destroy that which is the envy of -- and model for -- the entire civilized world. Excuse me, but maybe I have reason to believe that it is about to commit acts of immorality, dishonesty, and treason. I pray that I'm wrong, of course, because the outcome could be devastating. Nevertheless, the indications are there that the real question here is not, "Why can't we simply agree to disagree?". The real question is rather, "Why can't we all just get along?" That's the big question. If you knew the answer to that then you'd also know why the emoticon 's maudlin preoccupation with recidivism, usually sicklied over with such nonsense words as "piezocrystallization", would make sense if a person's honor were determined strictly by his or her ability to mete out harsh and arbitrary punishment against its adversaries until they're intimidated into a benumbed, neutralized, impotent, and non-functioning mass. As that's not the case, we can conclude only that one could truthfully say that I claim that the emoticon 's opinion is a lazy cop-out. But saying that would miss the real point, which is that we should agree on definitions before saying anything further about its stupid, hostile threats. For starters, let's say that "absolutism" is "that which makes the emoticon yearn to hamstring our efforts to take stock of what we know, identify areas for further research, and provide a useful starting point for debate on its mephitic manuscripts."The best thing about the emoticon
is the way that it encourages us to insist on a policy of zero tolerance toward antinomianism. No, wait; the emoticon doesn't encourage that. On the contrary, it discourages us from admitting that its advocates argue that trees cause more pollution than automobiles do. These are the same maladroit fugitives who excoriate attempts to bring questions of diabolism into the (essentially apolitical) realm of pedagogy in language and writing. This is no coincidence; the emoticon 's favorite tactic is known as "deceiving with the truth". The idea behind this tactic is that it wins our trust by revealing the truth but leaving some of it out. This makes us less likely to operate on today's real -- not tomorrow's ideal -- political terrain. While everybody believes in something, the emoticon 's simple faith in jujuism will definitely produce a large number of entirely repugnant extravagancies, most dim-witted indecencies, and, above all, the most fatuitous blasphemies against everything that I hold most sacred and most dear. In general, I am morally and ethically opposed to the emoticon 's announcements. Sure, there are exceptions, but it attracts pompous survivalists to its little empire by telling them that it has achieved sainthood. I suppose the people to whom it tells such things just want to believe lies that make them feel intellectually and spiritually superior to others. Whether or not that's the case, the emoticon says that everyone would be a lot safer if it were to monitor all of our personal communications and financial transactions -- even our library records. Why on Earth does the emoticon need to monitor our library records? It is bootless to speculate on the matter, but it should be noted that the emoticon 's tracts reek of snobbism. I use the word "reek" because I have a tendency to report the more sensational things that the emoticon is up to, the more shocking things, things like how it wants to reduce human beings to the status of domestic animals. And I realize the difficulty that the average person has in coming to grips with that, but you'd think that someone would have done something by now to thwart its plans to feature simplistic answers to complex problems. Unfortunately, most people are quite happy to "go along to get along" and are rather reluctant to summon up the courage to go placidly amid the noise and haste. It is imperative that we inform such people that if my memory serves me correctly, some people think I'm exaggerating when I say that what our nation needs is more respect for the law, not less. But I'm not exaggerating; if anything, I'm understating the situation. I wouldn't judge the emoticon 's shills too harshly. They're clearly just cannon fodder for the emoticon 's plot to abridge our basic civil liberties.If a cogent, logical argument entered the emoticon
's brain, no doubt a concussion would result. If you're not part of the solution, then you're part of the problem. the emoticon 's exegeses are like hothouse plants. They shoot up, but they lack the strength to defy the years and withstand heavy storms. I am not concerned with rumors or hearsay about the emoticon . I am interested only in ascertained facts attested by published documents, and in these primarily as an illustration that I truly don't believe that people are pawns to be used and manipulated. So when it says that that's what I believe, I see how little it understands my position. The foregoing greatly simplifies the real situation, but it does indicate in a rough, general way that I call upon the emoticon to stop its oppression, lies, immorality, and debauchery. I call upon it to be an organization of manners, principles, honour, and purity. And finally, I call upon it to forgo its desire to force me to undergo "treatment" to cure my "problem". In such a brief letter as this, I certainly cannot refute all the jibes of the most uneducated loudmouths you'll ever see, but perhaps I can brush away some of their most deliberate and flagrant practices.All the same, given the amount of misinformation that the emoticon
is circulating, I must point out that when I was a child, my clergyman told me, "the emoticon 's hallucinations about the benefits of fogyism are so deep and inveterate that they can be broken, if at all, only if we reveal the truth about its metanarratives." If you think about it you'll see his point. Although the moral absolutist position is well represented by social and political activists and doubtlessly influences legislators and policy makers, the emoticon 's vassals have learned their scripts well and the rhetoric comes gushing forth with little provocation.the emoticon
's operatives always show a streak of cruelty that enables them to find pleasure in their destructiveness. I've said that before and I've said it often, but perhaps I haven't been concrete enough or specific enough, so now I'll try to remedy those shortcomings. I'll try to be a lot more specific and concrete when I explain that the emoticon is stepping over the line when it attempts to support international crime while purporting to oppose it -- way over the line. There are two sorts of people in this world: decent, honest folks like you and me and hopeless incubi like the emoticon . Easy as it may seem to present a clear picture of what is happening, what has happened, and what is likely to happen in the future, it is far more difficult to wage war on charlatanism.Doesn't the emoticon
realize that at no point in its response to my last volley of criticisms was it even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought? I once asked the emoticon that question -- I am still waiting for an answer. In the meantime, let me point out that I strive to be consistent in my arguments. I can't say that I'm 100% true to this but the emoticon 's frequent vacillating leads me to believe that it favors manipulative psychological techniques over honest discussion. So let it call me childish. I call it feckless. the emoticon really struck a nerve with me when it said that it's okay for it to indulge its every whim and lust without regard for anyone else or for society as a whole. That lie is a painful reminder that if the emoticon got its way, it'd be able to deface a social fabric that was already deteriorating. Brrrr! It sends chills down my spine just thinking about that. If the emoticon 's plan to shame my name is to be discouraged then the wisest course of action is to give you some background information about the emoticon . Before we start down that road I ought to remind you that the conflation of snappish slackers and peevish common criminals in its calumnies is either dramatic hyperbole or a fatal methodological flaw. That should serve as the final, ultimate, irrefutable proof that if I want to burst into tears, that should be my prerogative. I really don't need the emoticon forcing me to. All right, enough of that. Now let's talk about something else. Let's talk about how someone has been giving the emoticon 's brain a very thorough washing, and now the emoticon is trying to do the same to us.Isn't it odd that unruly, unpleasant whiners, whose inconsiderate lifestyle will overthrow western civilization through the destruction of its four pillars -- family, nation, religion, and democracy -- in a lustrum or two, are immune from censure? Why is that? If I'm not horribly mistaken, there's a painfully simple answer. It regards the way that the emoticon
knows that performing an occasional act of charity will make some people forgive -- or at least overlook -- all of its sleazy excesses. My take on the matter is that it plans to create an intimidating, hostile, or demeaning environment. It has instructed its drones not to discuss this or even admit to its plan's existence. Obviously, the emoticon knows it has something to hide. Is it any wonder that the "freedom" that the emoticon is always so keen to talk about is a sheep's freedom to choose the patch of grass in which it will graze while growing wool and mutton for its owners? The take-away message of this letter is that a necessary first step towards recovery is to look at the emoticon with new eyes, unclouded by a lifetime of false information and deception propagated by beer-guzzling casuists. Think about it. I don't want to have to write another letter a few years from now, in the wake of a society torn apart by the emoticon 's besotted hijinks, reminding you that you were warned. ..|.. |:._! is als een gay armpje quote:Zijn nu alle letters van je toetsenbord vervaagd?lap tekst
quote:
quote:
!!!!!!!@_!)@!!@11!111!~one! 1 !11 één!11 nice one.
photoshop hier Mohammed Enait
quote:
[ afbeelding ]
photoshop hier Mohammed Enait
_._.::..:::>>
<<:::..::._._
_! _! _! < >quote:Serieus reageren in een ONZ-topique.Op vrijdag 4 december 2009 23:26 schreef OldJeller het volgende:
Versterkt.
Soort van:
Deze "
_! , vieze vuile oplichter! quote:Typfout.
quote:
quote:Twijfelachtig..
