Aspartaam

quote:

Op maandag 10 november 2008 00:05 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:

[..]

En een tegenhanger:
http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/cgi/reprint/15/9/1654

quote:

Op dinsdag 18 november 2008 12:57 schreef Lambiekje het volgende:

[..]

Overduidelijk een wij van WC Eend onderzoek.

quote:

Op dinsdag 18 november 2008 11:12 schreef Resonancer het volgende:

[..]


[..]

En als er wat nog "veiliger" is, dan verbied je dat gewoon.
[..]

quote:

Op dinsdag 18 november 2008 13:00 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:

[..]

En waarom zou dat zo zijn? Als een onderzoek iets anders aan lijkt te tonen zie ik dergelijke commentaren niet verschijnen.

quote:

Op dinsdag 18 november 2008 13:04 schreef Lambiekje het volgende:

[..]

zoals alle onderzoeken waarbij iets goed en veilig is verklaard is gefinancieerd door de producent zelf.

quote:

Aspartaam is rattegif, een biochemisch wapen wel te verstaan.

quote:

Op dinsdag 18 november 2008 13:24 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:

[..]

Ok... Kan je die claim onderbouwen?
[..]

Zoals ik al eerder vroeg, hoe kom je bij deze uitspraak?

quote:

Op dinsdag 18 november 2008 17:56 schreef Houtworm het volgende:
Lambiekje, simpele vraag. Ben jij ervan overtuigd dat jij het met dit soort beweringen bij het rechte eind hebt en het niet anders kan zijn?

quote:

Aspartame was never proven to be safe, nor effective as a diet aid.

quote:

Because aspartame changes brain chemistry and breaks down into a witches brew of toxins and tumor agents there was great concern by the National Soft Drink Association over putting this once-upon-a-time "ulcer drug" turned "safe food additive"... into beverages.

There was also concern over how much a child could eventually consume. Going from bad to worse... not mentioned in the NSDA document (although admitted by an FDA Commissioner) is the fact that the allowable daily dose was never set for humans to begin with... but for rats, because they tolerate more of the wood alcohol (metanol). In l983 aspartame was in only in a few hundred products, and yet, the NSDA and many others were already very concerned. They could soon get this toxin in
beverages and in coffee, tea and other hot drinks. The secret trade information (read into the congressional record and posted on DORway) stated that aspartame could not be used for everything. It also mentioned that considering the complete conversion to DKP (a brain tumor agent), that if they told the FDA of this problem they would never get aspartame approved.

The National Soft Drink Association, who protested so strongly, for some reason ignored their own 30-page protest, and turned around and lobbied for NutraSweet. What power these chemical and pharmaceutical companies exhibit! Searle was the original manufacturer but was later acquired by Monsanto Corporation, who created Nutrasweet and Equal.

As hundreds of complaints poured into the FDA the objections of the NSDA came to be a reality. The CDC was asked to investigate: they did, and indeed it was a most damning report that included memory loss, seizures, liver problems, mood alteration, cardiac arrest and death - for starters. However, the coverup continued because a summary was added to this investigation that contradicted the report saying that the findings were "mild". By virtue of this short one-paragraph summary (to a 146 page report) the term "mild death" is now a defacto part of CDC jargon.

Searle studies were the target of an indictment for fraud not carried out when two U.S. Prosecutors went to work for the law firm defending Searle. Senator Metzenbaum introduced a bill that never got out of committee (in l985) because Monsanto lobbying power was too strong. On the program "60 Minutes" Dr. Ralph Walton declared that 83 of 90 independent tests showed aspartame to have significant problems (Dec 29, l996), but then the usually aggressive expose staff failed to name those
problems, or to confront the manufacture with this information.

The manufacturer and the FDA has succeeded in preventing any new independent studies and the FDA has refused to answer 26 questions on DORway, even down to why the studies that showed aspartame triggers brain tumors were never replicated. In addition, the FDA refuses to confirm or deny that they now allow aspartame in products without the required warning label "PHENYLKETONURICS: Contains phenylalanine". Dr. H. J. Roberts (at a press conference in the 80's) warned the world by saying that something had to be done soon or we might have a plague on our hands within 5 to 10 years. The FDA sent out a brochure explaining the safety of aspartame full of propaganda that had nothing to do with the truth (rebutted on DORway). During 1996 the FDA decided to remove all restrictions on the use of aspartame (ignoring the fact that aspartame breaks down faster when
heated above 86 degrees F). In order to do so the FDA had to show a reduction in complaints (they admit to over 10,000 "official" complaints on this "most complained about substance, ever") so they diverted new complaints. One source indicated the FDA was referring complaints to the "Aids Hotline". Then, in order to reduce the number of existing complaints (to further show a reduction) they revised their book keeping system in order to eliminate hundreds of once-valid reports.

During June of 1996, Dr. David Kessler granted blanket approval (for this neurotoxin, a dangerous drug that changes brain chemistry and interacts with other drugs) to be used the same as sugar... in
everything. He did so without public notification, and shortly after being requested by retired Senator Metzenbaum to initiate additional safety testing.

Yes... the NSDA "knew the gun was loaded" but became a turncoat, lobbying for industry, with full knowledge of what would happen to the public. After 17 years on the market on-going "independent studies" are still "in progress" because the rat test subjects have been replaced by over 200 million human consumers, residing in 100 countries of the world, who unknowingly ingest this toxic soup from over 5000 products believing they are "safe" and a "diet aid". "Proof of the pudding" is in the medical system that is at its breaking point from a need to continually treat victims of aspartame disease... who cannot be cured by medications. Complete removal of aspartame from the diet is the only possible cure.

Perhaps the phrase that best applies is that "ASPARTAME is a Pandora's box of chameleon-like toxins and tumor agents that have 92 FDA acknowledged ways to ruin your life, death being one of them".

quote:

Op dinsdag 18 november 2008 17:45 schreef Lambiekje het volgende:

[..]

Dat is common knowledge. Zo was het patent aangevraagd voordat het bekend was dat ook lekker ranzig zoet is.

quote:

Op woensdag 19 november 2008 01:09 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:

[..]

Ik mag toch hopen dat je zelf ook doorhebt dat je daarmee te vraag ontwijkt... Is een direct antwoord teveel gevraagd?

quote:

Op woensdag 19 november 2008 07:28 schreef Lambiekje het volgende:

[..]

het is duidelijk dat je in al die jaren nog nooit zelf uberhaupt de moeite hebt genomen zelf eens Google ter hand te nemen.

quote:

Op woensdag 19 november 2008 08:36 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:

[..]

Leugens gaan spuien helpt nou ook niet bepaald...

quote:

Today we have "Nutra-Sweet", which is widely used in a plethora of consumables, despite a demonstrated neurological reaction in some people. In February 1996, it was decided to also use the product name "Benevia". It is estimated that as many as 20,000,000 people cannot metabolize phenylalimine, and this inability is genetically inherited by children. The inability to metabolize phenylalinine can lead to mental retardation in children. This means a risk of retardation for millions of children. A multi-billion dollar enterprise, this substance is said to be "refined" from "natural" substances. Like other "refined" substances, it represents a health threat to the general public. No long term studies have been performed to evaluate the physiological effects of this substance, yet the public is lead to believe it is absolutely safe. Technically, the chemical is called aspartame, and it was once on a Pentagon list of biowarfare chemicals submitted to Congress. [1] Aspartame is in over 4,000 products worldwide and is consumed by over 200 million people in the United States alone. What follows is a skeletal examination of the chronology related to aspartame. A more detailed chronology is given later in this chapter based on information provided to us by the Aspartame Consumer Safety Network.

quote:

Nutra-sweet the aspartam Pentagon biological warfare weapon


G.D. Sear!e, the pharmaceutical firm that introduced NutraSweet,
worked symbiotically with federal and congressional officials,
bribed investigators when violations of law were exposed,
*anything* to move aspartame to market. As far back as 1969, an
internal Searle "strategy memo" concluded the company must obtain
FDA approval to outpace firms competing for the artificial
sweetener market. Another memo in December 1970 urged that FDA
officials were to be "brought into a subconscious spirit of
participation" with Searle.27 To that end, with enormous profits
at stake, the pharmaceutical house set out on a long struggle to
transform the Pentagon's biochemical warfare agent into "the
taste Mother Nature intended.

quote:

Op woensdag 19 november 2008 09:47 schreef Lambiekje het volgende:

[..]

ok ok je zult vast wel eens gegoogled hebben maar nooit voor deelname discussie.
[..]


[..]

quote:

Op woensdag 19 november 2008 11:19 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:

[..]

Lekker neutrale bron he? Hoe serieus denk je dat die genomen gaat worden gezien de blunders in de eerste alinea?

quote:

Op woensdag 19 november 2008 18:37 schreef Erasmo het volgende:
Waarom heeft de grote suikermafia de invoering van aspertaam niet tegen gehouden? Dit geintje heeft ze bakken met geld gekost.