9-11 in scene gezet #2

quote:

Op zaterdag 5 juli 2008 10:27 schreef Terecht het volgende:

[..]

Dat kun je sowieso al wel naar het fabeltjesboek verwijzen hoor . Hier hebben we het al wel vaker over gehad, maar op de een of andere manier komt het regelmatig terug.

quote:

Op zaterdag 5 juli 2008 10:09 schreef ToT het volgende:
Heeft er al iemand met een geigerteller rondgelopen daar? Daarmee zou je dat verhaal over die mini-kernbommetjes snel kunnen bevestigen of ontkrachten.

quote:

http://www.gammascout.com/faq.html
Even though the Gamma-Scout® was originally conceived before 9/11, its features and refinements have been optimized for protection against these threats. In a likely terrorist scenario, unless you're at ground zero, your exposure will probably be at relatively low, but gradually rising levels, and may not appear in your immediate environment for several days.

quote:

http://www.saunalahti.fi/wtc2001/H-device.htm
3. They tried to explain [the fallout with tritium from emergency lighting]. Unfortunately all WTC emergency signs were based on the electroluminesence phenomenon. Thus they contained no tritium at all. A pure H-bomb produces one hundreth of the pollution of an atomic bomb of comparable size. And they are really not detectable with a Geiger counter (alpha particles and tritium particles). In addition they can mostly be washed away with the help of spraying water. The particles in question are very light, a kind of hydrogen and helium. When inhaled these particles are destructive

quote:

Op zaterdag 5 juli 2008 10:43 schreef nietzman het volgende:

[..]

Want dat is namelijk láng niet vergenoeg gezocht!

quote:

Elevated Tritium Levels at the WTC

1 Elevated tritium levels were already found as evidence for the mini-nuking of the Alfred P. Murrah federal building in Oklahoma City on April 19, 1995, see two reports by Sherman H. Skolnick

2. Elevated tritium levels were again found in the smoldering ruins of the World Trade Center after alleged Arab terrorists flew alleged passenger planes into the towers in an alleged Muslim terror attack in the morning of 9-11-1. Government scientists actually published their data, see at the top of this page. No government, scientist or university has ever stated any doubt about the published findings.

3. The presence of tritium, otherwise unexplained, would prove that the towers fell through nuclear devices (not Hiroshima type bombs, but smaller devices with easier detonation mechanisms).

4. The report cited above fails in its cover-up strategy: The alleged planes and their luminous EXIT signs are no credible source for the extra tritium.

Why ?!

There are two good reasons:

One:
When planes and passengers and their entire luggage vaporize in a fireball, the hydrogen (tritium is a form of hydrogen) of the EXIT signs vaporizes together with the rest, and is gone through the atmosphere. Why would tritiated water trickle down into the basement for measurement but not a single trace of any passenger blood, of which millions of times more was shed than tritiated water could have been created??

Two:
There were no planes, but only make-believe theater props copied or otherwise operated into the news videos of the alleged planes. This has been established beyond reasonable doubt by numerous 9-11 researchers

SUMMARY: For two good reasons (each one standing valid for itself), there is no explanation for the tritium in the WTC other than nuclear devices. Unlike at the OKC bombing, the tritium findings themselves are actually admitted and reported by the government, and there is no credible explanation for them to worm their way out.

quote:

Bali Micro Nuke - Lack of Radiation Confuses "Experts"
Less than ten-millionths of a second after the monster achieved critical mass, its searing thermal wave set fire to twenty-seven buildings in the immediate area, and spontaneously ignited automobiles parked two blocks away from ground zero. But as you will read later in this report, no ordinary Geiger counter from any nation could detect radiation from the weapon.