Search at the VDS home. Since when do Murder Rape and Kidnapping suspects get Immunity from having there property searched? Since when do they allow a Deputy Commissioners to obstruct justice in a murder Investigation? Since when do the Judges,ALE and Prosecuters all tell a different story and point fingers at each other but never resolve what happened? [color=blue]After this story was printed and Dompig was accused of Obstructing a murder Investigation I see he is running for a high ranking position in the ALE..Are you kidding me?[/color]
Ok,One last time I want to make sure this is all on record. I am convinced they are caught in a huge lie here. If something is wrong here please correct me!!!!!! It just doesnt make sense that Murder,Rape and Kidnapping suspects never had there house searched for 2 years!! We all saw they went in like lightening arrested 2 innocent men,did body searches,forensics in home and cars but for some reason the real perps were granted immunity. What did the Dutch first do when they arrived in Aruba? Did they question Beth what she did with Natalee? No they searched the VDS home and did forensics tests at the Kalpoes.
----------------------------------
Dompig: Said they were dissapointed that the judge did not allow them to search more than just Jorans Apt and they were turned down for a full search of the entire property. They were denied again when PVDS was arrested 8 days later for Premediated Murder and Kidnapping.
Peter De Vries: Told us that when they(ALE)arrived to search the the entire Van Der Sloot property but they were shocked when High Ranking official Ben King answered the door and they found out Judge Wit restricted the search of the VDS home to just Jorans little Apt and the two cars.
Judge Wit: Tells us that Dompig obstructed the search to give the Van Der Sloots privacy. Says the OM(Prosecutions Office)Never asked to search more than just Jorans Apt and the two cars. Said he had to make a decision on the spot? That if something was found it would not be allowed?
Karen Janssen:?
-------------------------------------------------
Translation - posted by Lazlo at RU
Bob Wit defends himself in Bon Dia.
(For sure translation faults, but on or about what it says is the following)
Ex Head Commissar Bob Wit defends his actions in the Holloway case.
-Willemstad- "I have acted correct procedure wise in the case of Natalee Holloway, The ex Head Commissaris in the affair, Bob Wit tells about the procedures that took place fast in the first days of the investigation. During one week, Mr Wit who's avenue is affiliated with the Court of Justice of the Caribbean, has functioned as a Head Commissar in the case here.
On Aruba the Chief of investigation in the time when Gerald Dompig was the Head Commissar, did not approve of the search of the house of the parents of Van Der Sloot as part of the investigation and had obstructed the investigation (?). The investigation of the Dutch crime investigator Peter R. de Vries, has came to the same conclusion. It was remarkable in the case that after the Dutch group of investigators had joined the case they were allowed to search the territory of the family. 
The impression was given also because it was the deal of a functionnaire who was learning to become Head, felt he had to protect the privacy of the family. Paul van der Sloot, father of Joran van der Sloot after having become a suspect in the case. ....... (no idea)Mr Wit, had to decide in an instant about the search of where Joran's father lived, and made the decision to allow the search of the apartment of Joran van der Sloot and also in the two cars of the family.At no moment they had (asked?) to search more then that. A Head Commisar cannot do otherwise, because the petition has to be substantial. Another word is by having allowed to search at other places that were not covered by the petition of the OM all evidence eventually obtained would be illegal. This is very significant since dealing with the case ourselves we had to work in a correct manner, Mr Wit says.
The ex Head Commissar also says by having dealt with the case himself the suspicions against Van Der Sloot and the Kalpoe brothers is strong.I had concluded from the dossier there had been various contradictions in their declarations. But that is not enough to succeed in a conviction. In a case where no the remains are found in order to treat it as a crime you have to have additional material such as a witness who has seen it happen or traces of blood that for example can be tested for DNA, so the Magistrate tells.
For one thing is, the case itself, Mr Wit says that even after time has passed one can still prosecute the suspects. I have seen often in my work the instant good new information comes up that can throw a new light on a case that was unsolved, so Mr Witt is commenting. The Ministry Public in Aruba has announced this the week that the case here ....of a "crime" is 7 years for murder and 10 years for premeditated murder.
--------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------
OCTOBER, 2005
http://scaredmonkeys.com/(...)lity-1-nay-sayers-0/Reporter: And the police only searched his apartment, deputy chief?
Dompig: That is correct. The fact is that we as a law enforcement agency always try to get the maximum. Meaning that we want to search as much places as possible. We were not granted by the judge a search warrant for the complete house, we only received the warrant for the apartment.NOVEMBER, 2006
Peter De Vries
On the Record w/ Greta
November 27, 2006
VAN SUSTEREN: What about the search of the van der Sloot property? Was that ever done, and was, you know--including, sort of, the cabana area where Joran lives?
DE VRIES: Well, the search in the home address of the family van der Sloot was very strange because the search warrant was made by head prosecutor Karin Janssen, and contained an allowance to search the whole address, “Montanja nineteen.” So, the gardens, the buildings--everything. But, when the police was on the spot, another high-ranking employee of the Justice office--it was Mr. Bob Wit--reduced the search warrant to only the room of Joran--and that was very strange.
Beth Twitty
MARTHA MCCALLUM
November 28, 2006
TWITTY: Well I think they will always have to look at there were two personnel involved from the Aruban Justice Department and that is why we do not have any evidence and that is what Joran’s attorney will have to be reminded of. It is because of Bob Witt and Ben King stopped the search warrants. It was made to initially search the entire area of Mon. 19 - the garden, the buildings and everything but on the spot a high ranking employee of the Justice Office, Bob Witt, reduced the search warrant to only the room of Joran so that’s why we do not have any evidence because of involvement of the obstruction from the Aruban Justice Department personnel.
-------------------------------------------------
[ Bericht 0% gewijzigd door observer777 op 11-02-2008 07:49:57 ]