BNW Brave New World
Samenzwering, verborgen agenda's en geheime geschiedenis. De zoektocht naar de wereld die achter de façade van alledag ligt.
ik heb weinig van het verhaal mee gekregen.quote:Op zaterdag 1 juni 2013 13:35 schreef ems. het volgende:
[..]
Omdat die daders in kwestie net een gewapende overval hebben gedaan en mensen gijzelen?
[..]
Wat is er zo moeilijk aan? Een ruit ingooien lijkt me 'moeilijker' dan gewoon via de voordeur gaan. Daarnaast wonen er mensen in het huis en lijkt het me juist een plus om zoveel mogelijk heel te houden.
maar een deuropening is erg krap , kan je ook zien dat ze staan te dringen bij de deur, kans dat iemand gewond raakt onder dreiging van een mes pistool is gewoon veel groter.
mja.. ben geen agent he
Er staat nog een vraag voor u open!!
Kickje want:
De moord op de Britse militair Lee Rigby vorig jaar had voorkomen kunnen worden als de geheime dienst op de hoogte was gesteld van de online uitlatingen van een van hen.
Dat heeft de commissie voor inlichtingen en veiligheid van het Britse parlement dinsdag gezegd.
Een van de twee islamitische extremisten had maanden voor de moord via internet zijn intentie uitgesproken een militair te vermoorden.
Het bedrijf dat het systeem beheert waarbinnen die communicatie plaatsvond, had de informatie moeten afstaan aan de geheime dienst. Als dat was gebeurd, was de terrorist "topprioriteit" van de geheime dienst geworden. De uitlatingen kwamen pas aan het licht na de moord in mei 2013.
De commissie concludeert dat het "onacceptabel" is dat het bedrijf de online communicatie niet controleert en de geheime dienst niet inlicht over potentiële dreigingen. "Zij bieden terroristen op deze manier, ook al is het onbedoeld, een toevluchtsoord."
Ook de inlichtendiensten hebben volgens de commissie fouten gemaakt. Zo bevonden de twee mannen zich op de radar van de diensten.
http://www.nu.nl/buitenla(...)n-kunnen-worden.html
De moord op de Britse militair Lee Rigby vorig jaar had voorkomen kunnen worden als de geheime dienst op de hoogte was gesteld van de online uitlatingen van een van hen.
Dat heeft de commissie voor inlichtingen en veiligheid van het Britse parlement dinsdag gezegd.
Een van de twee islamitische extremisten had maanden voor de moord via internet zijn intentie uitgesproken een militair te vermoorden.
Het bedrijf dat het systeem beheert waarbinnen die communicatie plaatsvond, had de informatie moeten afstaan aan de geheime dienst. Als dat was gebeurd, was de terrorist "topprioriteit" van de geheime dienst geworden. De uitlatingen kwamen pas aan het licht na de moord in mei 2013.
De commissie concludeert dat het "onacceptabel" is dat het bedrijf de online communicatie niet controleert en de geheime dienst niet inlicht over potentiële dreigingen. "Zij bieden terroristen op deze manier, ook al is het onbedoeld, een toevluchtsoord."
Ook de inlichtendiensten hebben volgens de commissie fouten gemaakt. Zo bevonden de twee mannen zich op de radar van de diensten.
http://www.nu.nl/buitenla(...)n-kunnen-worden.html
The murder of Fusilier Lee Rigby could not have been prevented despite his killers appearing in seven intelligence investigations, a report has found.
Although the parliamentary inquiry found errors in the operations, they were not "significant enough to have made a difference".
It highlighted one online exchange, that the agencies did not have access to, that may have prevented the attack.
The soldier was killed near Woolwich Barracks in London on 22 May 2013.
Michael Adebolajo was sentenced in February to a whole-life term and Michael Adebowale was jailed for a minimum of 45 years for the killing.
Adebolajo, and Adebowale - who were 29 and 22 years old respectively when sentenced - drove into Fusilier Rigby with a car before hacking him to death.
25 November 2014 Last updated at 12:04 GMT Share this pageEmail
Print Share this page
ShareFacebookTwitter.Woolwich murder: Lee Rigby's death was not preventable Fusilier Rigby was killed on 22 May last year
Continue reading the main story
Related Stories
Lee Rigby murder: Map and timeline
Rigby murderer given whole-life term
GCHQ, terrorists, and the internet: What are the issues?
The murder of Fusilier Lee Rigby could not have been prevented despite his killers appearing in seven intelligence investigations, a report has found.
Although the parliamentary inquiry found errors in the operations, they were not "significant enough to have made a difference".
It highlighted one online exchange, that the agencies did not have access to, that may have prevented the attack.
The soldier was killed near Woolwich Barracks in London on 22 May 2013.
Michael Adebolajo was sentenced in February to a whole-life term and Michael Adebowale was jailed for a minimum of 45 years for the killing.
Adebolajo, and Adebowale - who were 29 and 22 years old respectively when sentenced - drove into Fusilier Rigby with a car before hacking him to death.
Michael Adebolajo, left, and Michael Adebowale were sentenced in their absence following a scuffle in the dock.
The Intelligence and Security Committee spent 18 months examining the actions of MI5, MI6 and GCHQ (Government Communications Headquarters) in relation to the two men and produced the most detailed report it has ever published.
Among its findings:
The two men appeared in seven different agency investigations - for the most part as low-level subjects of interest
There were errors in these operations, where processes were not followed, decisions not recorded, or delays encountered
Adebolajo was a high priority for MI5 during two operations: they put significant effort into investigating him and employed a broad range of intrusive techniques. None of these revealed any evidence of attack planning
Adebowale was never more than a low-level subject of interest
MI6's "apparent lack of interest" in Adebolajo's arrest in Kenya was "deeply unsatisfactory". He was arrested in 2010, apparently preparing to fight with Somali militant group al-Shabab
The report's conclusion was "given what the agencies knew at the time, they were not in a position to prevent the murder of Fusilier Rigby".
'Safe haven'
However the committee flagged up an online exchange between Adebowale and an overseas extremist, which only came to light after the attack.
In the exchange from December 2012, Adebowale expresses his intent to murder a soldier in a "graphic and emotive" manner.
Committee chairman Sir Malcolm Rifkind said: "This was highly significant. Had MI5 had access to this exchange at the time, Adebowale would have become a top priority.
"There is then a significant possibility that MI5 would have been able to prevent the attack."
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-30192912
Dus de ene dienst zegt dat de moord wel voorkomen had kunnen worden en de andere dienst zegt van niet.
Although the parliamentary inquiry found errors in the operations, they were not "significant enough to have made a difference".
It highlighted one online exchange, that the agencies did not have access to, that may have prevented the attack.
The soldier was killed near Woolwich Barracks in London on 22 May 2013.
Michael Adebolajo was sentenced in February to a whole-life term and Michael Adebowale was jailed for a minimum of 45 years for the killing.
Adebolajo, and Adebowale - who were 29 and 22 years old respectively when sentenced - drove into Fusilier Rigby with a car before hacking him to death.
25 November 2014 Last updated at 12:04 GMT Share this pageEmail
Print Share this page
ShareFacebookTwitter.Woolwich murder: Lee Rigby's death was not preventable Fusilier Rigby was killed on 22 May last year
Continue reading the main story
Related Stories
Lee Rigby murder: Map and timeline
Rigby murderer given whole-life term
GCHQ, terrorists, and the internet: What are the issues?
The murder of Fusilier Lee Rigby could not have been prevented despite his killers appearing in seven intelligence investigations, a report has found.
Although the parliamentary inquiry found errors in the operations, they were not "significant enough to have made a difference".
It highlighted one online exchange, that the agencies did not have access to, that may have prevented the attack.
The soldier was killed near Woolwich Barracks in London on 22 May 2013.
Michael Adebolajo was sentenced in February to a whole-life term and Michael Adebowale was jailed for a minimum of 45 years for the killing.
Adebolajo, and Adebowale - who were 29 and 22 years old respectively when sentenced - drove into Fusilier Rigby with a car before hacking him to death.
Michael Adebolajo, left, and Michael Adebowale were sentenced in their absence following a scuffle in the dock.
The Intelligence and Security Committee spent 18 months examining the actions of MI5, MI6 and GCHQ (Government Communications Headquarters) in relation to the two men and produced the most detailed report it has ever published.
Among its findings:
The two men appeared in seven different agency investigations - for the most part as low-level subjects of interest
There were errors in these operations, where processes were not followed, decisions not recorded, or delays encountered
Adebolajo was a high priority for MI5 during two operations: they put significant effort into investigating him and employed a broad range of intrusive techniques. None of these revealed any evidence of attack planning
Adebowale was never more than a low-level subject of interest
MI6's "apparent lack of interest" in Adebolajo's arrest in Kenya was "deeply unsatisfactory". He was arrested in 2010, apparently preparing to fight with Somali militant group al-Shabab
The report's conclusion was "given what the agencies knew at the time, they were not in a position to prevent the murder of Fusilier Rigby".
'Safe haven'
However the committee flagged up an online exchange between Adebowale and an overseas extremist, which only came to light after the attack.
In the exchange from December 2012, Adebowale expresses his intent to murder a soldier in a "graphic and emotive" manner.
Committee chairman Sir Malcolm Rifkind said: "This was highly significant. Had MI5 had access to this exchange at the time, Adebowale would have become a top priority.
"There is then a significant possibility that MI5 would have been able to prevent the attack."
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-30192912
Dus de ene dienst zegt dat de moord wel voorkomen had kunnen worden en de andere dienst zegt van niet.
Kickje:
All officers should have Tasers, says Police Federation chief
Steve White, chairman of the Police Federation, says the heightened security threat means officers needed additional protection
31 Jan 2015
All rank-and-file police officers should be armed with a Taser because of the heightened security threat, the head of the Police Federation has said.
Steve White, chairman of the body which represents front-line officers, said acts of terrorism could be carried out anywhere and police needed to be protected.
He cited the killing of Fusilier Lee Rigby near Woolwich Barracks in 2013 as an example of how lone wolf-style attacks could be carried out without guns.
He told the Guardian: "The terrorist ideal to get attention no longer relies on an attack being in a place of note. It could be in Cheam high street, in any town, in any part of the UK. We know there are more dangerous people out there, preparing to attack police officers and we need to be able to respond to that threat.
"As (the) Lee Rigby (murder) demonstrated, you don't need to have a gun to create terrorism. It is a defensive tool and a tactical option. We have a largely unarmed service and the service wants that to remain.
http://www.telegraph.co.u(...)ederation-chief.html
All officers should have Tasers, says Police Federation chief
Steve White, chairman of the Police Federation, says the heightened security threat means officers needed additional protection
31 Jan 2015
All rank-and-file police officers should be armed with a Taser because of the heightened security threat, the head of the Police Federation has said.
Steve White, chairman of the body which represents front-line officers, said acts of terrorism could be carried out anywhere and police needed to be protected.
He cited the killing of Fusilier Lee Rigby near Woolwich Barracks in 2013 as an example of how lone wolf-style attacks could be carried out without guns.
He told the Guardian: "The terrorist ideal to get attention no longer relies on an attack being in a place of note. It could be in Cheam high street, in any town, in any part of the UK. We know there are more dangerous people out there, preparing to attack police officers and we need to be able to respond to that threat.
"As (the) Lee Rigby (murder) demonstrated, you don't need to have a gun to create terrorism. It is a defensive tool and a tactical option. We have a largely unarmed service and the service wants that to remain.
http://www.telegraph.co.u(...)ederation-chief.html
|
|
