Presidentsverkiezingen VS #84 Rematch?

quote:

Op vrijdag 31 december 2021 11:15 schreef QuidProJoe het volgende:
Het is prachtig om te zien hoe de angst voor Trump er nog goed in zit bij het Establishment. Het is zelfs zo triest gesteld met het Establishment, dat ze zich tot Alex Jones moeten wenden. Uiteraard kunnen de Linksen Alex Jones niet serieus nemen, na wat ze allemaal over hem hebben geschreven en gezegd.

Of, nou ja, met een stevige dosis cognitieve dissonantie kan alles.

quote:

Op vrijdag 31 december 2021 15:48 schreef Chivaz het volgende:

[..]
Ik vind dat ook opmerkelijk dat Alex Jones nu gebruikt moet worden om Trump te beschadigen. Veel dieper moet je toch niet zakken lijkt mij lmao.

quote:

Op vrijdag 31 december 2021 15:48 schreef Chivaz het volgende:

[..]
Ik vind dat ook opmerkelijk dat Alex Jones nu gebruikt moet worden om Trump te beschadigen. Veel dieper moet je toch niet zakken lijkt mij lmao.

quote:

The pursuit of the truth about the 2020 presidential election – was there or was there not undue influence or manipulation of the results? – has moved one step forward after a ruling from a court in Pennsylvania that a county's voting machines can be inspected.

The Amistad Project, which has been focused on election integrity since before the 2020 ballots were counted, announced that the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania is allowing the Project and Fulton County to send the county's Dominion voting machines to the state Senate for inspection.

"The court recognized that it was improper to demand that the county – which owns the machines, and has the responsibility of running the election along with the legislature – can’t determine whether the machines worked properly," said Phill Kline, director of The Amistad Project. "As the judge noted, there’s no justification for preventing the county from looking at their own machines."

The inspection had been scheduled for earlier this month but the state attorney general and secretary of state oddly sued to prevent any such move to affirm the accuracy of the 2020 election results.

quote:

It's now set for Jan. 10.

That's after a judge determined that the review must be allowed to proceed, with a short delay to allow experts from both sides to come up with a formal protocol for the inspection.

"Executive branch officials were trying to stop the inspection altogether, but the judge did not grant their emergency motion to stop the inspection," explained Amistad Project attorney Tom King. "They did not go to court seeking a delay; they sought to stop it, and they lost."

The Amistad Project began in 2018 and now reports it has ongoing litigation "against a shadow government that interfered with the 2020 election."

Kline commented on social media about the situation, noting that investigators with the state senate now can review the operations of the machines.

He also noted a Wisconsin judge will rule soon on whether Special Counsel Gableman, a former state Supreme Court justice appointed by lawmakers to review voting irregularities in that state, will be able to compel testimony from public officials who have refused to cooperate.

There have been claims made about the accuracy of the Dominion voting machines as they were used in multiple states where anomalous results were documented on election day in 2020.

The project also explains some of the other suspicious circumstances, including the fact that Mark Zuckerberg of Meta spent some $420 million to influence the election results.

The organization reported that IRS filings document he funded a "shadow government" by turning over $350 million to the Center for Tech and Civic Life, and more to another group, which then forwarded the cash to various progressives running various state and local election offices.

"CTCL is only the tip of the iceberg," Kline explained recently. "The left’s shadow government operated though scores of nonprofits, and so far The Amistad Project has identified well over $1 billion in monies, expertise, and technical support from leftist nonprofits to election officials. The result was that America was kicked out of the counting room, and billionaires were allowed in."

"CTCL, which grew out of the George Soros-funded New Organizing Institute, used its windfall to distribute grants to election officials at the municipal and county level, bypassing state legislatures," the Project explained. "The earliest – and by far the largest – grants went to deep-blue urban areas of key swing states. The grant agreements obligated the recipients to use a large portion of the money for voter turnout operations targeted at specific demographics of voters who could reliably be expected to vote for Joe Biden, effectively turning local election offices into partisan get-out-the-vote centers."

Just the News reported the state officials trying to stop the inspection of the voting machines earlier had been accused of punishing Fulton County for concerns about the election integrity.

They decertified county voting machines following a third-party audit organized by local officials.

Martin Walsh, in a commentary at Conservative Brief, said the decision was a major victory for accountability and transparency in elections.

In a separate case pending in Denver that involves Dominion, the plaintiffs, from Michigan, have accused the company of violating the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act.

They also charge the company intimidated its critics after the 2020 elections by sending cease and desist letters to those who expressed criticism of the company.

The complaint states, “Generally, Plaintiffs are everyday Americans. They are fathers, mothers, daughters, and sons. They are the neighbor you say good morning to on your way to work. They are Americans trying to participate in a public debate about election integrity and security. Plaintiffs have been intimidated from participating in the debate, however, because of Dominion."

The plaintiffs claim Dominion sent intimidating letters and used the threat of litigation to "chill the free speech" of those critical of the election.

quote:

Op woensdag 29 december 2021 17:43 schreef Ixnay het volgende:

[..]
Mensen die al 30 jaar in een grafkist liggen kunnen inderdaad niet naar een stembus lopen.

quote:

The investigation into Wisconsin’s elections is still ongoing as special counsel Michael Gableman continues looking into how voting in the state was carried out in the 2020 general election.

Gableman is now issuing about 70 subpoenas to state entities and employees, special interest groups, private companies, mayoral staffers and IT departments, throughout Wisconsin to obtain records, depositions and more information on the election process and organizations that seem to have had a hand in the administration of elections.

Gableman, who was previously a Wisconsin Supreme Court justice, was asked by Speaker of the Wisconsin state Assembly Robin Vos to lead an investigation into the 2020 election in the state. Gableman agreed and was appointed as special counsel.

The investigation is looking into several components of what went on during the election. Gableman is looking into how Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and the money he donated to the Center for Tech and Civic Life influenced the election, what the Wisconsin Election Commission was doing, the conduct of the mayors and the municipal clerks, the operation of the voting machines and other factors which might have influenced the election.

Wisconsin elections are not administered by the secretary of state, like in other states. Instead, Wisconsin’s Government Accountability Board works in collaboration with 1,853 municipal clerks, 72 county clerks and numerous election inspectors during election season.

Many municipal clerks throughout the state live in very small towns, but in contrast, there are clerks in Wisconsin’s five biggest cities: Madison, Racine, Kenosha, Green Bay and Milwaukee. The clerks, however, are not independent authorities and report to the mayor, the city’s common council or the state elections commission.

Now Gableman is specifically looking into these cities’ mayors, clerks and staffers and how they might have been influenced by funding from the CTCL, which, thanks to generous donations from Zuckerberg, gave approximately $350 million to communities to run elections.

A source close to the investigation told The Western Journal that, in short, CTCL approached these five Wisconsin cities and offered $8.8 million grants to help keep voters safe from COVID. The group reportedly offered this money even though the source said the federal government, under the Trump administration, had already given $7 million to make sure clerks had enough PPE, sanitation and anything else needed to keep voters safe from COVID-19.

According to the source, each mayor of the five cities took “good faith” money. Racine allegedly received $60,000 and the other four cities received $10,000 each. Once they took this initial grant, CTCL sent questionnaires to see if the five cities then qualified for the full $8.8 million grant, the source said.

The questionnaire asked what the city was going to do to drive up the vote in what they deemed were historically disenfranchised neighborhoods, according to the source.

Gableman already issued subpoenas to the mayors of the cities. The next round of subpoenas that have just been issued, according to the source, is to mayoral staffers and IT departments in order to find information on how the cities used the money from CTCL.

Already, hundreds of pages of emails between Milwaukee election officials and CTCL have been made public.

Another part of the election that Gableman is looking into, according to the source, is concerns regarding the Wisconsin Election Commission, which has also been issued a subpoena in order to see the voting data in the state and specifically, to see the rolls of registered, active and inactive voters.

Deactivated voters include those who are dead or have moved away. According to the Help America Vote Act passed in 2002, states are supposed to have voter records. But dead voters should not be on the rolls of voters. So the source said Gableman is subpoenaing WEC in order to have access to the voter rolls.

The source told The Western Journal that the most recent subpoenas Gableman issued were all in-state for the WEC, mayoral staffers, IT records and more. But while the subpoenas issued are all in-state, Gableman’s team anticipates additional subpoenas for others involved in the election, the source said.

One major player in the election was the companies that ran the machines, such as Dominion Voting Systems. Gableman’s investigation is subpoenaing the companies in order to know exactly how the machines work and check the security of the systems, according to the source.

Gableman is also looking into other figures and organizations (including CTCL itself) from out of state who may have had a hand in ballot harvesting and other roles in the election, the source said. His team is allegedly working on getting subpoenas for these.

The source close to the investigation said the team is expecting pushback on every single subpoena issued, but as that happens, the investigation will continue. According to the source, the group will move on to the higher courts as necessary, in order to keep investigating all of what went on in the 2020 election.

quote:

Op zaterdag 1 januari 2022 15:05 schreef QuidProJoe het volgende:
Breaking Exclusive: Election Fraud Investigators Blanket State with Surprise Subpoenas
[..]

quote:

Op zaterdag 1 januari 2022 20:22 schreef theguyver het volgende:

[..]
Zozo een onderzoek..
Lekker op tijd ook.

quote:

Op zaterdag 1 januari 2022 21:09 schreef QuidProJoe het volgende:

[..]
Jazeker. Ik heb geen idee wat de verjaringstermijn is voor verkiezings- en/of stemfraude, als die er al is, maar sowieso dienen verkiezingsgegevens minstens 22 maanden worden bewaard. Ruim op tijd. Het lijkt wel een beetje alsof je het er maar moeilijk mee hebt.

quote:

Op zaterdag 1 januari 2022 21:55 schreef QuidProJoe het volgende:
Tsja. Laten we het er maar op houden dat de een meer om feiten geeft en een goed en eerlijk proces, terwijl de ander liever een showproces voor het publiek heeft, in ware Sovjetstijl.

En hihi, de ontkenning weer van de resultaten van de eerdere onderzoeken, en daar worden uiteraard niet de onderzoeken van de fraudeurs zelf mee bedoeld. Maar goed, je hebt toegang tot alle informatie. Als jij jezelf voor de gek wilt laten houden, is dat 100% aan jou. De klap van de realiteit is niet oneindig uit te stellen.

quote:

Op zaterdag 1 januari 2022 21:55 schreef QuidProJoe het volgende:
Tsja. Laten we het er maar op houden dat de een meer om feiten geeft en een goed en eerlijk proces, terwijl de ander liever een showproces voor het publiek heeft, in ware Sovjetstijl.

En hihi, de ontkenning weer van de resultaten van de eerdere onderzoeken, en daar worden uiteraard niet de onderzoeken van de fraudeurs zelf mee bedoeld. Maar goed, je hebt toegang tot alle informatie. Als jij jezelf voor de gek wilt laten houden, is dat 100% aan jou. De klap van de realiteit is niet oneindig uit te stellen.

quote:

Op zaterdag 1 januari 2022 22:43 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:

[..]
Welke feiten over verkiezingsfraude denk je dat ze bij een eventueel proces dan gaan gebruiken?

quote:

Op zaterdag 1 januari 2022 21:55 schreef QuidProJoe het volgende:
Tsja. Laten we het er maar op houden dat de een meer om feiten geeft