[AMV] #982 Cancelled the Wall

quote:

Op dinsdag 26 oktober 2021 20:18 schreef Ulx het volgende:

[..]
Flynn zegt nooit zoiets als er geen toestemming van Trump is.

Ben jij ook tegen de politie?

quote:

Op dinsdag 26 oktober 2021 20:18 schreef Ulx het volgende:

[..]
Flynn zegt nooit zoiets als er geen toestemming van Trump is.

Ben jij ook tegen de politie?

quote:

More than 130,000 American lives could have been saved with swifter action and better coordinated public health messages after the virus’s first wave, Birx told investigators.

“I believe if we had fully implemented the mask mandates, the reduction in indoor dining, the getting friends and family to understand the risk of gathering in private homes, and we had increased testing, that we probably could have decreased fatalities into the 30-percent-less to 40-percent-less range,” Birx said.

More than 735,000 Americans have died of coronavirus-related complications since the pandemic began, including more than 300,000 since President Biden took office.

Birx earlier this year told reporters about the difficulty of responding to the pandemic during an election year. Asked to elaborate on her prior comments, Birx told the subcommittee that some officials “were actively campaigning and not as present in the White House as previously.”

The election year “just took people’s time away from and distracted them away from the pandemic in my personal opinion,” Birx said. She did not name the officials.

quote:

Op dinsdag 26 oktober 2021 15:36 schreef Ulx het volgende:
Er komen verkiezingen aan.

[ twitter ]

quote:

Op dinsdag 26 oktober 2021 23:30 schreef VoMy het volgende:

[..]
Heb je daar nog echte onderbouwing voor? @:Chivaz heeft verder gelijk, de Republikeinen zeggen dit helemaal niet.

quote:

Op woensdag 27 oktober 2021 11:48 schreef Ulx het volgende:

[..]
Ze nemen geen afstand van Flynn's uitspraken. Terwijl ze normaal wel heel erg fanatiek zijn als het om het defunden van de politie gaat.

quote:

Op woensdag 27 oktober 2021 12:38 schreef Ulx het volgende:

[..]
Als het gaat om het afschaffen van de federale politie wel. Zeker als je de hele tijd naar de anderen wijst. Hypocrisie is niet iets wat we willen tenslotte

quote:

Op woensdag 27 oktober 2021 15:24 schreef Ulx het volgende:

[..]
De MSM �n de alternatieve onderzoekers negeren dit schandaal! Vreselijk als ze dat doen!

quote:

Op woensdag 27 oktober 2021 15:26 schreef Ulx het volgende:
[ twitter ]

Godsamme, de satire heeft de waarheid echt rechts ingehaald h�.

Die hebben het eerder over de grote harde paars-met-gele-m&m's gekleurde kloppende roede van Hunter!

quote:

Op woensdag 27 oktober 2021 15:26 schreef Ulx het volgende:
[ twitter ]

Die hebben het eerder over de grote harde paars-met-gele-m&m's gekleurde kloppende roede van Hunter!

quote:

Just hours after Senate Democrats on Wednesday morning unveiled the billionaires tax -- to tax the wealth of a few hundred of the wealthiest of Americans -- the gambit came into question when Manchin raised concerns.

"I'm supporting, basically, that everyone should pay their fair share," Manchin told reporters on Capitol Hill. "I don't like the connotation that we're targeting different people."

When asked about the plan proposed by Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., which would help pay the $1.5 -2 trillion cost of sweeping new programs including child care, child tax credits, family leave and environmental initiatives, Manchin hesitated, saying while he thought they would "absolutely" get to a deal "the Senate will take time."

"There's a lot going on with that and it's very convoluted. I believe there's going to be everyone's going to pay. I believe that we will end up where everyone must participate," he said.

quote:

In your editorial “The Election for Pennsylvania’s High Court” (Oct. 25), you state the fact that a court wrongly said mail-in ballots could be counted after Election Day. “This didn’t matter,” you add, “because Mr. Biden won the state by 80,555, but the country is lucky the election wasn’t closer. If the election had hung on a few thousand Pennsylvanians, the next President might have been picked by the U.S. Supreme Court.”

Well actually, the election was rigged, which you, unfortunately, still haven’t figured out. Here are just a few examples of how determinative the voter fraud in Pennsylvania was:

• 71,893 mail-in ballots were returned after Nov. 3, 2020, at 8 p.m., according to Audit the Vote PA. None of these should have been counted according to the U.S. Constitution and the state Legislature, which didn’t approve this change.

• 10,515 mail-in votes from people who do not exist on the Pennsylvania voter rolls at all.

• 120,000 excess voters are not yet accounted for by the Pennsylvania Department of State—far more votes than voters!

• From 2016 to 2020, during my term as president, Republicans out-registered Democrats 21 to 1. This translated to a 659,145-vote lead at 12:38 a.m. on election night, with “Trump” up a full 15 points.

• Hundreds of thousands of votes were unlawfully counted in secret, in defiance of a court order, while Republican poll watchers were thrown out of buildings where voting took place.

• 39,771 people who registered to vote after the Oct. 19, 2020, deadline, still voted in the 2020 election—simply not allowed.

Highly respected Audit the Vote PA found numerous data integrity problems the Pennsylvania Statewide Uniform Registry of Electors (SURE) system, including:

• 305,874 voters were removed from the rolls after the election on Nov. 3rd.

• 51,792 voters with inactive voter registrations at the end of October 2020 nevertheless voted.

• 57,000 duplicate registrations.

• 55,823 voters who were backfilled into the SURE system.

• 58,261 first-time voters 70 years and older.

• 39,911 people who were added to voter rolls while under 17 years of age.

• 17,000 mail-in ballots sent to addresses outside of Pennsylvania.

• Another analysis of Montgomery County, Pa., found 98% of the eligible voting population in the county was already registered to vote—not possible.

• A canvass of Montgomery County has identified 78,000 phantom voters, with roughly 30% of respondents unaware that there are people registered and voting from their address.

• One nursing home in Lancaster County had 690 registrations and an extremely high turnout rate of 85% in 2020, while nursing homes were closed due to Covid. One of these residents said she had not voted in the past 3 years, but had a mail-in ballot cast in her name.

• 25,000 ballots were requested from nursing homes at the exact same time.

• Numerous reports and sworn affidavits attested to poll watcher intimidation and harassment, many by brute force.

• Attorney General Bill Barr ordered U.S. Attorney Bill McSwain to stand down and not investigate election irregularities.

• Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook poured over $17 million to interfere in the Pennsylvania election, including $5.5 million on “ballot processing equipment” in Philadelphia and $552,000 for drop boxes where the voting pattern was not possible.

And so much more! This is why Democrats and the Fake News Media do not want a full forensic audit in Pennsylvania. In reality, 80,555 ballots are nothing when there is this much corruption or voter irregularities.

Donald J. Trump

Palm Beach, Fla.

quote:

Op donderdag 28 oktober 2021 04:58 schreef AnneX het volgende:
Geweldig dat de kerel zulke cijfers kan reproduceren.
Er zal toch wel een weerwoord volgen?! en net zo gedetailleerd.

quote:

1. The Wall Street Journal should not have published it without assessing the claims and demonstrating where they were wrong, misleading or unimportant.

2. The Journal would have been better served had it explained why it chose to run the letter without contextualizing it, since that might have at least offered some clarity on the otherwise inexplicable decision, but it didn’t.

3. Even if those who decided to publish the letter lacked the resources to fact-check each of the claims, they might have pushed back on obviously false claims, as when Trump falsely claims that Facebook chief executive Mark Zuckerberg spent millions of dollars to “interfere in the Pennsylvania election.”

4. They might also have noted that the organization that Trump repeatedly cites as an authority for his claims, the “highly respected” group Audit the Vote PA, has no actual experience in evaluating elections.

5. Or, perhaps, that the organization’s website includes allegations of fraud that are themselves obviously false. This includes a reference to former Trump administration official Peter Navarro’s collection of fraud claims and a presentation by Douglas Frank, a close ally of MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell.

6. They could have pointed out that the first claim in Trump’s letter, about late-arriving mail ballots, had already been adjudicated by the courts and wouldn’t have changed the outcome of the race. That’s even if the numbers he cited (which came from Audit the Vote) were credible, which they aren’t.

7. They could have contextualized Trump’s argument that changes made by the state legislature should have nullified votes by pointing out that a court had already considered this question and determined that the votes should stand.

8. They could have noted that Trump’s lead on election night was meaningless given the number of absentee ballots that remained to be counted. It was obvious by the morning of Nov. 4 that there were enough absentee votes outstanding to probably hand Joe Biden a victory in the state. Yet, nearly a year later, the Journal allows Trump’s claim that something suspicious happened to stand without comment.

9. They could have taken out obviously unimportant arguments like his trip back to the “we have signed affidavits!!!” well.

10. They might have done more to elevate the fact that Trump’s loyal-until-the-election attorney general, William P. Barr, dismissed Trump’s claims of fraud, instead of letting him malign Barr’s refusal to chase Trump’s imaginary rabbits.

11. If they really wanted to spread their wings, they could have pointed out that a canvass of one county that claims to have identified 78,000 “phantom voters” is simply not credible. If you think contacting hundreds of people at home is trivial, you are encouraged to speak with someone who has spent even one day running a door-to-door political or marketing campaign.

12. The Journal could also have come back to Trump before publishing his letter, setting a higher bar for publication than, say, a guy from Ramapo who took issue with the paper’s coverage of dogecoin. The paper could, for example, have asked that Trump offer some baseline number of examples of proven, demonstrated fraud, not simply various numbers dependent on amateur analyses of voter data. It could have insisted that the former president of the United States, a billionaire, present whatever concrete evidence of fraud he should have ascertained nearly a year after the election and with all of the power of his political party and his pocketbook at his disposal.

13. The paper could have come back to Trump and asked him why he didn’t include various other claims of fraud in the state that he has in the past embraced. He once claimed that the state had 205,000 more votes than voters, a claim debunked in December, given that it was based on flawed analysis of voter data (including from the same system on which many of his Audit the Vote claims are based). Why was that debunked claim excluded when others weren’t?

14. The main thing you need to know about the letter, of course, is that Donald Trump is still railing against his election loss 358 days after it occurred. And that prominent institutions are still enabling his dangerous misinformation more than 358 days after they should have known better.