BNW Brave New World
Samenzwering, verborgen agenda's en geheime geschiedenis. De zoektocht naar de wereld die achter de façade van alledag ligt.
Waarom is dat vreemd? Vaccinatie heeft even nodig voor het effect heeft.quote:Op dinsdag 31 augustus 2021 23:32 schreef Probably_on_pcp het volgende:
Trust The Science? CDC Counts People Dying Within 14 Days Of Jab As “Unvaccinated”
A new Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) study is being used by mainstream media to fearmonger Americans into taking Covid vaccines.
Yahoo Finance published an article with the headline, “Unvaccinated LA residents were 29 times more likely to be hospitalized with COVID-19: CDC study.”
Citing the Los Angeles County Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report released on Tuesday, even local news promoted the claim that “Unvaccinated L.A. County residents [are] 5 times more likely to get COVID, 29 times more likely to be hospitalized.”
Looking at a screenshot of the CDC release, one can observe the definitions for what they consider “fully vaccinated,” “partially vaccinated,” or “unvaccinated.”
According to the chart, “unvaccinated <14 days receipt of the first dose of a 2-dose series or 1 dose of the single-dose vaccine or if no vaccination registry data were available.”
This means if someone was hospitalized, admitted to ICU, required mechanical ventilation or died within two weeks of getting the jab they are being counted as “unvaccinated.”
Gaat verder:
https://www.newswars.com/(...)jab-as-unvaccinated/
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Vaccinatie doden als ze significant zijn.quote:
[..]
Waarom is dat vreemd? Vaccinatie heeft even nodig voor het effect heeft.
"Het enkele feit dat de gewasbeschermingsmiddelen zijn toegelaten, geeft in ieder geval geen garantie op het ontbreken van met name een uitgesteld schadelijk effect op de gezondheid van mensen."
Hoe bedoel je?quote:
[..]
Vaccinatie doden als ze significant zijn.
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Vaccinatie doden tellen als Covid doden... Wie weet zal het gewoon meevallen hoor.quote:
"Het enkele feit dat de gewasbeschermingsmiddelen zijn toegelaten, geeft in ieder geval geen garantie op het ontbreken van met name een uitgesteld schadelijk effect op de gezondheid van mensen."
Zit jij ondertussen al zo diep in de rabbit hole ja?quote:
[..]
Vaccinatie doden tellen als Covid doden... Wie weet zal het gewoon meevallen hoor.
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
...quote:
[..]
Zit jij ondertussen al zo diep in de rabbit hole ja?
"Het enkele feit dat de gewasbeschermingsmiddelen zijn toegelaten, geeft in ieder geval geen garantie op het ontbreken van met name een uitgesteld schadelijk effect op de gezondheid van mensen."
Anyway, waarom is het vreemd om iemand als ongevaccineerd mee te tellen in de statistieken als de vaccinatie nog zo recent was dat het nog geen effect had?quote:
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Wat handige info/uitleg over de VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Report System)
VAERS - as of April 30th, 2021 - this is the best (and only) comprehensive analysis of the data
Jessica Rose
Hele vid de moeite waard om te kjiken.
17:00 - Are injections causing Adverse Events?
VAERS - as of April 30th, 2021 - this is the best (and only) comprehensive analysis of the data
Jessica Rose
Hele vid de moeite waard om te kjiken.
17:00 - Are injections causing Adverse Events?
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Nou, misschien omdat alle mensen die in het ziekenhuis overlijden als ''ongevaccineerd'' als vaccin weigeraars worden gezien en dat dan dus niet het geval is?quote:
[..]
Anyway, waarom is het vreemd om iemand als ongevaccineerd mee te tellen in de statistieken als de vaccinatie nog zo recent was dat het nog geen effect had?
To BG or not to BG!
Weigeraars niet nee, onbeschermd door het vaccin nog wel.quote:
[..]
Nou, misschien omdat alle mensen die in het ziekenhuis overlijden als ''ongevaccineerd'' als vaccin weigeraars worden gezien en dat dan dus niet het geval is?
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Omdat de reden van overlijden binnen de 14 dagen door het vaccin zou kunnen zijn veroorzaakt, ookal duurt het 14 dagen voordat je lichaam antistoffen aanmaakt (maar dat wil dus niet zeggen dat het vaccin niets in je lichaam doet, want het aanmaken van nieuwe antistoffen door je eigen lichaam kost wel tijd, maar de actie van het vaccin niet). Zie bijv. de bloedklontering, dat kan blijkbaar praktisch onmiddellijk of zeer snel optreden, in ieder geval binnen de 14 dagen als we onafhankelijke metingen met d-dimeertests moeten geloven. Een d-dimeertest meet alleen recente bloedklonters. Als je mensen die een week eerder zijn gevaccineerd daarmee test, is bewijs van bloedklontering een sterke aanwijzing dat de bloedklontering door het vaccin is veroorzaakt, omdat de test geen klonters meet van voor die periode. Dat is dus ook minder dan de 14 dagen.quote:
[..]
Anyway, waarom is het vreemd om iemand als ongevaccineerd mee te tellen in de statistieken als de vaccinatie nog zo recent was dat het nog geen effect had?
Er zijn mensen die onmiddellijk na hun injectie in een shock raken en overlijden. Die zouden dan ook tellen als niet-gevaccineerd. Het lijkt me vanzelfsprekend dat dat onjuist is. Met wetenschap heeft het niets te maken.
Samengevat: men overlijdt niet door het aanmaken van antistoffen door het eigen lichaam wat 14 dagen kan duren, maar men overlijdt door andere complicaties als gevolg van de injectie. Die complicaties kunnen onmiddellijk optreden omdat het vaccin onmiddellijk ageert en zijn niet afhankelijk van de tijd die het lichaam nodig heeft om antistoffen aan te maken.
Het is voor mij duidelijk dat men iedereen wil vaccineren en dat men met de cijfers goochelt om negatieve effecten zoveel mogelijk te minimaliseren en de angst voor corona zo hoog mogelijk op te voeren.
Dat de officiële instanties en ministers en minister-presidenten hieraan mee werken, is crimineel.
[ Bericht 14% gewijzigd door Ali_Kannibali op 02-09-2021 13:34:35 ]
Whopping 70 percent of unvaccinated Americans would quit their job if vaccines are mandated
https://thehill.com/chang(...)vaccinated-americans
https://thehill.com/chang(...)vaccinated-americans
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
Toronto ER Doctor’s Personal Testimony
My name is Mark Trozzi. I am a medical doctor; I graduated in 1990 from The University of Western Ontario. I have been practicing Emergency Medicine for the past twenty-five years, and am a veteran critical resuscitation instructor. I was on call in multiple emergency units since the onset of the so-called “pandemic”, until February 2021, including one ER designated specifically for COVID-19.
What follows is my observations and opinions; I am bound by my personal and religious convictions to speak openly and honestly. I do not have authority to tell you “the truth”, but I will share my honest experiences, perceptions, and digests of hundreds of hours of research on the subject of covid-19.
At the onset of this “pandemic”, I was cautious, and hence meticulous, with N95 mask use, hand washing, social isolation and distancing etc. I studied coronavirus science and was deeply involved in many emergency department drills to modify our practice in profound ways to deal with the “killer virus” we were advertised. However, various things soon made me consider that we were being deceived and manipulated. Here are a few.
The First Wave
The “first wave” of the “pandemic” was absolutely the quietest time in my career. I have worked very hard and been very busy over the past twenty-five years in ER. However, both in my regular ER and my “COVID-19 designated” ER, there were almost no patients, and almost no work. I had multiple, long ER shifts without a single patient. Meanwhile, when I would go to the local grocery store, the propagandized public, God bless them, would usher me to the front of the antisocial distance line, thanking me for everything I was going through as a front-line emergency doctor. They believed that the ER’s and hospitals were full of patients dying from covid, and that I must be exhausted and at risk of dying myself from exposure. I began contacting doctors and friends all over Canada and the US, and found the same pattern: empty hospitals, and propaganda saying that they were full of patients dying of covid.
Early Investigation
Early in my studies, I investigated zinc and hydroxychloroquine, which based on sound physiology, may genuinely help those rare persons who get very sick with this cold virus. I was surprised that this treatment was simply brushed aside and dismissed by most of the medical community.
Early Concerns
Researching the World Health Organization, of the UN, I learned that the Chinese dictatorship (PRC) had propped up communist and disreputable “Dr” Tedros, as the head of the WHO. I learned how the PRC had been involved in: the virus release; the cover up for weeks; the disappearing and suppression of honest Chinese doctors and scientist; the spreading of the virus to the world (sparing Beijing where the PRC elite live); and dramatic abuse of the Chinese people in their well-timed lockdown, which was filmed and transmitted to the world to create the panic that herded all of us into surrendering our economies and civil rights.
Foxes Guarding the Henhouse
I learned how Canada’s chief public health officer Dr Tam, is also on the oversight committee of the WHO with Dr Tedros making her, I think, a double agent. I have listened to her often-bizarre dissertations to Canadians regarding covid-19.
My Perception of the Situation
I perceive that at every level, hospital administration has had no apparent choice, other than to submit to the endless top-down roll out from governments, of questionable new rules, protocols, and procedures. My honest conversations with co-workers about my research and observations, became a problem. Caught in this quandary, an important administrator who I greatly respect, told me that “my thoughts made others uncomfortable, and made it difficult to keep everyone motivated and compliant” with all the new protocols and restrictions. Sympathetic to the sad situation, I maintained my clinical position by promising to “bite my tongue any time I thought I was going to speak about COVID-19” in the hospital. This was ultimately ethically impossible for me, and by mid-November I began winding down my ER work, and resigned from all my ER’s by mid-February, to avoid conflicts between my social, legal, and ethical responsibilities; and the hospitals which I am fond of.
Have I Ever Seen a Covid-19 Patient?
In my emergency department work, I have never seen a patient sick with COVID-19; I have seen some positive PCR tests in asymptomatic people, and watched people be imprisoned in their own homes and isolated from family and friends. My research into the PCR test has convinced me personally that it is misleading, manipulatable, and being used to drain endless taxpayer’s money and future debt, to dramatically enrich the very criminals running this scandal. My province alone has performed ~50,000 PCR tests daily. Meanwhile our federal government is bringing in hundreds of thousands of doses of potentially dangerous experimental injections of modified viral genetic material, calling them “vaccines”, and having the military manage them. Is this reasonable for a predominantly mild and non-fatal viral illness?
Information Suppression?
I have watched the suppression of doctors and scientists who performed serum antibody studies, whose findings showed that the virus was much more widespread, yet generally nonfatal, and asymptomatic or very mild in most cases; and that in many regions we had likely already achieved natural herd immunity by summer 2020.
Look at this study performed in Wuhan itself, which shows that the virus was done there by June 1, 2020 just two months after their brief lockdowns ended, and no one was spreading it, not even the very few people with a positive PCR “test” (and they were not sick):
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w
Gaat verder:
https://druthers.net/toronto-er-doctors-personal-testimony/
My name is Mark Trozzi. I am a medical doctor; I graduated in 1990 from The University of Western Ontario. I have been practicing Emergency Medicine for the past twenty-five years, and am a veteran critical resuscitation instructor. I was on call in multiple emergency units since the onset of the so-called “pandemic”, until February 2021, including one ER designated specifically for COVID-19.
What follows is my observations and opinions; I am bound by my personal and religious convictions to speak openly and honestly. I do not have authority to tell you “the truth”, but I will share my honest experiences, perceptions, and digests of hundreds of hours of research on the subject of covid-19.
At the onset of this “pandemic”, I was cautious, and hence meticulous, with N95 mask use, hand washing, social isolation and distancing etc. I studied coronavirus science and was deeply involved in many emergency department drills to modify our practice in profound ways to deal with the “killer virus” we were advertised. However, various things soon made me consider that we were being deceived and manipulated. Here are a few.
The First Wave
The “first wave” of the “pandemic” was absolutely the quietest time in my career. I have worked very hard and been very busy over the past twenty-five years in ER. However, both in my regular ER and my “COVID-19 designated” ER, there were almost no patients, and almost no work. I had multiple, long ER shifts without a single patient. Meanwhile, when I would go to the local grocery store, the propagandized public, God bless them, would usher me to the front of the antisocial distance line, thanking me for everything I was going through as a front-line emergency doctor. They believed that the ER’s and hospitals were full of patients dying from covid, and that I must be exhausted and at risk of dying myself from exposure. I began contacting doctors and friends all over Canada and the US, and found the same pattern: empty hospitals, and propaganda saying that they were full of patients dying of covid.
Early Investigation
Early in my studies, I investigated zinc and hydroxychloroquine, which based on sound physiology, may genuinely help those rare persons who get very sick with this cold virus. I was surprised that this treatment was simply brushed aside and dismissed by most of the medical community.
Early Concerns
Researching the World Health Organization, of the UN, I learned that the Chinese dictatorship (PRC) had propped up communist and disreputable “Dr” Tedros, as the head of the WHO. I learned how the PRC had been involved in: the virus release; the cover up for weeks; the disappearing and suppression of honest Chinese doctors and scientist; the spreading of the virus to the world (sparing Beijing where the PRC elite live); and dramatic abuse of the Chinese people in their well-timed lockdown, which was filmed and transmitted to the world to create the panic that herded all of us into surrendering our economies and civil rights.
Foxes Guarding the Henhouse
I learned how Canada’s chief public health officer Dr Tam, is also on the oversight committee of the WHO with Dr Tedros making her, I think, a double agent. I have listened to her often-bizarre dissertations to Canadians regarding covid-19.
My Perception of the Situation
I perceive that at every level, hospital administration has had no apparent choice, other than to submit to the endless top-down roll out from governments, of questionable new rules, protocols, and procedures. My honest conversations with co-workers about my research and observations, became a problem. Caught in this quandary, an important administrator who I greatly respect, told me that “my thoughts made others uncomfortable, and made it difficult to keep everyone motivated and compliant” with all the new protocols and restrictions. Sympathetic to the sad situation, I maintained my clinical position by promising to “bite my tongue any time I thought I was going to speak about COVID-19” in the hospital. This was ultimately ethically impossible for me, and by mid-November I began winding down my ER work, and resigned from all my ER’s by mid-February, to avoid conflicts between my social, legal, and ethical responsibilities; and the hospitals which I am fond of.
Have I Ever Seen a Covid-19 Patient?
In my emergency department work, I have never seen a patient sick with COVID-19; I have seen some positive PCR tests in asymptomatic people, and watched people be imprisoned in their own homes and isolated from family and friends. My research into the PCR test has convinced me personally that it is misleading, manipulatable, and being used to drain endless taxpayer’s money and future debt, to dramatically enrich the very criminals running this scandal. My province alone has performed ~50,000 PCR tests daily. Meanwhile our federal government is bringing in hundreds of thousands of doses of potentially dangerous experimental injections of modified viral genetic material, calling them “vaccines”, and having the military manage them. Is this reasonable for a predominantly mild and non-fatal viral illness?
Information Suppression?
I have watched the suppression of doctors and scientists who performed serum antibody studies, whose findings showed that the virus was much more widespread, yet generally nonfatal, and asymptomatic or very mild in most cases; and that in many regions we had likely already achieved natural herd immunity by summer 2020.
Look at this study performed in Wuhan itself, which shows that the virus was done there by June 1, 2020 just two months after their brief lockdowns ended, and no one was spreading it, not even the very few people with a positive PCR “test” (and they were not sick):
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w
Gaat verder:
https://druthers.net/toronto-er-doctors-personal-testimony/
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
Stanford Epidemiologist Studies COVID, Finds It’s Highly Treatable and RARELY a Deadly Disease
Early last year, Stanford professor John Ioannidis stated that if we didn’t know a new virus called COVID existed, we might just “have casually noted that flu this season seems to be a bit worse than average.” Now Ioannidis has done research that perhaps vindicates that statement, finding that the coronavirus’ infection fatality rate (IFR) in most of the world is less than 0.20 percent — much like that of the flu.
What’s more, the professor concludes that protecting the vulnerable and early treatment could likely reduce that IFR further.
Dr. John Ioannidis has some sterling credentials. After his name at Stanford’s University’s website it states, “Professor of Medicine (Stanford Prevention Research), of Epidemiology and Population Health and by courtesy, of Statistics and of Biomedical Data Science.”
“To boil it down,” explains PJ Media, “he is a medical doctor trained in internal medicine and infectious diseases, specializing in epidemiology, and evaluating medical data to inform decisions.” And what he’s learned about COVID-19 IFRs “should end Covidstan Forever,” the site optimistically states.
Curious about actual China virus IFRs and extrapolating “from confirmed cases, he concluded that, around the world, more than half a billion people have probably been infected with COVID,” writes commentator Andrea Widburg.
“Using that metric, Dr. Ioannidis concluded that most locations around the world have an IFR that’s less than 0.20%,” she continued.
“However, as we’ve also learned, COVID does not attack all people equally,” Widburg further writes. “When Democrat governors, beginning with Cuomo, decimated their elderly by warehousing COVID-infected people in old-age homes, we saw that the elderly are the single largest vulnerable population. Dr. Ioannidis, therefore, decided to look at age-related survival rates, and he came up with survival numbers that, if more widely known, would bring this mad panic to an end.”
Widburg then presents the following survivability numbers, courtesy of PJ Media.
None of this is surprising or revelatory. Note that the 0-19 survivability number above is almost precisely what the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) said it was last October: 99.997 percent. The other figures also more or less align with CDC 2020 findings.
Most Americans, however, would assume that the numbers are far higher, partially because of media and health-establishment misrepresentation. For example, the NIAID’s Dr. Anthony Fauci has said in the past that SARS-CoV-2 has a “mortality rate” of one percent, which itself had fallen from two or three percent.
But “mortality rate” is the wrong term. In fact, what Fauci was referencing wasn’t even the aforementioned infection fatality rate (IFR) — rather, it was the case fatality rate (CFR). This “is the total number of deaths divided by the total number of people that have the disease’s symptoms,” wrote Medium.com last year, explaining the difference. “In contrast, the IFR is the total number of deaths divided by the total number of people that carry the infection.” (And the “mortality rate” is the total number of deaths divided by the total number of people in the population.)
Fauci’s statement leads people to believe that if they contract the virus, they have a one in 100 chance of dying. This is untrue. In reality, most people’s chances vary between approximately one in 500 to one in 1,000,000. If you’re healthy and not elderly, the probability COVID will claim you is extremely low — your odds of dying in a car crash are far greater (one in 8,393 over just one year).
This gets at Ioannidis’s point, which is that many if not most people who contract the China virus won’t even know it. Moreover, even the CFR would be far lower if the health authorities hadn’t stigmatized early intervention, largely motivated by a one-dimensional, all-consuming, blind desire to push vaccines as the only disease-mitigation option. In fact, as I often mention, renowned COVID doctor Peter McCullough has said that a proper and official treatment protocol established early on could have saved 85 percent of the lives lost to the China virus.
Instead, however, the standard procedure has been to tell COVID patients with mild symptoms to go home and return only when symptoms worsen. Yet at this point it’s often too late for mitigation efforts to be effective — and death may result.
Despite this, the demonization of early treatment medications such as ivermectin continues. For example, when “word got out that Joe Rogan treated his COVID with ivermectin (as well as hydroxychloroquine), the condescending sneering began,” writes Widburg, before citing the following tweets. (New American readers will love this: The first is from a Council on Foreign Relations member.)
Gaat verder:
Link
Early last year, Stanford professor John Ioannidis stated that if we didn’t know a new virus called COVID existed, we might just “have casually noted that flu this season seems to be a bit worse than average.” Now Ioannidis has done research that perhaps vindicates that statement, finding that the coronavirus’ infection fatality rate (IFR) in most of the world is less than 0.20 percent — much like that of the flu.
What’s more, the professor concludes that protecting the vulnerable and early treatment could likely reduce that IFR further.
Dr. John Ioannidis has some sterling credentials. After his name at Stanford’s University’s website it states, “Professor of Medicine (Stanford Prevention Research), of Epidemiology and Population Health and by courtesy, of Statistics and of Biomedical Data Science.”
“To boil it down,” explains PJ Media, “he is a medical doctor trained in internal medicine and infectious diseases, specializing in epidemiology, and evaluating medical data to inform decisions.” And what he’s learned about COVID-19 IFRs “should end Covidstan Forever,” the site optimistically states.
Curious about actual China virus IFRs and extrapolating “from confirmed cases, he concluded that, around the world, more than half a billion people have probably been infected with COVID,” writes commentator Andrea Widburg.
“Using that metric, Dr. Ioannidis concluded that most locations around the world have an IFR that’s less than 0.20%,” she continued.
“However, as we’ve also learned, COVID does not attack all people equally,” Widburg further writes. “When Democrat governors, beginning with Cuomo, decimated their elderly by warehousing COVID-infected people in old-age homes, we saw that the elderly are the single largest vulnerable population. Dr. Ioannidis, therefore, decided to look at age-related survival rates, and he came up with survival numbers that, if more widely known, would bring this mad panic to an end.”
Widburg then presents the following survivability numbers, courtesy of PJ Media.
None of this is surprising or revelatory. Note that the 0-19 survivability number above is almost precisely what the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) said it was last October: 99.997 percent. The other figures also more or less align with CDC 2020 findings.
Most Americans, however, would assume that the numbers are far higher, partially because of media and health-establishment misrepresentation. For example, the NIAID’s Dr. Anthony Fauci has said in the past that SARS-CoV-2 has a “mortality rate” of one percent, which itself had fallen from two or three percent.
But “mortality rate” is the wrong term. In fact, what Fauci was referencing wasn’t even the aforementioned infection fatality rate (IFR) — rather, it was the case fatality rate (CFR). This “is the total number of deaths divided by the total number of people that have the disease’s symptoms,” wrote Medium.com last year, explaining the difference. “In contrast, the IFR is the total number of deaths divided by the total number of people that carry the infection.” (And the “mortality rate” is the total number of deaths divided by the total number of people in the population.)
Fauci’s statement leads people to believe that if they contract the virus, they have a one in 100 chance of dying. This is untrue. In reality, most people’s chances vary between approximately one in 500 to one in 1,000,000. If you’re healthy and not elderly, the probability COVID will claim you is extremely low — your odds of dying in a car crash are far greater (one in 8,393 over just one year).
This gets at Ioannidis’s point, which is that many if not most people who contract the China virus won’t even know it. Moreover, even the CFR would be far lower if the health authorities hadn’t stigmatized early intervention, largely motivated by a one-dimensional, all-consuming, blind desire to push vaccines as the only disease-mitigation option. In fact, as I often mention, renowned COVID doctor Peter McCullough has said that a proper and official treatment protocol established early on could have saved 85 percent of the lives lost to the China virus.
Instead, however, the standard procedure has been to tell COVID patients with mild symptoms to go home and return only when symptoms worsen. Yet at this point it’s often too late for mitigation efforts to be effective — and death may result.
Despite this, the demonization of early treatment medications such as ivermectin continues. For example, when “word got out that Joe Rogan treated his COVID with ivermectin (as well as hydroxychloroquine), the condescending sneering began,” writes Widburg, before citing the following tweets. (New American readers will love this: The first is from a Council on Foreign Relations member.)
Gaat verder:
Link
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
"MIJN MENING KOSTTE ME MIJN BAAN", VERTELT GEZONDHEIDSWETENSCHAPPER DRS. SAM BROKKEN...
“Ik heb me het afgelopen jaar vaak een lone wolf gevoeld”, vertelt gezondheidswetenschapper Drs. Sam Brokken…
"Op basis van negen maanden wetenschappelijke data blijkt meer en meer dat de huidige maatregelen disproportioneel zijn", schrijft Drs. Sam Brokken, lector Gezondheidswetenschappen en onderzoeker, in een open brief aan de Belgische regering en expertgroepen. Zijn brief werd ondertekend door meer dan 1.400 professionals uit de medische sector. Het kwam hem duur te staan want na een tv optreden in België waarin hij zijn opvattingen rondom vaccinatie nader toelichtte volgde zijn ontslag.
Deel 1 van de “Tegenwind” docu reeks staat in het licht van Sam Brokken die zijn verhaal in de prachtige Spaanse setting weet te vertellen aan documentairemaker Jakobien Huisman. De Delftse met Belgische tongval haalde 6 gerenommeerde wetenschappers naar Andalucië om met hen over de corona crisis en het impact op hun leven te praten. Brokken werd hard geraakt en verloor dus zijn baan.
Video
“Ik heb me het afgelopen jaar vaak een lone wolf gevoeld”, vertelt gezondheidswetenschapper Drs. Sam Brokken…
"Op basis van negen maanden wetenschappelijke data blijkt meer en meer dat de huidige maatregelen disproportioneel zijn", schrijft Drs. Sam Brokken, lector Gezondheidswetenschappen en onderzoeker, in een open brief aan de Belgische regering en expertgroepen. Zijn brief werd ondertekend door meer dan 1.400 professionals uit de medische sector. Het kwam hem duur te staan want na een tv optreden in België waarin hij zijn opvattingen rondom vaccinatie nader toelichtte volgde zijn ontslag.
Deel 1 van de “Tegenwind” docu reeks staat in het licht van Sam Brokken die zijn verhaal in de prachtige Spaanse setting weet te vertellen aan documentairemaker Jakobien Huisman. De Delftse met Belgische tongval haalde 6 gerenommeerde wetenschappers naar Andalucië om met hen over de corona crisis en het impact op hun leven te praten. Brokken werd hard geraakt en verloor dus zijn baan.
Video
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
Computer says pandemic!
The numbers of the pandemic in one day, active cases of coronavirus in Argentina fell from 189,980 to 43,779 due to an algorithm change
It was reported by the Ministry of Health. The modification was attributed to the difficulties that the burden of registration generates for the provinces.
The health part of this Thursday included a surprising figure: there are 43,779 active cases of coronavirus in Argentina . This figure marked a priori a "boom in recoveries" in just 24 hours: on Wednesday there were 189,980 infected . The quadruple. However, it has a technical explanation: an algorithm change .
The item "active cases" of covid-19 is the photo of how many patients with a confirmed diagnosis are suffering from the disease. People who went, swabbed and tested positive. In this group are those who do home isolation (the vast majority), those hospitalized and those interned in intensive care.
The problem in this registry, according to health sources consulted by Clarín , is that many cases were left open due to the overload that it implies for health teams in the provinces to load registrations in the National Health Surveillance System (SNVS).
In other words, the system continued to show people who contracted the virus and recovered as infected, but they continued to wear the "active case" corset because the province that uploaded the positive test never notified the discharge.
To fix this, the algorithm was modified. The Ministry of Health of the Nation reported this afternoon that the decision was made "at the request of the 24 jurisdictions" and attributed it to the fact that "the manual loading of the information on the discharges of COVID patients generates an overload in the epidemiological surveillance teams ".
What is the change? From now on, those cases uploaded to the system that have no notification of death or discharge after 90 days will be considered recovered .
"A change was applied in the algorithm for classifying active / non-active cases in the SNVS, so that those cases that are not classified as deceased and in which more than 90 days have elapsed from the date of notification are classified as not active ", was the official explanation of the ministry.
By applying this criterion, the system "cleaned" this Thursday more than 146,000 cases that had been uploaded to the national system by the provinces and were not updated later.
The second peculiarity was that, due to a system error, it had been initially reported that there were 1,400,000 tests that finally could not be solved, so the figures of the day's test were not reported.
"Today there was a system error between the SNVS database and the impact on the dashboard that does not allow the day's tests to be viewed. The IT teams are working to solve the situation as soon as possible," they reported. from the health portfolio.
Now the official count, according to the report released this afternoon, shows that 5,218,993 cases of covid-19 have been detected since March last year, of the 43,779 are still active and 5,062,115 recovered . There were 113,099 deaths .
In the last 24 hours, 3,661 new infections were confirmed and 138 deaths were reported.
Link
The numbers of the pandemic in one day, active cases of coronavirus in Argentina fell from 189,980 to 43,779 due to an algorithm change
It was reported by the Ministry of Health. The modification was attributed to the difficulties that the burden of registration generates for the provinces.
The health part of this Thursday included a surprising figure: there are 43,779 active cases of coronavirus in Argentina . This figure marked a priori a "boom in recoveries" in just 24 hours: on Wednesday there were 189,980 infected . The quadruple. However, it has a technical explanation: an algorithm change .
The item "active cases" of covid-19 is the photo of how many patients with a confirmed diagnosis are suffering from the disease. People who went, swabbed and tested positive. In this group are those who do home isolation (the vast majority), those hospitalized and those interned in intensive care.
The problem in this registry, according to health sources consulted by Clarín , is that many cases were left open due to the overload that it implies for health teams in the provinces to load registrations in the National Health Surveillance System (SNVS).
In other words, the system continued to show people who contracted the virus and recovered as infected, but they continued to wear the "active case" corset because the province that uploaded the positive test never notified the discharge.
To fix this, the algorithm was modified. The Ministry of Health of the Nation reported this afternoon that the decision was made "at the request of the 24 jurisdictions" and attributed it to the fact that "the manual loading of the information on the discharges of COVID patients generates an overload in the epidemiological surveillance teams ".
What is the change? From now on, those cases uploaded to the system that have no notification of death or discharge after 90 days will be considered recovered .
"A change was applied in the algorithm for classifying active / non-active cases in the SNVS, so that those cases that are not classified as deceased and in which more than 90 days have elapsed from the date of notification are classified as not active ", was the official explanation of the ministry.
By applying this criterion, the system "cleaned" this Thursday more than 146,000 cases that had been uploaded to the national system by the provinces and were not updated later.
The second peculiarity was that, due to a system error, it had been initially reported that there were 1,400,000 tests that finally could not be solved, so the figures of the day's test were not reported.
"Today there was a system error between the SNVS database and the impact on the dashboard that does not allow the day's tests to be viewed. The IT teams are working to solve the situation as soon as possible," they reported. from the health portfolio.
Now the official count, according to the report released this afternoon, shows that 5,218,993 cases of covid-19 have been detected since March last year, of the 43,779 are still active and 5,062,115 recovered . There were 113,099 deaths .
In the last 24 hours, 3,661 new infections were confirmed and 138 deaths were reported.
Link
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
Canadian Doctor: 62% of His Patients Vaccinated for COVID Have Permanent Heart Damage. “Microscopic Blood Clots”
We have previously covered the story of Dr. Charles Hoffe, the brave doctor who has been practicing medicine for 28 years in the small, rural town of Lytton in British Columbia, Canada.
After he had administered about 900 doses of the Moderna experimental mRNA COVID-19 injections, he sounded the alarm over the severe reactions he was observing in his patients who chose to get the shot (he chose NOT to get it himself), which included death.
The result of him sounding the alarm was a gag order issued against him by the medical authorities in his community. He defied this gag order and was interviewed by Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson on her show where he sounded the alarm. See: Canadian Doctor Defies Gag Order and Tells the Public How the Moderna COVID Injections Killed and Permanently Disabled Indigenous People in His Community
His punishment for going public to warn others on the dangers of these experimental shots was that he was relieved from hospital duty and lost half of his income: Canadian Doctor Removed from Hospital Duty after Speaking out about COVID “Vaccine” Side Effects
Last week, Dr. Hoffe was interviewed again by Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson, and he continues to share his findings with the public regarding the experimental COVID-19 shots.
Dr. Hoffe is truly a hero today, risking not only his reputation, but probably his very life to bring important information regarding the COVID-19 shots that the Globalists who control the corporate media and social media are trying very hard to censor.
In this latest interview, Dr. Hoffe states that the blood clots that are being reported in the corporate media as being “rare” are anything but rare, based on his own testing of his own patients who had recently received one of the shots.
The blood clots we hear about which the media claim are very rare are the big blood clots which are the ones that cause strokes and show up on CT scans, MRI, etc. The clots I’m talking about are microscopic and too small to find on any scan. They can thus only be detected using the D-dimer test.
Using this test with his own patients, Dr. Hoffe claims that he has found evidence of small blood clots in 62% of his patients who have been injected with an mRNA shot.
He states that these people are now permanently disabled, and they will no longer “be able to do what they used to do.”
These people have no idea they are even having these microscopic blood clots. The most alarming part of this is that there are some parts of the body like the brain, spinal cord, heart and lungs which cannot re-generate. When those tissues are damaged by blood clots they are permanently damaged.
His warning is very dire: “These shots are causing huge damage and the worst is yet to come.”
This is an 8 minute clip from the original interview, and we have posted it on our Bitchute channel and Rumble channel.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/YnLXgXob37T6/
Gaat verder:
https://www.globalresearc(...)heart-damage/5750198
We have previously covered the story of Dr. Charles Hoffe, the brave doctor who has been practicing medicine for 28 years in the small, rural town of Lytton in British Columbia, Canada.
After he had administered about 900 doses of the Moderna experimental mRNA COVID-19 injections, he sounded the alarm over the severe reactions he was observing in his patients who chose to get the shot (he chose NOT to get it himself), which included death.
The result of him sounding the alarm was a gag order issued against him by the medical authorities in his community. He defied this gag order and was interviewed by Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson on her show where he sounded the alarm. See: Canadian Doctor Defies Gag Order and Tells the Public How the Moderna COVID Injections Killed and Permanently Disabled Indigenous People in His Community
His punishment for going public to warn others on the dangers of these experimental shots was that he was relieved from hospital duty and lost half of his income: Canadian Doctor Removed from Hospital Duty after Speaking out about COVID “Vaccine” Side Effects
Last week, Dr. Hoffe was interviewed again by Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson, and he continues to share his findings with the public regarding the experimental COVID-19 shots.
Dr. Hoffe is truly a hero today, risking not only his reputation, but probably his very life to bring important information regarding the COVID-19 shots that the Globalists who control the corporate media and social media are trying very hard to censor.
In this latest interview, Dr. Hoffe states that the blood clots that are being reported in the corporate media as being “rare” are anything but rare, based on his own testing of his own patients who had recently received one of the shots.
The blood clots we hear about which the media claim are very rare are the big blood clots which are the ones that cause strokes and show up on CT scans, MRI, etc. The clots I’m talking about are microscopic and too small to find on any scan. They can thus only be detected using the D-dimer test.
Using this test with his own patients, Dr. Hoffe claims that he has found evidence of small blood clots in 62% of his patients who have been injected with an mRNA shot.
He states that these people are now permanently disabled, and they will no longer “be able to do what they used to do.”
These people have no idea they are even having these microscopic blood clots. The most alarming part of this is that there are some parts of the body like the brain, spinal cord, heart and lungs which cannot re-generate. When those tissues are damaged by blood clots they are permanently damaged.
His warning is very dire: “These shots are causing huge damage and the worst is yet to come.”
This is an 8 minute clip from the original interview, and we have posted it on our Bitchute channel and Rumble channel.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/YnLXgXob37T6/
Gaat verder:
https://www.globalresearc(...)heart-damage/5750198
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
Dr hoffe die niet snapt hoe een D-dimer testuitslag geïnterpreteerd moet wordenquote:
Canadian Doctor: 62% of His Patients Vaccinated for COVID Have Permanent Heart Damage. “Microscopic Blood Clots”
We have previously covered the story of Dr. Charles Hoffe, the brave doctor who has been practicing medicine for 28 years in the small, rural town of Lytton in British Columbia, Canada.
After he had administered about 900 doses of the Moderna experimental mRNA COVID-19 injections, he sounded the alarm over the severe reactions he was observing in his patients who chose to get the shot (he chose NOT to get it himself), which included death.
The result of him sounding the alarm was a gag order issued against him by the medical authorities in his community. He defied this gag order and was interviewed by Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson on her show where he sounded the alarm. See: Canadian Doctor Defies Gag Order and Tells the Public How the Moderna COVID Injections Killed and Permanently Disabled Indigenous People in His Community
His punishment for going public to warn others on the dangers of these experimental shots was that he was relieved from hospital duty and lost half of his income: Canadian Doctor Removed from Hospital Duty after Speaking out about COVID “Vaccine” Side Effects
Last week, Dr. Hoffe was interviewed again by Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson, and he continues to share his findings with the public regarding the experimental COVID-19 shots.
Dr. Hoffe is truly a hero today, risking not only his reputation, but probably his very life to bring important information regarding the COVID-19 shots that the Globalists who control the corporate media and social media are trying very hard to censor.
In this latest interview, Dr. Hoffe states that the blood clots that are being reported in the corporate media as being “rare” are anything but rare, based on his own testing of his own patients who had recently received one of the shots.
The blood clots we hear about which the media claim are very rare are the big blood clots which are the ones that cause strokes and show up on CT scans, MRI, etc. The clots I’m talking about are microscopic and too small to find on any scan. They can thus only be detected using the D-dimer test.
Using this test with his own patients, Dr. Hoffe claims that he has found evidence of small blood clots in 62% of his patients who have been injected with an mRNA shot.
He states that these people are now permanently disabled, and they will no longer “be able to do what they used to do.”
These people have no idea they are even having these microscopic blood clots. The most alarming part of this is that there are some parts of the body like the brain, spinal cord, heart and lungs which cannot re-generate. When those tissues are damaged by blood clots they are permanently damaged.
His warning is very dire: “These shots are causing huge damage and the worst is yet to come.”
This is an 8 minute clip from the original interview, and we have posted it on our Bitchute channel and Rumble channel.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/YnLXgXob37T6/
Gaat verder:
https://www.globalresearc(...)heart-damage/5750198
Do not go gentle into that good night
Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
Study Shows Vaccine Will ENHANCE Delta Infectivity
-A group of Japanese researchers released research showing that the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant “is poised to acquire complete resistance” to existing COVID-19 jabs
-When four common mutations were introduced to the Delta variant, Pfizer’s mRNA injection enhanced its infectivity, causing it to become resistant
-A Delta variant with three mutations has already emerged, which suggests it’s only a matter of time before a fourth mutation develops, at which point complete resistance to Pfizer’s jab may be imminent
-A number of experts have raised concerns that COVID-19 jabs and the mass vaccination program could worsen the pandemic by triggering the development of new variants, via a concept known as antigenic, or immune, escape
-Another study found that a worst-case scenario can develop when a large percentage of a population is vaccinated but viral transmission remains high, driving the development of resistant strains
COVID-19 jabs continue to be pushed as the only solution to the pandemic, even as “breakthrough” infections increasingly occur. A group of Japanese researchers has also released research showing that the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant “is poised to acquire complete resistance” to existing COVID-19 jabs like Pfizer and BioNTech’s BNT162b2,1 now being sold as Comirnaty.
What’s more, when four common mutations were introduced to the Delta variant, Pfizer’s mRNA injection enhanced its infectivity, causing it to become resistant. A Delta variant with three mutations has already emerged,2 which suggests it’s only a matter of time before a fourth mutation develops, at which point complete resistance to Pfizer’s jab may be imminent.
mRNA COVID-19 Injection Made Delta Variant More Infectious
The spike protein used in mRNA COVID-19 vaccines consists of the original SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, without mutations. Multiple variants of concern (VOC) have emerged, however, which have numerous mutations and are highly infectious. As mutations increase, so do concerns over vaccine resistance and enhanced infectivity. As the researchers explained in bioRxiv, the preprint server for biology:3
“The receptor binding domain (RBD) of the spike protein binds to the host cell receptor ACE2, and the interaction mediates membrane fusion during SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 are mainly directed to the RBD and block the interaction between the RBD and ACE2. Most SARS-CoV-2 variants have acquired mutations in the neutralizing antibody epitopes of the RBD, resulting in escape from neutralizing antibodies.”
When a single mutation was added to the Delta spike, most of the anti-RBD antibodies still recognized it. This wasn’t the case with four mutations, however, which the researchers called Delta 4+. Not only was Delta 4+ not recognized, but infectivity was enhanced:4
“… we analyzed the Delta 4+ pseudovirus with four additional RBD mutations. Surprisingly, most BNT162b2-immune sera enhanced infectivity of the Delta 4+ pseudovirus in a dose-dependent manner at relatively low concentrations of BNT162b2-immune sera, but showed weak neutralization only at the highest concentration of the sera.
Especially, PFZ7 greatly enhanced the infectivity at relatively low serum concentration. Some sera, such as PFZ13 and PFZ14, did not show neutralizing activity even at the highest concentration of the sera.”
Gaat verder:
https://archive.is/9CxBs#selection-645.0-709.207
-A group of Japanese researchers released research showing that the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant “is poised to acquire complete resistance” to existing COVID-19 jabs
-When four common mutations were introduced to the Delta variant, Pfizer’s mRNA injection enhanced its infectivity, causing it to become resistant
-A Delta variant with three mutations has already emerged, which suggests it’s only a matter of time before a fourth mutation develops, at which point complete resistance to Pfizer’s jab may be imminent
-A number of experts have raised concerns that COVID-19 jabs and the mass vaccination program could worsen the pandemic by triggering the development of new variants, via a concept known as antigenic, or immune, escape
-Another study found that a worst-case scenario can develop when a large percentage of a population is vaccinated but viral transmission remains high, driving the development of resistant strains
COVID-19 jabs continue to be pushed as the only solution to the pandemic, even as “breakthrough” infections increasingly occur. A group of Japanese researchers has also released research showing that the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant “is poised to acquire complete resistance” to existing COVID-19 jabs like Pfizer and BioNTech’s BNT162b2,1 now being sold as Comirnaty.
What’s more, when four common mutations were introduced to the Delta variant, Pfizer’s mRNA injection enhanced its infectivity, causing it to become resistant. A Delta variant with three mutations has already emerged,2 which suggests it’s only a matter of time before a fourth mutation develops, at which point complete resistance to Pfizer’s jab may be imminent.
mRNA COVID-19 Injection Made Delta Variant More Infectious
The spike protein used in mRNA COVID-19 vaccines consists of the original SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, without mutations. Multiple variants of concern (VOC) have emerged, however, which have numerous mutations and are highly infectious. As mutations increase, so do concerns over vaccine resistance and enhanced infectivity. As the researchers explained in bioRxiv, the preprint server for biology:3
“The receptor binding domain (RBD) of the spike protein binds to the host cell receptor ACE2, and the interaction mediates membrane fusion during SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 are mainly directed to the RBD and block the interaction between the RBD and ACE2. Most SARS-CoV-2 variants have acquired mutations in the neutralizing antibody epitopes of the RBD, resulting in escape from neutralizing antibodies.”
When a single mutation was added to the Delta spike, most of the anti-RBD antibodies still recognized it. This wasn’t the case with four mutations, however, which the researchers called Delta 4+. Not only was Delta 4+ not recognized, but infectivity was enhanced:4
“… we analyzed the Delta 4+ pseudovirus with four additional RBD mutations. Surprisingly, most BNT162b2-immune sera enhanced infectivity of the Delta 4+ pseudovirus in a dose-dependent manner at relatively low concentrations of BNT162b2-immune sera, but showed weak neutralization only at the highest concentration of the sera.
Especially, PFZ7 greatly enhanced the infectivity at relatively low serum concentration. Some sera, such as PFZ13 and PFZ14, did not show neutralizing activity even at the highest concentration of the sera.”
Gaat verder:
https://archive.is/9CxBs#selection-645.0-709.207
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
Niet dat ik de benaming zo belangrijk vind, maar sommige mensen beginnen te steigeren als je zegt dat de mRNA-behandelmethode, gentherapie is:
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
New Missouri COVID Whistleblower: HOSPITALS are LYING to the public about COVID… and I CAN PROVE IT
Another COVID whistleblower has come forward as exclusively reported by Gateway Pundit to allege that the statistics about ICU’s being overrun are wildly inflated, over-reported, and in many cases an outright LIE by political officials.
Josh Snider worked in facilities management at Missouri Baptist Medical Center or “MBMC”, “I watched our hospital administrators say in the media that our intensive care units were overflowing with COVID patients, at 98% capacity, knowing that it was a complete and utter lie.”
THIS MISSOURI HOSPITAL NEVER HAD 98% ICU OCCUPANCY, ADMINISTRATORS LIED TO UNCRITICAL MEDIA
Snider relates that the MBMC hospital, part of a larger $5.5 billion annual network within the Barnes Jewish hospital system in St. Louis, Missouri, actually shut down three out of four floors of intensive care during COVID because they were UNUSED.
HOSPITAL SHUT DOWN ICU FLOORS, DRAMATICALLY REDUCING CAPACITY
“And even after shutting down three-fourths of our ICU capacity, they were still never more than 50% full with that drastically reduced overall capacity. These medical systems that are saying they are overrun with COVID patients are likely LYING TO THE PUBLIC,” Snider said.
Gaat verder:
https://www.thegatewaypun(...)lic-covid-can-prove/
Another COVID whistleblower has come forward as exclusively reported by Gateway Pundit to allege that the statistics about ICU’s being overrun are wildly inflated, over-reported, and in many cases an outright LIE by political officials.
Josh Snider worked in facilities management at Missouri Baptist Medical Center or “MBMC”, “I watched our hospital administrators say in the media that our intensive care units were overflowing with COVID patients, at 98% capacity, knowing that it was a complete and utter lie.”
THIS MISSOURI HOSPITAL NEVER HAD 98% ICU OCCUPANCY, ADMINISTRATORS LIED TO UNCRITICAL MEDIA
Snider relates that the MBMC hospital, part of a larger $5.5 billion annual network within the Barnes Jewish hospital system in St. Louis, Missouri, actually shut down three out of four floors of intensive care during COVID because they were UNUSED.
HOSPITAL SHUT DOWN ICU FLOORS, DRAMATICALLY REDUCING CAPACITY
“And even after shutting down three-fourths of our ICU capacity, they were still never more than 50% full with that drastically reduced overall capacity. These medical systems that are saying they are overrun with COVID patients are likely LYING TO THE PUBLIC,” Snider said.
Gaat verder:
https://www.thegatewaypun(...)lic-covid-can-prove/
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
Do not go gentle into that good night
Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
BREAKING – 30,305 people died within 21 days of having a Covid-19 Vaccine in England during the first 6 months of 2021 according to ONS data
Official Office for National Statistics data has inadvertently revealed that 30,305 people have died within twenty-one days of having a Covid-19 vaccine in England during the first 6 months of 2021.
Dozens of freedom of information requests have been made to Public Health England (PHE) over the past few months requesting to know how many people have died within 28 days of having a Covid-19 vaccine, but each and every time PHE have claimed they do “not hold the information requested”.
It is extremely strange to find that PHE do not hold the information considering their counterpart in Scotland has been able to publish the data on deaths within 28 days of a Covid-19 vaccination.
Public Health Scotland last published the figures on the 23rd June 2021 in their ‘Covid-19 Statistical Report’ in which they revealed 5,522 people had died within 28 days of having a Covid-19 vaccine between December 8th 2020 and June 11th 2021 in Scotland.
PHS were also able to reveal the numbers by brand of vaccine and date of occurrence in a published spreadsheet found here. The spreadsheet shows that 1,877 people died with 28 days of having the Pfizer mRNA jab, 3,643 people died within 28 days of having the AstraZeneca viral vector jab, and 2 people died within 28 days of having the Moderna mRNA jab.
The reason people have been requesting to know the number of people to have died within 28 days of having a Covid-19 vaccine is because these are the exact same parameters that have been used to count alleged Covid-19 deaths for the majority of the alleged pandemic.
Gaat verder:
https://theexpose.uk/2021(...)-vaccine-in-england/
Official Office for National Statistics data has inadvertently revealed that 30,305 people have died within twenty-one days of having a Covid-19 vaccine in England during the first 6 months of 2021.
Dozens of freedom of information requests have been made to Public Health England (PHE) over the past few months requesting to know how many people have died within 28 days of having a Covid-19 vaccine, but each and every time PHE have claimed they do “not hold the information requested”.
It is extremely strange to find that PHE do not hold the information considering their counterpart in Scotland has been able to publish the data on deaths within 28 days of a Covid-19 vaccination.
Public Health Scotland last published the figures on the 23rd June 2021 in their ‘Covid-19 Statistical Report’ in which they revealed 5,522 people had died within 28 days of having a Covid-19 vaccine between December 8th 2020 and June 11th 2021 in Scotland.
PHS were also able to reveal the numbers by brand of vaccine and date of occurrence in a published spreadsheet found here. The spreadsheet shows that 1,877 people died with 28 days of having the Pfizer mRNA jab, 3,643 people died within 28 days of having the AstraZeneca viral vector jab, and 2 people died within 28 days of having the Moderna mRNA jab.
The reason people have been requesting to know the number of people to have died within 28 days of having a Covid-19 vaccine is because these are the exact same parameters that have been used to count alleged Covid-19 deaths for the majority of the alleged pandemic.
Gaat verder:
https://theexpose.uk/2021(...)-vaccine-in-england/
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
German Chief Pathologist Sounds Alarm on Fatal Covid Vaccine Injuries: “Jab is Cause of Death in 30-40% of Autopsies of Recently Vaccinated”
The director of the Pathological Institute of the University of Heidelberg, Peter Schirmacher, has carried out over forty autopsies on people who died within two weeks of receiving a Covid-19 vaccine and has expressed alarm over his findings.
Schirmacher stated that 30 to 40 per cent of people he examined died from the vaccine and that in his opinion, the frequency of fatal consequences of vaccinations is “underestimated.”
Following his findings, Schirmacher has called for more autopsies of vaccinated people to further determine whether the vaccines are linked to deaths. He has warned that the high number of unreported cases of vaccination deaths is partially due to the fact that “pathologists do not notice anything about most of the patients who die after and possible from a vaccination.”
Despite raising the alarm surrounding the vaccines, many have criticised Schirmacher’s conclusions, with the Paul Ehrlich Institute calling the director’s statements “incomprehensible.” The Chancellor’s lackey, senior German immunologist Thomas Mertens dismissed the findings right away: “I don’t know of any data that would allow a justifiable statement to be made here and I am not assuming an unreported number.”
The immunologist Christian Bogdan from the Erlangen University Hospital, a member of the Standing Vaccination Commission (STIKO), also contradicted Schirmacher’s assumption of a “high number of unreported vaccination complications or even deaths.”
Despite the criticism, Schirmacher did receive support from his own ranks, and the Federal Association of German Pathologists stated that more autopsies of vaccinated people who died within a certain time frame after vaccination should be performed.
The head of the “Autopsy Working Group” in this association wanted to make general practitioners and health authorities aware of this. Basically, doctors of the patients who die within a few days or weeks post-vaccination should apply for an autopsy in case of doubt or the health authorities should take action,
The Federal Association of Pathologists already requested this in March in a letter to Health Minister Jens Spahn (CDU), but it went unanswered.
Of course, it’s worth noting that Schirmacher’s warning could cause various pharmaceutical companies to lose billion dollars worth of long-term business, which explains why his findings have been scrutinised and tarnished by the pro-vaccine agenda.
However, the reputation and seriousness of Schirmacher cannot be ignored.
Schirmacher himself is already leading an autopsy project on people who have died from Covid-19, which is subsidised by the state. He himself then expanded the focus and began performing autopsies on more than 40 deceased vaccinated people. Whilst his results only represent a small sample size, it is a worrying representation of a bigger picture: 30 to 40 per cent died from vaccination itself. The pathologist cited “rare, severe side effects of the vaccination – such as cerebral vein thrombosis or autoimmune diseases.”
In response to critics, Schirmacher denied a lack of competence, stating: “The colleagues are definitely wrong because they cannot assess this specific question competently.” Additionally, the director said that he is not trying to fearmonger and is not opposed to vaccinations, as he himself has received the jab.
It won’t be a surprise to see in the coming weeks Schirmacher’s reputation completely torn to shreds in the media, online and in the scientific and medical community.
https://theexpose.uk/2021(...)recently-vaccinated/
The director of the Pathological Institute of the University of Heidelberg, Peter Schirmacher, has carried out over forty autopsies on people who died within two weeks of receiving a Covid-19 vaccine and has expressed alarm over his findings.
Schirmacher stated that 30 to 40 per cent of people he examined died from the vaccine and that in his opinion, the frequency of fatal consequences of vaccinations is “underestimated.”
Following his findings, Schirmacher has called for more autopsies of vaccinated people to further determine whether the vaccines are linked to deaths. He has warned that the high number of unreported cases of vaccination deaths is partially due to the fact that “pathologists do not notice anything about most of the patients who die after and possible from a vaccination.”
Despite raising the alarm surrounding the vaccines, many have criticised Schirmacher’s conclusions, with the Paul Ehrlich Institute calling the director’s statements “incomprehensible.” The Chancellor’s lackey, senior German immunologist Thomas Mertens dismissed the findings right away: “I don’t know of any data that would allow a justifiable statement to be made here and I am not assuming an unreported number.”
The immunologist Christian Bogdan from the Erlangen University Hospital, a member of the Standing Vaccination Commission (STIKO), also contradicted Schirmacher’s assumption of a “high number of unreported vaccination complications or even deaths.”
Despite the criticism, Schirmacher did receive support from his own ranks, and the Federal Association of German Pathologists stated that more autopsies of vaccinated people who died within a certain time frame after vaccination should be performed.
The head of the “Autopsy Working Group” in this association wanted to make general practitioners and health authorities aware of this. Basically, doctors of the patients who die within a few days or weeks post-vaccination should apply for an autopsy in case of doubt or the health authorities should take action,
The Federal Association of Pathologists already requested this in March in a letter to Health Minister Jens Spahn (CDU), but it went unanswered.
Of course, it’s worth noting that Schirmacher’s warning could cause various pharmaceutical companies to lose billion dollars worth of long-term business, which explains why his findings have been scrutinised and tarnished by the pro-vaccine agenda.
However, the reputation and seriousness of Schirmacher cannot be ignored.
Schirmacher himself is already leading an autopsy project on people who have died from Covid-19, which is subsidised by the state. He himself then expanded the focus and began performing autopsies on more than 40 deceased vaccinated people. Whilst his results only represent a small sample size, it is a worrying representation of a bigger picture: 30 to 40 per cent died from vaccination itself. The pathologist cited “rare, severe side effects of the vaccination – such as cerebral vein thrombosis or autoimmune diseases.”
In response to critics, Schirmacher denied a lack of competence, stating: “The colleagues are definitely wrong because they cannot assess this specific question competently.” Additionally, the director said that he is not trying to fearmonger and is not opposed to vaccinations, as he himself has received the jab.
It won’t be a surprise to see in the coming weeks Schirmacher’s reputation completely torn to shreds in the media, online and in the scientific and medical community.
https://theexpose.uk/2021(...)recently-vaccinated/
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
|
|
