Eerste link:
https://www.westernstanda(...)tor-to-jason-kenney/
Immunoloog dr. Carla Peeters legt uit waarom het nieuwe (massa)testbeleid niet deugt. Ze legt onder meer uit dat een positieve test niet automatisch betekent dat je besmet bent met het coronavirus, dat mensen zonder klachten niet besmettelijk zijn en dat het virus veel milder is dan aan het begin van de pandemie.
Gaat verder:
https://www.hpdetijd.nl/2(...)stbeleid-niet-deugt/
Ik zie vooral dat zijn oplossing een lange termijn oplossing is en dat hij zegt dat men zich niet ALLEEN moet concentreren op covid wat mij een valide kritiek lijkt mits dat een probleem is, in Nederland proberen we nu juist om er voor te zorgen dat alle zorg bereikbaar blijft, echter, en niet dat alles vol ligt dankzij covid.quote:Op woensdag 16 december 2020 18:26 schreef Probably_on_pcp het volgende:
Het leek me een goed idee om deze kant van de medaille even duidelijk onder te brengen in een apart topic. Eigenlijk zou het in COR moeten kunnen, maar daar mag je nauwelijks twijfelen aan de officiële standpunten van de overheid. Alleen de experts die door de overheid aan het woord worden gelaten schijnen verstand van zaken te hebben en de rest zijn wappies in de ogen van de mainstreamers.
Eerste link:
[ twitter ]
Het is maar net hoe je de insteek wil zien, denk ik, maar in essentie zie ik geen groot verschil met het OMT hier.
https://www.armstrongecon(...)e-out-against-covid/
Democrats are worried Dr. Jane M. Orient could undermine public health efforts to get the public inoculated against the coronavirus.
https://www.nbcnews.com/p(...)-treatments-n1250260
Dat is een ingezonden brief van een aardwetenschapper zo te zien. Verder wat dhr. dr. ir. @Tijger_m hierboven zegt.quote:
Kritiek op beleid is wel een stapje minder ver dan BNW in mijn ogen.
Facebook and YouTube censored a video featuring "America's Frontline Doctors" calling out a "massive disinformation campaign" on the treatment of the coronavirus. The event was initially live-streamed on Facebook by Breitbart News and was removed by the platform after accumulating 17 million views within hours.
https://www.realclearpoli(...)ess_conference.html#!
quote:
Facebook and YouTube Ban Video Of Doctors Talking COVID, Silenced Doctors Hold Press Conference
Facebook and YouTube censored a video featuring "America's Frontline Doctors" calling out a "massive disinformation campaign" on the treatment of the coronavirus. The event was initially live-streamed on Facebook by Breitbart News and was removed by the platform after accumulating 17 million views within hours.
https://www.realclearpoli(...)ess_conference.html#!
https://edition.cnn.com/2(...)ronavirus/index.htmlquote:One woman featured in the video, identified as Dr. Stella Immanuel, is a Houston-based physician and founder of the Fire Power Ministries church. On her website and in sermons posted on YouTube, Immanuel has made strange medical claims, including that sex with "tormenting spirits" are is responsible for gynecological problems, miscarriages, and impotence.
Jammer, want die link van HP De Tijd was wel het lezen waard.
Vandaag op onze zeepkist: huisarts Huib Pieter Rutten vindt dat er meer levens kapot gaan door de coronamaatregelen dan er worden gered. “Zullen de politici van nu betere keuzes maken dan honderd jaar terug?”
De fantastische schrijver Yuval Noah Harari (Sapiens) beschrijft in zijn boek Homo Deus het Onze Jongens Stierven Niet Voor Niets-syndroom. Het lijkt alsof we gegijzeld zijn door dit syndroom: hoe meer offers we brengen ten aanzien van een ingebeeld verhaal, hoe sterker dat verhaal wordt omdat we wanhopig zin willen toekennen aan de offers en het leed wat het bracht, schrijft hij.
Gaat verder:
https://www.hpdetijd.nl/2(...)voor-niets-syndroom/
Onvrijwillige eenzaamheid vergroot het risico op eerder overlijden en is vergelijkbaar met het roken van vijftien sigaretten per dag, schrijft immunoloog dr. Carla Peeters. Kerst dit jaar overslaan zou daarom weleens tot meer gezondheidsschade kunnen leiden dan mogelijke infecties door versoepeling van de maatregelen.
Verder:
https://www.hpdetijd.nl/2(...)te-door-eenzaamheid/
Tot dusver, en die persoon is nog steeds niet geweest want hij is/was goed ziek.
Dit betrof een test waarbij je binnen half uurtje uitslag kreeg.
Heb zelf nog geen test gehad, maar er waren een aantal op werk die nu al 3 of meerdere keren getest zijn.
Een aantal had ook gewoon griep of een verkoudheid.
Nja dat is de huidige stand bij mij op werk, buiten werk om of familie leden heel wat meer met positieve tests waarvan goed aantal echt ziek werden 6 IC gevallen en 2 overleden.
Maar dat had ik ook al in andere topic aangegeven.
Maar goed dat is mijn ervaring tot dusver..
-Experts are now coming forward in growing numbers denouncing mass PCR testing as foolhardy and nonsensical if not outright criminal
-PCR tests cannot distinguish between “live” viruses and inactive (noninfectious) viral particles and therefore cannot be used as a diagnostic tool. They also cannot confirm that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms as the test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens
-The tests have exceptionally high false result rates. The higher the cycle threshold (CT) — i.e., the number of amplification cycles used to detect RNA particles — the greater the chance of a false positive. Beyond 34 cycles, your chance of a positive PCR test being a true positive shrinks to zero
-Florida recently became the first state to require all labs in the state to report the CT used for their PCR tests
-The SARS-CoV-2 PCR test was developed based on a genetic sequence published by Chinese scientists, not the viral isolate. Missing genetic code was simply made up
Artikel gaat verder:
https://articles.mercola.(...)est-reliability.aspx
Boris Johnson was last night urged to publish clear evidence of the Covid data he used to cancel Christmas for millions.
The Prime Minister has warned the new variant of coronavirus may be up to 70 per cent more transmissible than previous strains and could overwhelm the NHS.
But last night one scientist demanded greater transparency over the number that shut down swathes of the UK.
Carl Heneghan, Professor of Evidence Based Medicine at Oxford University's Nuffield Department of Primary Care, expressed scepticism over the 70 per cent figure.
Gaat verder:
https://www.dailymail.co.(...)n-70-contagious.html
Jay Bhattacharya is a Professor of Medicine at Stanford University, where he received both an M.D. and a Ph.D. in economics. He is also a research associate at the National Bureau of Economics Research, a senior fellow at the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research and at the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, and director of the Stanford Center on the Demography and Economics of Health and Aging. A co-author of the Great Barrington Declaration, his research has been published in economics, statistics, legal, medical, public health, and health policy journals.
My goal today is, first, to present the facts about how deadly COVID-19 actually is; second, to present the facts about who is at risk from COVID; third, to present some facts about how deadly the widespread lockdowns have been; and fourth, to recommend a shift in public policy.
Artikel:
https://imprimis.hillsdal(...)anti-covid-strategy/
De keerzijde van de coronamaatregelen is dat kwetsbare ouderen veel meer stress en angst ervaren, waardoor zij onnodig lijden en sterven. Immunoloog dr. ir. Carla Peeters pleit daarom voor meer focus op de kwaliteit van leven van deze groep mensen, om ernstigere gezondheidsproblemen te voorkomen.
Het risico voor een infectie met SARS-COV-2 is voor mensen ouder dan 65 jaar hoger dan voor de jongere leeftijdsgroep. Met name in ziekenhuizen en verpleeghuizen is de verspreiding van het virus het grootst. Psychisch en sociaal welzijn van ouderen en zorgpersoneel staan al maanden onder druk. Door het nieuwe griepseizoen en de toenemende stress en angst stijgt de kans op een ernstige vorm van COVID-19 ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome) of gerelateerde infectieziekten voor kwetsbare ouderen. Er is meer aandacht nodig voor de keerzijde van de huidige maatregelen, die het immuunsysteem door langdurige stress en angst ervaringen onderdrukken. Juist nu is aandacht voor kwetsbare ouderen en zorg van familie nodig, aangevuld met extra voeding als vitamine D en C om het immuunsysteem te versterken, het virus in toom te houden en onnodig lijden te voorkomen.
Artikel gaat verder:
https://www.hpdetijd.nl/2(...)arlijker-dan-corona/
Het huidige coronatestbeleid faalt. Door minder en beter te testen wordt onnodige schade aan het welzijn en de economie voorkomen, schrijven dr. ir. Carla Peeters, prof. dr. Wim Vanden Berghe en prof. dr. Mattias Desmet in dit artikel.
https://www.hpdetijd.nl/2(...)et-testbeleid-faalt/
In een vierdelige serie geeft immunoloog dr. Carla Peeters, die verschillende jaren werkzaam was op het RIVM, alle ins en outs over het door de overheid in bepaalde situaties verplicht gestelde mondkapje. Deze week het vierde en laatste deel, waarin de belangrijkste punten van de vorige drie stukken worden samengevat en er enkele suggesties worden gedaan.
https://www.hpdetijd.nl/2(...)agen-van-mondkapjes/
Een groep kritische artsen heeft een stichting opgericht om aandacht te vragen voor de in hun ogen disproportionele coronamaatregelen. Ze zijn bezorgd over de gevolgen op lange termijn, onder meer op de mentale gezondheid van mensen. ,,Gezondheid is meer dan de afwezigheid van corona.’’
https://www.gelderlander.(...)s-belanden~a7f7c4a2/
Uitslag krijgen van een test ! niet okquote:
Van de +-150 testen die uitgevoerd werden bij mij op werk was er een ziek.
Tot dusver, en die persoon is nog steeds niet geweest want hij is/was goed ziek.
Dit betrof een test waarbij je binnen half uurtje uitslag kreeg.
Heb zelf nog geen test gehad, maar er waren een aantal op werk die nu al 3 of meerdere keren getest zijn.
Een aantal had ook gewoon griep of een verkoudheid.
Nja dat is de huidige stand bij mij op werk, buiten werk om of familie leden heel wat meer met positieve tests waarvan goed aantal echt ziek werden 6 IC gevallen en 2 overleden.
Maar dat had ik ook al in andere topic aangegeven.
Maar goed dat is mijn ervaring tot dusver..
quote:
]
[..]
Uitslag krijgen van een test ! niet ok
wel jeuk aan de neus, maar niet echt uitslag
Obviously, no amount of evidence, data, trends, facts, studies, or science will ever convince most ‘public health officials’ that masks aren’t doing squat to stop the spread of COVID-19. Cases and deaths continue to spike (yes, many of these are super-sensitive PCR test-driven numbers, but still) despite the fact that well over 90% of the country are complying with their absurd mandates. Yet, predictably, the virus keeps going right on virusing, as highly contagious respiratory viruses, unfortunately, tend to do, especially once cold weather hits.
Gaat verder:
https://townhall.com/colu(...)e-but-the-l-n2581879
heb je hier ook een lijst van?quote:
1000+ doctors come out against Covid:
https://www.armstrongecon(...)e-out-against-covid/
de vorige bestond veelal uit tandartsen psychiaters en veel andere beroepen en maar klein aantal doktoren.
maar, misschien even iets anders?
Er staat dokters tegen covid-19
dit zou eigenlijk Elke dokter op de planeet moeten zijn..
Here we go again. With even tighter restrictions likely to be imposed in the New Year, Britain is trapped in a futile cycle of Covid contagion and control.
Since the so-called ‘second wave’ began in the autumn, the public has been forced to endure regional lockdowns, another national lockdown and ever more complicated tiers of restrictions.
Yet none of these authoritarian bureaucratic impositions have proved effective.
Gaat verder:
https://www.dailymail.co.(...)ntagion-control.html
Je weet dat malaria en covid-19 2 totaal verschillende ziektes zijn?quote:
Danny spreekt met kritische huisartsen over het coronabeleid. Zij vinden dat de focus op corona ten koste gaat van andere patiënten, en willen meer onderzoek naar het veelbesproken anti-malariamiddel Hydroxychloroquine.
Je gebruikt toch ook geen diarree remmers als je migraine hebt!
En helaas voor hem mensen gaan nu eenmaal dood..
Dat hoort bij leven.
Er zijn genoeg medicatie die off label gebruikt worden.quote:Op dinsdag 29 december 2020 20:26 schreef theguyver het volgende:
[..]
Je weet dat malaria en covid-19 2 totaal verschillende ziektes zijn?
Je gebruikt toch ook geen diarree remmers als je migraine hebt!
En helaas voor hem mensen gaan nu eenmaal dood..
Dat hoort bij leven.
En dat mensen eenmaal dood gaan en het bij het leven hoort ben ik het helemaal mee eens. Weg met die maatregelen!
TS moet ook niet vergeten dat het virus en de maatschappij twee verschillende dingen zijn. Specialisten gaan over A, Politici over B.
Er zijn werknemers die grappen over corona maken en dan wat domme 'nep' hoest acties in de open ruimte doen zoals 4 jarigen. Er zijn erbij die hun smerige zakdoeken overal neerleggen. De mens is door de hele samenleving vaak onverantwoordelijk en dom bezig met alles. Als ze in een auto stappen planken ze met 80 door de bebouwde kom en wat je allemaal maar als yolo kunt beschouwen.
Voor dit soort mensen is dit ontworpen wat we nu doormaken en die hebben juist stevige maatregelen nodig willen ze iets doen wat jij en ik als normaal handelen beschouwen.
Verder zie ik een doorzetting zonder aandacht juist grotere problemen opleveren voor bedrijven. Ik stond met kromme tenen een bericht te lezen over een besmetting ergens en dat een werkgever meededeelde dat het virus van buitenaf
op de vloer was gekomen. Alsof er een optie was dat een mutatie op daar zou zijn ontsproten. Mededeling 2: niets aan de hand zegt Rivm (niet juist, thuiswerken is het advies en kan daar ook maar men wil dat niet echt). Gewoon regels wat beter naleven wordt er vermeld. Eerste reactie in de groepsapp: een grap over corona.Imho doet iedereen maar wat en is de uiteenzetting zoals die er nu ligt niet perfect maar meer vrijheid geven en er wordt een factor x meer genomen.
It should be common knowledge by now that younger people are significantly less likely to die of Covid-19 than the elderly. However, a new working paper published by the National Bureau of Economic Research notes some significant increases in excess deaths among working-age individuals. Excess deaths are the number of deaths exceeding the expected number in a given year. If there are excess deaths that means something unusual has happened, such as a pandemic or a drastic change to social life: such as lockdowns. The study notes,
“From March onward, excess deaths are approximately 250,000 of which about 17,000 appear to be a COVID undercount and 30,000 non-COVID. Deaths of despair (drug overdose, suicide, alcohol) in 2017 and 2018 are good predictors of the demographic groups with NCEDs in 2020. The NCEDs are disproportionately experienced by men aged 15-55, including men aged 15-25. Local data on opioid overdoses further support the hypothesis that the pandemic and recession were associated with a 10 to 60 percent increase in deaths of despair above already high pre-pandemic levels.”
Artikel gaat verder:
https://www.thedailyfodde(...)-lockdowns-have.html
Ik denk dat TS met de topictitel duidelijk heeft aangeduid wat het doel is van dit topic.quote:
TS maakt er een leuk prikbord van maar de artikelen zijn zo divers dat het ene het andere buitenspel zet. Een artikel over dat de anderhalve meter weg mag en mondkapjes voldoende zijn. Prima. Maar waar dan ineens het artikel over dat maskers ook niet werken vandaan komt (?). Dan zijn maskers en 1,5 meter toch de beste riemen voor het enigszins beheersen van groepen, of zie ik dat verkeerd.
TS moet ook niet vergeten dat het virus en de maatschappij twee verschillende dingen zijn. Specialisten gaan over A, Politici over B.
Ga carnaval vieren.quote:
[..]
Ik denk dat TS met de topictitel duidelijk heeft aangeduid wat het doel is van dit topic.
Lijkt me duidelijkquote:
[..]
Ik denk dat TS met de topictitel duidelijk heeft aangeduid wat het doel is van dit topic.
https://thehighwire.com/videos/the-toll-of-herd-stupidity/
https://streamable.com/udfd6g
Top epidemiologist Knut Wittkowski says that the massive drop in influenza cases can be attributed to the fact that many are being falsely counted as COVID-19 cases.
Wittkowski, former Head of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Research Design at Rockefeller University, cautioned that, “Influenza has been renamed COVID-19 in large part.”
According to CDC figures, the cumulative positive influenza test rate from late September into the week of December 19th was just 0.2%, compared to 8.7% from a year before.
According to Wittkowski, this is because many flu infections are being incorrectly labeled as coronavirus cases.
“There may be quite a number of influenza cases included in the ‘presumed COVID-19’ category of people who have COVID-19 symptoms (which Influenza symptoms can be mistaken for), but are not tested for SARS RNA,” Wittkowski told Just the News.
Those patients may “also may have some SARS RNA sitting in their nose while being infected with Influenza, in which case the influenza would be ‘confirmed’ to be COVID-19,” he added.
Wittkowski challenges the notion that masks and social distancing have resulted in a drop in flu cases, asserting that flu and COVID-19 viruses are “more similar than people want to acknowledge.”
“People know everybody is wearing masks and distancing, and so people want to come up with things that are good about it,” he said.
In places like California and Pennsylvania where mask wearing is most common, COVID-19 cases have continued to skyrocket.
As Just the News notes, “Data indicate that more than nine out of every 10 Americans in most states are wearing masks in public regularly; those numbers have been above 80% since the early fall. Yet average positive COVID-19 tests have multiplied by nearly seven times since the spring peak.”
https://summit.news/2021/(...)counted-as-covid-19/
Background and Aims
The most restrictive non‐pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) for controlling the spread of COVID‐19 are mandatory stay‐at‐home and business closures. Given the consequences of these policies, it is important to assess their effects. We evaluate the effects on epidemic case growth of more restrictive NPIs (mrNPIs), above and beyond those of less restrictive NPIs (lrNPIs).
Methods
We first estimate COVID‐19 case growth in relation to any NPI implementation in subnational regions of 10 countries: England, France, Germany, Iran, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, and the US. Using first‐difference models with fixed effects, we isolate the effects of mrNPIs by subtracting the combined effects of lrNPIs and epidemic dynamics from all NPIs. We use case growth in Sweden and South Korea, two countries that did not implement mandatory stay‐at‐home and business closures, as comparison countries for the other 8 countries (16 total comparisons).
Results
Implementing any NPIs was associated with significant reductions in case growth in 9 out of 10 study countries, including South Korea and Sweden that implemented only lrNPIs (Spain had a non‐significant effect). After subtracting the epidemic and lrNPI effects, we find no clear, significant beneficial effect of mrNPIs on case growth in any country. In France, e.g., the effect of mrNPIs was +7% (95CI ‐5%‐19%) when compared with Sweden, and +13% (‐12%‐38%) when compared with South Korea (positive means pro‐contagion). The 95% confidence intervals excluded 30% declines in all 16 comparisons and 15% declines in 11/16 comparisons.
Conclusions
While small benefits cannot be excluded, we do not find significant benefits on case growth of more restrictive NPIs. Similar reductions in case growth may be achievable with less restrictive interventions.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eci.13484
Tal van verhoren met artsen, profs, psychiaters, etc. Voor als iemand zich verveelt in het weekend.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCzBTOlq2SlV4TFYV1aaAuow/videos
Jongeren moeten naar festivals en cafés kunnen, zegt arts en filosoof Marli Huijer. En kinderen moeten naar school. „Het zou erom moeten gaan wat een goed leven is.”
https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws(...)elijk-leven-a4027683
Leuk als filosofie. Probeer dit idee echter eens te verkopen als politieke boodschap.quote:
Arts en filosoof Marli Huijer: ‘Niemand heeft récht op een zo lang mogelijk leven’
Jongeren moeten naar festivals en cafés kunnen, zegt arts en filosoof Marli Huijer. En kinderen moeten naar school. „Het zou erom moeten gaan wat een goed leven is.”
https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws(...)elijk-leven-a4027683
Lekker de maximale druk +10 opvoeren op de zorg en vervolgens mensen met andere aandoeningen vertellen dat alles vol zit omdat mensen lekker moeten kunnen leven.
Zit je straks met iets kleins dat complicatie op complicatie geeft en uiteindelijk dodelijk wordt omdat de wachtlijst oneindig is. Resultaat: nieuw BNW topic.
Omdat sommige mods in het Corona-subforum soms een beetje moeilijk kunnen doen als de bron of boodschap hen niet aanstaat.quote:
Waarom staat dit topic in BNW en niet gewoon in Corona subtopic?
What you will read in this article is the scientific evidence that it has never been proven that the "deadly" COVID-19 virus exists. In fact, all of the leading scientists on COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) have admitted that the scientific rules to prove COVID-19 have not been established. The global corona pandemic is simply based on assumptions and on agreed consensus and not science at all. This may sound unbelievable at first, but please read for yourself and see the facts that prove this irrevocably. Only after you have read this article will you be able to make a good judgement about the current COVID-19 Plandemic.
The detection method of the PCR tests is completely meaningless
I have already covered the topic of PCR testing in two of my articles. (1) (2) There I prove beyond doubt that the PCR test, which is considered the "gold standard" for COVID tests, is completely "meaningless".
The question now is: What is required first for the isolation / detection of viruses? We need to know where the RNA comes from for which the PCR tests are calibrated.
From textbooks (e.g., White/Fenner. Medical Virology, 1986, p. 9), as well as from leading virus researchers such as Luc Montagnier or Dominic Dwyer, (3) it has been found that particle cleaning - i.e., the separation of an object from everything that is not that object, such as the Nobel Prize winner Marie Curie in 1898 purified 100 mg of radium chloride by extraction from tons of pitchblende - is an essential prerequisite for proving the existence of a virus and thus proving that the RNA of the particle in question originates from a new virus.
The reason for this is that PCR is extremely sensitive, i.e. it can detect even the smallest pieces of DNA or RNA - but it cannot determine where these particles come from. This must be determined beforehand.
And because the PCR tests are calibrated for gene sequences (in this case RNA se-quences, because SARS-CoV-2 is probably an RNA virus), we need to know that these gene sequences are part of the virus we are looking for. And in order to know this, we must carry out a correct isolation and purification of the suspected virus.
Koch's postulates are the decisive criteria for the scientific detection of a virus
Before the invention of the electron microscope in the 1930s, it was not possible to see such small particles. With the electron microscope, the new generation of virologists began to examine unclean materials and claimed they could detect the viruses. The problem is that just by looking at a particle one cannot tell what it is or what it does without fulfilling Koch's postulates.
Koch's postulates were established by the great German bacteriologist Robert Koch in the 19th century.
Definition:
Four requirements set by Robert Koch that must be met in order to have microorganism may be called the causative agent of a specific disease.
1. Koch's postulate
The micro-organism must be detectable in all cases of disease with the same symptoms, but not in healthy individuals.
2. Koch's postulate
The microorganism can be transferred from the diseased individual to a pure culture (isolation)
3. Koch's postulate
A previously healthy individual, after infection with the micro-organism from the pure culture, shows the same symptoms as the one from which the micro-organism originally originated.
4. Koch's postulate
The microorganism can be transferred from the infected and diseased individuals back into a pure culture.
Artikel gaat verder:
https://telegra.ph/Leadin(...)nce-of-a-virus-07-31
https://ugetube.com/watch(...)SKqByzL26FZu3dE.html
Even the Robert Koch Institute and other health authorities cannot present decisive proof that a new virus named SARS-CoV-2 is haunting us. This alone turns the talk of dangerous viral mutations into irresponsible fearmongering and the so-called SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests definitely into a worthless venture.
In a request for a study which shows complete isolation and purification of the particles claimed to be SARS-CoV-2, Michael Laue from one of the world’s most important representatives of the COVID-19 “panicdemic,” the German Robert Koch Institute (RKI), answered that[1]:
I am not aware of a paper which purified isolated SARS-CoV-2.
This is a more than remarkable statement, it is admitting a complete failure. This concession is in line with the statements we presented in our article “COVID-19 PCR Tests Are Scientifically Meaningless” which OffGuardian published on June 27th, 2020 — a piece that was the first one worldwide outlining in detail why SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests are worthless for the diagnosis of a viral infection.
One of the crucial points in this analysis was that the studies contending to have shown that SARS-CoV-2 is a new and potentially deadly virus have no right to claim this, particularly because the studies claiming “isolation” of so-called SARS-CoV-2 in fact failed to isolate (purify) the particles said to be the new virus.
This is confirmed by the answers of the respective studies’ scientists to our inquiry, which are shown in a table in our piece — among them the world’s most important paper when it comes to the claim of having detected SARS-CoV-2 (by Zhu et al.), published in the New England Journal of Medicine on February 20, 2020, and now even the RKI.
Incidentally, we are in possession of a further confirmatory answer from authors [2] of an Australian study.
Gaat verder:
https://off-guardian.org/(...)earch-of-sars-cov-2/
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) stands accused of violating federal law by inflating Coronavirus fatality numbers, according to stunning information obtained by National File.
CDC illegally inflated the COVID fatality number by at least 1,600 percent as the 2020 presidential election played out, according to a study published by the Public Health Initiative of the Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge. The study, “COVID-19 Data Collection, Comorbidity & Federal Law: A Historical Retrospective,” was authored by Henry Ealy, Michael McEvoy, Daniel Chong, John Nowicki , Monica Sava, Sandeep Gupta, David White, James Jordan , Daniel Simon, and Paul Anderson.
The CDC is now legally requiring red-blooded Americans to wear face masks on all public transportation as globalists try to push the concept of "double-masking" on the populace. Since the election, the World Health Organization admits that PCR tests are not totally reliable on the first try and a second test might be needed. This corresponds with CDC's quiet admission that it blended viral and antibody test results for its case numbers and that people can test positive on an antibody test if they have antibodies from a family of viruses that cause the common cold. Hospitals in Florida had so many accuracy complications that Orlando Health had to admit that its 9.4 percent positivity rate got recorded at 98 percent. (READ: The TRUTH About Fauci and Gates And NIH Owning A Stake in the Vaccine).
"The groundbreaking peer-reviewed research...asserts that the CDC willfully violated multiple federal laws including the Information Quality Act, Paperwork Reduction Act, and Administrative Procedures Act at minimum. (Publishing Journal - Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge / Public Health Policy Initiative) Most notably, the CDC illegally enacted new rules for data collection and reporting exclusively for COVID-19 that resulted in a 1,600% inflation of current COVID-19 fatality totals," the watchdog group All Concerned Citizens declared in a statement provided to NATIONAL FILE, referring to the Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge study.
Gaat verder:
https://nationalfile.com/(...)olating-federal-law/
Maandenlang analyseerde ik allerlei grafieken en nieuws over het Coronavirus. Ik probeer hier de informatie te geven die door de media genegeerd, verdraaid of verwijderd wordt. Zoals over verboden geneesmiddelen. Of de nieuwste conclusie op basis van de grafieken: dat de lockdown geen verschil maakt. De “main stream media” en de “kwaliteitskranten” hebben bewezen slaafs mee te werken aan angst-verspreiding en indoctrinatie. Pas nu komt er mondjesmaat weer de eerste objectieve berichtgeving.
Samenvatting
In Nederland overleefde 99,9% van de bevolking het Corona-virus, net als in de rest van Europa en in Amerika. De sterfte was 0,1% (waarvan 90% ouderen met onderliggende ziekten). Van iedereen die besmet raakte werd 70% niet of nauwelijks ziek, door normale afweer. Degenen die toch erg ziek werden hadden ook een grote kans om weer te genezen: van de ernstig zieken herstelde 97%, nu zelfs 99%. Er zijn steeds meer effectieve behandelingen en medicijnen.
De immuniteit blijft laag, omdat maar zo weinig mensen ziek worden. Als je niet ziek wordt, wordt je ook niet immuun. Voor diegenen heeft vaccineren dan ook weinig zin. De directe doelgroep voor vaccineren is 0,1%. Met een enorme marge eromheen zou je een TIEN KEER grotere groep kunnen vaccineren: 1% oftewel 170.000 mensen. Die kun je in drie dagen vaccineren.
De lockdown werkt nauwelijks, volgens de grafieken: je ziet nauwelijks verschil na het begin van een lockdown, of na een opheffing van de lockdown. Dat zag je in alle landen, herhaaldelijk, in het afgelopen jaar. De besmettingen daalden en stegen overal in Europa op dezelfde manier, en zelfs bijna op hetzelfde moment, onafhankelijk van maatregelen. Het lijkt er dan op dat de maatregelen geen effect hebben. Afgezien van een vroeg verbod op Super spread events. Dat zijn grote events met heel veel mensen in één ruimte, en dus ook sommige grote bedrijven en instellingen, OV en kerken.
Gaat verder:
https://aartjan.nl/blog/coronavirus-de-missende-grafiek/
https://fullfact.org/health/Covid-isolated-virus/quote:
Definition:
Four requirements set by Robert Koch that must be met in order to have microorganism may be called the causative agent of a specific disease.
1. Koch's postulate
The micro-organism must be detectable in all cases of disease with the same symptoms, but not in healthy individuals.
2. Koch's postulate
The microorganism can be transferred from the diseased individual to a pure culture (isolation)
3. Koch's postulate
A previously healthy individual, after infection with the micro-organism from the pure culture, shows the same symptoms as the one from which the micro-organism originally originated.
4. Koch's postulate
The microorganism can be transferred from the infected and diseased individuals back into a pure culture.
quote:It’s also incorrect to say that the virus that causes Covid-19 would need to meet Koch’s postulates, primarily because Koch’s postulates weren’t written for viruses.
Koch’s postulates were a set of rules outlined by scientist Robert Koch in 1890 to decide whether a bacteria causes a disease. The original four criteria are:
“1. The microorganism must be found in the diseased animal, and not found in healthy animals.
“2. The microorganism must be extracted and isolated from the diseased animal and subsequently grown in culture.
“3. The microorganism must cause disease when introduced to a healthy experimental animal.
“4. The microorganism must be extracted from the diseased experimental animal and demonstrated to be the same microorganism that was originally isolated from the first diseased animal.”
As noted by many, these criteria were written before the discovery of viruses, so fail to include them in their consideration of what a disease is.
............
Epidemiologist Knut Wittkowski thinks he can answer the riddle.
“Influenza has been renamed COVID in large part,” Wittkowski, the former head of biostatistics, epidemiology and research design at Rockefeller University, told the outlet.
“There may be quite a number of influenza cases included in the ‘presumed COVID’ category of people who have COVID symptoms (which Influenza symptoms can be mistaken for), but are not tested for SARS RNA,” he added.
Such patients, he explained, “also may have some SARS RNA sitting in their nose while being infected with Influenza, in which case the influenza would be ‘confirmed’ to be COVID.”
Artikel gaat verder:
https://humansarefree.com(...)ied-as-covid-19.html
Knut Wittkowski doet een aanname dat er 'quite a number' van griepgevallen als covid geclassificeerd zijn. Maar hoeveel dan?quote:
Epidemiologist Knut Wittkowski thinks he can answer the riddle.
Prachtige bron verder.
quote:Some have attempted to explain the humongous difference in flu infections by claiming that mask-wearing, social distancing, and even lockdowns are making the difference.
Timothy Sly, an epidemiology professor at Ryerson University in Toronto, told the outlet that “the reduced incidence of seasonal influenza is almost certainly due to the protection that a large proportion of the population has been using for many months.”
Those measures, he said, are “designed to be effective against any airborne respiratory virus.”
And Holden Maecker, a professor of microbiology and immunology at Stanford University, agreed.
“I feel pretty confident that the COVID-19 mitigation measures have caused the reduction in flu cases this year,” he told Just the News. “Masks, social distancing, and hand washing are all effective counter-measures against colds and flu.”
Really? That’s just BS; if that were true, then COVID cases wouldn’t be spiking at all, anywhere — especially in liberty-free zones like New York and California.
But Maecker had an explanation for that, too. Asked why COVID continues to spread but the highly contagious influenza bug isn’t, he said:
“I think it’s because (1) there is less pre-existing immunity to SARS-CoV-2 in the population, whereas most of us have had vaccines and/or previous bouts with flu; and (2) the SARS-CoV-2 virus seems to spread more easily than influenza, including more aerosol transmission and ‘super-spreader’ events. Flu transmission is almost entirely close-range droplets and hand-to-nose or eyes contact.”
Again…BS. We’re being lied to once again about COVID so the authoritarians in our society can continue justifying the elimination of our freedoms.
Hier het originele artikel:
Why Face Masks Don’t Work: A Revealing Review
https://web.archive.org/w(...)rk-revealing-review/
En dit is wat je nu vindt op de website:
If you are looking for “Why Face Masks Don’t Work: A Revealing Review” by John Hardie, BDS, MSc, PhD, FRCDC, it has been removed. The content was published in 2016 and is no longer relevant in our current climate.
Please note that the content from Oral Health Group is primarily intended to educate and inform dental professionals.
https://www.oralhealthgro(...)rk-revealing-review/
Open Letter from the UK Medical Freedom Alliance to:
Nadhim Zahawi – Minister for Covid-19 Vaccine Deployment
Matt Hancock – Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
Re: Urgent warning re Covid-19 vaccine-related deaths in the elderly and Care Homes
In our Open Letter of 23 November 2020, addressed to the MHRA, JCVI and Matt Hancocki, we outlined our concerns of potential public health risks from a mass roll-out of the Covid-19 vaccines because of only limited short-term safety data and no long-term safety data.
In this letter we draw to your attention the mounting evidence that the public health risks we identified may be materialising.
We now call for an immediate and urgent audit of deaths that have occurred since the beginning of the Covid-19 vaccine rollout, to ascertain if Covid-19 vaccines (in general or any one brand in particular) are leading to an increased number of deaths (Covid-19 and non-Covid-19 related), Covid19 cases or increased risk of death in certain age groups or cohorts.
Brief gaat verder:
https://www.rescuepost.co(...)-alliance-letter.pdf
Met als je zoekt op die covid-uitbraken artikelen waarin staat dat corona een incubatietijd heeft, net als dat het vaccin niet direct werkt. Los van het feit dat ik mijn twijfels heb bij de beweegredenen en resulterende betrouwbaarheid van de UKMFA.quote:
Interessant document met veel informatie over hoe er Covid-uitbraken zijn na een vaccinatie-campagne:
CV19 Unmasked
https://pastelink.net/1z94s
Een voorbeeld:
Oops: It Looks Like the Vast Majority of Positive COVID Results Should Have Been Negative
https://townhall.com/tips(...)en-negative-n2575305
Up to 90 per cent of people diagnosed with coronavirus may not be carrying enough of it to infect anyone else, study finds as experts say tests are too sensitive
https://www.dailymail.co.(...)tests-sensitive.html
Your Coronavirus Test Is Positive. Maybe It Shouldn’t Be.
https://www.nytimes.com/2(...)navirus-testing.html
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) stands accused of violating federal law by inflating Coronavirus fatality numbers, according to stunning information obtained by NATIONAL FILE.
CDC illegally inflated the COVID fatality number by at least 1,600 percent as the 2020 presidential election played out, according to a study published by the Public Health Initiative of the Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge. The study, “COVID-19 Data Collection, Comorbidity & Federal Law: A Historical Retrospective,” was authored by Henry Ealy, Michael McEvoy, Daniel Chong, John Nowicki , Monica Sava, Sandeep Gupta, David White, James Jordan , Daniel Simon, and Paul Anderson.
Gaat verder:
https://nationalfile.com/(...)olating-federal-law/
Dr. Lee Merritt: In Animal Studies, After Being Injected With MRNA Technology, All Animals Died Upon Reinfection
In the following interview, Dr. Lee Merritt explains that mRNA technology is not a vaccine, mirroring what Dr. David Martin also stated recently.
In animal studies, after mRNA injections have been administered to cats, when the virus arrived once again into the body, it arrived like a Trojan Horse, undetected by the cats’ own immune system. The virus multiplied unchallenged and all animals involved in the experiment died from various causes.
According to Dr. Lee Merritt,
What happened is all animals died… but they didn’t died of the “vaccine”. What they died from what used to be called “immune enhancement” and now they call it “antibody dependent enhancement” (ADE).
Here’s what happens:
They make the RNA and you get the “vaccine” and you do fine. Now, you challenge the animal with the virus that you are supposed to be immunizing against.
So when they challenged those cats with SARS [a.k.a. SARS-CoV-1, is a coronavirus species], instead of killing the virus or weakening it, the immune response that they built into your system when out and codded the virus, so the virus came into the cat’s body like a Trojan Horse, unseen by the cat’s own immune system, and then it replicated without checking and killed the cat with overwhelming sepsis and cardiac failure. And that [also] happened in ferrets, that happened every time they tried this.
Let me just point out. We have never made it through an animal study successfully for this type of virus.
We have never done this in humans before… We don’t really have a track record of success.
This vaccine was rolled out to distribution centers before they even made a show of caring about the FDA approving it. Do you realize that?
I’ve never seen that happen before.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/G3LkvUTMWl57/
https://humansarefree.com(...)ll-animals-died.html
Covid cases have dropped 77% in six weeks. Experts should level with the public about the good news.
Amid the dire Covid warnings, one crucial fact has been largely ignored: Cases are down 77% over the past six weeks. If a medication slashed cases by 77%, we’d call it a miracle pill. Why is the number of cases plummeting much faster than experts predicted?
In large part because natural immunity from prior infection is far more common than can be measured by testing. Testing has been capturing only from 10% to 25% of infections, depending on when during the pandemic someone got the virus. Applying a time-weighted case capture average of 1 in 6.5 to the cumulative 28 million confirmed cases would mean about 55% of Americans have natural immunity.
Gaat verder:
https://www.wsj.com/artic(...)l-11613669731?page=1
In an amended reply to the FDA’s rejection of his concerns about Pfizer’s clinical trials, Dr. Sin Hang Lee says the FDA is glossing over potential risks of an mRNA vaccine while concealing its true efficacy.
Pfizer’s announcement in November 2020 that clinical trials showed its COVID-19 vaccine was “95% effective” prompted Dr. Sin Hang Lee, a Connecticut pathologist, to question Pfizer’s methodology and petition the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to require accurate counts of COVID-19 cases in the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccine trial before granting the vaccine Emergency Use Authorization (EAU).
Gaat verder:
https://childrenshealthde(...)&utm_medium=defender
The UK Government have released a report highlighting adverse reactions to both the Pfizer and Oxford / Astrazeneca vaccines that have occurred since the rollout began on the 8th December and it does not make for pleasant reading.
The report has collated data inputted up to the 24th January 2021 via the MHRA Yellow Card Scheme. At this point an estimated 5.4 million first doses of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine and 1.5 million doses of the Oxford University/AstraZeneca vaccine had been administered, and around 0.5 million second doses, mostly the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine, had been administered.
But as predicted, with the rise in vaccines administered came a rise in adverse reactions with 49,472 reported reactions to the Pfizer vaccine and 21,032 reactions to the Oxford / Astrazeneca vaccine. For both vaccines this equates to 1 in every 333 people suffering an adverse reaction. This rate could actually be higher as some cases may have not been reported to the Yellow Card Scheme.
The Daily Expose took a look through the report (which you can find here) and carried out an in depth review of reactions to the Pfizer vaccine and this is what we found –
Thanks to the Pfizer vaccine, which uses MRNA technology to instruct human cells to carry out “a certain task” 5 people are now blind and a further 31 have had their vision impaired. In total there have been 634 eye disorders reported so far. Imagine being confined to the same four walls for over a year and not being able to see family or friends. Then getting excited because you naively think an experimental “vaccine” is going to give you your life back and allow you to see them once more. But then leaving without the ability to ever see anything ever again.
Gaat verder:
https://dailyexpose.co.uk(...)actions-to-vaccines/
With no data showing COVID vaccines are safe for pregnant women, and despite reports of miscarriages among women who have received the experimental Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, Fauci and other health officials advise pregnant women to get the vaccine.
https://childrenshealthde(...)women-covid-vaccine/
Immunologist J. Bart Classen warns that the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines for COVID-19 can potentially cause neurodegenerative disorders, such as Alzheimer’s disease.
In a paper published in the journal Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, Classen reported that mRNA-based vaccines like the two jabs can misfold proteins in the body that are linked to the development of neurodegenerative disorders.
Gaat verder:
https://www.newswars.com/(...)-such-as-alzheimers/
Analysis by infectious disease specialist claims mismatch between data published by authorities and reality on the ground.
A front-page article appeared in the FranceSoir newspaper about findings on the Nakim website regarding what some experts are calling "the high mortality caused by the vaccine."
The paper interviews Aix-Marseille University Faculty of Medicine Emerging Infectious and Tropical Diseases Unit's Dr. Hervé Seligmann and engineer Haim Yativ about their research and data analysis. They claim that Pfizer's shot causes "mortality hundreds of times greater in young people compared to mortality from coronavirus without the vaccine, and dozens of times more in the elderly, when the documented mortality from coronavirus is in the vicinity of the vaccine dose, thus adding greater mortality from heart attack, stroke, etc."
Dr Hervé Seligmann works at the Emerging Infectious and Tropical Diseases Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France. He is of Israeli-Luxembourg nationality. He has a B. Sc. In Biology from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and has written over 100 scientific publications.
Gaat verder:
https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/297051
Jonas Ludvigsson undermined the political argument that schools couldn’t reopen in person with his research findings about COVID-19’s negligible threat to children and minor threat to teachers.
The professor of clinical epidemiology at Sweden’s Karolinska Institute faced such hostility for his findings, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, that he’s now given up on researching COVID-19, much less debating it.
Ludvigsson’s comments to the Swedish Medical Association were translated from Swedish by The British Medical Journal. He said that he hasn’t been able to sleep more than a few hours for a week as a result of the “angry messages through social media and email” criticizing his study and partly blaming him for Sweden’s contrarian COVID-19 strategy.
His letter to the editor, first published Jan. 6 and listed in the Feb. 18 issue of NEJM, went through several revisions and “formal external peer review,” including statistically, before it was published, Ludvigsson told the association.
The pediatrician’s research focused on children from age 1 to 16 during the first wave of COVID-19 last spring, tracking admissions to intensive care units March 1-June 30. It included those with “laboratory-verified or clinically verified Covid-19, including patients who were admitted for multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children” because it’s “likely” related to COVID-19.
Gaat verder:
https://en-volve.com/2021(...)-re-opening-schools/
It’s sad to say, but some people just have to learn the hard way. A polish doctor died just days after taking the experimental COVID injection. The cause of death, we are told, was heart failure. However, what’s most ironic is that he recorded a video of his injection while mocking anti-vaxxers.
I do not speak his language, but translators have said this is what he said before taking the experimental injection. If you have any corrections, please click the contact button and send me an email.
“Vaccinate yourself to protect yourself, your loved ones, friends and also patients. And to mention quickly I have info for anti-vaxxers and anti-coviders if you want to contact Bill Gates you can do this through me. I can also provide for you from my organism the 5G network. I am sorry I hadn’t spoke for a bit but I was just getting autism.”
He died just days later from heart failure.
Gaat verder:
https://thewashingtonstan(...)es-days-later-video/
De tweede prik. De bron mag je zelf zoeken. Daar zal je misschien ook lezen dat hij al 15 jaar hartpatiënt was.quote:
A polish doctor died just days after taking the experimental COVID injection.
the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and SPM at GAVI is urging WHO and world political leaders to
immediately halt all ongoing Covid-19 mass vaccination campaigns as there is compelling evidence that
they will soon dramatically worsen the consequences of the current pandemic
Attached to this letter, you will find a summary of the manuscript I am currently in the process of
finalizing. I initially intended to attach the manuscript in full to my letter. However, given the exceptional
urgency of my call, I have no choice but to send you the summary (+ conclusion) in advance. I will post
the manuscript in full on LinkedIn as soon as I can (presumably in the course of next week).
In the upcoming manuscript I will share my insights on the immune pathogenesis of Coronavirus
pandemics. Those are based on an in-depth analysis of Covid-19-relevant scientific literature (key
references will be appended) and backed by my deep vaccine knowledge and relentless perseverance in
unraveling the host’s immune defense mechanisms and strategies viruses have evolved to escape those.
Understanding the interplay between the virus and the host immune system is a prerequisite for
designing vaccines able to counter the immune subversive strategy of infectious pathogens.
I do not think that it is reasonable for WHO or any other health authority to approve ‘emergency use’ of vaccines
aimed at conducting mass vaccination campaigns in the very heat of an infectious pandemic without
having gained an in-depth understanding of how this may impact on the outcome of the pandemic.
Gaat verder:
https://www.deblauwetijge(...)vanden-Bossche-2.pdf
Interview met Geert van den Bossche:quote:
Geert Vanden Bossche, DVM, PhD virology, independent seasoned vaccine researcher, previous SPO at
the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and SPM at GAVI is urging WHO and world political leaders to
immediately halt all ongoing Covid-19 mass vaccination campaigns as there is compelling evidence that
they will soon dramatically worsen the consequences of the current pandemic
Attached to this letter, you will find a summary of the manuscript I am currently in the process of
finalizing. I initially intended to attach the manuscript in full to my letter. However, given the exceptional
urgency of my call, I have no choice but to send you the summary (+ conclusion) in advance. I will post
the manuscript in full on LinkedIn as soon as I can (presumably in the course of next week).
In the upcoming manuscript I will share my insights on the immune pathogenesis of Coronavirus
pandemics. Those are based on an in-depth analysis of Covid-19-relevant scientific literature (key
references will be appended) and backed by my deep vaccine knowledge and relentless perseverance in
unraveling the host’s immune defense mechanisms and strategies viruses have evolved to escape those.
Understanding the interplay between the virus and the host immune system is a prerequisite for
designing vaccines able to counter the immune subversive strategy of infectious pathogens.
I do not think that it is reasonable for WHO or any other health authority to approve ‘emergency use’ of vaccines
aimed at conducting mass vaccination campaigns in the very heat of an infectious pandemic without
having gained an in-depth understanding of how this may impact on the outcome of the pandemic.
Gaat verder:
https://www.deblauwetijge(...)vanden-Bossche-2.pdf
Here's some great quotes from top medical journal editors that tell you to do the exact opposite of that - as they explain the majority of all scientific literature is riddled with corruption and has devolved into a marketing arm for pharmaceutical companies
------------------------
"The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness."
“A lot of what is published is incorrect.”
"Journals have devolved into information laundering operations for the pharmaceutical industry”
-Richard Horton, Editor in chief of The Lancet
https://www.thelancet.com(...)5%2960696-1/fulltext
"Medical Journals are an extension of the marketing arm of the pharmaceutical companies"
"Between two-thirds and three-quarters of the trials published in the major journals - Annals of Internal Medicine, JAMA, Lancet, and New England of Medicine - are funded by the industry."
-Richard Smith, Editor for the British Medical Journal
https://journals.plos.org(...)journal.pmed.0020138
"It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgement of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor at the New England Journal of Medicine."
-Marcia Angell, MD, former Editor in chief of The New England Journal of Medicine.
https://www.nybooks.com/a(...)story-of-corruption/
Waar was Dhr van den Bossche 'n jaar geleden?quote:
[..]
Interview met Geert van den Bossche:
Hieronder maar 'n paar stukjes quotes van de artikel...
The Curious Case of Geert Vanden Bossche.
His Open Letter, Video Interview and High-Profile Supporters
Rosemary Frei, via her website
https://off-guardian.org/(...)eert-vanden-bossche/
'On March 6, an open letter by Geert Vanden Bossche, PhD, DVM, and a video interview of him by Phillip McMillan, MD, from a company called Vejon Health, were posted online.'
'On the surface, Vanden Bossche appears to perhaps be addressing credible concerns about Covid.
He’s saying that the current crop of Covid vaccines will cause the novel coronavirus to mutate into a “super-infectious virus.” And therefore he’s calling for an immediate halt of the use of the current vaccines.'
So I decided to write this article to expose a few of the dozens of clues that this curious case is a continuation of the overall Covid deception.
Here are some more of those clues:
1. In his March 11 segment, Bigtree shows a slide with Vanden Bossche’s background. It indicates he’s affiliated with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI), GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis and other vaccine proponents. Dell dubs Vanden Bossche a “world-renowned vaccine creator.” Coleman calls him “a very eminent vaccine specialist.”
But, when combined with the contents of his open letter, it’s impossible to believe that he’s in fact an insider who’s now going against his very high-powered comrades. (More on this below.) It’s more likely that he’s their accomplice.'
2. In his open letter Vanden Bossche also writes, “I can assure you that each of the current vaccines have been designed, developed and manufactured by brilliant and competent scientists.” However, he doesn’t say a word about the massive adverse-event rate and very scant efficacy profile of the vaccines that were created by these “brilliant scientists.”
Don’t miss Rosemary’s interview on The Last American Vagabond, live at 16.30 EST/21.30 GMT.
22.30 CET.
Hier de oorspronkelijke bron:
https://www.rosemaryfrei.(...)eert-vanden-bossche/
[ Bericht 4% gewijzigd door Tingo op 16-03-2021 19:13:12 ]
Abstract
Many countries across the globe utilized medical and non-medical facemasks as non-pharmaceutical intervention for reducing the transmission and infectivity of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). Although, scientific evidence supporting facemasks’ efficacy is lacking, adverse physiological, psychological and health effects are established. Is has been hypothesized that facemasks have compromised safety and efficacy profile and should be avoided from use. The current article comprehensively summarizes scientific evidences with respect to wearing facemasks in the COVID-19 era, providing prosper information for public health and decisions making.
Conclusion
The existing scientific evidences challenge the safety and efficacy of wearing facemask as preventive intervention for COVID-19. The data suggest that both medical and non-medical facemasks are ineffective to block human-to-human transmission of viral and infectious disease such SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19, supporting against the usage of facemasks. Wearing facemasks has been demonstrated to have substantial adverse physiological and psychological effects. These include hypoxia, hypercapnia, shortness of breath, increased acidity and toxicity, activation of fear and stress response, rise in stress hormones, immunosuppression, fatigue, headaches, decline in cognitive performance, predisposition for viral and infectious illnesses, chronic stress, anxiety and depression.
Long-term consequences of wearing facemask can cause health deterioration, developing and progression of chronic diseases and premature death. Governments, policy makers and health organizations should utilize prosper and scientific evidence-based approach with respect to wearing facemasks, when the latter is considered as preventive intervention for public health.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7680614/
PCR testing (polymerase chain reaction testing) has come under fire from numerous doctors, scientists, politicians and journalists since the beginning of this pandemic.
Not everyone would know this if their only source of information was mainstream media however, as they’ve chosen not to cover the controversy surrounding it.
This is not to say that PCR testing hasn’t been praised as a useful tool to determine a covid infection, but again, there are great causes for concern that aren’t really being addressed.
As far back as 2007, Gina Kolata published an article in the New York Times about how declaring pandemics based on PCR testing can end in a disaster. The article was titled Faith in Quick Test Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t.
In July, professor Carl Heneghan, director for the centre of evidence-based medicine at Oxford University, an outspoken critic of the current UK response to the pandemic, wrote a piece titled “How many Covid diagnoses are false positives?”
He has argued that the proportion of positive tests that are false in the UK could also be as high as 50%.
The Deputy Medical Officer of Ontario, Canada, Dr. Barbara Yaffe recently stated that COVID-19 testing may yield at least 50 percent false positives. This means that people who test positive for COVID may not actually have it.
Former scientific advisor at Pfizer, Dr. Mike Yeadon, argued that the proportion of positive tests that are false may actually be as high as 90%.
Furthermore, 22 researchers have put out a paper explaining why, according to them, it’s clear that the PCR test is not effective in identifying COVID-19 cases, and that as a result we may be seeing a significant amount of false positives.
Artikel gaat verder:
https://humansarefree.com(...)fectious-people.html
It comes as an economist in the Victorian Department of Finance and Treasury, Sanjeev Sabhlok, on Wednesday penned an article in the Australian Financial Review announcing his resignation from his position.
Mr Sabhlok wrote he resigned "so that I would be able to speak out against the state's management of the COVID-19 infection".
"I made a number of criticisms of the state government on social media. The head of human relations at Treasury asked me to remove them.
"I resigned on the same day, the only honourable course for a free citizen of Australia," Mr Sabhlok wrote.
Mr Sabhlok continued to note a number of his other criticisms over the response to the virus.
"One question remains, how many others have been silenced across all arms of government, including in Canberra," Mr Jones said.
Mr Jones also reiterated his call for a national advertising campaign to "tell the public the truth about the fact this virus is not a pandemic".
America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) spoke to former Pfizer Vice President and Chief Science Officer Dr. Mike Yeadon about his views on the COVID-19 vaccine, hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, the regulatory authorities, and more.
At the outset, Dr. Yeadon said “I’m well aware of the global crimes against humanity being perpetrated against a large proportion of the worlds population.
Artikel gaat verder:
https://www.americasfront(...)-scale-depopulation/
Meer info over Yeadon:
An Education in Viruses and Public Health, from Michael Yeadon, Former VP of Pfizer
This video provides one of the most erudite and informative looks at Covid-19 and the consequences of lockdowns. It was remarkable this week to watch as it appeared on YouTube and was forcibly taken down only 2 hours after posting. The copy below is hosted on LBRY, a blockchain video application. In a year of fantastic educational content, this is one of the best we've seen.
Consider the presenter's bio:
Dr. Michael Yeadon is an Allergy & Respiratory Therapeutic Area expert with 23 years in the pharmaceutical industry. He trained as a biochemist and pharmacologist, obtaining his PhD from the University of Surrey (UK) in 1988.
Dr. Yeadon then worked at the Wellcome Research Labs with Salvador Moncada with a research focus on airway hyper-responsiveness and effects of pollutants including ozone and working in drug discovery of 5-LO, COX, PAF, NO and lung inflammation. With colleagues, he was the first to detect exhaled NO in animals and later to induce NOS in lung via allergic triggers.
Joining Pfizer in 1995, he was responsible for the growth and portfolio delivery of the Allergy & Respiratory pipeline within the company. He was responsible for target selection and the progress into humans of new molecules, leading teams of up to 200 staff across all disciplines and won an Achievement Award for productivity in 2008.
Under his leadership the research unit invented oral and inhaled NCEs which delivered multiple positive clinical proofs of concept in asthma, allergic rhinitis and COPD. He led productive collaborations such as with Rigel Pharmaceuticals (SYK inhibitors) and was involved in the licensing of Spiriva and acquisition of the Meridica (inhaler device) company.
Dr. Yeadon has published over 40 original research articles and now consults and partners with a number of biotechnology companies. Before working with Apellis, Dr. Yeadon was VP and Chief Scientific Officer (Allergy & Respiratory Research) with Pfizer.
Artikel gaat verder en de volledige video van 30 minuten is hier te zien:
https://www.aier.org/arti(...)former-vp-of-pfizer/
EXCLUSIVE - Former Pfizer VP: ‘Your government is lying to you in a way that could lead to your death.’
Dr. Michael Yeadon, Pfizer's former Vice President and Chief Scientist for Allergy & Respiratory who spent 32 years in the industry leading new medicines research and retired from the pharmaceutical giant with “the most senior research position” in his field, spoke with LifeSiteNews.
He addressed the “demonstrably false” propaganda from governments in response to COVID-19, including the “lie” of dangerous variants, the totalitarian potential for “vaccine passports,” and the strong possibility we are dealing with a “conspiracy” which could lead to something far beyond the carnage experienced in the wars and massacres of the 20th century.
His main points included:
There is “no possibility” current variants of COVID-19 will escape immunity. It is “just a lie.”
Yet, governments around the world are repeating this lie, indicating that we are witnessing not just “convergent opportunism,” but a “conspiracy.” Meanwhile media outlets and Big Tech platforms are committed to the same propaganda and the censorship of the truth.
Pharmaceutical companies have already begun to develop unneeded “top-up” (“booster”) vaccines for the “variants.” The companies are planning to manufacture billions of vials, in addition to the current experimental COVID-19 “vaccine” campaign.
Regulatory agencies like the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency, have announced that since these “top-up” vaccines will be so similar to the prior injections which were approved for emergency use authorization, drug companies will not be required to “perform any clinical safety studies.”
Thus, this virtually means that design and implementation of repeated and coerced mRNA vaccines “go from the computer screen of a pharmaceutical company into the arms of hundreds of millions of people, [injecting] some superfluous genetic sequence for which there is absolutely no need or justification.”
Why are they doing this? Since no benign reason is apparent, the use of vaccine passports along with a “banking reset” could issue in a totalitarianism unlike the world has ever seen. Recalling the evil of Stalin, Mao, and Hitler, “mass depopulation” remains a logical outcome.
The fact that this at least could be true means everyone must “fight like crazy to make sure that system never forms.”
Gaat verder:
https://www.lifesitenews.(...)tm_campaign=standard
Veteran investigative reporter Leo Hohmann has discovered a 2017 Ted Talk presentation by Dr. Tal Zaks, the chief medical officer at Moderna Inc., where he clearly explains in layperson’s language just what the mRNA technology does in vaccines.
As Dr. Zaks clearly states, they are “hacking the software of life,” by injecting their own genetic code into humans.
Moderna boss: mRNA jabs are "rewriting the Genetic Code" we call it "information therapy" (Ted 2017)
Volledig artikel:
https://humansarefree.com(...)oftware-of-life.html
Volgens deze redenatie ben je dus ook je lichaam aan het injecteren met water als je dat drinktquote:
Moderna’s Top Scientist On MRNA Technology In COVID Shots: ‘We Are Actually Hacking The Software Of Life’
Veteran investigative reporter Leo Hohmann has discovered a 2017 Ted Talk presentation by Dr. Tal Zaks, the chief medical officer at Moderna Inc., where he clearly explains in layperson’s language just what the mRNA technology does in vaccines.
As Dr. Zaks clearly states, they are “hacking the software of life,” by injecting their own genetic code into humans.
[ afbeelding ]
Moderna boss: mRNA jabs are "rewriting the Genetic Code" we call it "information therapy" (Ted 2017)
Volledig artikel:
https://humansarefree.com(...)oftware-of-life.html
😷
Research on SARS-CoV-2 RNA by scientists at Harvard and MIT has implications for how mRNA vaccines could permanently alter genomic DNA, according to Doug Corrigan, Ph.D., a biochemist-molecular biologist who says more research is needed.
Over the past year, it would be all but impossible for Americans not to notice the media’s decision to make vaccines the dominant COVID narrative, rushing to do so even before any coronavirus-attributed deaths occurred.
The media’s slanted coverage has provided a particularly fruitful public relations boost for messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines — decades in the making but never approved for human use — helping to usher the experimental technology closer to the regulatory finish line.
Under ordinary circumstances, the body makes (“transcribes”) mRNA from the DNA in a cell’s nucleus. The mRNA then travels out of the nucleus into the cytoplasm, where it provides instructions about which proteins to make.
By comparison, mRNA vaccines send their chemically synthesized mRNA payload (bundled with spike protein-manufacturing instructions) directly into the cytoplasm.
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and most mRNA vaccine scientists, the buck then stops there — mRNA vaccines “do not affect or interact with our DNA in any way,” the CDC says. The CDC asserts first, that the mRNA cannot enter the cell’s nucleus (where DNA resides), and second, that the cell — Mission-Impossible-style — “gets rid of the mRNA soon after it is finished using the instructions.”
A December preprint about SARS-CoV-2, by scientists at Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), produced findings about wild coronavirus that raise questions about how viral RNA operates.
The scientists conducted the analysis because they were “puzzled by the fact that there is a respectable number of people who are testing positive for COVID-19 by PCR long after the infection was gone.”
Their key findings were as follows: SARS-CoV-2 RNAs “can be reverse transcribed in human cells,” “these DNA sequences can be integrated into the cell genome and subsequently be transcribed” (a phenomenon called “retro-integration”) — and there are viable cellular pathways to explain how this happens.
According to Ph.D. biochemist and molecular biologist Dr. Doug Corrigan, these important findings (which run contrary to “current biological dogma”) belong to the category of “Things We Were Absolutely and Unequivocally Certain Couldn’t Happen Which Actually Happened.”
The findings of the Harvard and MIT researchers also put the CDC’s assumptions about mRNA vaccines on shakier ground, according to Corrigan. In fact, a month before the Harvard-MIT preprint appeared, Corrigan had already written a blog outlining possible mechanisms and pathways whereby mRNA vaccines could produce the identical phenomenon.
In a second blog post, written after the preprint came out, Corrigan emphasized that the Harvard-MIT findings about coronavirus RNA have major implications for mRNA vaccines — a fact he describes as “the big elephant in the room.” While not claiming that vaccine RNA will necessarily behave in the same way as coronavirus RNA — that is, permanently altering genomic DNA — Corrigan believes that the possibility exists and deserves close scrutiny.
In Corrigan’s view, the preprint’s contribution is that it “validates that this is at least plausible, and most likely probable.”
Gaat verder:
https://childrenshealthde(...)-vaccines-alter-dna/
https://en.wikipedia.org/(...)ng_COVID-19_pandemicquote:
Vooraanstaande wetenschapper over mondkapjes:
[ twitter ]
Dan inhoudelijk:quote:Responses to Bhakdi's criticisms
The German non-profit Correctiv fact-checked one of Bhakdi's YouTube videos, and found a number of problematic claims, including the claim that any COVID-19 vaccine would be "pointless", and that the virus posed no more threat than influenza. Writing for Foreign Policy, Tyson Barker (Head of DGAP's Technology & Global Affairs Program) described Bhakdi as a prominent example from a "crop of debunked but credentialed so-called experts minting conspiracy theories and undermining fact-based information".
In October 2020 the University of Mainz issued a statement to the effect that it does not support Bhakdi's views.
Hij praat over schrikbarend hoge concentraties CO2 achter het masker, met schade voor kinderen.
https://uihc.org/health-t(...)etain-carbon-dioxide
quote:Face masks do not decrease your oxygen intake
They also do not make you retain more carbon dioxide than usual
Oxygen and CO2 are very small, so they can easily pass through a face mask
Droplets are much larger in comparison, and they cannot pass easily through a face mask
Wearing face masks now helps us get back to normal sooner
Leuk man een wikipedia link en een oud artikel over CO2 en mondkapjes, terwijl Bhakdi in de video zegt dat een collega van hem net onderzoek heeft gedaan naar CO2 en mondkapjes.quote:
[..]
https://en.wikipedia.org/(...)ng_COVID-19_pandemic
[..]
Dan inhoudelijk:
Hij praat over schrikbarend hoge concentraties CO2 achter het masker, met schade voor kinderen.
https://uihc.org/health-t(...)etain-carbon-dioxide
[..]
Misschien moet je dat onderzoek er even bijpakken ipv weer voor de zoveelste keer een post te "debunken" door wat linkjes neer te pleuren.
En ga alsjeblieft weg met je "fact-checker organisatie" onzin. Iedereen die niet zn kop in het zand heeft ziet tegenwoordig dat dit soort organisaties helemaal niet objectief "fact checken".
Als hij de naam van zijn collega noemt wil ik ook die naam wel even door de zoekmachine halen.quote:
Leuk man een wikipedia link en een oud artikel over CO2 en mondkapjes, terwijl Bhakdi in de video zegt dat een collega van hem net onderzoek heeft gedaan naar CO2 en mondkapjes.
Daarnaast verwacht ik niet dat de natuurwetten sinds juli 2020 radicaal anders zijn gaan werken.
Ow heb jij dat onderzoek gevonden? Dan wil ik het wel even lezen hoor.quote:Misschien moet je dat onderzoek er even bijpakken ipv weer voor de zoveelste keer een post te "debunken" door wat linkjes neer te pleuren.
Zijn er organisaties die wel objectief fact-checken waar ik nog niks van weet?quote:En ga alsjeblieft weg met je "fact-checker organisatie" onzin. Iedereen die niet zn kop in het zand heeft ziet tegenwoordig dat dit soort organisaties helemaal niet objectief "fact checken".
Charles Hoffe has been a medical doctor for 28 years in the small, rural town of Lytton in British Columbia, Canada. The town is comprised of many indigenous groups and the “First Nations.”
When Dr. Hoffe was given 900 doses of the Moderna experimental COVID-19 injections, he administered the doses through the Lytton Medical Clinic to those who wanted them.
He chose not to inject himself.
Dr. Hoffe reports that the result of injecting 900 people among the indigenous First Nations community was that 2 people went into anaphylactic shock, one person died, and several others have suffered what appear to be permanent disabilities. He relates how one of his patients is in so much pain now, that she prefers death to life.
By contrast, no one in the community died or became permanently disabled due to the COVID-19 virus for the past year.
Dr. Hoffe reported these adverse reactions by email to the medical personnel in his community who were responsible for the roll-out of the Moderna shots, which included pharmacists, nurses, and doctors in his area, a total of about 18 people he says.
His email expressed grave concern over the side effects he was seeing, and he asked if perhaps they should pause the injections for a while.
He reports that within 48 hours he received a very stern rebuke from his superiors at the Interior Health Authority accusing him of causing “vaccine hesitancy” and that they were going to report him to BC College of Physicians and Surgeons.
They forbade him from saying anything negative about the Moderna shots by issuing a gag order against him.
Dr. Hoffe explains that this is a method of intimidation that is being used against other doctors who have become too afraid to speak out, because the College of Physicians and Surgeons has great authority to shut down doctors’ careers, or heavily fine them.
As he continued to see more injuries the following week, he became very angry about his gag order. He was told that if he had any concerns about the injections that he had to contact the medical health officer in charge of the Moderna roll out.
He did, but when he did not receive a reply, he decided to write an open letter directly to Dr. Bonnie Henry, British Columbia Provincial Health Officer, in direct defiance of his gag order since he made it public.
Artikel gaat verder:
https://vaccineimpact.com(...)le-in-his-community/
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Robert Redfield acknowledged during a House hearing Friday that COVID-19 data could be inflated because hospitals receive a monetary gain by reporting COVID-19 cases.
Republican Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer of Missouri questioned Redfield during a House Oversight and Reform subcommittee hearing on coronavirus containment. He asked about the “perverse incentive” for hospitals to classify deaths as being coronavirus related when the virus didn’t cause the death.
Luetkemeyer voiced concern about how an automobile accident-related death could be recorded as a COVID-related death. In this scenario, the death was recorded as COVID-related because the virus was in the victim’s system, even if the car accident was the major factor.
Gaat verder:
https://www.christianpost(...)e-covid-19-data.html
Niet alle politie-agenten in Canada staan achter het beleid van de overheid.
Group of Ontario police officers launches charter challenge of pandemic restrictions
Civil action seeks court declaration that COVID-19 laws 'are not rational'
A group of 19 Ontario police officers has launched a constitutional challenge against the provincial and federal governments and several police chiefs, claiming that enforcing sweeping pandemic health restrictions puts them at odds with their oath to uphold the charter.
Fifteen active and four retired members of law enforcement agencies — including the Toronto Police Service, York Regional Police Service, Ottawa Police Service, Niagara Regional Police Service, Hamilton Police Service and the RCMP — are behind the civil action.
It was filed in the Superior Court of Justice against the premier, the attorneys general of Canada and Ontario, as well as five police chiefs.
The challenge has yet to be tested in court.
It seeks these declarations:
Canada's pandemic laws "are not rational" and have "no force or effect."
Lockdowns, stay-at-home orders and curfews are "forms of martial law."
Wearing masks, social distancing and lockdowns are "ineffective" and "not scientifically or medically based" because they're based on coronavirus cases the legal documents claim "are 96.5 per cent false."
The group also wants the court to declare that religious gatherings and protests are exempt from pandemic restrictions in Ontario.
The lawyer for the officers is Rocco Galati, executive director of the Toronto-based Constitutional Rights Centre. He didn't respond to a request for comment on Monday, but the legal challenge was detailed in a virtual news conference posted April 30 to YouTube.
Officers describe rank-and-file 'divide'
"My clients are concerned to the point that they're stepping forward at their personal and reputational risk because of unwarranted, and hostile and irrational reprisals," said Galati, flanked by Toronto police Sgt. Julie Evans and York Regional Police Const. Christopher Vandenbos, who are both plaintiffs.
"Anyone who dares speak out is ostracized and attacked, even if they do so in civil and appropriate ways," said the lawyer.
Artikel gaat verder:
https://www.cbc.ca/news/c(...)-challenge-1.6012099
John Goss
May 4, 2021 2:10 PM
My comment at 12.10 contained the following.
“I cannot get to see my doctor. But I can go there for an untested experimental vaccine. I cannot get through to the surgery (you are number 21 in the queue) yet I get weekly bombardments telling me my vaccine is available – this is even though I’ve informed them that it should be on my record that I do not want any vaccine of any kind unless I ask for it.
Meanwhile these are some more personal stories of vaccine woe from a social-networking group that has, like so many, been removed.
'On 21 January this year I put together a blog-post revealing deaths and damaging reactions from vaccines which were garnered from a Facebook group called “Covid-19 Vaccinations, Reactions and Feedback.”. For no explicable reason this group was removed. Another Facebook group, Covid19 vaccine victims and families, despite begging pleas from a moderator, was similarly removed. I managed to grab a few screenshots suspecting this group would meet with the same fate as the former.'
https://johnplatinumgoss.(...)-well-as-mainstream/
The time grows neigh for liberty lovers on both sides of the political spectrum to regain control and send the clear message that nothing like 2020 will ever happen again by calling for mass resignations and stripping perpetual perpetrators of all power, property, and influence, not as a first strike, of course, but as a form of “equitable restitution” for the colossally bad policies foisted on a bewildered and overly trusting people.
It’s slowly dawning on Americans that 2020 need not have gone down as it did. A virus didn’t lay waste to the global economy, as so many media reports blared. Lockdowns were the big problem and those restrictions on human rights were not simply unnecessary, they were harmful, and obviously so. AIER began warning about them very early, when they were still a gleam in the eye of fanatical reporters at the New York Times, but people educated by government schools refused to believe until the reports of rampant business closures, high unemployment, crime, and drug use, spikes in suicides and other non-Covid deaths, increased child abuse and sexual molestation, and other serious lockdown costs began to sneak by concerted efforts to censor it.
What about all those who died with, if not from, Covid? Tragic indeed but what about all of those who died with, if not from, lockdowns? AIER has discovered not a handful but 35 major studies from leading scientists and economists that show that lockdowns didn’t just hurt the economy, they killed more people than they saved! Unlike Covid, which took mainly the elderly, lockdowns killed indiscriminately across the age spectrum.
Renowned economist Doug Allen of Simon Fraser University in British Columbia penned the latest such study to come to AIER’s attention (Douglas W. Allen, “Covid Lockdowns Cost/Benefits: A Critical Assessment of the Literature” [April 2021]). Instead of quoting from it extensively, I’ll encourage you to read it and simply summarize it here. Basically, Allen found that lockdowns (which should not be confused with the isolation policies of certain islands) were unnecessary because individuals voluntarily engaged in sufficient mitigation efforts to achieve the same level of disease spread and death as top-down, cookie-cutter government mandates did. The latter either did not bind (e.g., socially distanced sexual activity, as if!) or target the wrong behaviors. Turns out, once again, that individuals and their doctors know more about what is best for them than bureaucrats half a world away do!
Gaat verder:
https://www.thewashington(...)campaign=socialshare
Harvard Medical School's Dr. Martin Kulldorff invented key parts of the U.S. vaccine safety system. But the CDC doesn't want his expertise on COVID vaccines. Why? Looks like politics.
The Centers for Disease Control pulled a world-renowned expert off a vaccine safety advisory committee after he publicly disagreed with the agency’s pause of the Johnson and Johnson COVID vaccine.
In an email, the CDC’s Dr. Amanda Cohn said Dr. Martin Kulldorff of Harvard Medical School was being removed for communicating to the public his expert opinion, which differed from what the CDC was saying publicly at the time. Four days later, however, the CDC reinstated the use of the vaccine, effectively adopting Kulldorff’s recommendation after punishing him for publicly communicating it.
“It has been brought to CDC and ACIPs attention recent public statements you’ve made regarding policy opinions that appear to be pre-determined prior to complete review of data,” Cohn wrote Kulldorff in an April 19 email. “We understand and appreciate that VaST members have personal opinions and we do not object to the expression of those opinions. However, we expect members to be objective and devoid of any appearance of bias… Therefore, CDC is respectfully ending your membership on VaST effective today.”
Gaat verder:
https://thefederalist.com(...)llowed-4-days-later/
Martin Kulldorff is a professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School and a biostatistician and epidemiologist at the Brigham and Women's Hospital.
COVID-19 Counter Measures Should be Age Specific
Among COVID-19 exposed individuals, people in their 70s have roughly twice the mortality of those in their 60s, 10 times the mortality of those in their 50s, 40 times that of those in their 40s, 100 times that of those in their 30s, 300 times that of those in their 20s, and a mortality that is more than 3000 times higher than for children. Since COVID-19 operates in a highly age specific manner, mandated counter measures must also be age specific. If not, lives will be unnecessarily lost.
To determine effective public health counter measures against COVID-19, it is important to know the population characteristics of the epidemic [1]. It has been widely reported that mortality rates among those diagnosed and hospitalized are higher in older age groups [2, 3], but to determine public health action, it is the mortality among those exposed or infected that is of primary importance. Absolute risk estimates are uncertain at this stage of the epidemic, due to asymptomatic infected individuals [4] and limited population based testing [1], but with reasonable assumptions about exposure, it is possible to obtain rough estimates of the relative risks in different age groups, as well as upper bounds for the absolute risks.
Gaat verder:
https://www.linkedin.com/(...)ic-martin-kulldorff/
Academics must urgently counter the very real danger of groupthink across a range of issues, starting with lockdown
There is little room for ambivalence or nuance in modern debate. Any comment or piece of analysis will be taken as support for either of the polarised views on a particular issue. If you do not come down clearly on one side, then too many people are quick to conclude that you must support the other extreme. This makes it very difficult for us to steer an effective path through complex issues. In fact, it’s worse than that because one side of the debate will usually represent the prevailing narrative in society, and so any concerns about that perspective are greeted with much greater hostility than the other way around.
Consider the case of the pandemic. The prevailing narrative, especially among academics like me, is that lockdowns are both required and effective. So, if I am not fervently supporting lockdowns, then I am assumed to be opposed to any form of restrictions. This has been the reaction from across the academy when I have variously suggested: that the stay at home messaging was so effective that it might have resulted in more life years being lost from missed cancer treatments; that middle-aged decision-makers might have been unduly influenced by their own fear of dying; that the life experiences of younger people have been seen as a luxury good whilst we focus on the life expectancies of older people; and that it unethical to scare people into believing that their own risks from the virus are higher than they really are.
At no point have I ever endorsed a no-restrictions policy. At no point have other “lockdown sceptics” more prominent than me ever suggested that we simply let the virus rip. When Sunetra Gupta and colleagues argued for the focussed protection of older people (which is a long way from doing nothing), they were rounded on by many in the academy, and subjected to considerable personal abuse. Given all the uncertainties surrounding COVID, none of us can know with any degree of confidence what the right approach to the virus is, and I remain deeply sceptical of anyone who is so confident that strict lockdowns are best for social welfare in the UK.
One of the main reasons I became an academic was to help to shed light on difficult questions, and to be respectful of evidence that might lead to different answers. In the final analysis, I am pretty sure that many more people will conclude that younger people have been required to pay too high a price, but I am open to weighing up any evidence that speaks to this issue. What I am not open to are attempts to shut down academic debate and empirical investigation into these issues on the grounds that the right response has already been established, and that any dissent represents denial of the seriousness of the virus.
The academy must therefore urgently counter the very real danger of groupthink across a range of issues. Inter-group contact, where members of different groups are brought together to reduce prejudice, has been suggested as a method for tackling polarisation. While some research has shown that exposure to the ideas of the opposing group can increase polarisation, other research shows that inter-group contact works better in reducing prejudice if certain conditions are satisfied, such as prolonged exposure to more than one member of the other group.
I therefore urge academics to embrace adversarial collaboration, which explicitly brings together people with different prior beliefs to work on a research question. I have started doing this more in my own academic work, such as when we sought to value the intangible benefits of the 2012 Olympic Games. I absolutely loved the Games and thought they were worth every penny, but most of my dull economist collaborators thought they were a waste of money. For those that are interested, it was the basically the opening ceremony wot won it.
None of us - not even academics - can avoid bringing our own biases and beliefs to an issue and the evidence surrounding it. At least politicians are explicit about their disagreements. There is an honesty in that which is currently lacking in the academy. The world is a crazy place when an academic is extolling the honesty of politicians. But it does feel like the world has got a little crazier – and more polarised – over the past year. So, let us all use COVID and other potentially divisive contemporary issues as an opportunity to accept different perspectives, and to reduce polarisation rather than to increase it.
https://archive.is/1eHTa#selection-1219.0-1243.624
https://www.telegraph.co.(...)must-not-let-happen/
Mass infection prevention and mass vaccination with leaky Covid-19 vaccines in the midst of the pandemic can only breed highly infectious variants.
Key document on mass vaccination and immune escape. Response to critics. Why do mass vaccination campaigns promote dominance of selective immune escape variants? I repeat with utmost urgency my call for a public scientific debate with the WHO, qualified experts and authorities worldwide.
https://www.geertvandenbossche.org/
"Most fundamentally, the groups we studied believe that science is a process, and not an institution."
"Indeed, anti-maskers often reveal themselves to be more sophisticated in their understanding of how scientific knowledge is socially constructed than their ideological adversaries, who espouse naïve realism about the “objective” truth of public health data."
"In other words, anti-maskers value unmediated access to information and privilege personal research and direct reading over “expert” interpretations."
"Its members value individual initiative and ingenuity, trusting scientific analysis only insofar as they can replicate it themselves by accessing and manipulating the data firsthand."
"They are highly reflexive about the inherently biased nature of any analysis, and resent what they view as the arrogant self-righteousness of scientific elites."
"Many of the users believe that the most important metrics are missing from government-released data."
"One user wrote: 'Coding data is a big deal—and those definitions should be offered transparently by every state. Without a national guideline—we are left with this mess'."
"The lack of transparency within these data collection systems—which many of these users infer as a lack of honesty—erodes these users’ trust within both government institutions and the datasets they release."
"In fact, there are multiple threads every week where users debate how representative the data are of the population given the increased rate of testing across many states."
"These groups argue that the conflation of asymptomatic and symptomatic cases therefore makes it difficult for anyone to actually determine the severity of the pandemic."
"For these anti-mask users, their approach to the pandemic is grounded in more scientific rigor, not less."
"These individuals as a whole are extremely willing to help others who have trouble interpreting graphs with multiple forms of clarification: by helping people find the original sources so that they can replicate the analysis themselves, by referencing other reputable studies...
that come to the same conclusions, by reminding others to remain vigilant about the limitations of the data, and by answering questions about the implications of a specific graph."
"While these groups highly value scientific expertise, they also see collective analysis of data as a way to bring communities together within a time of crisis, and being able to transparently and dispassionately analyze the data is crucial for democratic governance."
"In fact, the explicit motivation for many of these followers is to find information so that they can make the best decisions for their families—and by extension, for the communities around them."
"The message that runs through these threads is unequivocal: that data is the only way to set fear-bound politicians straight, and using better data is a surefire way towards creating a safer community."
"Data literacy is a quintessential criterion for membership within the community they have created."
"Arguing anti-maskers need more scientific literacy is to characterize their approach as uninformed & inexplicably extreme. This study shows the opposite: they are deeply invested in forms of critique & knowledge production they recognize as markers of scientific expertise"
"We argue that anti-maskers’ deep story draws from similar wells of resentment, but adds a particular emphasis on the usurpation of scientific knowledge by a paternalistic, condescending elite that expects intellectual subservience rather than critical thinking from the public."
And yet in the conclusion they lament "the skeptical impulse that the 'science simply isn’t settled,' prompting people to simply 'think for themselves” to horrifying ends."
They then compare it to the January 6 Capitol riot.
Bizarre and fascinating document.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1391754136031477760.html
Dit lijkt mij waarom er conspiracy theories bestaan.quote:
Toch wel bijzonder hoe deze Yeadon zich uitlaat over Covid en vaccinaties. Vooral als je kijkt naar zijn voormalige positie binnen Pfizer.
EXCLUSIVE - Former Pfizer VP: ‘Your government is lying to you in a way that could lead to your death.’
Dr. Michael Yeadon, Pfizer's former Vice President and Chief Scientist for Allergy & Respiratory who spent 32 years in the industry leading new medicines research and retired from the pharmaceutical giant with “the most senior research position” in his field, spoke with LifeSiteNews.
He addressed the “demonstrably false” propaganda from governments in response to COVID-19, including the “lie” of dangerous variants, the totalitarian potential for “vaccine passports,” and the strong possibility we are dealing with a “conspiracy” which could lead to something far beyond the carnage experienced in the wars and massacres of the 20th century.
His main points included:
There is “no possibility” current variants of COVID-19 will escape immunity. It is “just a lie.”
Yet, governments around the world are repeating this lie, indicating that we are witnessing not just “convergent opportunism,” but a “conspiracy.” Meanwhile media outlets and Big Tech platforms are committed to the same propaganda and the censorship of the truth.
Pharmaceutical companies have already begun to develop unneeded “top-up” (“booster”) vaccines for the “variants.” The companies are planning to manufacture billions of vials, in addition to the current experimental COVID-19 “vaccine” campaign.
Regulatory agencies like the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency, have announced that since these “top-up” vaccines will be so similar to the prior injections which were approved for emergency use authorization, drug companies will not be required to “perform any clinical safety studies.”
Thus, this virtually means that design and implementation of repeated and coerced mRNA vaccines “go from the computer screen of a pharmaceutical company into the arms of hundreds of millions of people, [injecting] some superfluous genetic sequence for which there is absolutely no need or justification.”
Why are they doing this? Since no benign reason is apparent, the use of vaccine passports along with a “banking reset” could issue in a totalitarianism unlike the world has ever seen. Recalling the evil of Stalin, Mao, and Hitler, “mass depopulation” remains a logical outcome.
The fact that this at least could be true means everyone must “fight like crazy to make sure that system never forms.”
Gaat verder:
https://www.lifesitenews.(...)tm_campaign=standard
Mensen hebben teveel vertrouwen in de rationaliteit van overheden. Dat komt tot uiting in conspiracy denkers "wappies" en blind volgende angst "schapen".
Doodsangsten doen rare dingen met de emoties van mensen. En ze vallen er allemaal ten prooi aan incl wetenschappers op hoge plekken.
The past year has accelerated all kinds of trends that were already moving through our societies. Social atomisation, the decline of the high street and communities, the rise of the nanny state — Covid and lockdown have brought all of these to the fore. Among the most concerning is the rise of Big Tech censorship, and the way in which a handful of Silicon Valley oligarchs have come to set the terms of debate and even rule on what is true.
This week representatives from Facebook and Twitter were brought before parliament to discuss their firms’ censorship of discussion around Covid. Two particularly pertinent cases were raised — though there are many more. The first was a statement by Martin Kulldorff, a professor at the Harvard Medical School and one of the key authors of the anti-lockdown Great Barrington Declaration. His tweet last month, suggesting that not everyone needed to be vaccinated, particularly those who had previously been infected, was labelled ‘misleading’ by Twitter.
Tweeters were rendered unable to interact with it and were instructed that 'health officials recommend a vaccine for most people'. Similarly, in November, Facebook labelled a Spectator article on the efficacy of masks, penned by Carl Heneghan and Tom Jefferson of Oxford University’s Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, as ‘false information’.
Here we have two social-media giants effectively intervening in scientific debate. Kulldorff, Heneghan and Jefferson are not snarling conspiracy theorists or bluffers wading into things they don’t understand. They are dissenting scientists and medics who hold positions at esteemed institutions. On what basis could Facebook or Twitter simply declare their arguments null and void? The answers provided to parliamentarians were chilling. Katy Minshall, head of UK public policy at Twitter, essentially said anything that contradicts official guidance from public health authorities is deemed misleading by the platform. She told the committee:
What we want to do is when people see [Kulldorff's] tweet to really quickly direct them to authoritative sources of information like the CDC, the NHS or the Department of Health so they can see what the official guidance is and make up their own mind.
Ms Minshall's comment is, ironically, misleading — Twitter isn't inviting people to 'make up their own minds', it is labelling statements as incorrect and banning users from interacting with it. Given that public health authorities across the world have got a lot wrong during this pandemic — this time last year UK health authorities were advising against masks and until last summer Public Health England wasn’t even counting the deaths properly — this seems a dodgy standard. Later on, Facebook’s representative told the Lords that an army of fact-checkers, most of whom will not have had any medical or scientific training, essentially have the final say on what is or isn’t deemed ‘false’ on the world’s biggest social network.
Social media censorship is nothing new of course. For years now Twitter, Facebook and YouTube have been gradually tightening their policies around hate speech and misinformation in response to various moral panics about bigotry, bile and bunkum on their platforms. But the Covid pandemic has pushed them well beyond what even they would have previously been comfortable with. There was an elitist assumption at the beginning of the pandemic that people are idiots and so shouldn’t be left to navigate the Covid debate for themselves. This led to incredible pressure being piled on social media giants to filter, fact-check and censor. As recently as 2018, Mark Zuckerberg insisted that Facebook would not censor conspiracy theories, even Holocaust denial, because it was not Facebook’s business to rule on what is true. Now Facebook, Twitter and the rest are censoring not only Covid-denying loons but also eminent scientists who just so happen to dissent from official orthodoxy.
This is a disaster for freedom of speech. These corporate giants essentially own the modern-day public square. What’s more, at a time when citizens are being asked to put up with unprecedented restrictions on all their other liberties, freedom of speech must not be compromised. Even where there is a strong consensus on a specific course of action — like lockdown — dissent is still vital. If nothing else, it forces the powers that be to present their evidence and refine their arguments. In times of crisis, free speech matters more not less. And yet Big Tech took the precise opposite message from the pandemic. Covid became a pretext on which it has further tightened its grip.
https://www.spectator.co.(...)d-our-modern-censors
https://archive.is/nOH3F#selection-649.0-673.682
The next big wave of COVID infections, already hitting states such as Michigan, will be dominated by people who have been fully vaccinated.
This was predicted by the authors of a scientific study published in a British medical journal.
Between 60 and 70 percent of “third wave” COVID deaths and hospitalizations will be from people who were fully vaccinated, according to the study, Summary of Further Modeling of Easing Restrictions, published March 31 by the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.
This may at least partially explain why Detroit-area hospitals are filling up with COVID patients.
But you won’t read about this angle to the story from anyone in the mainstream media. They are reporting the story as simply a new wave of COVID hospitalizations and deaths caused by a UK-based variant of the virus that has nothing to do with the high rate of vaccinations. [See Detroit News, April 15, 2021, Beaumont nears COVID hospital capacity as experts warn of ‘new pandemic.’]
Mainstream news outlets have yet to express the tiniest bit of curiosity as to why the big spike in COVID is taking place even as large percentages of the public have been vaccinated [Michigan is one of the most-vaccinated states in the nation with nearly 30 percent of Michiganders receiving the jab]. In fact, health officials quoted in the above Detroit News article are blaming “vaccine hesitancy” for the new wave, a diabolical falsification of what’s going on in Michigan meant to put more pressure on the people who refuse the unproven experimental injection.
Apparently those health officials haven’t read the new British study, which states:
“The resurgence in both hospitalizations and deaths is dominated by those that have received two doses of the vaccine, comprising around 60% and 70% of the wave respectively. This can be attributed to the high levels of uptake in the most at-risk age
groups, such that immunization failures account for more serious illness than unvaccinated individuals.” [See page 10, summary point No. 32].
And what do the British scientists who authored the study say is the answer to this dilemma of the fully vaccinated coming down with COVID? Why, more vaccines and more lockdowns, of course!
And Big Pharma is more than happy to comply. Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla announced a “third dose” of its vaccine will be needed within 12 months of the second dose and likely another dose every year after that. As we predicted, the globalists planned all along to use COVID to scare people into getting annual injections. Nobody knows what’s in these injections or how they will affect human health in the medium and long term.
The scenario taking shape is beginning to look like the one Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche warned us about in early March. Based on his years of experience in the vaccine industry, Vanden Bossche called for a halt to the mass vaccination programs being conducted “in the middle of a pandemic.” He said that if the jabs were not halted they would lead to the creation of stronger and stronger variants of the virus until a “super virus” takes hold and wipes out huge numbers of people. [See Top vaccine expert calls for global moratorium on COVID injections, LeoHohmann.com, March 17, 2021]
Speaking to ChurchMilitant.com, academic and mental-health ethicist Niall McCrae noted that “the report’s prediction that 70% of COVID-19 deaths will be of dual-vaccinated people is quite startling.”
“Clearly these pseudo-scientific modelers would like us to be locked down ad infinitum, but do they know something that governments and public health authorities aren’t telling us?” Dr. McCrae asked.
The academic slammed the study’s “Alice-in-Wonderland logic, ‘following the science’ down a rabbit hole” since “the report states, ‘this is because vaccine uptake has been so high in the oldest age groups,’ and that ‘this is not the result of vaccines being ineffective, merely uptake being so high.’”
McCrae elaborated:
“We already know that for two to three weeks after the injection, elderly and vulnerable people are at increased risk of serious respiratory infection, due to lowering of immunity. That’s why there was a surge in deaths after vaccination rollout, with the evidence most stark in countries with the highest vaccination numbers; such as Hungary, Israel, Serbia, Gibraltar and the United Arab Emirates.”
Even more concerning is the report’s warning of a longer-term risk to the vaccinated. Will they be more prone to COVID-19 variants or to other viruses, as Vanden Bossche suggested?
McCrae answered as follows:
“In the old joke when someone asks an Irishman for directions, and he says, ‘I wouldn’t start from here,’ I fear for those who took the jab and thought that the road ahead would be safe and straightforward.”
https://www.technocracy.n(...)en-fully-vaccinated/
Ik vertrouw die wetenschappers niet hoor.quote:
STUDY: ‘Third Wave’ Of Sickness And Death Will Be Dominated By Those Who Have Been Fully Vaccinated
The next big wave of COVID infections, already hitting states such as Michigan, will be dominated by people who have been fully vaccinated.
This was predicted by the authors of a scientific study published in a British medical journal.
Between 60 and 70 percent of “third wave” COVID deaths and hospitalizations will be from people who were fully vaccinated, according to the study, Summary of Further Modeling of Easing Restrictions, published March 31 by the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.
This may at least partially explain why Detroit-area hospitals are filling up with COVID patients.
But you won’t read about this angle to the story from anyone in the mainstream media. They are reporting the story as simply a new wave of COVID hospitalizations and deaths caused by a UK-based variant of the virus that has nothing to do with the high rate of vaccinations. [See Detroit News, April 15, 2021, Beaumont nears COVID hospital capacity as experts warn of ‘new pandemic.’]
Mainstream news outlets have yet to express the tiniest bit of curiosity as to why the big spike in COVID is taking place even as large percentages of the public have been vaccinated [Michigan is one of the most-vaccinated states in the nation with nearly 30 percent of Michiganders receiving the jab]. In fact, health officials quoted in the above Detroit News article are blaming “vaccine hesitancy” for the new wave, a diabolical falsification of what’s going on in Michigan meant to put more pressure on the people who refuse the unproven experimental injection.
Apparently those health officials haven’t read the new British study, which states:
“The resurgence in both hospitalizations and deaths is dominated by those that have received two doses of the vaccine, comprising around 60% and 70% of the wave respectively. This can be attributed to the high levels of uptake in the most at-risk age
groups, such that immunization failures account for more serious illness than unvaccinated individuals.” [See page 10, summary point No. 32].
And what do the British scientists who authored the study say is the answer to this dilemma of the fully vaccinated coming down with COVID? Why, more vaccines and more lockdowns, of course!
And Big Pharma is more than happy to comply. Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla announced a “third dose” of its vaccine will be needed within 12 months of the second dose and likely another dose every year after that. As we predicted, the globalists planned all along to use COVID to scare people into getting annual injections. Nobody knows what’s in these injections or how they will affect human health in the medium and long term.
The scenario taking shape is beginning to look like the one Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche warned us about in early March. Based on his years of experience in the vaccine industry, Vanden Bossche called for a halt to the mass vaccination programs being conducted “in the middle of a pandemic.” He said that if the jabs were not halted they would lead to the creation of stronger and stronger variants of the virus until a “super virus” takes hold and wipes out huge numbers of people. [See Top vaccine expert calls for global moratorium on COVID injections, LeoHohmann.com, March 17, 2021]
Speaking to ChurchMilitant.com, academic and mental-health ethicist Niall McCrae noted that “the report’s prediction that 70% of COVID-19 deaths will be of dual-vaccinated people is quite startling.”
“Clearly these pseudo-scientific modelers would like us to be locked down ad infinitum, but do they know something that governments and public health authorities aren’t telling us?” Dr. McCrae asked.
The academic slammed the study’s “Alice-in-Wonderland logic, ‘following the science’ down a rabbit hole” since “the report states, ‘this is because vaccine uptake has been so high in the oldest age groups,’ and that ‘this is not the result of vaccines being ineffective, merely uptake being so high.’”
McCrae elaborated:
“We already know that for two to three weeks after the injection, elderly and vulnerable people are at increased risk of serious respiratory infection, due to lowering of immunity. That’s why there was a surge in deaths after vaccination rollout, with the evidence most stark in countries with the highest vaccination numbers; such as Hungary, Israel, Serbia, Gibraltar and the United Arab Emirates.”
Even more concerning is the report’s warning of a longer-term risk to the vaccinated. Will they be more prone to COVID-19 variants or to other viruses, as Vanden Bossche suggested?
McCrae answered as follows:
“In the old joke when someone asks an Irishman for directions, and he says, ‘I wouldn’t start from here,’ I fear for those who took the jab and thought that the road ahead would be safe and straightforward.”
https://www.technocracy.n(...)en-fully-vaccinated/
"60% of new C-19 cases that are being treated are people who have been vaccinated."
~Dr. Harvey Risch, Professor of Epidemiology, YaleVaccines
https://www.reddit.com/r/(...)e_being_treated_are/
Prof. Luc Montagnier said that epidemiologists know but are “silent” about the phenomenon, known as “Antibody-Dependent Enhancement” (ADE).
While it is understood that viruses mutate, causing variants, French Virologist and Nobel Prize Winner Luc Montagnier contends that “it is the vaccination that is creating the variants.”
The 2008 Nobel Laureate made the explosive comments as part of a larger interview with Pierre Barnérias of Hold-Up Media earlier this month. The clip was exclusively translated for RAIR Foundation USA, and is quite damning for the agenda-driven left-wing establishment.
As reported at RAIR in April of last year, Prof. Montagnier presented a powerful case that the coronavirus was created in a lab. His comments at the time offended the left-wing establishment so much that they aggressively attempted to discredit his statement. Now, the media is backpedaling on the origin of the coronavirus after prominent scientists called for further scrutiny.
Vaccines are Creating the Variants
Prof. Montagnier referred to the vaccine program for the coronavirus as an “unacceptable mistake”. Mass vaccinations are a “scientific error as well as a medical error,” he said. “It is an unacceptable mistake. The history books will show that, because it is the vaccination that is creating the variants,” Prof. Luc Montagnier continued.
The prominent virologist explained that “there are antibodies, created by the vaccine,” forcing the virus to “find another solution” or die. This is where the variants are created. It is the variants that “are a production and result from the vaccination.”
Antibody-Dependent Enhancement
Prof. Montagnier said that epidemiologists know but are “silent” about the phenomenon, known as “Antibody-Dependent Enhancement” (ADE). In the articles that mention ADE, the concerns expressed by Prof. Montagnier are dismissed. “Scientists say that ADE is pretty much a non-issue with COVID-19 vaccines,” an article at Medpage Today reported in March.
Prof. Montagnier explained that the trend is happening in “each country” where “the curve of vaccination is followed by the curve of deaths.”
The Nobel Laureate’s point is emphasized by information revealed in an open letter from a long list of medical doctors to the European Medicines Agency. The letter stated in part that “there have been numerous media reports from around the world of care homes being struck by COVID-19 within days of vaccination of residents.”
Earlier this month, RAIR reported on a statement by French Virologist Christine Rouzioux:
“…the rise in new cases is occurring in vaccinated patients in nursing homes in ‘Montpellier, in the Sarte, in Rheims, in the Moselle…”
Prof. Luc Montagnier continued to say that he is doing his own experiments with those who become infected with the coronavirus after getting the vaccine. “I will show you that they are creating the variants that are resistant to the vaccine,” he said.
Watch the clip (transcribed below):
https://rairfoundation.co(...)s-creating-variants/
If we look at the curve from the WHO, since the vaccinations started in January, the curve showing new infections (contamination) has exploded, along with deaths.
Notably among young people.
—Yes. With thromboses, etc.
How do you view the mass vaccination program? Mass vaccination compared to treatments that work and aren’t expensive.
—It’s an enormous mistake, isn’t it? A scientific error as well as a medical error. It is an unacceptable mistake. The history books will show that, because it is the vaccination that is creating the variants.
—For the China virus, there are antibodies, created by the vaccine. What does the virus do? Does it die or find another solution?
—The new variants are a production and result from the vaccination. You see it in each country, it’s the same: the curve of vaccination is followed by the curve of deaths.
—I’m following this closely and I am doing experiments at the Institute with patients who became sick with Corona after being vaccinated. I will show you that they are creating the variants that are resistant to the vaccine.
Should we be vaccinating during a pandemic?
—It’s unthinkable.
—They’re silent… many people know this, epidemiologists know it.
—It is the antibodies produced by the virus that enable an infection to become stronger.
—It’s what we call Antibody Dependent Enhancement, which means antibodies favor a certain infection. The antibody attaches to the virus, from that moment it has the receptors, the antibodies, we have them in the macrophage etc.
—It pokes the virus and not accidentally, but because of the fact that they’re linked to the antibodies.
—It is clear that the new variants are created by antibody-mediated selection due to the vaccination. OK?
https://rairfoundation.co(...)s-creating-variants/
Lockdowns are conferring little benefit, but causing colossal damage, a Economics professor has concluded, using a cost benefit analysis to calculate that strict Covid restrictions caused 282 times the loss of years of life, that it saved.
Economics Professor Douglas W. Allen, from Simon Fraser University in Canada looked at the effect of loss of employment, loss of education, increased mental health problems, increased domestic violence risk and lost opportunities for healthcare.
He also examined over 80 research papers from around the world that studied lockdowns. He found that many of them employed false assumptions in their calculations, including: the assumption of a overstated reproduction rate for the virus; assuming a infection fatality rate that was too high and not age dependent; assuming hospital capacity was assumed fixed and unchangeable; and assuming individuals would not change behavior in the face of a new virus.
This led to analyses which, he believes, greatly overestimated the benefits of lockdowns and underestimated the harm the restrictions would cause.
After comparing regions with and without lockdowns around the world, and after counting the negative effects of lockdown on public health, the economist has calculated that for every year of life lockdowns has saved, it has caused the loss of 282 years of life.
Professor Allen concluded that “Lockdowns have had, at best, a marginal effect on the number of Covid-19 deaths.”
The economics professor published his findings in a report entitled Covid Lockdown Cost/Benefits: A Critical Assessment of the Literature.
Perhaps the greatest error in the reports and modelling, according to Allen, is the assumption that places without lockdowns would involve people taking zero precautions.
In his study, he performed a cost benefit analysis specifically on life-years saved versus life-years lost due to lockdown measures. He concluded that in Canada lockdown measures saved 22,333 years of life.
However, the cost of lockdown, he calculated was up to 6,300,000 years of lost life. From these figures, he posits that lockdown was 282 times more deadly than no lockdown.
The “seen costs” of covid-19 are clear and can be measured in death counts. This number has been fed constantly to a nervous public for over 14 months now and is the main factor in the continuing public support for lockdown.
However the “unseen costs” of lockdown are not so easy to measure and include lost civil liberty; lost social contact; medical preventions and procedures; impoverishment and economic loss which results in deteriorating health outcomes; lost opportunity in education and career which leads to worsening economic and health outcomes; increased domestic violence; increased anxiety and mental suffering; increased substance abuse; and increased deaths of despair.
These are all unseen costs which can’t be measured immediately, and by the time they are measured they become lost in background statistical noise.
In the coming years these costs will show up in terms of a population-wide falling life expectancy, which will be felt most heavily by the poor, the paper noted.
In Prof. Allen’s assessment, “heavy lockdowns did not meaningfully reduce the number of deaths in the areas where they are implemented, when compared to areas where lockdowns were not implemented or as stringent.”
He was highly critical of the one sided narrative and information suppression of the main stream media, big tech, and the political establishment.
“The ubiquitous media, public health, and political response to the pandemic has been one-sided, incomplete, and almost unchanging over the past year, said Prof. Allen.
“With respect to lockdown policies, many political jurisdictions have repeated the same spring 2020 programs in 2021, ignoring what has been learned in the meantime. Often public announcements were made that were inconsistent with basic Covid-19 facts that were easy to look up if you know where to look. Furthermore, when research results contrary to the official government response were shared on social media, they were often pulled from social media platforms.”
He lambasted politicians who seemed more interested in managing the narrative than in managing public health, and claimed that politicians often take credit for having achieved a reduction in case numbers through their lockdown measures.
“I think it makes perfect sense why they do exactly what they did last year,” Allen said.
“If you were a politician, would you say, ‘We’re not going to lock down because it doesn’t make a difference, and we actually did the equivalent of killing 600,000 people this last year.’”
Allen noted that many of the lockdown costs will not be known for years. “It is possible that lockdown will go down as one of the greatest peacetime policy failures in Canada’s history,” he wrote.
He also noted that governments were slow to produce cost-benefit analysis of the Covid-19 locksdowns.
“Over the course of the Covid-19 pandemic, there has been no public evidence that either the federal or provincial governments of Canada have considered both the benefit and cost sides of their policy decisions,” his report notes. “To my knowledge, no government has provided any formal cost/benefit analysis of their actions.”
In Ireland, the government has not produced any cost-benefit analysis for what has been described as the longest lockdown in Europe, with devastating effects expected for the economy, health and housing. Not that they’ve been asked any hard questions about this by most of the media.
https://gript.ie/decision(...)economics-professor/
100% mee eens, ook mijn opleidingsachtergrond overigens, kosten/baten analyses worden echt nauwelijks begrepen, zeker hier.quote:
Decision to lockdown caused 282 times the loss of years of life says Economics professor
Lockdowns are conferring little benefit, but causing colossal damage, a Economics professor has concluded, using a cost benefit analysis to calculate that strict Covid restrictions caused 282 times the loss of years of life, that it saved.
Economics Professor Douglas W. Allen, from Simon Fraser University in Canada looked at the effect of loss of employment, loss of education, increased mental health problems, increased domestic violence risk and lost opportunities for healthcare.
He also examined over 80 research papers from around the world that studied lockdowns. He found that many of them employed false assumptions in their calculations, including: the assumption of a overstated reproduction rate for the virus; assuming a infection fatality rate that was too high and not age dependent; assuming hospital capacity was assumed fixed and unchangeable; and assuming individuals would not change behavior in the face of a new virus.
This led to analyses which, he believes, greatly overestimated the benefits of lockdowns and underestimated the harm the restrictions would cause.
After comparing regions with and without lockdowns around the world, and after counting the negative effects of lockdown on public health, the economist has calculated that for every year of life lockdowns has saved, it has caused the loss of 282 years of life.
Professor Allen concluded that “Lockdowns have had, at best, a marginal effect on the number of Covid-19 deaths.”
The economics professor published his findings in a report entitled Covid Lockdown Cost/Benefits: A Critical Assessment of the Literature.
Perhaps the greatest error in the reports and modelling, according to Allen, is the assumption that places without lockdowns would involve people taking zero precautions.
In his study, he performed a cost benefit analysis specifically on life-years saved versus life-years lost due to lockdown measures. He concluded that in Canada lockdown measures saved 22,333 years of life.
However, the cost of lockdown, he calculated was up to 6,300,000 years of lost life. From these figures, he posits that lockdown was 282 times more deadly than no lockdown.
The “seen costs” of covid-19 are clear and can be measured in death counts. This number has been fed constantly to a nervous public for over 14 months now and is the main factor in the continuing public support for lockdown.
However the “unseen costs” of lockdown are not so easy to measure and include lost civil liberty; lost social contact; medical preventions and procedures; impoverishment and economic loss which results in deteriorating health outcomes; lost opportunity in education and career which leads to worsening economic and health outcomes; increased domestic violence; increased anxiety and mental suffering; increased substance abuse; and increased deaths of despair.
These are all unseen costs which can’t be measured immediately, and by the time they are measured they become lost in background statistical noise.
In the coming years these costs will show up in terms of a population-wide falling life expectancy, which will be felt most heavily by the poor, the paper noted.
In Prof. Allen’s assessment, “heavy lockdowns did not meaningfully reduce the number of deaths in the areas where they are implemented, when compared to areas where lockdowns were not implemented or as stringent.”
He was highly critical of the one sided narrative and information suppression of the main stream media, big tech, and the political establishment.
“The ubiquitous media, public health, and political response to the pandemic has been one-sided, incomplete, and almost unchanging over the past year, said Prof. Allen.
“With respect to lockdown policies, many political jurisdictions have repeated the same spring 2020 programs in 2021, ignoring what has been learned in the meantime. Often public announcements were made that were inconsistent with basic Covid-19 facts that were easy to look up if you know where to look. Furthermore, when research results contrary to the official government response were shared on social media, they were often pulled from social media platforms.”
He lambasted politicians who seemed more interested in managing the narrative than in managing public health, and claimed that politicians often take credit for having achieved a reduction in case numbers through their lockdown measures.
“I think it makes perfect sense why they do exactly what they did last year,” Allen said.
“If you were a politician, would you say, ‘We’re not going to lock down because it doesn’t make a difference, and we actually did the equivalent of killing 600,000 people this last year.’”
Allen noted that many of the lockdown costs will not be known for years. “It is possible that lockdown will go down as one of the greatest peacetime policy failures in Canada’s history,” he wrote.
He also noted that governments were slow to produce cost-benefit analysis of the Covid-19 locksdowns.
“Over the course of the Covid-19 pandemic, there has been no public evidence that either the federal or provincial governments of Canada have considered both the benefit and cost sides of their policy decisions,” his report notes. “To my knowledge, no government has provided any formal cost/benefit analysis of their actions.”
In Ireland, the government has not produced any cost-benefit analysis for what has been described as the longest lockdown in Europe, with devastating effects expected for the economy, health and housing. Not that they’ve been asked any hard questions about this by most of the media.
https://gript.ie/decision(...)economics-professor/
Ik ben wel benieuwd naar de economische wetenschap qua opvattingen over het hele covid gebeuren, de basisregels zijn niet zo duur maar alles wat er nu gebeurt is in de buitenlucht.....
De virologen schuilen zich achter dat er nog veel onduidelijk was, maar dat houdt dan puur in dat het advies van de virologen op die onderwerpen ook niet beter is dan die van een leek.
Dat zorgt voor biases in wat belangrijk wrodt bevonden voor het landsbeleid, het kabinet heeft niet het land geleid maar de personen binnen het OMT.
Dat is echter niet hun functie, en het is wel overduidelijk dat er geen maatschappij brede kosten/baten analyses zijn uitgevoerd.
Dat OMT met 100% focus op zorg was in de paniekstand wel prima, maar evaluaties en een breder perspectief zijn te lang uitgebleven.
Ik vraag me af hoe dit type evaluaties zijn gegaan na de Spaanse griep...... Ik vraag me af of we iets gaan leren van deze pandemie waar we beter van worden (ipv doorslaan in de angst).
Of dat we alle lessen van deze pandemie gewoon lekker vergeten heel snel
.Inderdaad.quote:'However the “unseen costs” of lockdown are not so easy to measure and include lost civil liberty; lost social contact; medical preventions and procedures; impoverishment and economic loss which results in deteriorating health outcomes; lost opportunity in education and career which leads to worsening economic and health outcomes; increased domestic violence; increased anxiety and mental suffering; increased substance abuse; and increased deaths of despair.
These are all unseen costs which can’t be measured immediately, and by the time they are measured they become lost in background statistical noise.
In the coming years these costs will show up in terms of a population-wide falling life expectancy, which will be felt most heavily by the poor, the paper noted.'
New policies will artificially deflate “breakthrough infections” in the vaccinated, while the old rules continue to inflate case numbers in the unvaccinated.
The US Center for Disease Control (CDC) is altering its practices of data logging and testing for “Covid19” in order to make it seem the experimental gene-therapy “vaccines” are effective at preventing the alleged disease.
They made no secret of this, announcing the policy changes on their website in late April/early May, (though naturally without admitting the fairly obvious motivation behind the change).
The trick is in their reporting of what they call “breakthrough infections” – that is people who are fully “vaccinated” against Sars-Cov-2 infection, but get infected anyway.
Essentially, Covid19 has long been shown – to those willing to pay attention – to be an entirely created pandemic narrative built on two key factors:
False-positive tests. The unreliable PCR test can be manipulated into reporting a high number of false-positives by altering the cycle threshold (CT value)
Inflated Case-count. The incredibly broad definition of “Covid case”, used all over the world, lists anyone who receives a positive test as a “Covid19 case”, even if they never experienced any symptoms.
Without these two policies, there would never have been an appreciable pandemic at all, and now the CDC has enacted two policy changes which means they no longer apply to vaccinated people.
Firstly, they are lowering their CT value when testing samples from suspected “breakthrough infections”.
From the CDC’s instructions for state health authorities on handling “possible breakthrough infections” (uploaded to their website in late April):
For cases with a known RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) value, submit only specimens with Ct value ≤28 to CDC for sequencing. (Sequencing is not feasible with higher Ct values.)
Throughout the pandemic, CT values in excess of 35 have been the norm, with labs around the world going into the 40s.
Essentially labs were running as many cycles as necessary to achieve a positive result, despite experts warning that this was pointless (even Fauci himself said anything over 35 cycles is meaningless).
But NOW, and only for fully vaccinated people, the CDC will only accept samples achieved from 28 cycles or fewer. That can only be a deliberate decision in order to decrease the number of “breakthrough infections” being officially recorded.
Secondly, asymptomatic or mild infections will no longer be recorded as “covid cases”.
That’s right. Even if a sample collected at the low CT value of 28 can be sequenced into the virus alleged to cause Covid19, the CDC will no longer be keeping records of breakthrough infections that don’t result in hospitalisation or death.
From their website:
As of May 1, 2021, CDC transitioned from monitoring all reported vaccine breakthrough cases to focus on identifying and investigating only hospitalized or fatal cases due to any cause. This shift will help maximize the quality of the data collected on cases of greatest clinical and public health importance. Previous case counts, which were last updated on April 26, 2021, are available for reference only and will not be updated moving forward.
Just like that, being asymptomatic – or having only minor symptoms – will no longer count as a “Covid case” but only if you’ve been vaccinated.
The CDC has put new policies in place which effectively created a tiered system of diagnosis. Meaning, from now on, unvaccinated people will find it much easier to be diagnosed with Covid19 than vaccinated people.
Consider…
Person A has not been vaccinated. They test positive for Covid using a PCR test at 40 cycles and, despite having no symptoms, they are officially a “covid case”.
Person B has been vaccinated. They test positive at 28 cycles, and spend six weeks bedridden with a high fever. Because they never went into a hospital and didn’t die they are NOT a Covid case.
Person C, who was also vaccinated, did die. After weeks in hospital with a high fever and respiratory problems. Only their positive PCR test was 29 cycles, so they’re not officially a Covid case either.
The CDC is demonstrating the beauty of having a “disease” that can appear or disappear depending on how you measure it.
To be clear: If these new policies had been the global approach to “Covid” since December 2019, there would never have been a pandemic at all.
If you apply them only to the vaccinated, but keep the old rules for the unvaccinated, the only possible result can be that the official records show “Covid” is much more prevalent among the latter than the former.
This is a policy designed to continuously inflate one number, and systematically minimise the other.
What is that if not an obvious and deliberate act of deception?
https://www.zerohedge.com(...)ew-covid-cases-among
Kben wel klaar met de pandemie.
Luister naar de experts!
Independent Sage expert who warned against reopening is race adviser with no medical qualification
A member of Independent Sage who berated the Government on Tuesday for not delaying the easing of Covid-19 restrictions in Britain is a social scientist turned race adviser who has no medical qualifications.
Dr Zubaida Haque, a founding member of the group, specialises in racial equality and has been involved with various government-commissioned reports on welfare issues.
In an interview with Good Morning Britain, she said the Government should have stalled the latest stage of the roadmap out of lockdown.
“We didn't pass test four – test four of the Government's roadmap said that if we think that there's any further risk from new variants of concern, we should stall – they completely ignored that and have gone ahead,” she said.
She went on to criticise Matt Hancock for his recent comments indicating vaccine hesitancy may be behind the rise in Covid-19 hospitalisations in Bolton, one of the Indian variant hotspots.
"This whole notion that, that at the moment, everyone's freedom is threatened because of vaccine hesitancy groups is absolute nonsense,” Dr Haque said.
It was one of Dr Haque’s many TV interviews and newspaper columns since the pandemic began, ranging in scope from vaccine passports and the reopening of schools to financial support for low-paid workers needing to self-isolate.
However, she has no medical, clinical, virological or epidemiological qualifications.
Instead, her PhD thesis was titled: Exploring the validity and possible causes of the apparently poor performances of Bangladeshi students in British secondary schools.
Gaat verder:
https://archive.is/NoRV7#selection-795.0-841.169
Woman says 100% of all Covid-19 hospitalizations are in "fully vaccinated" people
https://www.reddit.com/r/(...)19_hospitalizations/
Update van dezelfde mevrouw:
https://old.reddit.com/r/(...)ctions_for_2_months/
Nog te weinig informatie maar mogelijk interessant om in de gaten te houden:
https://old.reddit.com/r/(...)_climb_in_step_with/
Someone who has tested positive for COVID-19 commits suicide, the Ontario Ministry of Health will record their cause of death as COVID-19
As of Sunday, December 13, Public Health Ontario counted 140,181 cumulative cases of COVID-19, and 3,949 deaths.
“As a result of how data is recorded by health units into public health information databases, the ministry is not able to accurately separate how many people died directly because of COVID versus those who died with a COVID infection,” Ontario Ministry of Health Senior Communications Advisor Anna Miller said to True North in an email.
“A death that occurs in an active case of COVID-19 is counted as a COVID-19 death.”
This information confirms what the Toronto Public Health Twitter account tweeted back in June 2020: “Individuals who have died with COVID-19, but not as a result of COVID-19 are included in the case counts for COVID-19 deaths in Toronto.”
According to Miller, “COVID-19 cases marked as fatal are included in the public health reporting databases whether or not COVID-19 was determined to be a contributing or underlying cause of death. This is an inclusive approach to reporting on COVID-19 related deaths to ensure that all deaths linked to the disease are captured.”
Some researchers are predicting increases of suicide in Canada as a result of the economic instability, social isolation and job losses brought on by the government-mandated lockdowns.
The Canada Suicide Prevention Service, which operates a crisis hotline, says between 15–20% of crisis calls they’ve received during the pandemic have mentioned COVID-19.
However, health authorities in Ontario and in Canada seem to have no intention to separate deaths caused by a COVID-19 infection, deaths caused by the consequences of government-mandated lockdowns and deaths unrelated to COVID-19 where the victim was found to have tested positive.
https://lakesuperiornews.(...)-covid-19-fatalities
COVID Vaccines May Bring Avalanche of Neurological Disease
The typical unprecedented vaccine takes 12 years to develop, and of all the
unprecedented vaccines in development, only 2% are projected to ever make it through
all Phase 2 and 3 clinical phases of testing
The COVID-19 vaccine was developed with Operation Warp Speed in less than one year,
which makes it virtually impossible to assess safety and efficacy, as the vaccine has not
been adequately tested
Five months into the vaccination campaign, statistics tell a frightening story. Research
shows deaths are 15 times higher during the first 14 days after the first COVID injection
among people over the age of 60, compared to those who aren't vaccinated
Another study shows that after COVID-19 vaccines were implemented, overall death rates
have increased, with the exception of a few areas. It appears countries in which COVID19 vaccines have not raised mortality rates are also not using glyphosate
In the next 10 to 15 years, we are likely to see spikes in prion diseases, autoimmune
diseases, neurodegenerative diseases at younger ages, and blood disorders such as
blood clots, hemorrhaging, stroke and heart failure
In this interview, return guest Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D., a senior research scientist at MIT for over five decades, discusses the COVID-19 vaccines. Since 2008, her primary focus has been glyphosate and sulfur, but in the last year, she took a deep-dive into the science of these novel injections and recently published an excellent paper on this topic.
“To have developed this incredibly new technology so quickly, and to skip so
many steps in the process of evaluating [its safety], it's an insanely reckless
thing that they've done,” she says. “My instinct was that this is bad, and I
needed to know [the truth].
So, I really dug into the research literature by the people who've developed these
vaccines, and then more extensive research literature around those topics. And
I don't see how these vaccines can possibly be doing anything good. When you
weigh the good against the bad, I can't see how they could possibly be winning,
from what I've seen.”
Significant Death Toll Will Rise in Months and Years to Come
Five months into the vaccination campaign, statistics tell a frightening story. Seneff
cites research showing deaths are 14.6 times more frequent during the first 14 days
after the first COVID injection among people over the age of 60, compared to those who
aren't vaccinated. That is extraordinary. You can read the full paper here.
Other data, reviewed in the video above, show that after COVID-19 vaccines were
implemented, overall death rates have increased, with the exception of a few areas.
Interestingly, Seneff believes she may have discovered why. It appears countries in
which COVID-19 vaccines have not raised mortality rates are also not using glyphosate.
“I immediately suspected glyphosate when I started to see COVID-19,” Seneff
says. “I've written a book on glyphosate called ‘Toxic Legacy,’ and I have an
entire chapter in that book on the immune system. Glyphosate, I believe, is a
train wreck for the innate immune system, and when your immune system is
weak, your body has to overreact to the virus. It can't kill the virus.
Gaat verder:
https://media.mercola.com(...)ovid-vaccine-pdf.pdf
According to Dr. Peter McCullough, vice chief of internal medicine at Baylor University Medical Center and known for being one of the top five most-published medical researchers in the United States, COVID-19 vaccines are killing “huge numbers” of people and the government is simply ignoring it.
In a video interview with investigative journalist and founder of Liberty Sentinel, Alex Newman, McCullough says the U.S. government, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and health agencies around the world have all committed to vaccinating the global population while sitting on data showing the COVID-19 “vaccines” are turning out to be the most lethal vaccines ever created.
McCullough, who also has a master’s degree in public health, has provided testimony in three different Senate hearings, sharing the treatments he used to help patients recover from COVID-19 and avoid hospitalization. He summarizes his protocol in the interview.
These strategies are also detailed in “Pathophysiological Basis and Rationale for Early Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 Infection,” published in the January 2021 issue of the American Journal of Medicine.1 He was also a consulting editor of “A Guide to Home-Based COVID Treatment.”2
During a recent Texas state Senate Health and Human Services Committee hearing, McCullough noted that, according to available data, early treatment could have prevented up to 85% of COVID-19 deaths.3 Early at-home treatment also minimizes the spread, as the amount of time you’re infectious can be reduced from two weeks to about four days.
Yet, despite being inexpensive and readily available, early treatments have all been censored and suppressed, apparently in order to secure this global mass vaccination campaign. In fact, as McCullough notes, there’s been no clarified guidance on COVID treatment at all, not even hospital protocols.
The entire focus of our health agencies has been on masking, lockdowns and waiting for a gene therapy “vaccine.” The results have been devastating. Five months into the mass vaccination campaign, more than 10,000 in the U.S. and European Union have already died after getting the shots. Any other vaccine would have been pulled from the market by now.
Shocking Stats Show Just How Dangerous COVID ‘Vaccines’ Are
For example, in 1976, the U.S. government vaccinated 45 million people against pandemic swine flu. The entire program was canceled after reports of just 53 deaths, according to Fox News.4 Note: The number of deaths reported after the 1976 inoculation program varies from three to 53, depending on the source.5,6,7
Now, health authorities are shrugging off more than 3,800 deaths8 after COVID-19 vaccination as either coincidental or inconsequential. Think about that. Five months into the COVID-19 vaccination campaign, we’re looking at a death toll that is 7,000% greater than during the swine flu vaccination campaign, which was canceled after the vaccine was deemed too risky.
The COVID-19 “vaccine” is also on a level of magnitude more dangerous than the seasonal flu vaccine. As reported by McCullough, on average, there are 20 to 30 deaths reported following the seasonal flu vaccine, which is given to about 195 million Americans each year.9
Compare that to these novel COVID-19 gene therapies. So far, an estimated 124 million Americans are fully vaccinated against COVID-19 and the death count is already at 3,837, as of April 30, 2021.10
Worse, it appears the vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) is backlogged by about three months,11 so this is likely to be a serious undercount. Even if VAERS was fully caught up, it would be an undercount, as only 1%12,13 to 10%14 of adverse events after vaccination are ever reported. So, in reality, we might be looking at anywhere from 38,370 to 383,700 COVID vaccine-related deaths.
A third comparison can be made against vaccines as a whole. As reported by Tucker Carlson,15 May 6, 2021, the COVID-19 shots have already resulted in more deaths than all available vaccines combined from mid-1997 until the end of 2013 — a period of 15.5 years.
Gaat verder:
https://libertarianhub.co(...)cine-related-deaths/
Kvind het maar tricky want als je mensen gaat vaccineren met 1 been in het graf is het nogal wiedes dat het aantal doden exorbitant zal zijn na vaccinatie.quote:
GOVERNMENT SCRUBS STATS ON VACCINE-RELATED DEATHS
According to Dr. Peter McCullough, vice chief of internal medicine at Baylor University Medical Center and known for being one of the top five most-published medical researchers in the United States, COVID-19 vaccines are killing “huge numbers” of people and the government is simply ignoring it.
In a video interview with investigative journalist and founder of Liberty Sentinel, Alex Newman, McCullough says the U.S. government, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and health agencies around the world have all committed to vaccinating the global population while sitting on data showing the COVID-19 “vaccines” are turning out to be the most lethal vaccines ever created.
McCullough, who also has a master’s degree in public health, has provided testimony in three different Senate hearings, sharing the treatments he used to help patients recover from COVID-19 and avoid hospitalization. He summarizes his protocol in the interview.
These strategies are also detailed in “Pathophysiological Basis and Rationale for Early Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 Infection,” published in the January 2021 issue of the American Journal of Medicine.1 He was also a consulting editor of “A Guide to Home-Based COVID Treatment.”2
During a recent Texas state Senate Health and Human Services Committee hearing, McCullough noted that, according to available data, early treatment could have prevented up to 85% of COVID-19 deaths.3 Early at-home treatment also minimizes the spread, as the amount of time you’re infectious can be reduced from two weeks to about four days.
Yet, despite being inexpensive and readily available, early treatments have all been censored and suppressed, apparently in order to secure this global mass vaccination campaign. In fact, as McCullough notes, there’s been no clarified guidance on COVID treatment at all, not even hospital protocols.
The entire focus of our health agencies has been on masking, lockdowns and waiting for a gene therapy “vaccine.” The results have been devastating. Five months into the mass vaccination campaign, more than 10,000 in the U.S. and European Union have already died after getting the shots. Any other vaccine would have been pulled from the market by now.
Shocking Stats Show Just How Dangerous COVID ‘Vaccines’ Are
For example, in 1976, the U.S. government vaccinated 45 million people against pandemic swine flu. The entire program was canceled after reports of just 53 deaths, according to Fox News.4 Note: The number of deaths reported after the 1976 inoculation program varies from three to 53, depending on the source.5,6,7
Now, health authorities are shrugging off more than 3,800 deaths8 after COVID-19 vaccination as either coincidental or inconsequential. Think about that. Five months into the COVID-19 vaccination campaign, we’re looking at a death toll that is 7,000% greater than during the swine flu vaccination campaign, which was canceled after the vaccine was deemed too risky.
The COVID-19 “vaccine” is also on a level of magnitude more dangerous than the seasonal flu vaccine. As reported by McCullough, on average, there are 20 to 30 deaths reported following the seasonal flu vaccine, which is given to about 195 million Americans each year.9
Compare that to these novel COVID-19 gene therapies. So far, an estimated 124 million Americans are fully vaccinated against COVID-19 and the death count is already at 3,837, as of April 30, 2021.10
Worse, it appears the vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) is backlogged by about three months,11 so this is likely to be a serious undercount. Even if VAERS was fully caught up, it would be an undercount, as only 1%12,13 to 10%14 of adverse events after vaccination are ever reported. So, in reality, we might be looking at anywhere from 38,370 to 383,700 COVID vaccine-related deaths.
A third comparison can be made against vaccines as a whole. As reported by Tucker Carlson,15 May 6, 2021, the COVID-19 shots have already resulted in more deaths than all available vaccines combined from mid-1997 until the end of 2013 — a period of 15.5 years.
Gaat verder:
https://libertarianhub.co(...)cine-related-deaths/
Dr. Marty Makary, appeared for an interview on “The Vince Coglianese Show” Tuesday to talk about immunity from the coronavirus. As a professor at Johns Hopkins Medical school, Makary said the total disregard for natural immunity is “one of the biggest failures of our current medical leadership.”
Many representatives in the House, along with three senators, have refused the vaccine, because they’re immune since they’ve already been infected. They faced criticism over their decision. Makary stood up for these lawmakers, saying they’re being “reasonable.”
“Natural immunity works,” he said. Not only does it work, but the doctor also added “It’s probably lifelong immunity.” A study in Denmark showed that 6/10ths of 1% got reinfected after already having the virus.
“Please, ignore the CDC guidance,” Makary said. “Live a normal life, unless you are unvaccinated and did not have the infection, in which case you need to be careful.” After all, the Center for Disease Control and Prevention has become a “slow, reactionary, political” organization.
https://saraacarter.com/i(...)es-natural-immunity/
https://video.twimg.com/e(...)Qt5SQI9-M.mp4?tag=12
WORLD RENOWNED DOCTOR BLOWS LID OFF OF COVID VACCINE
https://rumble.com/vhp8e1(...)f-covid-vaccine.html
MUST WATCH: Dr. Peter McCullough discusses the dangers of the novel COVID vaccine and it's roll out. This is a product that had minimal testing but is being pushed on the masses. Must we all get the shot for things to "go back to normal"? Are you going to get the shot?
Dr. Peter McCullough has been the world's most prominent and vocal advocate for early outpatient treatment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Infection in order to prevent hospitalization and death. On May 19, 2021, he was interviewed regarding his efforts as a treating physician and researcher. From his unique vantage point, he has observed and documented a PROFOUNDLY DISTURBING POLICY RESPONSE to the pandemic -- a policy response that may prove to be the greatest malpractice and malfeasance in the history of medicine and public health.
Dr. McCullough is an internist, cardiologist, epidemiologist, and Professor of Medicine at Texas A & M College of Medicine, Dallas, TX USA. Since the outset of the pandemic, Dr. McCullough has been a leader in the medical response to the COVID-19 disaster and has published “Pathophysiological Basis and Rationale for Early Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Infection” the first synthesis of sequenced multidrug treatment of ambulatory patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in the American Journal of Medicine and subsequently updated in Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine. He has 40 peer-reviewed publications on the infection and has commented extensively on the medical response to the COVID-19 crisis in TheHill and on FOX NEWS Channel. On November 19, 2020, Dr. McCullough testified in the US Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and throughout 2021 in the Texas Senate Committee on Health and Human Services, Colorado General Assembly, and New Hampshire Senate concerning many aspects of the pandemic response.
Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH, FACP, FACC, FAHA, FCRSA, FCCP, FNKF, FNLA
Professor of Medicine, Texas A & M College of Medicine
Board Certified Internist and Cardiologist
President Cardiorenal Society of America
Editor-in-Chief, Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine
Editor-in-Chief, Cardiorenal Medicine
Senior Associate Editor, American Journal of Cardiology
For more information about Dr. McCullough, please visit: heartplace.com/dr-peter-a-mccullough
A major new study by German scientists at Munich University has found that lockdowns had no effect on reducing the country’s coronavirus infection rate.
“Statisticians at Munich University found “no direct connection” between the German lockdown and falling infection rates in the country,” reports the Telegraph.
The study found that, on all three occasions before Germany imposed its lockdowns in November, December and April, infection rates had already begun to fall.
The R rate – the number that indicates how many other people an infected person passes the virus to – was already under 1 before the lockdown restrictions came into force.
As we highlighted last year, a leaked study from inside the German Ministry of the Interior revealed that the impact of the country’s lockdown could end up killing more people than the coronavirus due to victims of other serious illnesses not receiving treatment.
This is by no means the only study to have concluded that lockdowns are completely useless and don’t work.
A peer reviewed study published in January by Stanford researchers found that mandatory lockdowns do not provide more benefits to stopping the spread of COVID-19 than voluntary measures such as social distancing.
Back in March, Stanford medical professor Dr. Jay Bhattacharya told Newsweek that COVID-19 lockdowns are “the single worst public health mistake in the last 100 years.”
Earlier this year, academics from Duke, Harvard, and Johns Hopkins concluded that there could be around a million excess deaths over the next two decades as a result of lockdowns.
Other research has concluded lockdowns will conservatively “destroy at least seven times more years of human life” than they save.
https://www.zerohedge.com(...)topping-spread-covid
Was toch al overduidelijk, ook het WHO gaf het al aan overigens.quote:
German Study Finds Lockdown "Had No Effect" In Stopping Spread Of COVID
A major new study by German scientists at Munich University has found that lockdowns had no effect on reducing the country’s coronavirus infection rate.
“Statisticians at Munich University found “no direct connection” between the German lockdown and falling infection rates in the country,” reports the Telegraph.
The study found that, on all three occasions before Germany imposed its lockdowns in November, December and April, infection rates had already begun to fall.
The R rate – the number that indicates how many other people an infected person passes the virus to – was already under 1 before the lockdown restrictions came into force.
As we highlighted last year, a leaked study from inside the German Ministry of the Interior revealed that the impact of the country’s lockdown could end up killing more people than the coronavirus due to victims of other serious illnesses not receiving treatment.
This is by no means the only study to have concluded that lockdowns are completely useless and don’t work.
A peer reviewed study published in January by Stanford researchers found that mandatory lockdowns do not provide more benefits to stopping the spread of COVID-19 than voluntary measures such as social distancing.
Back in March, Stanford medical professor Dr. Jay Bhattacharya told Newsweek that COVID-19 lockdowns are “the single worst public health mistake in the last 100 years.”
Earlier this year, academics from Duke, Harvard, and Johns Hopkins concluded that there could be around a million excess deaths over the next two decades as a result of lockdowns.
Other research has concluded lockdowns will conservatively “destroy at least seven times more years of human life” than they save.
https://www.zerohedge.com(...)topping-spread-covid
Maar je moet echt een gehaktbal zijn wil je het niet zien, natuurlijk ga je niks significants vinden als er nauwelijks iets veranderd.
Maar Ernst Kuipers zou wel weer voor zijn beurt hebben gesproken hier in Nederland, I.p.v. dat die andere mongolen hun oogkleppen eens afzetten.
Er wordt veelvuldig naar onderzoeken gewezen maar nergens kan ik een link naar het daadwerkelijke onderzoek vinden. Noch naar enig ander onderzoek waar ze naar verwijzen.quote:
German Study Finds Lockdown "Had No Effect" In Stopping Spread Of COVID
A major new study by German scientists at Munich University has found that lockdowns had no effect on reducing the country’s coronavirus infection rate.
“Statisticians at Munich University found “no direct connection” between the German lockdown and falling infection rates in the country,” reports the Telegraph.
The study found that, on all three occasions before Germany imposed its lockdowns in November, December and April, infection rates had already begun to fall.
The R rate – the number that indicates how many other people an infected person passes the virus to – was already under 1 before the lockdown restrictions came into force.
As we highlighted last year, a leaked study from inside the German Ministry of the Interior revealed that the impact of the country’s lockdown could end up killing more people than the coronavirus due to victims of other serious illnesses not receiving treatment.
This is by no means the only study to have concluded that lockdowns are completely useless and don’t work.
A peer reviewed study published in January by Stanford researchers found that mandatory lockdowns do not provide more benefits to stopping the spread of COVID-19 than voluntary measures such as social distancing.
Back in March, Stanford medical professor Dr. Jay Bhattacharya told Newsweek that COVID-19 lockdowns are “the single worst public health mistake in the last 100 years.”
Earlier this year, academics from Duke, Harvard, and Johns Hopkins concluded that there could be around a million excess deaths over the next two decades as a result of lockdowns.
Other research has concluded lockdowns will conservatively “destroy at least seven times more years of human life” than they save.
https://www.zerohedge.com(...)topping-spread-covid
Heb jij die links toevallig?
Bron?quote:Op maandag 7 juni 2021 13:16 schreef ludovico het volgende:
[..]
Was toch al overduidelijk, ook het WHO gaf het al aan overigens.
https://healthfeedback.or(...)by-peter-mccullough/quote:
Peter McCullough, een normale arts en Covid-wetenschapper (die o.a. niets wilde weten van Hydroxychloroquine), zegt nu dat de vaccins niet veilig genoeg zijn om ze aan te raden aan zijn patienten:
WORLD RENOWNED DOCTOR BLOWS LID OFF OF COVID VACCINE
https://rumble.com/vhp8e1(...)f-covid-vaccine.html
MUST WATCH: Dr. Peter McCullough discusses the dangers of the novel COVID vaccine and it's roll out. This is a product that had minimal testing but is being pushed on the masses. Must we all get the shot for things to "go back to normal"? Are you going to get the shot?
Dr. Peter McCullough has been the world's most prominent and vocal advocate for early outpatient treatment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Infection in order to prevent hospitalization and death. On May 19, 2021, he was interviewed regarding his efforts as a treating physician and researcher. From his unique vantage point, he has observed and documented a PROFOUNDLY DISTURBING POLICY RESPONSE to the pandemic -- a policy response that may prove to be the greatest malpractice and malfeasance in the history of medicine and public health.
Dr. McCullough is an internist, cardiologist, epidemiologist, and Professor of Medicine at Texas A & M College of Medicine, Dallas, TX USA. Since the outset of the pandemic, Dr. McCullough has been a leader in the medical response to the COVID-19 disaster and has published “Pathophysiological Basis and Rationale for Early Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Infection” the first synthesis of sequenced multidrug treatment of ambulatory patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in the American Journal of Medicine and subsequently updated in Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine. He has 40 peer-reviewed publications on the infection and has commented extensively on the medical response to the COVID-19 crisis in TheHill and on FOX NEWS Channel. On November 19, 2020, Dr. McCullough testified in the US Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and throughout 2021 in the Texas Senate Committee on Health and Human Services, Colorado General Assembly, and New Hampshire Senate concerning many aspects of the pandemic response.
Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH, FACP, FACC, FAHA, FCRSA, FCCP, FNKF, FNLA
Professor of Medicine, Texas A & M College of Medicine
Board Certified Internist and Cardiologist
President Cardiorenal Society of America
Editor-in-Chief, Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine
Editor-in-Chief, Cardiorenal Medicine
Senior Associate Editor, American Journal of Cardiology
For more information about Dr. McCullough, please visit: heartplace.com/dr-peter-a-mccullough
Hmm toch niet zo'n geweldige arts blijkbaar
Heb voor nu even wat Duitse artikelen gevonden:quote:
[..]
Er wordt veelvuldig naar onderzoeken gewezen maar nergens kan ik een link naar het daadwerkelijke onderzoek vinden. Noch naar enig ander onderzoek waar ze naar verwijzen.
Heb jij die links toevallig?
https://www.focus.de/poli(...)tzt_id_13348160.html
https://www.rnd.de/gesund(...)Q5O5G7UVH45JFCE.html
edit:
Hier het onderzoek:
https://www.covid19.stati(...)codag_bericht_16.pdf
Tnx.. zal lezenquote:
[..]
Heb voor nu even wat Duitse artikelen gevonden:
https://www.focus.de/poli(...)tzt_id_13348160.html
https://www.rnd.de/gesund(...)Q5O5G7UVH45JFCE.html
edit:
Hier het onderzoek:
https://www.covid19.stati(...)codag_bericht_16.pdf
Dit is wel een interessant onderzoek (voor zover ik het kan volgen). Maar de onderzoekers houden ook zelf nog een slag om de arm, zo ook hier te lezen: https://www.zdf.de/nachri(...)wirksamkeit-100.html.quote:
Hier het onderzoek:
https://www.covid19.stati(...)codag_bericht_16.pdf
WHOquote:
Link? Oh wacht Hebben ze namelijk nooit gezegd dus die heb je niet.quote:
Zie google.quote:
[..]
Link? Oh wacht Hebben ze namelijk nooit gezegd dus die heb je niet.
inderdaadquote:
https://www.isdatechtzo.n(...)lockdown-niet-werkt/
https://www.forbes.com/si(...)ext/?sh=6a4df648158c
Heb ik verdorie alweer gelijk
Wat jij definieert als "het werkt" zal uiteraard weer verschillen van de definitie die ik hanteer.quote:
[..]
inderdaad
https://www.isdatechtzo.n(...)lockdown-niet-werkt/
https://www.forbes.com/si(...)ext/?sh=6a4df648158c
Heb ik verdorie alweer gelijk
Het heeft in dit land geen significant meetbaar effect. Dat is mijn definitie.
Dat het in Australië wél werkt is andere koek. Dat het in een andere opzet wel werkt, is andere koek, dat het hier niet streng genoeg was is andere koek.
Onze lock-down. Was een grote schadepost zonder significante positieve punten.
Ah de bekende doelpalen worden weer verzet.quote:
[..]
Wat jij definieert als "het werkt" zal uiteraard weer verschillen van de definitie die ik hanteer.
Het heeft in dit land geen significant meetbaar effect. Dat is mijn definitie.
Dat het in Australië wél werkt is andere koek. Dat het in een andere opzet wel werkt, is andere koek, dat het hier niet streng genoeg was is andere koek.
Onze lock-down. Was een grote schadepost zonder significante positieve punten.
Jij zegt dat de WHO ook toegeeft dat lockdowns niet werken... Je kunt daar geen bron van geven, en nu krabbel je weer terug met je eigen definite
ik zeg, dikke
Kleine troll, er valt nooit een serieus gesprek met je te voeren en dat heeft echt alles te maken met je instelling.quote:
[..]
Ah de bekende doelpalen worden weer verzet.
Jij zegt dat de WHO ook toegeeft dat lockdowns niet werken... Je kunt daar geen bron van geven, en nu krabbel je weer terug met je eigen definite
ik zeg, dikke
jawel hoor.. maar je moet gewoon geen leugens vertellen en pissed off doen als je betrapt wordtquote:
[..]
Kleine troll, er valt nooit een serieus gesprek met je te voeren en dat heeft echt alles te maken met je instelling.
quote:
Kleine troll, er valt nooit een serieus gesprek met je te voeren en dat heeft echt alles te maken met je instelling.
Mooie Trump move van je. Jij liegt, wordt betrapt en dan beticht je iemand anders van wat je zelf doet.Ik denk dat de beste samenvatting gegeven wordt door Ralph Brinks:quote:
[..]
Heb voor nu even wat Duitse artikelen gevonden:
https://www.focus.de/poli(...)tzt_id_13348160.html
https://www.rnd.de/gesund(...)Q5O5G7UVH45JFCE.html
edit:
Hier het onderzoek:
https://www.covid19.stati(...)codag_bericht_16.pdf
Dass der Lockdown unnötig war, kann man so aus den Daten nicht sagen.
Ralph Brinks, Lehrstuhl für Medizinische Biometrie und Epidemiologie der Universität Witten/Herdecke
Probleem met dit soort onderzoeken is altijd dat je geen passend referentiekader hebt.
Dat een lockdown niet meteen zorgt voor dalende cijfers heeft veel te maken met hoe goed men zich aan de maatregelen houdt. Maar vooral belangrijk is dat je niet weet wat het niet hebben van een lockdown met de cijfers gedaan zou hebben.
Ik ben doelpalen aan het verzetten.quote:
[..]
Of je moet gewoon niet aannemen dat we het in een Nederlandse omgeving het niet over Nederland zouden hebben.
WHO gaat wereldwijd en die spreken zich toch echt uit tegen lock downs. Doen vaak meer kwaad dan goed.
Werkt een lock down in dat geval?
Je weet niet waar ik het over heb joh, je toetst de context niet, maar neemt een context aan die je zelf zint. En ik verwissel doelpalen? Je houdt jezelf voor de gek.
En nogmaals: Het ligt echt aan jezelf als iedere keer zo een discussie verlept verloopt, dat is echt 100% je eigen instelling.
Geldt ook voor Devlin of andere trollen in dit topic.
Als je iemand in het water duwt, en hij wordt nat, kan je niet zeggen dat hij nat is geworden door hem in het water te gooien, immers, er is geen situatie die precies gelijk is waarin dat persoon niet in het water werd gegooid!quote:
[..]
Ik denk dat de beste samenvatting gegeven wordt door Ralph Brinks:
Dass der Lockdown unnötig war, kann man so aus den Daten nicht sagen.
Ralph Brinks, Lehrstuhl für Medizinische Biometrie und Epidemiologie der Universität Witten/Herdecke
Probleem met dit soort onderzoeken is altijd dat je geen passend referentiekader hebt.
Dat een lockdown niet meteen zorgt voor dalende cijfers heeft veel te maken met hoe goed men zich aan de maatregelen houdt. Maar vooral belangrijk is dat je niet weet wat het niet hebben van een lockdown met de cijfers gedaan zou hebben.
Nogmaals bron?quote:
[..]
Ik ben doelpalen aan het verzetten.
WHO gaat wereldwijd en die spreken zich toch echt uit tegen lock downs.
Hebben ze namelijk nooit gezegd en dat weet je ook en toch gebruik je het. Al die doelpalen eromheen die je aan het verzetten bent helpen niet
Whatever, je hebt zelf google.quote:
[..]
Nogmaals bron?
Hebben ze namelijk nooit gezegd en dat weet je ook en toch gebruik je het. Al die doelpalen eromheen die je aan het verzetten bent helpen niet
quote:
[..]
Als je iemand in het water duwt, en hij wordt nat, kan je niet zeggen dat hij nat is geworden door hem in het water te gooien, immers, er is geen situatie die precies gelijk is waarin dat persoon niet in het water werd gegooid!
Weet ff niet of ik moet huilen of lachen
Ja en daar valt te vinden dat ze het niet hebben gezegd. Had jij ook kunnen vinden voordat je dit soort onzin neerpentquote:
Weetje het is niet eens het argument dat niet valide is ofzo, het gaat erom hoe subjectief jij dit type argumenten draait zodat het altijd in jouw voordeel spreekt.quote:
[..]
Ik denk dat de beste samenvatting gegeven wordt door Ralph Brinks:
Dass der Lockdown unnötig war, kann man so aus den Daten nicht sagen.
Ralph Brinks, Lehrstuhl für Medizinische Biometrie und Epidemiologie der Universität Witten/Herdecke
Probleem met dit soort onderzoeken is altijd dat je geen passend referentiekader hebt.
Dat een lockdown niet meteen zorgt voor dalende cijfers heeft veel te maken met hoe goed men zich aan de maatregelen houdt. Maar vooral belangrijk is dat je niet weet wat het niet hebben van een lockdown met de cijfers gedaan zou hebben.
Dat werkt zo niet hè.quote:
[..]
Ja en daar valt te vinden dat ze het niet hebben gezegd. Had jij ook kunnen vinden voordat je dit soort onzin neerpent
Nee, klopt, ik heb je al 2 bronnen gegeven waaruit blijkt dat het niet klopt wat je zegt terwijl normaliter degene die wat beweert het te bewijzen heeft. Ik heb dus alweer teveel gedaan.quote:
Zit je me nu te beschuldigen van het feit dat ik valide argumenten geef die mijn punt ondersteunen...quote:
[..]
Weetje het is niet eens het argument dat niet valide is ofzo, het gaat erom hoe subjectief jij dit type argumenten draait zodat het altijd in jouw voordeel spreekt.
Ik ga je maar gewoon weer negeren... beviel nog het beste
Nee je buigt de interpretatie naar je eigen voordeel, ipv dat je zegt dat bewijs nooit 100% betrouwbaar is maak jij als het in je voordeel spreekt ervan "voldoende bewijs" en als het in je nadeel is "onvoldoende bewijs".quote:
[..]
Zit je me nu te beschuldigen van het feit dat ik valide argumenten geef die mijn punt ondersteunen...
Ik ga je maar gewoon weer negeren... beviel nog het beste
Je bent niet objectief. Je draait teveel. Je bent niet integer.
ok, Trumpquote:
[..]
Nee je buigt de interpretatie naar je eigen voordeel, ipv dat je zegt dat bewijs nooit 100% betrouwbaar is maak jij als het in je voordeel spreekt ervan "voldoende bewijs" en als het in je nadeel is "onvoldoende bewijs".
Je bent niet objectief. Je draait teveel. Je bent niet integer.
You would think that during the worst Pandemic since the 1918 Spanish Flu life insurance companies would be hedging their bets to avoid major losses from Covid-19. I haven’t written a life policy for several years so I was wondering what was going on? I called one of the brokers I deal with that interacts with hundreds of big life insurers to get an inside look into how the Covid crisis has changed their business.
Imagine my surprise when she said it was pretty much business as usual! Last year when the hysteria was just getting ramped up she did say the companies temporarily tightened up underwriting and reduced the amount of coverage they would offer. But as time went by and the hard data came rolling in those same companies went back to business as usual.
I asked her specifically if life insurers wanted a Covid test as part of the underwriting process and she said none that she was aware of. Hmm, that’s pretty interesting isn’t it? The most lethal pandemic in decades descends on the globe with deadly mutations taking millions of innocent lives and the life insurance companies couldn’t care less.
I also asked if the cost per thousand of coverage had increased due to Covid and again she said no. Rates were pretty much the same as they were before the Covid Pandemic ravaged the earth. Life Insurance companies are very risk adverse. They don’t like losing money to unnecessary claims. The fact they’re treating Covid as a nonevent should be an indicator that something is very wrong with the whole narrative.
http://www.ronpaulinstitu(...)-doesn-t-make-sense/
A group of parents in Gainesville, FL, sent 6 face masks to a lab at the University of Florida, requesting an analysis of contaminants found on the masks after they had been worn. The resulting report found that five masks were contaminated with bacteria, parasites, and fungi, including three with dangerous pathogenic and pneumonia-causing bacteria. Although the test is capable of detecting viruses, including SARS-CoV-2, only one virus was found on one mask (alcelaphine herpesvirus 1).
The analysis detected the following 11 dangerous pathogens on the masks:
-Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumonia)
-Mycobacterium tuberculosis (tuberculosis)
-Neisseria meningitidis (meningitis, sepsis)
-Acanthamoeba polyphaga (keratitis and granulomatous amebic encephalitis)
-Acinetobacter baumanni (pneumonia, blood stream infections, meningitis, UTIs—resistant to antibiotics)
-Escherichia coli (food poisoning)
-Borrelia burgdorferi (causes Lyme disease)
-Corynebacterium diphtheriae (diphtheria)
-Legionella pneumophila (Legionnaires’ disease)
-Staphylococcus pyogenes serotype M3 (severe infections—high morbidity rates)
-Staphylococcus aureus (meningitis, sepsis)
Half of the masks were contaminated with one or more strains of pneumonia-causing bacteria. One-third were contaminated with one or more strains of meningitis-causing bacteria. One-third were contaminated with dangerous, antibiotic-resistant bacterial pathogens. In addition, less dangerous pathogens were identified, including pathogens that can cause fever, ulcers, acne, yeast infections, strep throat, periodontal disease, Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever, and more.
The face masks studied were new or freshly-laundered before wearing and had been worn for 5 to 8 hours, most during in-person schooling by children aged 6 through 11. One was worn by an adult. A t-shirt worn by one of the children to school and unworn masks were tested as controls. No pathogens were found on the controls; samples from the front top and bottom of the t-shirt found proteins that are commonly found in skin and hair, along with some commonly found in soil.
A parent who participated in the study, Ms. Amanda Donoho, commented that this small sample points to a need for more research: “We need to know what we are putting on the faces of our children each day. Masks provide a warm, moist environment for bacteria to grow.”
The parents contracted with the lab because they were concerned about the potential of contaminants on masks that their children were forced to wear all day at school, taking them on and off, setting them on various surfaces, wearing them in the bathroom, etc. This prompted them to send the masks to the University of Florida’s Mass Spectrometry Research and Education Center for analysis.
Click to view the mask reports: https://rationalground.com/mask-reports-from-lab/
Artikel:
https://rationalground.co(...)hildrens-face-masks/
De Britse begrafenisondernemer John O’Looney heeft aan architect en filmproducent Robin Monotti laten weten hoe hij deze ‘neppandemie’ heeft ervaren. “De sterfte lag op normaal niveau en was zelfs iets lager dan 2019,” schreef hij in een bericht op Telegram.
O’Looney zei dat veel van zijn collega’s rond kerst hun koelkasten uitdeden omdat ‘niemand stierf’. “We begonnen hier op 6 januari te vaccineren, waarna het aantal sterfgevallen vrijwel meteen door het dak ging. Ik heb in 15 jaar als begrafenisondernemer nog nooit zo’n hoge sterfte meegemaakt.”
Hij plaatste dit bericht op YouTube onder een video over corona. Het werd ruim 300 keer geliket waarna zijn YouTube-account zonder waarschuwing werd verwijderd omdat het in strijd zou zijn met het beleid.
Aan het begin van de ‘coronapandemie’ haalde O’Looney, woonachtig in Milton Keynes, de media toen hij waarschuwde dat lichamen mogelijk in ziekenhuizen zouden blijven liggen omdat nabestaanden een begrafenis of crematie niet konden betalen als gevolg van de lockdown.
Hij zei tegen de BBC dat alle aandacht uitging naar het vergroten van de koelcapaciteit in mortuaria terwijl er geen rekening werd gehouden met mensen die vanwege financiële problemen geen uitvaart konden regelen.
https://www.artsenvoorvri(...)de-coronavaccinatie/
What's in a namequote:
Britse begrafenisondernemer: ‘Aantal sterfgevallen steeg explosief na start van de coronavaccinatie’
De Britse begrafenisondernemer John
O’Looney
Maar is dat dezelfde man als deze...
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-beds-bucks-herts-52193244
Eerst mij vragen om in te gaan op inhoud van een zweverige oerzang website, en hier ga je zelf niet eens in op de inhoud, enkel wat lachen met een naamquote:
What's in a name
Maar is dat dezelfde man als deze...
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-beds-bucks-herts-52193244
Jezus, heeft het niet vaccineren je gevoel voor humor aangetast?quote:
[..]
Eerst mij vragen om in te gaan op inhoud van een zweverige oerzang website, en hier ga je zelf niet eens in op de inhoud, enkel wat lachen met een naam
Wat valt er in te gaan. De man heeft een mening zoals velen. Ik heb geen inzicht in zijn hoeveelheid begravenissen, hij deelt ook geen cijfers dus wat valt er te checken aan deze anekdote?
Hahaha probeer je nou steeds te doen alsof er gevolgen zijn vanwege niet vaccineren ? Wij blijven gewoon hetzelfde hoor . Alsof je zegt als je die hamburger niet opeet krijg je de calorieen van de burger binnenquote:
[..]
Jezus, heeft het niet vaccineren je gevoel voor humor aangetast?
Wat valt er in te gaan. De man heeft een mening zoals velen. Ik heb geen inzicht in zijn hoeveelheid begravenissen, hij deelt ook geen cijfers dus wat valt er te checken aan deze anekdote?
Hmm het was een grap, maar nu breng je me toch aan het twijfelen of ik niet toch iets op het spoor ben per ongeluk.quote:
[..]
Hahaha probeer je nou steeds te doen alsof er gevolgen zijn vanwege niet vaccineren ? Wij blijven gewoon hetzelfde hoor . Alsof je zegt als je die hamburger niet opeet krijg je de calorieen van de burger binnen
Wellicht zijn ze allemaal gecremeerdquote:
Britse begrafenisondernemer: ‘Aantal sterfgevallen steeg explosief na start van de coronavaccinatie’
De Britse begrafenisondernemer John O’Looney heeft aan architect en filmproducent Robin Monotti laten weten hoe hij deze ‘neppandemie’ heeft ervaren. “De sterfte lag op normaal niveau en was zelfs iets lager dan 2019,” schreef hij in een bericht op Telegram.
O’Looney zei dat veel van zijn collega’s rond kerst hun koelkasten uitdeden omdat ‘niemand stierf’. “We begonnen hier op 6 januari te vaccineren, waarna het aantal sterfgevallen vrijwel meteen door het dak ging. Ik heb in 15 jaar als begrafenisondernemer nog nooit zo’n hoge sterfte meegemaakt.”
Hij plaatste dit bericht op YouTube onder een video over corona. Het werd ruim 300 keer geliket waarna zijn YouTube-account zonder waarschuwing werd verwijderd omdat het in strijd zou zijn met het beleid.
[ afbeelding ]
Aan het begin van de ‘coronapandemie’ haalde O’Looney, woonachtig in Milton Keynes, de media toen hij waarschuwde dat lichamen mogelijk in ziekenhuizen zouden blijven liggen omdat nabestaanden een begrafenis of crematie niet konden betalen als gevolg van de lockdown.
Hij zei tegen de BBC dat alle aandacht uitging naar het vergroten van de koelcapaciteit in mortuaria terwijl er geen rekening werd gehouden met mensen die vanwege financiële problemen geen uitvaart konden regelen.
https://www.artsenvoorvri(...)de-coronavaccinatie/
https://www.cremation.org(...)%20for%20Website.pdf
TOTALS # 472,308 (2019) vs 542,774 (2020)
‘I queried data … and have assessed that the deaths occurring within 3 days of vaccination are higher than those reported in VAERS by a factor of at least 5. This would indicate the true number of vaccine-related deaths was at least 45,000.’
ANAHEIM, California, July 22, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) – A government related computer programmer, who works in health care data analytics, has made a declaration under penalty of perjury that according to medical claims submitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) there are “at least 45,000” vaccine-related deaths due to experimental COVID-19 vaccine injections.
This dramatic announcement was made earlier this week by Ohio-based attorney Thomas Renz, at Clay Clark's ReAwaken America Tour stop in Anaheim California. Renz remains a lead attorney in several major cases brought against federal agencies relating to fraud and violations of medical freedom rights.
“I’m filing papers in federal court today,” Renz said to the enthusiastic crowd. This filing is “based on a sworn declaration, under threat of perjury,” by a female expert whistleblower who attested “that there have been at least, 45,000 deaths from this vaccine.”
Further, these numbers are “based on how many people died within three days of the vaccine in just one system that is reporting to the federal government.”
Renz continued to explain, “there are reportedly around 11 or 12 systems that are reporting deaths and injuries to the government,” and his own estimation is that the real numbers are “immensely higher” than even the 45,000 deaths, even if he can’t immediately prove it.
According to the full data, of all reporting systems, Renz asked, “how many have really died? And why are they covering it up? These people are murdering people. This is complicity at a minimum. People need to be in jail.”
Gaat verder:
https://www.lifesitenews.(...)aths-at-least-45000/
Introduction
Unprecedented. This word has defined so much about 2020 and the pandemic related to SARS-CoV-2. In addition to an unprecedented disease and its global response, COVID-19 also initiated an unprecedented process of vaccine research, production, testing, and public distribution (Shaw, 2021). The sense of urgency around combatting the virus led to the creation, in March 2020, of Operation Warp Speed (OWS), then-President Donald Trump’s program to bring a vaccine against COVID-19 to market as quickly as possible(Jacobs and Armstrong, 2020).
OWS established a few more unprecedented aspects of COVID-19. First, it brought the US Department of Defense into direct collaboration with US health departments with respect to vaccine distribution (Bonsell, 2021). Second, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) collaborated with the biotechnology company Moderna in bringing an unprecedented type of vaccine against infectious disease to market, one utilizing a technology based on messenger RNA (mRNA) (National Institutes of Health, 2020).
The confluence of these unprecedented events has rapidly brought to public awareness the promise and potential of mRNA vaccines as a new weapon against infectious diseases into the future. At the same time, events without precedent are, by definition, without a history and context against which to fully assess risks, hoped-for benefits, safety, and long-term viability as a positive contribution to public health.
In this paper we will be briefly reviewing oneparticular aspect of these unprecedented events, namely the development and deployment of mRNA vaccines against the targeted class of infectious diseases under the umbrella of “SARS-CoV-2.”We believe many of the issues we raise here will be applicable toany future mRNA vaccine that might be produced against other infectious agents, or in applications related to cancer and genetic diseases, while others seem specifically relevant to mRNA vaccines currently being implemented against the subclass of corona viruses.
While the promises of this technology have been widely heralded, the objectively assessed risks and safety concerns have received far less detailed attention. It is our intention to review several highly concerning molecular aspects of infectious disease-related mRNA technology, and to correlate these with both documented and potential pathological effects.
Unprecedented
Many aspects of Covid-19 and subsequent vaccine development are unprecedented for a vaccine deployed for use in the general population. Some of these includes the following.
1.First to use PEG (polyethylene glycol) in an injection (see text)
2.First to usemRNAvaccine technology against an infectious agent
3.First time Moderna has brought any product to market
4.First to have public health officials telling those receiving the vaccination to expectan adverse reaction
5.First to be implemented publicly with nothing more than preliminary efficacy data (see text)6.Firstvaccine to make no clear claims about reducing infections, transmissibility, or deaths
7.First coronavirusvaccine ever attempted in humans8.Firstinjection of genetically modified polynucleotides in the general population
Gaat verder:
https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/23/51
A PATHOLOGIST SUMMARY OF WHAT THESE JABS DO TO THE BRAIN AND OTHER ORGANS
Ryan Cole MD, AFLDS PHYSICIAN
A scientific clarification of what these injections do in the head and other organs of the vaccinated people
https://www.bitchute.com/video/TsdTTHJteilw/
Ken wel een trieste case via Blckbox maar verder niet super veel, ja het een en ander uit de states van die filmjes van enorme pechvogels.
Ik heb geen idee van percentages. Op Reddit zijn wel veel vervelende ervaringen te lezen: www.reddit.com/r/covidvaccinatedquote:
Komen er nou al een beetje heftige side effects bovendrijven of valt het allemaal reuze mee?
Ken wel een trieste case via Blckbox maar verder niet super veel, ja het een en ander uit de states van die filmjes van enorme pechvogels.
Hier in NL heb ik wat rondgekeken online maar heb gelukkig niet heel veel vervelende ervaringen voorbij zien komen.
oston's mayor said she wants to encourage people to get vaccinated against COVID-19 but compared the idea of requiring vaccine passports to several unsavory parts of American history.
NewsCenter 5's Sharman Sacchetti posed the question to Mayor Kim Janey Tuesday, after New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio announced that proof of COVID-19 vaccination will soon be required for entering restaurants, gyms and indoor venues.
Gaat verder:
https://www.wcvb.com/arti(...)-birtherism/37213542
Dit is gewoon ziek en kjik naar die reacties ook joh.. Weet niet hoor maar kan mij slecht voorstellen dat 80% van de Nederlanders zo debiel is, dus vanwaar die skew naar idioten op nu.nl?
Ik volg de reacties op NU.nl al een tijdje en volgens mij wordt daar nogal gebruik gemaakt van bots en nep-accounts en nep-likes om de opinie te sturen.quote:
https://www.nu.nl/economi(...)l#coral_talk_wrapper
Dit is gewoon ziek en kjik naar die reacties ook joh.. Weet niet hoor maar kan mij slecht voorstellen dat 80% van de Nederlanders zo debiel is, dus vanwaar die skew naar idioten op nu.nl?
Op Reddit heb ik dat zo door de jaren heen ook steeds meer zien gebeuren (en duidelijke bewijzen hiervan gezien) en wat er op NU.nl gebeurt, voelt hetzelfde aan.
“If you were wondering why Ivermectin was suppressed, it is because the agreement that countries had with Pfizer does not allow them to escape their contract, which states that even if a drug will be found to treat COVID-19, the contract cannot be voided.”
Unredacted contracts for the experimental biological agent known as the “COVID-19 vaccine” between the Pfizer corporation and various governments continue to be revealed.
Information security expert Ehden Biber told America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) Frontline News that the first document to recently emerge was discovered by Albanian newspaper Gogo.al. Biber then was able to locate the digitally-signed Brazilian contract, and at least two others, one with the European Commission, and the other with the Dominican Republic.
AFLDS Chief Science Officer Dr. Michael Yeadon responded to the revelations after perusing the Albania contract, saying it “looks genuine.” He continued: “I know the basic anatomy of these agreements and nothing is missing that I’d expect to be present, and I’ve seen no clues that suggests it’s fake.”
Yeadon noted what he found “the most stunning revelation,” citing the clause that stipulates “if there are any laws or regulations in your country under which Pfizer could be prosecuted, you agree to CHANGE THE LAW OR REGULATION to close that off.” (emphasis his)
In a Twitter thread that has since been removed except the first tweet in the thread, Biber explained the significance of the revealed agreements: “Because the cost of developing contracts is very high and time consuming (legal review cycles), Pfizer, like all corporations, develop a standardized agreement template and use these agreements with relatively minor adjustments in different countries.
“These agreements are confidential, but luckily one country did not protect the contract document well enough, so I managed to get a hold of a copy.
“As you are about to see, there is a good reason why Pfizer was fighting to hide the details of these contracts.”
Video volgt en artikel gaat verder:
https://americasfrontline(...)-of-these-contracts/
Kan je dat krachtiger neerzetten?quote:
[..]
Ik volg de reacties op NU.nl al een tijdje en volgens mij wordt daar nogal gebruik gemaakt van bots en nep-accounts en nep-likes om de opinie te sturen.
Op Reddit heb ik dat zo door de jaren heen ook steeds meer zien gebeuren (en duidelijke bewijzen hiervan gezien) en wat er op NU.nl gebeurt, voelt hetzelfde aan.
Ik begrijp je vraag niet goedquote:
[..]
Kan je dat krachtiger neerzetten?
Hier kun je zien dat er gelukkig ook nog genoeg normale mensen op NU.nl zitten:quote:
https://www.nu.nl/economi(...)l#coral_talk_wrapper
Dit is gewoon ziek en kjik naar die reacties ook joh.. Weet niet hoor maar kan mij slecht voorstellen dat 80% van de Nederlanders zo debiel is, dus vanwaar die skew naar idioten op nu.nl?
https://www.nu.nl/artikel(...)b4-9ef4-43a1b3392e1f
Naja met wat meer bewijs zegmaar.quote:
[..]
Ik begrijp je vraag niet goed
De analyse topics van jaren terug, die kan ik zo 1,2,3 niet terugvinden helaas.. Maar hier in dit topic staan zaken die in principe laten zien dat heb manipuleren met bots en dergelijke vrij normaal is tegenwoordig:quote:
[..]
Naja met wat meer bewijs zegmaar.
NWS / We leven in een tijd van informatie-oorlogen
Ook was een paar jaar terug het bericht er dat je op NU.nl niet meer mocht twijfelen aan klimaatopwarming volgens mij. Geeft ook wel een beetje aan hoe manipulatief ze zijn daar.
Ik geloof best dat we naar +1.5 graden gaan, dat het een doemscenario is... Mweh.quote:
Ook was een paar jaar terug het bericht er dat je op NU.nl niet meer mocht twijfelen aan klimaatopwarming volgens mij. Geeft ook wel een beetje aan hoe manipulatief ze zijn daar.
Dat het goed is om alles uit te faseren, sure.
Maar iets wat marginaal efffect heeft kan nooit belangrijk genoeg zijn om kapitaalsvernietiging voor toe te passen.
Mwa, meer om eindeloze discussies te vermijden tussen klimaatwappies en normale mensen zodat je niet 3x zoveel personeel nodig hebt om enkel de boel te modereren, niet omdat het ze iets boeit.quote:
Ook was een paar jaar terug het bericht er dat je op NU.nl niet meer mocht twijfelen aan klimaatopwarming volgens mij. Geeft ook wel een beetje aan hoe manipulatief ze zijn daar.
Dr. Peter McCullough - Ends The Pandemic With 5 COVID Facts
1. The virus does not spread asymptomatically.
2. We should never test asymptomatic people.
3. Natural immunity is robust, complete, and durable.
4. COVID-19 is easily treatable at home.
5. The current vaccines are obsolete, unsafe, and unfit for human use.
https://rumble.com/vl16yw(...)h-5-covid-facts.html
Het gaat hier om censuur van meningen natuurlijk.quote:
[..]
Ik geloof best dat we naar +1.5 graden gaan, dat het een doemscenario is... Mweh.
Dat het goed is om alles uit te faseren, sure.
Maar iets wat marginaal efffect heeft kan nooit belangrijk genoeg zijn om kapitaalsvernietiging voor toe te passen.
Censuur is censuur.quote:
[..]
Mwa, meer om eindeloze discussies te vermijden tussen klimaatwappies en normale mensen zodat je niet 3x zoveel personeel nodig hebt om enkel de boel te modereren, niet omdat het ze iets boeit.
Het is per definitie geen censuur, gezien ze zelf mogen bepalen wat op hun platform komt als bedrijf zijnde.quote:
Ach kom!!quote:
[..]
Het is per definitie geen censuur, gezien ze zelf mogen bepalen wat op hun platform komt als bedrijf zijnde.
Ik snap de denkwijze, maar je verwacht op Stormfront toch ook niet dat posts over Gay Pride blijven staan?quote:
Beetje out there, maar in essentie klopt de vergelijking.
[ Bericht 0% gewijzigd door illusions op 15-08-2021 10:05:36 ]
Ja daar moet je nu.nl dan maar mee vergelijken zegmaar...quote:
[..]
Ik snap de denkwijze, maar je verwacht op Stormfront toch ook niet dat posts over Gay Pride blijven staan?
Beetje out there, maar in essentie klopt de vergelijking.
Beetje jammer dat er geen degelijk alternatief is alleen. Zodra de marktpenetratie erg hoog gaat liggen worden de omstandigheden gewoon eng.
‘It is unclear why quality control did not detect this issue’: Early CDC tests couldn’t distinguish between coronavirus and water
-The CDC botched its early development of coronavirus test kits, according to a government email obtained by The Wall Street Journal.
-Those tests could not differentiate between the novel coronavirus and lab-grade water.
-The delay in coronavirus testing has forced federal, state, and local governments to accelerate their response and contain the virus without up-to-date data of how far it’s spread.
As government authorities faced a looming coronavirus epidemic in February that has now turned into a full-blown crisis, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention botched its development of testing kits, according to government emails seen by the Wall Street Journal.
In particular, some of the CDC’s tests wrongly detected the new coronavirus in laboratory-grade water. The email, sent from a CDC official to state public-health-lab officials, said some labs found “sporadic reactivity in the negative control of one of the three assay components.”
But the CDC had already sent those kits to state public-health laboratories and had to retrieve them.
“It is unclear why quality control did not detect this issue before the kits were sent out to states,” the email noted.
https://www.businessinsid(...)ernational=true&r=US
A freedom of information request made to the MHRA has revealed just how deadly the Covid-19 vaccines really are.
The request made by Duncan Husband on the 29th May 2021 asked the MHRA to provide a list of all new vaccines in the UK between 2010 and 2020 and to also provide the number of deaths, per vaccine, per month for the same time frame.
The MHRA fulfilled the FOI request on the 29th June 2021 and provided a full list of all approved vaccines and a vaccine analysis print for each type of vaccine excluding the Adacel jab which the MHRA claim they do not have any reports on.
Unfortunately the provided data does not breakdown into each month as Duncan Husband requested but does provide an overall review over the past decade of the total number of adverse reactions and deaths which are as follows –
The Pediacel vaccine to tackle diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis was granted authorisation by the MHRA on the 3rd December 2010. As of the 8th April 2021 there have been 3013 adverse reactions and 15 deaths reported to the MHRA.
Vervolgens staan er veel tabellen in het artikel over de verschillende vaccins:
https://dailyexpose.co.uk(...)combined-since-2010/
Laatste overzichtstabel:
Fully vaccinated account for 73% of recent Covid-19 deaths and data shows fully vaccinated are over 5 times more likely to die if infected with Covid-19
We’re told the Covid-19 vaccines reduce the risk of hospitalisation and death if the vaccinated person was to encounter the alleged Covid-19 virus by around 95%, but official Public Health data proves that this is a lie.
A weekly Covid-19 statistical report released by Public Health Scotland confirmed that between the 29th December 2020 and the 29th July 2021 there had been 3,063 alleged Covid-19 deaths among unvaccinated population, 271 alleged Covid-19 deaths among people who’d had one dose of a Covid-19 vaccine, and 172 Covid-19 deaths among the fully vaccinated population.
Gaat verder:
https://dailyexpose.co.uk(...)ected-with-covid-19/
Infection-enhancing anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies recognize both the original Wuhan/D614G strain and Delta variants. A potential risk for mass vaccination?
-Infection-enhancing antibodies have been detected in symptomatic Covid-19.
-Antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) is a potential concern for vaccines.
-Enhancing antibodies recognize both the Wuhan strain and delta variants.
-ADE of delta variants is a potential risk for current vaccines.
-Vaccine formulations lacking ADE epitope are suggested.
Uit het artikel:
Antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) of infection is a safety concern for vaccine strategies.
En:
In conclusion, ADE may occur in people receiving vaccines based on the original Wuhan strain spike sequence (either mRNA or viral vectors) and then exposed to a Delta variant. Although this potential risk has been cleverly anticipated before the massive use of Covid-19 vaccines6, the ability of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies to mediate infection enhancement in vivo has never been formally demonstrated.
However, although the results obtained so far have been rather reassuring1, to the best of our knowledge ADE of Delta variants has not been specifically assessed. Since our data indicate that Delta variants are especially well recognized by infection enhancing antibodies targeting the NTD, the possibility of ADE should be further investigated as it may represent a potential risk for mass vaccination during the current Delta variant pandemic. In this respect, second generation vaccines7 with spike protein formulations lacking structurally-conserved ADE-related epitopes should be considered.
https://www.journalofinfection.com/article/S0163-4453(21)00392-3/fulltext#
Less than three months ago, the Centers for Disease Control published a mostly-ignored, large-scale study of Covid-19 transmission in US schools which concluded that while masking then-unvaccinated teachers and improving ventilation was associated with lower levels of virus transmission in schools - social distancing, classroom barriers, HEPA filters, and forcing students to wear masks did not result in a statistically significant benefit.
According to the report, scientists believe that the CDC's decision to intentionally omit the findings on student masking from a summary of the study amounts to "file drawering" the findings - the practice of burying studies that don't have statistically significant results.
"That a masking requirement of students failed to show independent benefit is a finding of consequence and great interest," according to Vinay Prasad, an associate professor in University of California, San Francisco’s Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics. "It should have been included in the summary."
Epidemiologist Tracy Hoeg, author of a different CDC study on Covid-19 transmission in schools said that "The summary gives the impression that only masking of staff was studied," adding "when in reality there was this additional important detection about a student-masking requirement not having a statistical impact."
Gaat verder:
https://www.zerohedge.com(...)-significant-benefit
Covid vaccine maker Moderna received 300,000 reports of side effects after vaccinations over a three-month period following the launch of its shot, according to an internal report from a company that helps Moderna manage the reports.
That figure is far higher than the number of side effect reports about Moderna’s vaccine publicly available in the federal system that tracks such adverse events.
Vaccine manufacturers like Moderna are legally required to forward all side effect reports they receive to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System, where they are made public each week.
Run by the Centers for Disease Control and Food & Drug Administration, the VAERS system is crucial to tracking potential problems with vaccines. It helped scientists determine the Covid vaccines may cause heart problems in young adults.
The reason for the gap is not clear. Moderna may simply still be processing the reports, though the number of reports about Moderna’s vaccine in VAERS from the first half of 2021 remained almost flat this week.
Moderna and IQVIA, the company that works with Moderna to handle the reports, did not return emails for comment.
The 300,000 figure comes from an internal update provided to employees by IQVIA, a little-known but enormous company that helps drugmakers manage clinical trials. Headquartered in North Carolina, IQVIA has 74,000 employees worldwide and had $11 billion in sales last year.
Earlier this week, Richard Staub, the president of IQVIA’s Research & Development Solutions division, sent a “Q2 2021 update” which was labeled “Confidential – For internal distribution only.”
A person with access to the presentation provided screenshots of the relevant slide, which clearly explains the 300,000 side effect reports were received over “a three-month span” – not since the introduction of the vaccine in December – and differentiates between them and “medical information queries.”
The slide does not make clear what three months are covered but refers to the “global launch” of the vaccine, which essentially took place in the first quarter of 2021. Whether the slide is referring to January through March or April through June, the 300,000 figure dwarfs the number of reports in VAERS for the Moderna vaccine for either period.
A query of VAERS this morning reveals roughly 110,500 adverse events reports worldwide for Spikevax completed from January through March. All but 650 were in the United States. VAERS also includes 78,000 reports completed from April through June, including 71,400 in the United States.
Those figures overstate the number of reports Moderna has provided, because they include many reports from patients, physicians, and other health-care providers, as well as those from Moderna.
VAERS was established in 1990 and is jointly managed by the CDC and FDA, which contract with General Dynamics to administer it. It has struggled to keep up with the hundreds of thousands of reports it has received about the Covid vaccines since their rollout began in December. For much of the spring, it lagged months behind in making reports public.
VAERS is usually characterized as a voluntary system. But physicians and healthcare providers are required to report certain serious post-vaccine side effects, including deaths. However, the CDC and FDA have no real way to check if they are doing so.
Healthcare providers do have discretion over whether they report less serious side effects. Many have decided not to do so for the Covid vaccines, because the volume of reports is already so high.
However, vaccine manufacturers must forward ALL reports they receive, as the VAERS Website makes clear. It distinguishes between healthcare providers, who are “strongly encouraged” to report various events, and manufacturers like Moderna, who “are required [emphasis added] to report to VAERS all adverse events that come to their attention.”
Moderna’s stock has nearly quadrupled this year as sales of the Covid vaccine have soared. On Thursday, the company reported $4.4 billion in sales and $2.8 billion in profits for the second quarter.
As of today’s update, VAERS contains more than 3,000 reports of deaths following Moderna vaccinations.
https://principia-scienti(...)verse-event-reports/
A preprint paper by the prestigious Oxford University Clinical Research Group, published Aug. 10 in The Lancet, found vaccinated individuals carry 251 times the load of COVID-19 viruses in their nostrils compared to the unvaccinated.
A groundbreaking preprint paper by the prestigious Oxford University Clinical Research Group, published Aug. 10 in The Lancet, includes alarming findings devastating to the COVID vaccine rollout.
The study found vaccinated individuals carry 251 times the load of COVID-19 viruses in their nostrils compared to the unvaccinated.
While moderating the symptoms of infection, the jab allows vaccinated individuals to carry unusually high viral loads without becoming ill at first, potentially transforming them into presymptomatic superspreaders.
This phenomenon may be the source of the shocking post-vaccination surges in heavily vaccinated populations globally.
The paper’s authors, Chau et al, demonstrated widespread vaccine failure and transmission under tightly controlled circumstances in a hospital lockdown in Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
The scientists studied healthcare workers who were unable to leave the hospital for two weeks. The data showed that fully vaccinated workers — about two months after injection with the Oxford/AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine (AZD1222) — acquired, carried and presumably transmitted the Delta variant to their vaccinated colleagues.
They almost certainly also passed the Delta infection to susceptible unvaccinated people, including their patients. Sequencing of strains confirmed the workers transmitted SARS-CoV-2 to one another.
This is consistent with the observations in the U.S. from Farinholt and colleagues, and congruent with comments by the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention conceding COVID-19 vaccines have failed to stop transmission of SARS-CoV-2.
On Feb. 11, the World Health Organization indicated the AZD1222 vaccine efficacy of 63.09% against the development of symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. The conclusions of the Chau paper support the warnings by leading medical experts that the partial, non-sterilizing immunity from the three notoriously “leaky” COVID-19 vaccines allow carriage of 251 times the viral load of SARS-CoV-2 as compared to samples from the pre-vaccination era in 2020.
Thus, we have a key piece to the puzzle explaining why the Delta outbreak is so formidable — fully vaccinated are participating as COVID-19 patients and acting as powerful Typhoid Mary-style super-spreaders of the infection.
Vaccinated individuals are blasting out concentrated viral explosions into their communities and fueling new COVID surges. Vaccinated healthcare workers are almost certainly infecting their coworkers and patients, causing horrendous collateral damage.
Continued vaccination will only make this problem worse, particularly among frontline doctors and nurses workers who are caring for vulnerable patients.
Health systems should drop vaccine mandates immediately, take stock of COVID-19 recovered workers who are robustly immune to Delta and consider the ramifications of their current vaccinated healthcare workers as potential threats to high risk patients and coworkers.
https://childrenshealthde(...)patients-co-workers/
Uit het onderzoekquote:
Study: Fully Vaccinated Healthcare Workers Carry 251 Times Viral Load, Pose Threat to Unvaccinated Patients, Co-Workers
A preprint paper by the prestigious Oxford University Clinical Research Group, published Aug. 10 in The Lancet, found vaccinated individuals carry 251 times the load of COVID-19 viruses in their nostrils compared to the unvaccinated.
A groundbreaking preprint paper by the prestigious Oxford University Clinical Research Group, published Aug. 10 in The Lancet, includes alarming findings devastating to the COVID vaccine rollout.
The study found vaccinated individuals carry 251 times the load of COVID-19 viruses in their nostrils compared to the unvaccinated.
Wat een angstporno artikel weer van "the Defender"quote:Viral loads of breakthrough Delta variant infection cases were 251 times higher than those of cases infected with old strains detected between March-April 2020
Spain’s Supreme Court made waves last week by becoming the first judicial authority in Europe to rule against the use of covid passports to restrict access to public spaces — specifically hospitality businesses (bars, restaurants and nightclubs). It is not the first Spanish court to come out against vaccine passports but it is the most important. So far, only five of Spain’s 17 autonomous regions – the Canary Islands, Ceuta and Melilla, Andalusia, Cantabria and Galicia – have proposed using vaccine passports to restrict access to public spaces. And all have been rejected by local judges.
The EU’s Green Pass is a one-piece QR-code document that can be issued to a traveller in both paper and digital format. It is intended to prove that the holder has either received one of the four vaccines authorised by the European Medicine Agency (BioNTech-Pfizer’s, Moderna’s, AztraZeneca’s and Johnson &Johnson’s), has tested negative for Covid-19 in the last 48 hours or has been infected with Covid in the last six months and therefore has natural immunity. However, some countries such as France have chosen only to allow entry to travellers that are fully vaccinated.
Many government are also using the documents to limit access for unvaccinated citizens to public spaces and services with their own countries. But so far Spanish judges have challenged this trend, on the grounds that it would infringe on certain constitutionally recognised individual rights, such as the right to physical integrity and privacy, while also having limited impact on public health. The Supreme Courts of Andalusia and Ceuta and Melilla said the measures were also discriminatory. When the Supreme Court of Andalusia sided with local hospitality businesses in their appeal against the region’s proposed vaccine passport measures, the regional authority took the case to the national Supreme Court. And lost.
Economic considerations may have also played a part in the courts’ decision. Spain’s hospitality sector generates a huge amount of money and a huge number of jobs, especially during the peak tourist season (i.e., right now). The sector has already been through the grinder of last year’s three-month national lockdown as well as sporadic regional lockdowns. Even with the introduction of vaccine passports, overseas visitors continue to arrive in dribs and drabs. As was the case last year, it’s domestic demand that is keeping many businesses alive. And limiting that demand is likely to create even more economic pain.
Gaat verder:
https://www.zerohedge.com(...)strict-access-public
A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of cloth masks to medical masks in hospital healthcare workers (HCWs). The null hypothesis is that there is no difference between medical masks and cloth masks.
Setting: 14 secondary-level/tertiary-level hospitals in Hanoi, Vietnam.
Participants: 1607 hospital HCWs aged ≥18 years working full-time in selected high-risk wards.
Intervention: Hospital wards were randomised to: medical masks, cloth masks or a control group (usual practice, which included mask wearing). Participants used the mask on every shift for 4 consecutive weeks.
Main outcome measure: Clinical respiratory illness (CRI), influenza-like illness (ILI) and laboratory-confirmed respiratory virus infection.
Results: The rates of all infection outcomes were highest in the cloth mask arm, with the rate of ILI statistically significantly higher in the cloth mask arm (relative risk (RR)=13.00, 95% CI 1.69 to 100.07) compared with the medical mask arm. Cloth masks also had significantly higher rates of ILI compared with the control arm. An analysis by mask use showed ILI (RR=6.64, 95% CI 1.45 to 28.65) and laboratory-confirmed virus (RR=1.72, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.94) were significantly higher in the cloth masks group compared with the medical masks group. Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%.
Conclusions: This study is the first RCT of cloth masks, and the results caution against the use of cloth masks. This is an important finding to inform occupational health and safety. Moisture retention, reuse of cloth masks and poor filtration may result in increased risk of infection. Further research is needed to inform the widespread use of cloth masks globally. However, as a precautionary measure, cloth masks should not be recommended for HCWs, particularly in high-risk situations, and guidelines need to be updated.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25903751/
Distrust of public health officials may be a major factor in people refusing to get the COVID-19 vaccine. Nearly a third of Americans believe officials are lying about vaccine safety, a number that rises to almost two-thirds among those who say they don’t intend to get vaccinated against the coronavirus.
The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 32% of American Adults believe public health officials are lying about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines. Forty-eight percent (48%) don’t think so, while 20% are not sure. (To see survey question wording, click here.)
https://www.rasmussenrepo(...)about_vaccine_safety
87% van de Amerikanen gelooft in het bestaan van een god...quote:
Nearly a Third of Americans Think Public Health Officials Are Lying About Vaccine Safety
Distrust of public health officials may be a major factor in people refusing to get the COVID-19 vaccine. Nearly a third of Americans believe officials are lying about vaccine safety, a number that rises to almost two-thirds among those who say they don’t intend to get vaccinated against the coronavirus.
The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 32% of American Adults believe public health officials are lying about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines. Forty-eight percent (48%) don’t think so, while 20% are not sure. (To see survey question wording, click here.)
https://www.rasmussenrepo(...)about_vaccine_safety
Dat maakt het nog niet waar
Daar heb je helemaal gelijk in. Schijnbaar is 48% van de Amerikanen ervan overtuigd dat 'public health officials' niet liegen omtrent de veiligheid van de Covid vaccins, dat maakt het ook niet per definitie waar.quote:
[..]
87% van de Amerikanen gelooft in het bestaan van een god...
Dat maakt het nog niet waar
A new Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) study is being used by mainstream media to fearmonger Americans into taking Covid vaccines.
Yahoo Finance published an article with the headline, “Unvaccinated LA residents were 29 times more likely to be hospitalized with COVID-19: CDC study.”
Citing the Los Angeles County Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report released on Tuesday, even local news promoted the claim that “Unvaccinated L.A. County residents [are] 5 times more likely to get COVID, 29 times more likely to be hospitalized.”
Looking at a screenshot of the CDC release, one can observe the definitions for what they consider “fully vaccinated,” “partially vaccinated,” or “unvaccinated.”
According to the chart, “unvaccinated <14 days receipt of the first dose of a 2-dose series or 1 dose of the single-dose vaccine or if no vaccination registry data were available.”
This means if someone was hospitalized, admitted to ICU, required mechanical ventilation or died within two weeks of getting the jab they are being counted as “unvaccinated.”
Gaat verder:
https://www.newswars.com/(...)jab-as-unvaccinated/
Maar aantal <14 dagen weten ze niet...quote:
Trust The Science? CDC Counts People Dying Within 14 Days Of Jab As “Unvaccinated”
A new Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) study is being used by mainstream media to fearmonger Americans into taking Covid vaccines.
Yahoo Finance published an article with the headline, “Unvaccinated LA residents were 29 times more likely to be hospitalized with COVID-19: CDC study.”
Citing the Los Angeles County Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report released on Tuesday, even local news promoted the claim that “Unvaccinated L.A. County residents [are] 5 times more likely to get COVID, 29 times more likely to be hospitalized.”
Looking at a screenshot of the CDC release, one can observe the definitions for what they consider “fully vaccinated,” “partially vaccinated,” or “unvaccinated.”
According to the chart, “unvaccinated <14 days receipt of the first dose of a 2-dose series or 1 dose of the single-dose vaccine or if no vaccination registry data were available.”
This means if someone was hospitalized, admitted to ICU, required mechanical ventilation or died within two weeks of getting the jab they are being counted as “unvaccinated.”
Gaat verder:
https://www.newswars.com/(...)jab-as-unvaccinated/
Waarom is dat vreemd? Vaccinatie heeft even nodig voor het effect heeft.quote:
Trust The Science? CDC Counts People Dying Within 14 Days Of Jab As “Unvaccinated”
A new Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) study is being used by mainstream media to fearmonger Americans into taking Covid vaccines.
Yahoo Finance published an article with the headline, “Unvaccinated LA residents were 29 times more likely to be hospitalized with COVID-19: CDC study.”
Citing the Los Angeles County Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report released on Tuesday, even local news promoted the claim that “Unvaccinated L.A. County residents [are] 5 times more likely to get COVID, 29 times more likely to be hospitalized.”
Looking at a screenshot of the CDC release, one can observe the definitions for what they consider “fully vaccinated,” “partially vaccinated,” or “unvaccinated.”
According to the chart, “unvaccinated <14 days receipt of the first dose of a 2-dose series or 1 dose of the single-dose vaccine or if no vaccination registry data were available.”
This means if someone was hospitalized, admitted to ICU, required mechanical ventilation or died within two weeks of getting the jab they are being counted as “unvaccinated.”
Gaat verder:
https://www.newswars.com/(...)jab-as-unvaccinated/
Vaccinatie doden als ze significant zijn.quote:
[..]
Waarom is dat vreemd? Vaccinatie heeft even nodig voor het effect heeft.
Hoe bedoel je?quote:
[..]
Vaccinatie doden als ze significant zijn.
Vaccinatie doden tellen als Covid doden... Wie weet zal het gewoon meevallen hoor.quote:
Zit jij ondertussen al zo diep in de rabbit hole ja?quote:
[..]
Vaccinatie doden tellen als Covid doden... Wie weet zal het gewoon meevallen hoor.
...quote:
[..]
Zit jij ondertussen al zo diep in de rabbit hole ja?
Anyway, waarom is het vreemd om iemand als ongevaccineerd mee te tellen in de statistieken als de vaccinatie nog zo recent was dat het nog geen effect had?quote:
VAERS - as of April 30th, 2021 - this is the best (and only) comprehensive analysis of the data
Jessica Rose
Hele vid de moeite waard om te kjiken.
17:00 - Are injections causing Adverse Events?
Nou, misschien omdat alle mensen die in het ziekenhuis overlijden als ''ongevaccineerd'' als vaccin weigeraars worden gezien en dat dan dus niet het geval is?quote:
[..]
Anyway, waarom is het vreemd om iemand als ongevaccineerd mee te tellen in de statistieken als de vaccinatie nog zo recent was dat het nog geen effect had?
Weigeraars niet nee, onbeschermd door het vaccin nog wel.quote:
[..]
Nou, misschien omdat alle mensen die in het ziekenhuis overlijden als ''ongevaccineerd'' als vaccin weigeraars worden gezien en dat dan dus niet het geval is?
Omdat de reden van overlijden binnen de 14 dagen door het vaccin zou kunnen zijn veroorzaakt, ookal duurt het 14 dagen voordat je lichaam antistoffen aanmaakt (maar dat wil dus niet zeggen dat het vaccin niets in je lichaam doet, want het aanmaken van nieuwe antistoffen door je eigen lichaam kost wel tijd, maar de actie van het vaccin niet). Zie bijv. de bloedklontering, dat kan blijkbaar praktisch onmiddellijk of zeer snel optreden, in ieder geval binnen de 14 dagen als we onafhankelijke metingen met d-dimeertests moeten geloven. Een d-dimeertest meet alleen recente bloedklonters. Als je mensen die een week eerder zijn gevaccineerd daarmee test, is bewijs van bloedklontering een sterke aanwijzing dat de bloedklontering door het vaccin is veroorzaakt, omdat de test geen klonters meet van voor die periode. Dat is dus ook minder dan de 14 dagen.quote:
[..]
Anyway, waarom is het vreemd om iemand als ongevaccineerd mee te tellen in de statistieken als de vaccinatie nog zo recent was dat het nog geen effect had?
Er zijn mensen die onmiddellijk na hun injectie in een shock raken en overlijden. Die zouden dan ook tellen als niet-gevaccineerd. Het lijkt me vanzelfsprekend dat dat onjuist is. Met wetenschap heeft het niets te maken.
Samengevat: men overlijdt niet door het aanmaken van antistoffen door het eigen lichaam wat 14 dagen kan duren, maar men overlijdt door andere complicaties als gevolg van de injectie. Die complicaties kunnen onmiddellijk optreden omdat het vaccin onmiddellijk ageert en zijn niet afhankelijk van de tijd die het lichaam nodig heeft om antistoffen aan te maken.
Het is voor mij duidelijk dat men iedereen wil vaccineren en dat men met de cijfers goochelt om negatieve effecten zoveel mogelijk te minimaliseren en de angst voor corona zo hoog mogelijk op te voeren.
Dat de officiële instanties en ministers en minister-presidenten hieraan mee werken, is crimineel.
[ Bericht 14% gewijzigd door Ali_Kannibali op 02-09-2021 13:34:35 ]
https://thehill.com/chang(...)vaccinated-americans
My name is Mark Trozzi. I am a medical doctor; I graduated in 1990 from The University of Western Ontario. I have been practicing Emergency Medicine for the past twenty-five years, and am a veteran critical resuscitation instructor. I was on call in multiple emergency units since the onset of the so-called “pandemic”, until February 2021, including one ER designated specifically for COVID-19.
What follows is my observations and opinions; I am bound by my personal and religious convictions to speak openly and honestly. I do not have authority to tell you “the truth”, but I will share my honest experiences, perceptions, and digests of hundreds of hours of research on the subject of covid-19.
At the onset of this “pandemic”, I was cautious, and hence meticulous, with N95 mask use, hand washing, social isolation and distancing etc. I studied coronavirus science and was deeply involved in many emergency department drills to modify our practice in profound ways to deal with the “killer virus” we were advertised. However, various things soon made me consider that we were being deceived and manipulated. Here are a few.
The First Wave
The “first wave” of the “pandemic” was absolutely the quietest time in my career. I have worked very hard and been very busy over the past twenty-five years in ER. However, both in my regular ER and my “COVID-19 designated” ER, there were almost no patients, and almost no work. I had multiple, long ER shifts without a single patient. Meanwhile, when I would go to the local grocery store, the propagandized public, God bless them, would usher me to the front of the antisocial distance line, thanking me for everything I was going through as a front-line emergency doctor. They believed that the ER’s and hospitals were full of patients dying from covid, and that I must be exhausted and at risk of dying myself from exposure. I began contacting doctors and friends all over Canada and the US, and found the same pattern: empty hospitals, and propaganda saying that they were full of patients dying of covid.
Early Investigation
Early in my studies, I investigated zinc and hydroxychloroquine, which based on sound physiology, may genuinely help those rare persons who get very sick with this cold virus. I was surprised that this treatment was simply brushed aside and dismissed by most of the medical community.
Early Concerns
Researching the World Health Organization, of the UN, I learned that the Chinese dictatorship (PRC) had propped up communist and disreputable “Dr” Tedros, as the head of the WHO. I learned how the PRC had been involved in: the virus release; the cover up for weeks; the disappearing and suppression of honest Chinese doctors and scientist; the spreading of the virus to the world (sparing Beijing where the PRC elite live); and dramatic abuse of the Chinese people in their well-timed lockdown, which was filmed and transmitted to the world to create the panic that herded all of us into surrendering our economies and civil rights.
Foxes Guarding the Henhouse
I learned how Canada’s chief public health officer Dr Tam, is also on the oversight committee of the WHO with Dr Tedros making her, I think, a double agent. I have listened to her often-bizarre dissertations to Canadians regarding covid-19.
My Perception of the Situation
I perceive that at every level, hospital administration has had no apparent choice, other than to submit to the endless top-down roll out from governments, of questionable new rules, protocols, and procedures. My honest conversations with co-workers about my research and observations, became a problem. Caught in this quandary, an important administrator who I greatly respect, told me that “my thoughts made others uncomfortable, and made it difficult to keep everyone motivated and compliant” with all the new protocols and restrictions. Sympathetic to the sad situation, I maintained my clinical position by promising to “bite my tongue any time I thought I was going to speak about COVID-19” in the hospital. This was ultimately ethically impossible for me, and by mid-November I began winding down my ER work, and resigned from all my ER’s by mid-February, to avoid conflicts between my social, legal, and ethical responsibilities; and the hospitals which I am fond of.
Have I Ever Seen a Covid-19 Patient?
In my emergency department work, I have never seen a patient sick with COVID-19; I have seen some positive PCR tests in asymptomatic people, and watched people be imprisoned in their own homes and isolated from family and friends. My research into the PCR test has convinced me personally that it is misleading, manipulatable, and being used to drain endless taxpayer’s money and future debt, to dramatically enrich the very criminals running this scandal. My province alone has performed ~50,000 PCR tests daily. Meanwhile our federal government is bringing in hundreds of thousands of doses of potentially dangerous experimental injections of modified viral genetic material, calling them “vaccines”, and having the military manage them. Is this reasonable for a predominantly mild and non-fatal viral illness?
Information Suppression?
I have watched the suppression of doctors and scientists who performed serum antibody studies, whose findings showed that the virus was much more widespread, yet generally nonfatal, and asymptomatic or very mild in most cases; and that in many regions we had likely already achieved natural herd immunity by summer 2020.
Look at this study performed in Wuhan itself, which shows that the virus was done there by June 1, 2020 just two months after their brief lockdowns ended, and no one was spreading it, not even the very few people with a positive PCR “test” (and they were not sick):
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w
Gaat verder:
https://druthers.net/toronto-er-doctors-personal-testimony/
Early last year, Stanford professor John Ioannidis stated that if we didn’t know a new virus called COVID existed, we might just “have casually noted that flu this season seems to be a bit worse than average.” Now Ioannidis has done research that perhaps vindicates that statement, finding that the coronavirus’ infection fatality rate (IFR) in most of the world is less than 0.20 percent — much like that of the flu.
What’s more, the professor concludes that protecting the vulnerable and early treatment could likely reduce that IFR further.
Dr. John Ioannidis has some sterling credentials. After his name at Stanford’s University’s website it states, “Professor of Medicine (Stanford Prevention Research), of Epidemiology and Population Health and by courtesy, of Statistics and of Biomedical Data Science.”
“To boil it down,” explains PJ Media, “he is a medical doctor trained in internal medicine and infectious diseases, specializing in epidemiology, and evaluating medical data to inform decisions.” And what he’s learned about COVID-19 IFRs “should end Covidstan Forever,” the site optimistically states.
Curious about actual China virus IFRs and extrapolating “from confirmed cases, he concluded that, around the world, more than half a billion people have probably been infected with COVID,” writes commentator Andrea Widburg.
“Using that metric, Dr. Ioannidis concluded that most locations around the world have an IFR that’s less than 0.20%,” she continued.
“However, as we’ve also learned, COVID does not attack all people equally,” Widburg further writes. “When Democrat governors, beginning with Cuomo, decimated their elderly by warehousing COVID-infected people in old-age homes, we saw that the elderly are the single largest vulnerable population. Dr. Ioannidis, therefore, decided to look at age-related survival rates, and he came up with survival numbers that, if more widely known, would bring this mad panic to an end.”
Widburg then presents the following survivability numbers, courtesy of PJ Media.
None of this is surprising or revelatory. Note that the 0-19 survivability number above is almost precisely what the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) said it was last October: 99.997 percent. The other figures also more or less align with CDC 2020 findings.
Most Americans, however, would assume that the numbers are far higher, partially because of media and health-establishment misrepresentation. For example, the NIAID’s Dr. Anthony Fauci has said in the past that SARS-CoV-2 has a “mortality rate” of one percent, which itself had fallen from two or three percent.
But “mortality rate” is the wrong term. In fact, what Fauci was referencing wasn’t even the aforementioned infection fatality rate (IFR) — rather, it was the case fatality rate (CFR). This “is the total number of deaths divided by the total number of people that have the disease’s symptoms,” wrote Medium.com last year, explaining the difference. “In contrast, the IFR is the total number of deaths divided by the total number of people that carry the infection.” (And the “mortality rate” is the total number of deaths divided by the total number of people in the population.)
Fauci’s statement leads people to believe that if they contract the virus, they have a one in 100 chance of dying. This is untrue. In reality, most people’s chances vary between approximately one in 500 to one in 1,000,000. If you’re healthy and not elderly, the probability COVID will claim you is extremely low — your odds of dying in a car crash are far greater (one in 8,393 over just one year).
This gets at Ioannidis’s point, which is that many if not most people who contract the China virus won’t even know it. Moreover, even the CFR would be far lower if the health authorities hadn’t stigmatized early intervention, largely motivated by a one-dimensional, all-consuming, blind desire to push vaccines as the only disease-mitigation option. In fact, as I often mention, renowned COVID doctor Peter McCullough has said that a proper and official treatment protocol established early on could have saved 85 percent of the lives lost to the China virus.
Instead, however, the standard procedure has been to tell COVID patients with mild symptoms to go home and return only when symptoms worsen. Yet at this point it’s often too late for mitigation efforts to be effective — and death may result.
Despite this, the demonization of early treatment medications such as ivermectin continues. For example, when “word got out that Joe Rogan treated his COVID with ivermectin (as well as hydroxychloroquine), the condescending sneering began,” writes Widburg, before citing the following tweets. (New American readers will love this: The first is from a Council on Foreign Relations member.)
Gaat verder:
Link
“Ik heb me het afgelopen jaar vaak een lone wolf gevoeld”, vertelt gezondheidswetenschapper Drs. Sam Brokken…
"Op basis van negen maanden wetenschappelijke data blijkt meer en meer dat de huidige maatregelen disproportioneel zijn", schrijft Drs. Sam Brokken, lector Gezondheidswetenschappen en onderzoeker, in een open brief aan de Belgische regering en expertgroepen. Zijn brief werd ondertekend door meer dan 1.400 professionals uit de medische sector. Het kwam hem duur te staan want na een tv optreden in België waarin hij zijn opvattingen rondom vaccinatie nader toelichtte volgde zijn ontslag.
Deel 1 van de “Tegenwind” docu reeks staat in het licht van Sam Brokken die zijn verhaal in de prachtige Spaanse setting weet te vertellen aan documentairemaker Jakobien Huisman. De Delftse met Belgische tongval haalde 6 gerenommeerde wetenschappers naar Andalucië om met hen over de corona crisis en het impact op hun leven te praten. Brokken werd hard geraakt en verloor dus zijn baan.
Video
The numbers of the pandemic in one day, active cases of coronavirus in Argentina fell from 189,980 to 43,779 due to an algorithm change
It was reported by the Ministry of Health. The modification was attributed to the difficulties that the burden of registration generates for the provinces.
The health part of this Thursday included a surprising figure: there are 43,779 active cases of coronavirus in Argentina . This figure marked a priori a "boom in recoveries" in just 24 hours: on Wednesday there were 189,980 infected . The quadruple. However, it has a technical explanation: an algorithm change .
The item "active cases" of covid-19 is the photo of how many patients with a confirmed diagnosis are suffering from the disease. People who went, swabbed and tested positive. In this group are those who do home isolation (the vast majority), those hospitalized and those interned in intensive care.
The problem in this registry, according to health sources consulted by Clarín , is that many cases were left open due to the overload that it implies for health teams in the provinces to load registrations in the National Health Surveillance System (SNVS).
In other words, the system continued to show people who contracted the virus and recovered as infected, but they continued to wear the "active case" corset because the province that uploaded the positive test never notified the discharge.
To fix this, the algorithm was modified. The Ministry of Health of the Nation reported this afternoon that the decision was made "at the request of the 24 jurisdictions" and attributed it to the fact that "the manual loading of the information on the discharges of COVID patients generates an overload in the epidemiological surveillance teams ".
What is the change? From now on, those cases uploaded to the system that have no notification of death or discharge after 90 days will be considered recovered .
"A change was applied in the algorithm for classifying active / non-active cases in the SNVS, so that those cases that are not classified as deceased and in which more than 90 days have elapsed from the date of notification are classified as not active ", was the official explanation of the ministry.
By applying this criterion, the system "cleaned" this Thursday more than 146,000 cases that had been uploaded to the national system by the provinces and were not updated later.
The second peculiarity was that, due to a system error, it had been initially reported that there were 1,400,000 tests that finally could not be solved, so the figures of the day's test were not reported.
"Today there was a system error between the SNVS database and the impact on the dashboard that does not allow the day's tests to be viewed. The IT teams are working to solve the situation as soon as possible," they reported. from the health portfolio.
Now the official count, according to the report released this afternoon, shows that 5,218,993 cases of covid-19 have been detected since March last year, of the 43,779 are still active and 5,062,115 recovered . There were 113,099 deaths .
In the last 24 hours, 3,661 new infections were confirmed and 138 deaths were reported.
Link
We have previously covered the story of Dr. Charles Hoffe, the brave doctor who has been practicing medicine for 28 years in the small, rural town of Lytton in British Columbia, Canada.
After he had administered about 900 doses of the Moderna experimental mRNA COVID-19 injections, he sounded the alarm over the severe reactions he was observing in his patients who chose to get the shot (he chose NOT to get it himself), which included death.
The result of him sounding the alarm was a gag order issued against him by the medical authorities in his community. He defied this gag order and was interviewed by Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson on her show where he sounded the alarm. See: Canadian Doctor Defies Gag Order and Tells the Public How the Moderna COVID Injections Killed and Permanently Disabled Indigenous People in His Community
His punishment for going public to warn others on the dangers of these experimental shots was that he was relieved from hospital duty and lost half of his income: Canadian Doctor Removed from Hospital Duty after Speaking out about COVID “Vaccine” Side Effects
Last week, Dr. Hoffe was interviewed again by Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson, and he continues to share his findings with the public regarding the experimental COVID-19 shots.
Dr. Hoffe is truly a hero today, risking not only his reputation, but probably his very life to bring important information regarding the COVID-19 shots that the Globalists who control the corporate media and social media are trying very hard to censor.
In this latest interview, Dr. Hoffe states that the blood clots that are being reported in the corporate media as being “rare” are anything but rare, based on his own testing of his own patients who had recently received one of the shots.
The blood clots we hear about which the media claim are very rare are the big blood clots which are the ones that cause strokes and show up on CT scans, MRI, etc. The clots I’m talking about are microscopic and too small to find on any scan. They can thus only be detected using the D-dimer test.
Using this test with his own patients, Dr. Hoffe claims that he has found evidence of small blood clots in 62% of his patients who have been injected with an mRNA shot.
He states that these people are now permanently disabled, and they will no longer “be able to do what they used to do.”
These people have no idea they are even having these microscopic blood clots. The most alarming part of this is that there are some parts of the body like the brain, spinal cord, heart and lungs which cannot re-generate. When those tissues are damaged by blood clots they are permanently damaged.
His warning is very dire: “These shots are causing huge damage and the worst is yet to come.”
This is an 8 minute clip from the original interview, and we have posted it on our Bitchute channel and Rumble channel.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/YnLXgXob37T6/
Gaat verder:
https://www.globalresearc(...)heart-damage/5750198
Dr hoffe die niet snapt hoe een D-dimer testuitslag geïnterpreteerd moet wordenquote:
Canadian Doctor: 62% of His Patients Vaccinated for COVID Have Permanent Heart Damage. “Microscopic Blood Clots”
We have previously covered the story of Dr. Charles Hoffe, the brave doctor who has been practicing medicine for 28 years in the small, rural town of Lytton in British Columbia, Canada.
After he had administered about 900 doses of the Moderna experimental mRNA COVID-19 injections, he sounded the alarm over the severe reactions he was observing in his patients who chose to get the shot (he chose NOT to get it himself), which included death.
The result of him sounding the alarm was a gag order issued against him by the medical authorities in his community. He defied this gag order and was interviewed by Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson on her show where he sounded the alarm. See: Canadian Doctor Defies Gag Order and Tells the Public How the Moderna COVID Injections Killed and Permanently Disabled Indigenous People in His Community
His punishment for going public to warn others on the dangers of these experimental shots was that he was relieved from hospital duty and lost half of his income: Canadian Doctor Removed from Hospital Duty after Speaking out about COVID “Vaccine” Side Effects
Last week, Dr. Hoffe was interviewed again by Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson, and he continues to share his findings with the public regarding the experimental COVID-19 shots.
Dr. Hoffe is truly a hero today, risking not only his reputation, but probably his very life to bring important information regarding the COVID-19 shots that the Globalists who control the corporate media and social media are trying very hard to censor.
In this latest interview, Dr. Hoffe states that the blood clots that are being reported in the corporate media as being “rare” are anything but rare, based on his own testing of his own patients who had recently received one of the shots.
The blood clots we hear about which the media claim are very rare are the big blood clots which are the ones that cause strokes and show up on CT scans, MRI, etc. The clots I’m talking about are microscopic and too small to find on any scan. They can thus only be detected using the D-dimer test.
Using this test with his own patients, Dr. Hoffe claims that he has found evidence of small blood clots in 62% of his patients who have been injected with an mRNA shot.
He states that these people are now permanently disabled, and they will no longer “be able to do what they used to do.”
These people have no idea they are even having these microscopic blood clots. The most alarming part of this is that there are some parts of the body like the brain, spinal cord, heart and lungs which cannot re-generate. When those tissues are damaged by blood clots they are permanently damaged.
His warning is very dire: “These shots are causing huge damage and the worst is yet to come.”
This is an 8 minute clip from the original interview, and we have posted it on our Bitchute channel and Rumble channel.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/YnLXgXob37T6/
Gaat verder:
https://www.globalresearc(...)heart-damage/5750198
-A group of Japanese researchers released research showing that the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant “is poised to acquire complete resistance” to existing COVID-19 jabs
-When four common mutations were introduced to the Delta variant, Pfizer’s mRNA injection enhanced its infectivity, causing it to become resistant
-A Delta variant with three mutations has already emerged, which suggests it’s only a matter of time before a fourth mutation develops, at which point complete resistance to Pfizer’s jab may be imminent
-A number of experts have raised concerns that COVID-19 jabs and the mass vaccination program could worsen the pandemic by triggering the development of new variants, via a concept known as antigenic, or immune, escape
-Another study found that a worst-case scenario can develop when a large percentage of a population is vaccinated but viral transmission remains high, driving the development of resistant strains
COVID-19 jabs continue to be pushed as the only solution to the pandemic, even as “breakthrough” infections increasingly occur. A group of Japanese researchers has also released research showing that the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant “is poised to acquire complete resistance” to existing COVID-19 jabs like Pfizer and BioNTech’s BNT162b2,1 now being sold as Comirnaty.
What’s more, when four common mutations were introduced to the Delta variant, Pfizer’s mRNA injection enhanced its infectivity, causing it to become resistant. A Delta variant with three mutations has already emerged,2 which suggests it’s only a matter of time before a fourth mutation develops, at which point complete resistance to Pfizer’s jab may be imminent.
mRNA COVID-19 Injection Made Delta Variant More Infectious
The spike protein used in mRNA COVID-19 vaccines consists of the original SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, without mutations. Multiple variants of concern (VOC) have emerged, however, which have numerous mutations and are highly infectious. As mutations increase, so do concerns over vaccine resistance and enhanced infectivity. As the researchers explained in bioRxiv, the preprint server for biology:3
“The receptor binding domain (RBD) of the spike protein binds to the host cell receptor ACE2, and the interaction mediates membrane fusion during SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 are mainly directed to the RBD and block the interaction between the RBD and ACE2. Most SARS-CoV-2 variants have acquired mutations in the neutralizing antibody epitopes of the RBD, resulting in escape from neutralizing antibodies.”
When a single mutation was added to the Delta spike, most of the anti-RBD antibodies still recognized it. This wasn’t the case with four mutations, however, which the researchers called Delta 4+. Not only was Delta 4+ not recognized, but infectivity was enhanced:4
“… we analyzed the Delta 4+ pseudovirus with four additional RBD mutations. Surprisingly, most BNT162b2-immune sera enhanced infectivity of the Delta 4+ pseudovirus in a dose-dependent manner at relatively low concentrations of BNT162b2-immune sera, but showed weak neutralization only at the highest concentration of the sera.
Especially, PFZ7 greatly enhanced the infectivity at relatively low serum concentration. Some sera, such as PFZ13 and PFZ14, did not show neutralizing activity even at the highest concentration of the sera.”
Gaat verder:
https://archive.is/9CxBs#selection-645.0-709.207
Another COVID whistleblower has come forward as exclusively reported by Gateway Pundit to allege that the statistics about ICU’s being overrun are wildly inflated, over-reported, and in many cases an outright LIE by political officials.
Josh Snider worked in facilities management at Missouri Baptist Medical Center or “MBMC”, “I watched our hospital administrators say in the media that our intensive care units were overflowing with COVID patients, at 98% capacity, knowing that it was a complete and utter lie.”
THIS MISSOURI HOSPITAL NEVER HAD 98% ICU OCCUPANCY, ADMINISTRATORS LIED TO UNCRITICAL MEDIA
Snider relates that the MBMC hospital, part of a larger $5.5 billion annual network within the Barnes Jewish hospital system in St. Louis, Missouri, actually shut down three out of four floors of intensive care during COVID because they were UNUSED.
HOSPITAL SHUT DOWN ICU FLOORS, DRAMATICALLY REDUCING CAPACITY
“And even after shutting down three-fourths of our ICU capacity, they were still never more than 50% full with that drastically reduced overall capacity. These medical systems that are saying they are overrun with COVID patients are likely LYING TO THE PUBLIC,” Snider said.
Gaat verder:
https://www.thegatewaypun(...)lic-covid-can-prove/
Weer een verdubbeling
Official Office for National Statistics data has inadvertently revealed that 30,305 people have died within twenty-one days of having a Covid-19 vaccine in England during the first 6 months of 2021.
Dozens of freedom of information requests have been made to Public Health England (PHE) over the past few months requesting to know how many people have died within 28 days of having a Covid-19 vaccine, but each and every time PHE have claimed they do “not hold the information requested”.
It is extremely strange to find that PHE do not hold the information considering their counterpart in Scotland has been able to publish the data on deaths within 28 days of a Covid-19 vaccination.
Public Health Scotland last published the figures on the 23rd June 2021 in their ‘Covid-19 Statistical Report’ in which they revealed 5,522 people had died within 28 days of having a Covid-19 vaccine between December 8th 2020 and June 11th 2021 in Scotland.
PHS were also able to reveal the numbers by brand of vaccine and date of occurrence in a published spreadsheet found here. The spreadsheet shows that 1,877 people died with 28 days of having the Pfizer mRNA jab, 3,643 people died within 28 days of having the AstraZeneca viral vector jab, and 2 people died within 28 days of having the Moderna mRNA jab.
The reason people have been requesting to know the number of people to have died within 28 days of having a Covid-19 vaccine is because these are the exact same parameters that have been used to count alleged Covid-19 deaths for the majority of the alleged pandemic.
Gaat verder:
https://theexpose.uk/2021(...)-vaccine-in-england/
The director of the Pathological Institute of the University of Heidelberg, Peter Schirmacher, has carried out over forty autopsies on people who died within two weeks of receiving a Covid-19 vaccine and has expressed alarm over his findings.
Schirmacher stated that 30 to 40 per cent of people he examined died from the vaccine and that in his opinion, the frequency of fatal consequences of vaccinations is “underestimated.”
Following his findings, Schirmacher has called for more autopsies of vaccinated people to further determine whether the vaccines are linked to deaths. He has warned that the high number of unreported cases of vaccination deaths is partially due to the fact that “pathologists do not notice anything about most of the patients who die after and possible from a vaccination.”
Despite raising the alarm surrounding the vaccines, many have criticised Schirmacher’s conclusions, with the Paul Ehrlich Institute calling the director’s statements “incomprehensible.” The Chancellor’s lackey, senior German immunologist Thomas Mertens dismissed the findings right away: “I don’t know of any data that would allow a justifiable statement to be made here and I am not assuming an unreported number.”
The immunologist Christian Bogdan from the Erlangen University Hospital, a member of the Standing Vaccination Commission (STIKO), also contradicted Schirmacher’s assumption of a “high number of unreported vaccination complications or even deaths.”
Despite the criticism, Schirmacher did receive support from his own ranks, and the Federal Association of German Pathologists stated that more autopsies of vaccinated people who died within a certain time frame after vaccination should be performed.
The head of the “Autopsy Working Group” in this association wanted to make general practitioners and health authorities aware of this. Basically, doctors of the patients who die within a few days or weeks post-vaccination should apply for an autopsy in case of doubt or the health authorities should take action,
The Federal Association of Pathologists already requested this in March in a letter to Health Minister Jens Spahn (CDU), but it went unanswered.
Of course, it’s worth noting that Schirmacher’s warning could cause various pharmaceutical companies to lose billion dollars worth of long-term business, which explains why his findings have been scrutinised and tarnished by the pro-vaccine agenda.
However, the reputation and seriousness of Schirmacher cannot be ignored.
Schirmacher himself is already leading an autopsy project on people who have died from Covid-19, which is subsidised by the state. He himself then expanded the focus and began performing autopsies on more than 40 deceased vaccinated people. Whilst his results only represent a small sample size, it is a worrying representation of a bigger picture: 30 to 40 per cent died from vaccination itself. The pathologist cited “rare, severe side effects of the vaccination – such as cerebral vein thrombosis or autoimmune diseases.”
In response to critics, Schirmacher denied a lack of competence, stating: “The colleagues are definitely wrong because they cannot assess this specific question competently.” Additionally, the director said that he is not trying to fearmonger and is not opposed to vaccinations, as he himself has received the jab.
It won’t be a surprise to see in the coming weeks Schirmacher’s reputation completely torn to shreds in the media, online and in the scientific and medical community.
https://theexpose.uk/2021(...)recently-vaccinated/
The esteemed New England Journal of Medicine posted a correction last week and now admits the COVID vaccine may not be safe for pregnant women.
The study was updated after it found that 104 of 827 pregnant participants experienced a spontaneous abortion after receiving the COVID vaccine. That is roughly 1 of 8 pregnant women losing their baby after getting the vaccine.
Gaat verder:
Link
The new coronavirus is unlikely to mutate into a variant that can evade vaccines because there “aren’t very many places for the virus to go”, the creator of the Oxford jab has said.
Dame Sarah Gilbert, speaking yesterday in a Royal Society of Medicine webinar, played down fears of a more deadly new variant. “We normally see that viruses become less virulent as they circulate more easily and there is no reason to think we will have a more virulent version of Sars-CoV-2,” she said.
Chris Whitty, the chief medical officer for England, said yesterday that all children who had not been vaccinated would end up getting Covid-19 at some point because the virus would continue to circulate as immunity waned. Gilbert suggested, however, that illness caused by the virus would become ever milder. She said: “We tend to see slow genetic drift of the virus and there will be gradual immunity developing in the population as there is to all the other seasonal coronaviruses.”
These other coronaviruses are causes of the common cold and Gilbert said: “Eventually Sars-CoV-2 will become one of those.”
She argued that the spike protein targeted by vaccines had only limited ability to mutate while still allowing the virus to get inside human cells. “If it changes its spike protein so much that it can’t interact with that receptor, then it’s not going to be able to get inside the cell. So there aren’t very many places for the virus to go to have something that will evade immunity but still be a really infectious virus,” she said.
Professor Sharon Peacock, head of the Covid-19 UK Genomics Consortium, which monitors variants, said: “I think there will be new variants emerging over time and there is still quite a lot of road to travel down with this virus.”
The Times
Long Covid is “overblown” and many people who think they have it are actually suffering from something else, a medical expert has said.
Professor Sir John Bell, regius professor of medicine at Oxford University, said that long Covid was “more complicated than people assume” and that “the incidence is much, much lower than people had anticipated”.
His comments follow data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) which suggests that half of people suffering from long Covid may not have it.
“The long Covid thing has been slightly overblown and as soon as you start to do proper epidemiological studies, you find the incidence is much, much lower than people had anticipated,” Bell told Times Radio.
The ONS survey, published last week, found that 5 per cent of people who had tested positive for Covid reported at least one symptom 12 to 16 weeks after their infection. However, it also found that 3.4 per cent of people who had not been diagnosed with Covid also reported the same symptoms.
It estimated that two million people have self-reported long Covid, with the most common symptoms being fatigue, muscle ache, headache and brain fog. Fever, nausea, abdominal pain, sore throat and loss of taste and smell, shortness of breath and cough are also recognised symptoms. The ONS said that such conditions were experienced regularly within the general population.
Bell said the country was “over the worst” of the pandemic and that things “should be fine” once winter had passed.
“If you look at the trajectory we’re on, we’re a lot better off than we were six months ago,” he said. “So the pressure on the NHS is largely abated. If you look at the deaths from Covid, they tend to be very elderly people, and it’s not entirely clear it was Covid that caused all those deaths. So I think we’re over the worst of it now.”
Professor Dame Sarah Gilbert, who developed the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine, told a Royal Society of Medicine webinar that viruses tend to become weaker as they spread around.
Professor Neil Ferguson, whose modelling was instrumental to the UK going into lockdown in March last year, said there had not been a “rapid increase” in Covid cases as schools have gone back.
The scientist, from Imperial College London, who is a member of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies, added: “The challenge will be as we head into the autumn and winter.”
He said the protective effect of the vaccines was likely to wane slightly “so there is likely to be some upward pressure on case numbers” but that trends in Britain were “cautiously encouraging”.
The Times
O nee he...misschien dat er 'n nieuwe corona-covid-mutant-influenza variant is !quote:
Covid-19 will just end up causing a cold, says Oxford vaccine creator Sarah Gilbert
[ afbeelding ]
These other coronaviruses are causes of the common cold and Gilbert said: “Eventually Sars-CoV-2 will become one of those.”
The Times
Misschien kunnen ze al de oude voorraad van de griepprik gebruiken.
Another expert added "Many people believe far too much of the complete and utter bullshit that they hear from those so-called experts on corona-hysteria TV and will develop symptoms of long covid...in other words, they worry themselves sick by the power of suggestion - a psychological condition which has been studied for more than a hundred years."quote:
Long Covid is overblown and often something else, says Oxford professor
Long Covid is “overblown” and many people who think they have it are actually suffering from something else, a medical expert has said.
Professor Sir John Bell, regius professor of medicine at Oxford University, said that long Covid was “more complicated than people assume” and that “the incidence is much, much lower than people had anticipated”.
His comments follow data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) which suggests that half of people suffering from long Covid may not have it.
“The long Covid thing has been slightly overblown and as soon as you start to do proper epidemiological studies, you find the incidence is much, much lower than people had anticipated,” Bell told Times Radio.
The Times
quote:
[..]
Another expert added "Many people believe far too much of the complete and utter bullshit that they hear from those so-called experts on corona-hysteria TV and will develop symptoms of long covid...in other words, they worry themselves sick by the power of suggestion - a psychological condition which has been studied for more than a hundred years."
Men weet idd nog niet eens goed wat Long Covid is, maar de usual suspects op dit forum willen hier niets van weten. Long Covid is hier vooral een stok om mee te slaan. Als ik een topic open in COR over dat Long Covid onder kinderen erg meevalt, dan word ik plotseling aangevallen door de usual suspects! Stel je toch eens voor dat deze usual suspects, die zoveel geven om de mensheid, blij zouden zijn dat Long Covid blijkt mee te vallen!
Die twee links van The Times zie ik als 'n positieve teken omdat het 'n enorme U-turn is.quote:
[..]
Men weet idd nog niet eens goed wat Long Covid is, maar de usual suspects op dit forum willen hier niets van weten. Long Covid is hier vooral een stok om mee te slaan. Als ik een topic open in COR over dat Long Covid onder kinderen erg meevalt, dan word ik plotseling aangevallen door de usual suspects! Stel je toch eens voor dat deze usual suspects, die zoveel geven om de mensheid, blij zouden zijn dat Long Covid blijkt mee te vallen!
Hoeveel keren hebben we van de Provax Gang gehoord:
'Het is echt niet met de griep te vergelijken hoor!'
'Corona veel gevaarlijker is hoor!'
'Die Long covid helemaal erg is hoor!'
Ben echt benieuwd over wat de andere kranten enz. gaan doen.
Meer over Sir John Bell...quote:
Long Covid is overblown and often something else, says Oxford professor
Long Covid is “overblown” and many people who think they have it are actually suffering from something else, a medical expert has said.
Professor Sir John Bell, regius professor of medicine at Oxford University, said that long Covid was “more complicated than people assume” and that “the incidence is much, much lower than people had anticipated”.
His comments follow data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) which suggests that half of people suffering from long Covid may not have it.
“The long Covid thing has been slightly overblown and as soon as you start to do proper epidemiological studies, you find the incidence is much, much lower than people had anticipated,” Bell told Times Radio.
The Times
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Bell_(physician)
Bell serves on the Genentech Board in San Francisco, and formerly served on the scientific advisory board of AstraZeneca (1997–2000)
He chairs the Global Health Scientific advisory board of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, he is a Trustee of the Rhodes Trust, he sits on the award jury of the Gairdner Foundation, he is a non-executive member of Genomics England, and he is a member of Cancer Research UK. He has advised governments and foundations in Singapore, France, Canada, Sweden, Finland, and Alberta on biomedical research. He is on the Jenner Institute Board and the Gray Institute Board.
For all the twists and turns of the COVID-19 pandemic, perhaps none is stranger than so-called “Long Covid.”
or all the twists and turns of the COVID-19 pandemic, perhaps none is stranger than so-called “Long Covid,” “Long Haul Covid,” or “Chronic Covid.” With almost countless and often bizarre symptoms from which some sufferers feel they will never recover — in at least one high-profile case leading to suicide — it almost seems like another media clickbait concoction. Except that the medical community is taking it very seriously too, with Anthony Fauci calling it “quite real and quite extensive.” And unlike some other mass psychosomatic (the more accepted term now is “psychogenic”) syndromes that appear to have little in common in terms of exposure but only in symptoms, these do: COVID.
Or do they? What if you knew that the overwhelming majority of these sufferers never had a positive antigen test to indicate present COVID infection or an antibody test to show past infection? What if you knew that just as hospitals were paid bonuses to declare cases as COVID rather than any number of other potential causes of death, the U.S. government is paying a bounty to researchers to pontificate on “Long COVID”?
And what if you knew the demographic profile for sufferers of acute COVID is vastly different from that of so-called “long-haulers”? Acute COVID (normally lasting about one to four weeks) is essentially a disease of the elderly and hits males and blacks harder than females and whites. “Long COVID” is overwhelmingly a disease of white middle-aged females.
What if you also knew that those “Long COVID” demographics, even according to those who insist this is definitely COVID-related, happen to match those of previous somatoform diseases (even if it’s become not just un-PC but a career-killer to say so) such as “multiple chemical sensitivity” and “fibromyalgia encephalitis/chronic fatigue syndrome” and that indeed even these syndromes appear to have been identified well over a century ago?
Finally, what if you knew that far from doing sufferers a favor by misclassifying their symptoms we’re actually dooming them to perhaps a lifetime of suffering because just as there’s no cure to the above somatoform diseases there will never be a cure to “Long COVID,” leaving these people forever in despair sometimes, as with Dawson’s Creek writer Heidi Ferrer who took her own life in May after what her husband called “an unremitting battle with long-haul COVID-19.” She was 50 years old.
Gaat verder:
https://spectator.org/long-covid-myth/
Half of all deaths were below, half were above the median age.
Country- Median age
Australia - 82 years
Austria - 82 years
Belgium - 86 years
Brazil - 70 years
Canada - 86 years
England - 82 years
France - 84 years
Germany - 83 years
Italy - 82 years
South Africa - 62 years
Spain - 82 years
Sweden - 84 years
Switzerland - 86 years
USA - 78 years
https://swprs.org/studies-on-covid-19-lethality/#age
En hoe de extremisten gaan reageren hierop? (newsworld, klapmongool, miester etc)quote:
[..]
Die twee links van The Times zie ik als 'n positieve teken omdat het 'n enorme U-turn is.
Hoeveel keren hebben we van de Provax Gang gehoord:
'Het is echt niet met de griep te vergelijken hoor!'
'Corona veel gevaarlijker is hoor!'
'Die Long covid helemaal erg is hoor!'
Ben echt benieuwd over wat de andere kranten enz. gaan doen.
Weet zeker dat ze dit verdraaien totdat het past in hun plaatje. Die gaan nooit toegeven dat deze hele pandemie een complete collectieve angststoornis is gebleken. (denk dat ik geluk heb gehad dat ik geen tv heb want heb het om me heen letterlijk zien gebeuren)
Goede omschrijving.quote:
[..]
En hoe de extremisten gaan reageren hierop? (newsworld, klapmongool, miester etc)
Weet zeker dat ze dit verdraaien totdat het past in hun plaatje. Die gaan nooit toegeven dat deze hele pandemie een complete collectieve angststoornis is gebleken. (denk dat ik geluk heb gehad dat ik geen tv heb want heb het om me heen letterlijk zien gebeuren)
En dat het allemaal op paniekzaaijende computer modelletjes van Prof. Neil Ferguson die ook al goed bekend door z'n foute computer modellen over andere epidemics is. Ook heeft de gast zelf die corona maatregelen gebroken. Hij weet dondersgoed dat het allemaal niet zo gevaarlijk was.
New York City restaurateurs are complaining that their business has been slashed severely by the COVID-19 vaccine mandate, which requires people 12 and older to show vaccination proof for indoor dining, indoor fitness, and indoor entertainment.
Pre-pandemic, O’Donoghue’s Pub and Restaurant was a successful business that has been open for 10 years in Times Square, Manhattan.
Fergal Burke, the owner of O’Donoghue’s noticed that his business has seen “a massive drop,” since the vaccine mandate came into effect.
“We don’t have the money here to survive without the help of our landlord, [who] has been very supportive and has been giving us breaks on the rent, but without our landlord, we would not be in business,” Burke told The Epoch Times.
He said that he needed to hire another person to be at the door checking for vaccination proof, which increased his expenses.
Comparing the clientele from pre-mandate to when it kicked in about two weeks ago, “Our business is definitely down 50, I’m going to say 60 percent,” Burke said with a somewhat downhearted tone. “There’s just not people coming into the restaurant, they have the fear of being asked for vaccines.”
Burke and his staff have had to refuse a lot of customers for not having the passes.
“They’re being refused and they get a resentment against us, they don’t get a resentment against Bill de Blasio or Biden, or whoever is mandating us to check for this.”
“It comes as a personal rejection,” he said, further stressing that it’s not O’Donoghue’s that wants this. “We don’t want this mandate, we want nothing to do with this.”
He also noted how the subway is full of people but there’s no requirement to show vaccination proof.
“I mean how is that fair in New York City, that the trains are jammed with people with a silly mask on and they’re not being mandated to show nothing, and yet they’re coming against the heart of the city. We’re the ones that’s trying to keep 20 people employed here,” Burke said.
“We will go out of business if this continues, it’s gonna force us to shut our doors.”
Despite winter coming soon, they now need to build an outdoor dining area to facilitate an outdoor space, which will cost about 10 to $15,000.
Gaat verder:
Link
Hmm... toch even wat anders dan dit:
Maar de vaccins zijn wel goed onderzocht hoor en trust the science enzo.
[ Bericht 16% gewijzigd door Probably_on_pcp op 03-10-2021 13:12:47 ]
A whistleblower has provided government data documenting 48,465 deaths within 14 days of Covid vaccination among Medicare patients alone, according to attorney Thomas Renz.
Video
One slide showed that the number of “persons who died within 14 days of a COVID-19 vaccine” equated to 19,400 for those younger than 81 years old, and 28,065 for those 81 and over, totaling 48,465 deaths.
“This is raw data. There’s no analysis, and these death numbers are from less than 20% of the U.S. population.”
“Do you want to know why 14 days is important? Because if you die with 14 days, you’re not considered vaccinated.” According to the CDC, one is not considered “vaccinated” until 14 days after the second shot.
Renz provided screenshots of the “raw data from the Medicare servers. And what I want to know is, are you going to fact-check the HHS now? Are you going to fact-check Fauci?”
A former Pfizer employee, now working as an industry analyst, has provided documentation indicating the pharmaceutical giant—whose gene-based COVID-19 vaccine has now been reportedly injected almost 225 million times into the arms of Americans—knows these shots cause recipients to become more susceptible to contracting COVID-19.
On Saturday Karen Kingston, the former Pfizer employee, a pharmaceutical marketing expert and biotech analyst, appeared beside medical freedom rights attorney Thomas Renz in a public meeting. The Ohio-based lawyer has been involved in several major cases brought against federal agencies relating to fraud and violations of medical freedom rights over the last 19 months.
After introducing Kingston, Renz presented the documents she had provided. (See from 17.40 in video.)
Gaat verder:
Link
Ff x3 doen voor de IFR.quote:
Gaat om de 2e video hieronder:
Imagine you’re a doctor. You go into work every day for long hours and figure out how to treat Covid. You are saving lives and doing so patient by patient. Each patient has individual needs that sometimes require custom care, but you know early treatment works.
Suddenly, faraway bureaucrats demand that you abandon your best practices and fall into line around their grand plan. Suddenly your patients can’t get what you prescribe. Media apparatchiks diminish, invalidate or mock everything you’ve learned and are doing.
And all of it is being carried out in the name of “science.”
The Physicians’ Rebellion
More than 10,000 physicians and medical scientists have signed onto a Declaration that accuses public health authorities of, well, doing it wrong–and to devastating effect.
“WHEREAS, public policy makers have chosen to force a “one size fits all” treatment strategy, resulting in needless illness and death, rather than upholding fundamental concepts of the individualized, personalized approach to patient care which is proven to be safe and more effective;”
The Declaration goes on to assert that “thousands of physicians are being prevented from providing treatment to their patients, as a result of barriers put up by pharmacies, hospitals, and public health agencies” and that “These policies may actually constitute crimes against humanity.”
They also state that hundreds of thousands of unnecessary patient deaths have occurred:
Thousands of physicians are being prevented from providing treatment to their patients, as a result of barriers put up by pharmacies, hospitals, and public health agencies, rendering the vast majority of healthcare providers helpless to protect their patients in the face of disease. Physicians are now advising their patients to simply go home (allowing the virus to replicate) and return when their disease worsens, resulting in hundreds of thousands of unnecessary patient deaths, due to failure-to-treat;
Gaat verder:
https://www.thewashington(...)ors-stand-up-to.html
https://files.catbox.moe/thx9aj.MP4
quote:
Trust The Science? CDC Counts People Dying Within 14 Days Of Jab As “Unvaccinated”
A new Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) study is being used by mainstream media to fearmonger Americans into taking Covid vaccines.
Yahoo Finance published an article with the headline, “Unvaccinated LA residents were 29 times more likely to be hospitalized with COVID-19: CDC study.”
Citing the Los Angeles County Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report released on Tuesday, even local news promoted the claim that “Unvaccinated L.A. County residents [are] 5 times more likely to get COVID, 29 times more likely to be hospitalized.”
Looking at a screenshot of the CDC release, one can observe the definitions for what they consider “fully vaccinated,” “partially vaccinated,” or “unvaccinated.”
According to the chart, “unvaccinated <14 days receipt of the first dose of a 2-dose series or 1 dose of the single-dose vaccine or if no vaccination registry data were available.”
This means if someone was hospitalized, admitted to ICU, required mechanical ventilation or died within two weeks of getting the jab they are being counted as “unvaccinated.”
Gaat verder:
https://www.newswars.com/(...)jab-as-unvaccinated/
Korte video met cijfers: https://www.bitchute.com/video/3YQozON6gNLi/
quote:
[..]
Another expert added "Many people believe far too much of the complete and utter bullshit that they hear from those so-called experts on corona-hysteria TV and will develop symptoms of long covid...in other words, they worry themselves sick by the power of suggestion - a psychological condition which has been studied for more than a hundred years."
Deze gedachte had ik altijd al heel sterk bij de Long-covid verhalen. Het zijn ook altijd mensen die al erg bang waren covid te krijgen, let maar eens op.quote:they worry themselves sick by the power of suggestion - a psychological condition which has been studied for more than a hundred years.
"Unvaccinated people are generating the mutants is an absolute falsehood." - Dr. Harvey Risch, MD, Ph.D., Yale Professor of Epidemiology
Avi Abelow, Founder & CEO of The Pulse of Israel, recently interviewed Yale Epidemiologist Dr. Harvey Risch, MD, Ph.D. He made a stunning claim that completely goes against what the Biden Regime and Big Media have been calling the Pandemic of the Unvaccinated.
Dr. Risch says it’s the complete opposite.
Avi Abelow: For the vaccinated to be afraid of the unvaccinated?
Dr. Harvey Risch: No. I put it the other way around. The unvaccinated should be afraid of the vaccinated. They’re just as infected. In fact, maybe more infected. If vaccinated, people are infected. So it is well known that it is the vaccinated people that generate the mutant strains and not the unvaccinated people. And that has led that corruption of the medical establishment saying that unvaccinated people are generating the mutants is an absolute falsehood. It is exactly the opposite. This has been known for 100 years that it’s vaccinated people who are more prone to generate mutant strains.
Artikel met video-interview
Dit is natuurlijk alom bekend!quote:
Pandemic Of The VACCINATED Generating Mutant Chinese Virus Strains, More Infected Than Unvaccinated?
"Unvaccinated people are generating the mutants is an absolute falsehood." - Dr. Harvey Risch, MD, Ph.D., Yale Professor of Epidemiology
Avi Abelow, Founder & CEO of The Pulse of Israel, recently interviewed Yale Epidemiologist Dr. Harvey Risch, MD, Ph.D. He made a stunning claim that completely goes against what the Biden Regime and Big Media have been calling the Pandemic of the Unvaccinated.
Dr. Risch says it’s the complete opposite.
Avi Abelow: For the vaccinated to be afraid of the unvaccinated?
Dr. Harvey Risch: No. I put it the other way around. The unvaccinated should be afraid of the vaccinated. They’re just as infected. In fact, maybe more infected. If vaccinated, people are infected. So it is well known that it is the vaccinated people that generate the mutant strains and not the unvaccinated people. And that has led that corruption of the medical establishment saying that unvaccinated people are generating the mutants is an absolute falsehood. It is exactly the opposite. This has been known for 100 years that it’s vaccinated people who are more prone to generate mutant strains.
Artikel met video-interview
Vaccines currently are the primary mitigation strategy to combat COVID-19 around the world. For instance, the narrative related to the ongoing surge of new cases in the United States (US) is argued to be driven by areas with low vaccination rates [1].
A similar narrative also has been observed in countries, such as Germany and the United Kingdom [2]. At the same time, Israel that was hailed for its swift and high rates of vaccination has also seen a substantial resurgence in COVID-19 cases [3]. We investigate the relationship between the percentage of population fully vaccinated and new COVID-19 cases across 68 countries and across 2947 counties in the US.
Gaat verder:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10654-021-00808-7
Zorgmaken, angst, stress, anxiety enz. ken een grote indruk op je fysiek gezondheid hebben. Pyschosomatic symptomen en/of the placebo/nocebo effect bvb.quote:
[..]
[..]
Deze gedachte had ik altijd al heel sterk bij de Long-covid verhalen. Het zijn ook altijd mensen die al erg bang waren covid te krijgen, let maar eens op.
https://www.hpdetijd.nl/2(...)-de-volksgezondheid/quote:Niet een virus, maar een verzwakt immuunsysteem is de grootste bedreiging voor de volksgezondheid
Uit meerdere wetenschappelijke studies is inmiddels gebleken dat de immuniteit na een natuurlijke infectie een betere bescherming geeft dan een immuniteit na Covid-19-vaccinatie. Natuurlijke immuniteit kan wel eens nodig zijn om volledige bescherming in de populatie op te bouwen, schrijft immunoloog dr. Carla Peeters.
[ Bericht 0% gewijzigd door #ANONIEM op 23-10-2021 19:50:13 ]
https://www.ad.nl/nijmege(...)Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fquote:Pleidooi: beter niet iedereen vaccineren, het coronavirus verdwijnt namelijk toch niet
NIJMEGEN - Vaccineren van kinderen en jonge, gezonde mensen tegen corona levert weinig op. Groepsimmuniteit is namelijk onhaalbaar, het coronavirus zal niet meer verdwijnen en in steeds nieuwe varianten opduiken.
Dat stellen Jona Walk, recent gepromoveerd op vaccin-immunologie, en arts-microbioloog Bert Mulder vandaag in het blad Medisch Contact.
De beide artsen van het Nijmeegse Canisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis plaatsen daarmee vraagtekens bij het beleid van het kabinet en gezondheidsinstituut om de hele bevolking te vaccineren om terug te keren naar ‘normaal’. Zij worden ondersteund door een recent artikel ‘Five reasons why COVID herd immunity is probably impossible’ in het vooraanstaande wetenschappelijke medisch tijdschrift Nature.
https://www.sciencedirect(...)89238X21000292#f0005quote:Aphasia seven days after second dose of an mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine
https://www.frontnieuws.c(...)l-de-hoogopgeleiden/quote:De meest vaccinatie-weigerende groep van allemaal? De hoogopgeleiden
augustus 13, 2021
Er is veel gediscussieerd over de vraag hoe we de ongevaccineerden zover kunnen krijgen dat zij een vaccinatie nemen – door hen te schande te maken, door hen om te kopen of door hen te behandelen als slachtoffers van onjuiste en desinformatiecampagnes – maar wie zijn deze mensen eigenlijk?, schrijft Dr. Doug Corrigan.
…………..
Continues…
https://www.frontnieuws.c(...)orden-te-vaccineren/