BNW Brave New World
Samenzwering, verborgen agenda's en geheime geschiedenis. De zoektocht naar de wereld die achter de façade van alledag ligt.
Background
In 2008 there was a huge international controversy when an old 1992 video clip from Paul de Leeuw's own TV show was posted on Youtube. This video has since then been meticulously removed from Youtube and other major platforms – even from Bitchute. But, there is still one platform where the 4,5 min. clip still remains: https://d.tube/#!/v/trans(...)gTabCvXgMokC12Aa5PnL. If you are for some reason not outraged enough at the beginning of the video then watch the last 20 seconds…!
The Infamous Brongersma.info website
What I find very revealing is that Paul de Leeuw is referred to several times in the posts of the pedophilia promoting website brongersma.info. There is for example the following entry: “What does Paul de Leeuw think of when someone says 'Martijn'? Tonight in the broadcast of PaPaul the answer turned out: "a chief editor of a pedophile magazine". This off-topic comment was a bit dead, but is actually more of an insider joke;) “ This “inside joke” refers to the infamous court-banned Dutch pedophilia association Vereniging Martijn.
Direct accusations
The following excerpt is translated from a Dutch web article: https://www.boublog.nl/20(...)ld-en-bart-van-well/ and it also refers to this article: https://web.archive.org/w(...)ij-pedo-netwerk.html
“ Below is a transcript of notes taken by Micha Kat from an interview held on Sunday January 16, 2011 in Hellevoetsluis. The identity of the source is known to this site and can be revealed to the National Prosecutor's Office if the Public Prosecution Service undertakes to respect the source in its rights. The importance of the source is also apparent from the fact that he has proven to be the source of an explosive article published on December 7, 2004 on Kleintje Muurkrant about a pedo-bar in Amsterdamse Paardenstraat (the 'Festival Bar') where people like Ed van Thijn, Paul de Leeuw and Andre van Duin raped children. This bar was closed shortly after the publication of the said document. “
Modified Wikipedia profile
The following cannot be taken as direct evidence against Paul de Leeuw in this matter but curiously in December 2017 an article appeared in the political weblog Dagelijkse Standaard https://www.dagelijksesta(...)bekend-als-pedofiel/. It states that someone from the city of Amsterdam’s parking service department had modified Paul de Leeuw’s Wikipedia page claiming that he is living a double life and is actually a pedophile. This claim has since been removed by other Wikipedia moderators.
Association with the Dutch "Harvey Weinstein"
Paul de Leeuw also happens to be a good friend of Job Gosschalk who resigned his position as a producer and director of a known Dutch film company due to sexual misconduct. Mr. Gosschalk has been called the Dutch Harvey Weinstein and there has also been accusations that he has abused children (underage). See RTL channel presenter’s research on this subject (in Dutch): https://www.nporadio1.nl/(...)derjarigen-misbruikt.
In spite of a huge public controversy and disgust towards Mr. Gosschalk Paul de Leeuw has openly requested that Gosschalk should be forgiven and returned back to his former position as a caster for movie roles!
Pedophile symbol on his music album cover
There is a boy-lover's symbol on his musical album cover.
https://twitter.com/Trans(...)731072126979/photo/1
The name of the album is "For your majesty". Hmm, this put s chills down my spine when you consider the alleged involvement of the former Dutch Queen Beatrix in child sacrifice rituals. See the testimonial of a brave Dutch woman Annemarie van Blijenburg here:
Revealing song lyrics
The lyrics of one of Paul de Leeuw's songs goes like this (translated with Google translate from: https://genius.com/Paul-de-leeuw-de-hit-lyrics)
He had a children's choir with voices as gems...Lalalalala...I sang songs with 40 golden throats...Lalalalala It was great to do, I kissed them all
Children crowded into my yard, get lost...Lalalalala... When they saw me they started to sing, Wodan took it...Lalalalala...I became nervous, I became unstable, I became *LESS AND LESS PEDOPHILE*.
The truly bizarre Filmpje! movie from 2005
Paul de Leeuw also wrote the script and acted the main roles in a disturbing 1995 movie called Filmpje! ? Already during the first minute they start talking about ordering a child ('rare kindje') from the internet. Although it is meant to refer to an adoption this really gives me a bad feeling...
At a strange scene (starts 6:05) Papa spits into the crib, shakes it violently and then throws the whole crib against a wall. It is unclear if a baby was inside (I hope not).
At the court room scene (starts 8:25) there is a naked baby doll on the table..
In one scene (starts 19:27) the main character 'Papa' visits a strange "Eyes wide shut" type of corporate building where sex services are offered.
In another scene (starts 27:49) the 'Papa' comes home and his daughter (who is wearing a really gruesome looking tooth straightening device on her head) goes to greet him by kneeling in front of him – what happens after this is not shown. After this 'Papa' violently throws his daughter against the glass door of a cabinet. A bit strange...
And sure enough a Wizard of Oz inspired clip (start 1:34:16) is used in this movie. According to victims of sexual abuse, "pedophiles abuse the movie The Wizard of Oz to brainwash their child sex slaves."
For some reason there are lobsters everywhere in the movie - the main character (Paul) is even wearing a lobster in his/her head dress. According to the Urban dictionary website the term ‘rock lobster’ refers to a male pedofile.
The movie is supposed to be funny but it has a very dark undertone the whole time... My Dutch isn't good enough but I am pretty sure there are more indications of pedophilia in this movie.
Adoption
Considering this background I think it is a bit alarming that Paul de Leeuw adopted two children from Africa. At the beginning of the disturbing movie Filmpje! they talk about ordering kids from Africa...
Public reactions in the Netherlands
Many Dutch people have expressed their disapproval of the 1992 TV show video but I have also seen disturbingly many people trying to explain it away by using the following types of arguments:
“It was such a long time ago (28 years ago) and the times were different back then.”
“It was a staged act agreed to by the boy’s parents and and the boy knew what was happening.”
“Oh Paul is Paul – he is a comedian and he pushes people’s buttons, his acts shouldn’t be taken literally.”
“Foreigners just don’t understand the unique Dutch humour and culture.”
“Paul is is a very famous person, he is also a very likable guy and he shouldn’t be accused of these kinds of things.”
Conclusion
BUT, there is still a huge elephant in the living room here - a video that shows a young boy being sexually molested on public TV in a very obvious and graphic manner (whether the act was staged or not). Taking into consideration the other indications I have described above I am asking the same question that was asked by someone on Quora years ago - why is he still allowed to have his own show on Dutch TV? Is he perhaps protected by some very high level people? Does the Dutch society still stick its head in the sand and pretend that there is nothing to address here!?
I am not trying to somehow witch hunt Paul de Leeuw but I feel it is important to let the cat out of the bag. Numerous children are being abused around the world – if this issue cannot be discussed in one of the most developed Western societies (the Netherlands) then where are we heading to as a collective humanity...
In 2008 there was a huge international controversy when an old 1992 video clip from Paul de Leeuw's own TV show was posted on Youtube. This video has since then been meticulously removed from Youtube and other major platforms – even from Bitchute. But, there is still one platform where the 4,5 min. clip still remains: https://d.tube/#!/v/trans(...)gTabCvXgMokC12Aa5PnL. If you are for some reason not outraged enough at the beginning of the video then watch the last 20 seconds…!
The Infamous Brongersma.info website
What I find very revealing is that Paul de Leeuw is referred to several times in the posts of the pedophilia promoting website brongersma.info. There is for example the following entry: “What does Paul de Leeuw think of when someone says 'Martijn'? Tonight in the broadcast of PaPaul the answer turned out: "a chief editor of a pedophile magazine". This off-topic comment was a bit dead, but is actually more of an insider joke;) “ This “inside joke” refers to the infamous court-banned Dutch pedophilia association Vereniging Martijn.
Direct accusations
The following excerpt is translated from a Dutch web article: https://www.boublog.nl/20(...)ld-en-bart-van-well/ and it also refers to this article: https://web.archive.org/w(...)ij-pedo-netwerk.html
“ Below is a transcript of notes taken by Micha Kat from an interview held on Sunday January 16, 2011 in Hellevoetsluis. The identity of the source is known to this site and can be revealed to the National Prosecutor's Office if the Public Prosecution Service undertakes to respect the source in its rights. The importance of the source is also apparent from the fact that he has proven to be the source of an explosive article published on December 7, 2004 on Kleintje Muurkrant about a pedo-bar in Amsterdamse Paardenstraat (the 'Festival Bar') where people like Ed van Thijn, Paul de Leeuw and Andre van Duin raped children. This bar was closed shortly after the publication of the said document. “
Modified Wikipedia profile
The following cannot be taken as direct evidence against Paul de Leeuw in this matter but curiously in December 2017 an article appeared in the political weblog Dagelijkse Standaard https://www.dagelijksesta(...)bekend-als-pedofiel/. It states that someone from the city of Amsterdam’s parking service department had modified Paul de Leeuw’s Wikipedia page claiming that he is living a double life and is actually a pedophile. This claim has since been removed by other Wikipedia moderators.
Association with the Dutch "Harvey Weinstein"
Paul de Leeuw also happens to be a good friend of Job Gosschalk who resigned his position as a producer and director of a known Dutch film company due to sexual misconduct. Mr. Gosschalk has been called the Dutch Harvey Weinstein and there has also been accusations that he has abused children (underage). See RTL channel presenter’s research on this subject (in Dutch): https://www.nporadio1.nl/(...)derjarigen-misbruikt.
In spite of a huge public controversy and disgust towards Mr. Gosschalk Paul de Leeuw has openly requested that Gosschalk should be forgiven and returned back to his former position as a caster for movie roles!
Pedophile symbol on his music album cover
There is a boy-lover's symbol on his musical album cover.
https://twitter.com/Trans(...)731072126979/photo/1
The name of the album is "For your majesty". Hmm, this put s chills down my spine when you consider the alleged involvement of the former Dutch Queen Beatrix in child sacrifice rituals. See the testimonial of a brave Dutch woman Annemarie van Blijenburg here:
Revealing song lyrics
The lyrics of one of Paul de Leeuw's songs goes like this (translated with Google translate from: https://genius.com/Paul-de-leeuw-de-hit-lyrics)
He had a children's choir with voices as gems...Lalalalala...I sang songs with 40 golden throats...Lalalalala It was great to do, I kissed them all
Children crowded into my yard, get lost...Lalalalala... When they saw me they started to sing, Wodan took it...Lalalalala...I became nervous, I became unstable, I became *LESS AND LESS PEDOPHILE*.
The truly bizarre Filmpje! movie from 2005
Paul de Leeuw also wrote the script and acted the main roles in a disturbing 1995 movie called Filmpje! ? Already during the first minute they start talking about ordering a child ('rare kindje') from the internet. Although it is meant to refer to an adoption this really gives me a bad feeling...
At a strange scene (starts 6:05) Papa spits into the crib, shakes it violently and then throws the whole crib against a wall. It is unclear if a baby was inside (I hope not).
At the court room scene (starts 8:25) there is a naked baby doll on the table..
In one scene (starts 19:27) the main character 'Papa' visits a strange "Eyes wide shut" type of corporate building where sex services are offered.
In another scene (starts 27:49) the 'Papa' comes home and his daughter (who is wearing a really gruesome looking tooth straightening device on her head) goes to greet him by kneeling in front of him – what happens after this is not shown. After this 'Papa' violently throws his daughter against the glass door of a cabinet. A bit strange...
And sure enough a Wizard of Oz inspired clip (start 1:34:16) is used in this movie. According to victims of sexual abuse, "pedophiles abuse the movie The Wizard of Oz to brainwash their child sex slaves."
For some reason there are lobsters everywhere in the movie - the main character (Paul) is even wearing a lobster in his/her head dress. According to the Urban dictionary website the term ‘rock lobster’ refers to a male pedofile.
The movie is supposed to be funny but it has a very dark undertone the whole time... My Dutch isn't good enough but I am pretty sure there are more indications of pedophilia in this movie.
Adoption
Considering this background I think it is a bit alarming that Paul de Leeuw adopted two children from Africa. At the beginning of the disturbing movie Filmpje! they talk about ordering kids from Africa...
Public reactions in the Netherlands
Many Dutch people have expressed their disapproval of the 1992 TV show video but I have also seen disturbingly many people trying to explain it away by using the following types of arguments:
“It was such a long time ago (28 years ago) and the times were different back then.”
“It was a staged act agreed to by the boy’s parents and and the boy knew what was happening.”
“Oh Paul is Paul – he is a comedian and he pushes people’s buttons, his acts shouldn’t be taken literally.”
“Foreigners just don’t understand the unique Dutch humour and culture.”
“Paul is is a very famous person, he is also a very likable guy and he shouldn’t be accused of these kinds of things.”
Conclusion
BUT, there is still a huge elephant in the living room here - a video that shows a young boy being sexually molested on public TV in a very obvious and graphic manner (whether the act was staged or not). Taking into consideration the other indications I have described above I am asking the same question that was asked by someone on Quora years ago - why is he still allowed to have his own show on Dutch TV? Is he perhaps protected by some very high level people? Does the Dutch society still stick its head in the sand and pretend that there is nothing to address here!?
I am not trying to somehow witch hunt Paul de Leeuw but I feel it is important to let the cat out of the bag. Numerous children are being abused around the world – if this issue cannot be discussed in one of the most developed Western societies (the Netherlands) then where are we heading to as a collective humanity...
Niet te geloven dat ineens weer zo in het nieuws is. Ik kan me zelfs nog herinneren dat ik het origineel op tv gezien heb destijds.
That was all, zenk joe for your topic.
That was all, zenk joe for your topic.
En over een paar jaar is ‘t net als bij Savile...
"We aren't people, we are text." - Japanman Sakyusan -
Denk dat Paultje inderdaad op zijn tijd ook wel een lijk neukt, wat jij dan.quote:Op maandag 13 juli 2020 15:10 schreef Tyr80 het volgende:
En over een paar jaar is ‘t net als bij Saville...
Denk het ook man. Hij is bekend dus moet hij maar kapot.
Zolang er niks bewezen is, heeft dit geneuzel geen zin.
Zolang er niks bewezen is, heeft dit geneuzel geen zin.
1992..... toen was men niet vies van een beetje (soft) porno met kinderen.
Was toen ook nog gewoon legaal om als zestienjarige in pornoboekjes als Candy, Seventeen e.d. te gaan staan...
Was toen ook nog gewoon legaal om als zestienjarige in pornoboekjes als Candy, Seventeen e.d. te gaan staan...
blablablabla
lolquote:
Maak er dan ook Paul the Lion van als je het dan toch in het engels wil doen
Gerieflijke groeten, ChevyCaprice
Moderator DIG
Russell-supporter (LET'S GO GEORGE!) F1 Watcher
🇺🇦 Fight Fight Fight! 🇺🇦
Moderator DIG
Russell-supporter (LET'S GO GEORGE!) F1 Watcher
🇺🇦 Fight Fight Fight! 🇺🇦
quote:
Maak er dan ook Paul the Lion van als je het dan toch in het engels wil doen
Vergeet de scène niet waarin Bob de Rooy zijn kinderen meeneemt naar een pornofilm. Of de scène waarin een baby wordt opgeblazen.
Wie jaren naar De schreeuw van De Leeuw heeft gekeken, kent de humor van Paul de Leeuw. Afgezien van wat je daarvan vindt, is die humor soms op de grens van wat nog kan. Dat er mensen zijn die dit op de snijtafel leggen en met een vooringenomen standpunt deze film als kindermisbruik (of verheerlijking daarvan) ziet, en daarbovenop tegenargumenten behandelt als een ultieme bevestiging van het gelijk, is op z’n minst kansloos.
Wie jaren naar De schreeuw van De Leeuw heeft gekeken, kent de humor van Paul de Leeuw. Afgezien van wat je daarvan vindt, is die humor soms op de grens van wat nog kan. Dat er mensen zijn die dit op de snijtafel leggen en met een vooringenomen standpunt deze film als kindermisbruik (of verheerlijking daarvan) ziet, en daarbovenop tegenargumenten behandelt als een ultieme bevestiging van het gelijk, is op z’n minst kansloos.
Kinderpornoarts Luc Frijns was te gast bij Paul de Leeuw:
https://www.dumpert.nl/item/6687175_b721b066
Gewoon weer een toeval?
https://www.dumpert.nl/item/6687175_b721b066
Gewoon weer een toeval?
Enjoy.
Persoonlijk had ik weinig met de humor van hem, en snap niet waarom ze hem zolang verschillende programma's hebben laten presenteren.
Er staat nog een vraag voor u open!!
Ik ook niet. Heb het altijd al een misselijk mannetje gevonden. Daarentegen zijn er gelukkig genoeg presentators waar ik wel met plezier naar kan kijken.quote:Op dinsdag 21 juli 2020 15:13 schreef theguyver het volgende:
Enjoy.
Persoonlijk had ik weinig met de humor van hem, en snap niet waarom ze hem zolang verschillende programma's hebben laten presenteren.
A child is born with no state of mind.
Inderdaad wel waar. Humor is een kwestie van smaak. Maar al vind ik dat filmpje wel een beetje eng.quote:
Vergeet de scène niet waarin Bob de Rooy zijn kinderen meeneemt naar een pornofilm. Of de scène waarin een baby wordt opgeblazen.
Wie jaren naar De schreeuw van De Leeuw heeft gekeken, kent de humor van Paul de Leeuw. Afgezien van wat je daarvan vindt, is die humor soms op de grens van wat nog kan. Dat er mensen zijn die dit op de snijtafel leggen en met een vooringenomen standpunt deze film als kindermisbruik (of verheerlijking daarvan) ziet, en daarbovenop tegenargumenten behandelt als een ultieme bevestiging van het gelijk, is op z’n minst kansloos.
Groot fan van User Wotte
Paul de Leeuw heeft ook kinderen geadopteerd ...
https://www.lifesitenews.(...)or-years-offered-him
Zijn dit dezelfde ouders als op de vorige linkfoto?
https://twitter.com/WokeC(...)589709078534/photo/1
https://www.lifesitenews.(...)or-years-offered-him
Zijn dit dezelfde ouders als op de vorige linkfoto?
https://twitter.com/WokeC(...)589709078534/photo/1
Stop hiermee. In hetzelfde draadje is het al debunked. Mi gado.quote:
Paul de Leeuw heeft ook kinderen geadopteerd ...
https://www.lifesitenews.(...)or-years-offered-him
Zijn dit dezelfde ouders als op de vorige linkfoto?
https://twitter.com/WokeC(...)589709078534/photo/1
Groot fan van User Wotte
|
|
