Ik klikte net even op een willekeurige site (niet gerelateerd aan het onderwerp) en toen kwam ik de volgende afbeeldingen tegen:
![asar-amsr_2006_h.jpg]()
Waarom ontbreekt daar een essentieel stuk?
Bron:
http://soveriegn.wordpres(...)term-of-melting-ice/Verder kwam ik dit nog tegen:
![essa7.jpg]()
That composite picture of the North Pole taken the 23 Nov. 1968 was published for the first time in June 1970 in Ray Palmer magazine "Flying Saucer" a clear-circular-gigantic-hole appears at the North Pole...why has this part been removed from the picture??...Perhaps somebody could give me a reasonable answer that makes sense?...i guess that at that time, they didn`t have yet, sufficient imagery technology to fill the gap decently, like it could be easily done nowadays with "Photoshop".
![troupole3.jpg]()
This composite picture is another NASA document created by Drs David S. Johnson of "National environment Satellite Center" from several shots done by ESSA satellite in April 1967.
AGAIN A PART HAS BEEN REMOVED...which hides the North Pole entrance???...
![essa3.jpg]()
Another composite photography of the North Pole taken by the ESSA-3 satellite in January 6, 1967. It shows what seems to be an inward motion of the clouds?...i guess that the rest of the North Pole area has been removed.
Note: All the photographies of the North Pole taken above show clearly that they are composite pictures done through several shots since the entire hemisphere is bathed in sunlight, but why are the lines radiating from the Equator up to the North Pole never ending their course at the very top? For the ESSA-3 picture, it makes sense since in January the North Pole is plunged in total darkness however i can`t explain the clouds inward motion? Those pictures are not absolute proof of a massive hole! but they do fail some explanations.
En dan nog dit:
In March 1960, the very much in depht and popular French science magazine "science et vie," published a very interesting article of the South Pole area nearby the Ross sea. It says that Russian scientists explored the "BENGUER " oasis, an area of 500KM2 free of ice (displaying an average temperature of more than 25°Celsius??...) with lakes, springs, vegetation and several bird species...For such an incredible phenomenon, the magazine says that the scientists found out the reason of that sudden rise of temperature, which is due to the fact that in the South, mountains are breaking down the wind and holding a huge amount of ice and snow and in the North the ocean has a softening effect? How could these scientists let us believe that a mountain range and the softening effect of the ocean can explain a difference of more than 100°Celsius! (that`s boiling water!) since the article says that the lower temperature surrounding the area has reached a phenomenal record of minus 86.7° Celsius and displays an average of minus 50° Celsius.
![science&viecouverture.jpg]()
Het artikel (Franstalig):
http://mysterioushollowearth.webs.com/science&viemars1960.pdfThe BENGUER Oasis "green area" very well surrounded by US military bases: