Drugshond | zondag 18 januari 2009 @ 22:38 |
quote: ![]() Ach boeien, de ECB springt wel bij, print maar raak voor een knaak. Je gaat je dan wel afvragen wat er werkelijk in het vat zit voor ING en consorten. Option ARM , ALT-A, Prime, Subprime, Jumbo, CDO, CDS whatever. We gaan met of zonder Europa ook redelijk naar de klote denk ik. | |
arjan1212 | zondag 18 januari 2009 @ 22:42 |
engeland gaat het ook goed? Published: January 18 2009 13:24 | Last updated: January 18 2009 20:19 Britain’s beleaguered banks were on Sunday night preparing to accept a new bail-out as government officials put the finishing touches to a plan designed to end uncertainty about future losses and stimulate the flow of credit to consumers and companies. Alistair Darling, chancellor of the exchequer, spoke to senior executives of Britain’s largest banks to outline the plan, which will see the government insure banks against potential losses on risky loans in return for firm commitments to increase lending to credit-starved consumers and businesses. EDITOR’S CHOICE Lex: Once more unto the breach - Jan-18UK takes a gamble on bank insurance - Jan-18Brown orders Britain’s banks to come clean - Jan-17Barclays seeks to reassure investors - Jan-16Turmoil needs more effective solutions - Jan-17Regulation is small price for protection - Jan-16Amid fears about a public backlash against billions more of taxpayers’ money being committed to help the financial sector, ministers are expected to express their anger and frustration at the banks’ reluctance to increase lending despite benefiting from the government’s £400bn bail-out in October. As part of a series of measures, the government is expected to announce it is converting £5bn of preference shares issued by Royal Bank of Scotland into ordinary shares, increasing the state’s shareholding from about 58 per cent to 68 per cent. However, Lloyds Banking Group – the merged Lloyds TSB-HBOS – is unlikely to accept an offer to convert government preference shares into ordinary shares. The new bail-out package, due to be unveiled before the markets open in London on Monday, comes after an intense weekend of discussions involving bank executives, ministers and Gordon Brown, the prime minister. Speaking to reporters on Sunday in Egypt, where he was attending talks on Gaza, Mr Brown said: “We know the essential problem is the resumption of lending.” The package is designed to “get lending moving in the economy” to help families and businesses hit by a freeze in the global credit markets, he added. As part of the insurance scheme, which is voluntary, the government is expected to negotiate separate agreements with individual banks to cap potential losses on a portfolio of assets. In return, the government is expected to charge a fee – which could be in the form of shares – as well as an explicit commitment to increase lending. Separately, the government will also unveil plans to guarantee new issues of securities backed by mortgages and other assets. It will also extend a scheme that guarantees bonds issued by banks until the end of the year. The scheme had been due to expire in April. It may also revise the business plan for Northern Rock in order to allow the state-owned mortgage bank to make more new loans. The new package follows renewed jitters in the banking sector after Bank of America and Citigroup, two of the world’s largest financial institutions, last week reported heavy losses. The figures underscored the difficult operating environment for banks in the fourth quarter of last year. RBS is among those banks that is expected to unveil heavy losses when it reports full-year results next month. The losses are likely to include RBS writing off the goodwill on its share of ABN Amro, the Dutch lender it acquired as part of a break-up bid in 2007. Rival Barclays moved to reassure investors on Friday that it had avoided losses when it announced that full-year profits for 2008 would be “well ahead” of the £5.3bn forecast by analysts. Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2009 | |
PietjePuk007 | zondag 18 januari 2009 @ 22:45 |
We hebben 't hier wel over "der Spiegel" he ![]() ![]() | |
Drugshond | zondag 18 januari 2009 @ 22:50 |
quote: ![]() We hebben dat rapport nooit gezien. 1000 miljard = zowat 66 % van het totale bruto binnenlands product. | |
elcastel | zondag 18 januari 2009 @ 22:54 |
quote:Nou als je kijkt wat er tot nu toe aan financiele injecties in uitgedeeld, dan zit je niet te wachten op nog meer significante hoeveelheden afschrijvingen op risicovolle producten (zoals ze zelf aangeven op het min.Fin.). Of vind jij het wel lekker klinken ? | |
PietjePuk007 | zondag 18 januari 2009 @ 22:56 |
Absoluut niet, maar der Spiegel is wel goed in paniek veroorzaken ![]() ![]() | |
Drugshond | zondag 18 januari 2009 @ 23:22 |
quote:Daar heb ik Der Spiegel niet voor nodig. Je kunt beter de balans opmaken van wat er nu werkelijk aan de hand is, als je goed tussen de regels leest en nevenbronnen erbij gaat zoeken. Van de officiële woordvoerders hoef je niks te verwachten (toen niet en nu niet). Die verkopen nog meer onzin dan Der Spiegel. Om de schijn te wekken dat het allemaal nog meevalt en beheersbaar is. Ondertussen schrijven we wel geschiedenis, omdat er allerlei dingen gebeuren die kompleet buiten het statistisch patroon vallen. Vrijwel geen enkele analist durft nog met cijfers aan te komen. De meeste economische modellen zijn tot pulp verschoten (het pseudo lineaire model ist kaput). We vluchten met zijn allen in de laatste bubble/line of defense.... staatsobligaties. We parkeren de schuldvraag in de toekomst. En dit zou wel eens zo groot kunnen worden dat het niet meer oplosbaar is. quote:Nou reken maar dat die overschreden gaan worden in 2009. Maar dat gooien ze liever niet in het nieuws. Slechts een handvol berichtjes in google news. ![]() ff opgezocht Spanje : het begrotingstekort zou toenemen tot 5,8 procent. - Nee hoor niks aan de hand ![]() | |
TubewayDigital | zondag 18 januari 2009 @ 23:45 |
quote:Ik neem aan dat de topmannen van de geplaagde banken vrijwillig hun bonussen van de afgelopen jaren terugbetalen ![]() | |
PietjePuk007 | donderdag 5 februari 2009 @ 09:26 |
quote:Bron | |
Billary | donderdag 5 februari 2009 @ 12:25 |
En dan deze, wat klopt er niet? ''Feb. 5 (Bloomberg) -- Deutsche Bank AG, Germany’s biggest bank, said revenue in January amounted to 2.8 billion euros ($3.6 billion), “significantly above” the previous year. Chief Executive Officer Josef Ackermann said today the performance in January gives the bank “confidence” for 2009.'' | |
TubewayDigital | donderdag 5 februari 2009 @ 13:15 |
1000 miljard ?????![]() ![]() ![]() Die verdienen het op de blaren te zitten. | |
Drugshond | zondag 15 februari 2009 @ 19:47 |
quote: | |
Drugshond | zondag 29 maart 2009 @ 15:10 |
quote: | |
Drugshond | zondag 26 juli 2009 @ 09:55 |
Germany's looming credit crunch A reluctant patient Europe’s biggest economy has largely escaped the squeeze. Not for much longer ![]() Illustration by S. Kambayashi ONE of the hardest tasks doctors face is convincing an outwardly well patient that he needs drastic treatment. So too with Germany’s financial system. By most measures, the flow of credit has held up pretty well in Germany, even as it has fallen elsewhere. Yet without painful surgery, there is a real danger that the arteries of finance may soon clog. There is no obvious need to panic. According to ZEW, a research institute, the total volume of loans outstanding in Germany was almost 3% higher in May than a year earlier, compared with loan growth of under 2% in the rest of the euro area. Surveys of businesses and banks have shown no pervasive tightening of credit. A monthly survey by the IFO institute for economic research at Munich University found that in June more than half of German firms thought credit no harder to come by than usual. A similar study by the German chambers of industry and commerce (DIHK) found that almost two-thirds of firms had experienced no tightening of credit conditions. Bankers say that they have got tougher but they have still tightened lending standards less markedly than their counterparts in the euro area as a whole. Not even the notoriously pessimistic Bundesbank expected Germany to experience a credit squeeze when it produced its latest forecasts in June. “Overall what you see right now is not a credit crunch,” says Carola Schuler of Moody’s, a rating agency. Yet many in Germany are increasingly concerned that a looming credit crunch will squeeze lending to the country’s middle-sized firms, throttling any hope of a rebound in growth next year. “There is a real danger for the second half of the year” that credit conditions will tighten sharply, says a senior government official. The first reason for worry, oddly, is that Germany’s legion of small and medium-sized firms entered this downturn with balance-sheets stuffed with cash. Most say that they are not having trouble raising loans because many have not yet tried. But the sharp contraction in German export orders, with sales in some industries such as machine tools falling by 60%, means that many firms are now burning cash and will soon need to replenish reserves, says Alexandra Böhne of the DIHK. Being very small will afford some protection. Germany’s locally owned savings banks (or Sparkassen), co-operative banks and small regional banks seem still to be lending furiously to their local clients. Alongside dedicated mortgage banks, such institutions account for about two-thirds of all lending in Germany, although most of this is to (thrifty) households and very small businesses. Being very big may also help. Germany’s largest firms have successfully sold bonds in recent months. That leaves the Mittelstand, the mid-sized firms that are the backbone of Germany’s export-driven economy, most exposed to a credit squeeze. Sheltering these firms will be tricky because there are many reasons for the expected contraction in lending. The first is that they were keenly courted before the crisis by foreign banks that have since pulled back. Stories abound of clients of these banks desperately knocking on the doors of domestic lenders. “Foreign banks have more or less retreated from Germany,” says Matthias Wissmann of the German Association of the Automotive Industry (VDA). A second reason is that the merger of two of the country’s big domestic banks, Commerzbank and Dresdner Bank, is leading to a sharp withdrawal of credit from the Mittelstand. This is partly because the combined bank is obliged under European state-aid rules to shrink its balance-sheet in return for the help it has received from the government. But it is mainly because many middle-sized companies were clients of both banks. Now that they have merged, credit lines are being amalgamated and cut back. ![]() Underlying these risks is a deeper weakness. German banks are thinly capitalised, with little more than 2% of equity supporting their assets (see chart). Loan losses from a prolonged downturn could quickly deflate that cushion; so too could losses on the banks’ hoard of toxic securities, estimated in some quarters to exceed $1 trillion. German banks also fear the effects of credit downgrades among their corporate clients. Under Basel 2 rules banks would then have to set aside more capital relative to their assets. The head of corporate banking at one large German bank anticipates an average downgrade of three notches among its clients, which in theory could force the bank to increase its capital reserves by as much as a quarter. Others expect more modest downgrades of one to two notches on average, but few can afford even that sort of deterioration. Many are likely to cut back on lending rather than try to raise more capital. Such problems are not unique to Germany, but they are being handled in a uniquely short-sighted way. Germany’s bad-bank plan, which passed into law this month, seems determined to deter banks from using it by imposing unnecessarily onerous conditions. Only two banks look likely to take it up. The scheme’s main aim is to protect taxpayers from bearing losses. In that it will be a remarkable success. But it will do little to protect the economy from a prolonged credit squeeze. Symptomatic of Germany’s reluctance to peer into the state of its banks is its steadfast refusal to force them to conduct stress tests against published criteria. “Why were we reluctant to stress-test the banks?” says an official. “Because we were worried about what we would find.” With doctors like these, pray for the patient. |