Nasa Proves God

The general theory of evolution is based on several faulty
assumptions. (Note: It is important to understand by this statement
that we are not disputing simple variations that some call
"microevolution," whose micro-changes are often observed but
never lead to a fundamentally different kind of plant or animal.) The
following assumptions of evolutionary theory are easy to prove
false:

1. the universe is billions of years old,

2. life spontaneously arose from nonliving minerals,

3. mutations create or improve a species,

4. natural selection has creative power.

In this section we will deal with the first of these
assumptions. The others will be dealt with elsewhere.
If, in fact, it could be demonstrated that the universe is not
billions of years old, all other arguments
about evolution become meaningless and unnecessary.

In childrens fairy tales, we are told:
frog + magic spell (usually a kiss) = prince

In modern "science" textbooks we are told:
frog + time = prince

The same basic fairy tale (evolution) is being promoted in
textbooks today, but the new magic potion
cited is time. When the theory of evolution is discussed, time
is the panacea for all the thousands of
problems that arise.

In nearly all discussions and debates about evolution that I
have held at universities and colleges, I
ask the evolutionists how certain things could have evolved by
chance. Their answer is nearly always
"Given enough time..." Time is the evolutionists god. Time is
able to accomplish anything the
evolutionists can propose. Time can easily turn a frog into a
prince. Time can create matter from
nothing and life from matter. According to evolutionists, time
can create order from chaos.

But lets remove time from the above equation. There would be
the following three results:

1. Evolution becomes obviously impossible.

2. Evolutionists will scream like a baby whose pacifier has
been pulled out because they know that if
time is removed, their religion (evolution is religion, not
science) is silly.

3. Creation becomes the only reasonable alternative explanation
for the existence of this complex
universe.

Lets imagine we are exploring an old gold mine, and we find a
Casio Databank watch half buried in
the mud on the floor of the mine. Suppose also that the correct
time and date are displayed on the
watch and it is still running smoothly. Then imagine that I
tell you the watch has been there for over
one thousand years.

"Thats impossible!" you say. "That watch could not have been
there for a thousand years, and I can
prove it!"

"How can you prove Im wrong?" I say.

"Well, for one thing, this mine was just dug 150 years ago,"
you say.

"Okay," I admit, "youre right about the thousand years being
too much, but the watch has been here
for 150 years at least!"

"No!" you say. "Casio didnt make the Databank watch until
twelve years ago."

"All right," I say. "The watch was dropped here twelve years
ago then."

"Impossible!" you say. "The batteries only last five years on
that watch, and its still running. That
proves it has been here less than five years."

While we still cant prove exactly when the watch was left
there, you have logically limited the date to
five years at the most. You have effectively proven that my
initial statement about the watch being
1000 years old is wrong. The larger numbers prove nothing in
this debate. Even if I were to carbon
date the mud or the plastic in the watch to try to prove that
it is thousands of years old, my data would
be meaningless. The same logic can be applied to finding the
age of the earth. If several factors limit
the age of the earth to a few thousand years, the earth cannot
be older than a few thousand years!
Even if a few indicators seem to show a greater age for the
earth, it takes only ONE fact to prove the
earth is young.

The Bible teaches that: God created the universe approximately
6000 years ago, ex nihilo (out of
nothing) in six literal, twenty-four hour days. Then,
approximately 4400 years ago, the earth was
destroyed by a worldwide Flood. This devastating, year-long
Flood was responsible for the sediment
layers being deposited (the water was going and returning, Gen.
8:3-5). As the mountains rose and
the ocean basins sank after the Flood (Psalm 104:5-8, Gen.
8:1), the waters rushed off the rising
mountains into the new ocean basins. This rapid-erosion through
still-soft, unprotected sediments
formed the topography we still see today, in places like the
Grand Canyon. The uniformitarian
assumptionthat todays slow erosion rates that take place
through solid rock are the same as has
always beenis faulty logic, and ignores catastrophes like the
Flood. (2 Pet. 3:3-8 says that the
scoffers are "willingly ignorant" of the Flood.)

Listed below are some of the factors from various branches of
science that limit the age of the
universe (including earth) to within the last few thousand
years. Though it cannot be scientifically
proven exactly when the universe was created, its age can be
shown to not be billions of years old.
Each of the following evidences of a young earth is described
in great detail in the books referenced
below. Source number and page number are given for the
following statements (at the bottom of this
page):

***** Evidence from Space *****

The shrinking sun limits the earth-sun relationship to less
than "billions of years." The sun is losing
both mass and diameter. Changing the mass would upset the fine
gravitational balance that keeps the
earth at just the right distance for life to survive. (1, p.
169; 2, p. 30; 4, pp. 56-63; 5, p. 26; 6, p. 43;)

The ½ inch layer of cosmic dust on the moon indicates the moon
has not been accumulating dust for
billions of years. (2, p. 26; 3, p. 22; 4, p. 15; 6, p. 35; 7;
9, p. 25) *Insufficient evidence to be positive
(almost all estimates before the lunar landing anticipated
great quantities of dust.)

"I get a picture therefore, of the first spaceship, picking out
a nice, level place for landing purposes,
coming in slowly downward tail-first, and sinking majestically
out of sight." -- Isaac Asimov, Science
Digest, January, 1959, p 36

Lyttleton felt that the X-rays and UV light striking exposed
moon rocks "could, during the age of the
moon be sufficient to form a layer over it several miles deep."
-- Monthly Notices of the Royal
Astronomical Society of London, vol. 115, pp. 585-604

The existence of short-period comets indicates the universe is
less than billions of years old. (2, p.
31; 3, p. 27; 4, p. 35; 6, p. 37; 7)

Fossil meteorites are very rare in layers other than the top
layers of the earth. This indicates that the
layers were not exposed for millions of years as is currently
being taught in school textbooks. (4, p.
26)

The moon is receding a few inches each year. Billions of years
ago the moon would have been so
close that the tides would have been much higher, eroding away
the continents. (3, p. 25; 6, p. 43; 7)

The moon contains considerable quantities of U-236 and Th-230,
both short-lived isotopes that would
have been long gone if the moon were billions of years old. (8,
p. 177; see also 4, p. 51, for
information on rock "flow")

The existence of great quantities of space dust, which by the
Pointing-Robertson effect would have
been vacuumed out of our solar system in a few thousand years,
indicates the solar system is young.
(3, p. 29; 6, p.44)

At the rate many star clusters are expanding, they could not
have been traveling for billions of years.
(3, p. 29; 4, pp. 30 and 59; 6, p. 44)

Saturns rings are still unstable, indicating they are not
billions of years old. (4, p. 45)

Jupiter and Saturn are cooling off rather rapidly. They are
losing heat twice as fast as they gain it from
the sun. They cannot be billions of years old. (5, p. 26; 4, p.
43; Jupiters moon, Io, is losing matter to
Jupiter. It cannot be billions of years old. (4, p. 3)

Among other factors to consider is that all the ancient
astronomers from 2000 years ago recorded
that Sirius was a red startoday it is a white dwarf star.
Since todays textbooks in astronomy state
that one hundred thousand years are required for a star to
"evolve" from a red giant to a white dwarf,
obviously this view needs to be restudied.

Evidence from Earth

The decaying magnetic field limits earths age to less than
billions. (1, p. 157; 2, p. 27; 3, p. 20; 5, p.
23; 6, p. 42; 9, p. 25; 10, p. 38)

The volume of lava on earth divided by its rate of efflux gives
a number of only a few million years, not
billions. I believe that during the Flood, while "the fountains
of the deep were broken up," most of the
earths lava was deposited rapidly. (1, p. 156)

Dividing the amount of various minerals in the ocean by their
influx rate indicates only a few thousand
years of accumulation. (1, p. 153; 5, p. 24; 6, p. 42)

The amount of Helium 4 in the atmosphere, divided by the
formation rate on earth, gives only 175,000
years. (God may have created the earth with some helium which
would reduce the age more.) (1, p.
151; 6, p. 42; 9, p. 25)

The erosion rate of the continents is such that they would
erode to sea level in less than 14,000,000
years, destroying all old fossils. (2, p. 31; 6, p 38; American
Science Vol 56 p 356-374)

Topsoil formation rates indicate only a few thousand years of
formation. (6, p. 38)

Niagara Falls erosion rate (four to five feet per year)
indicates an age of less than 10,000 years.
Dont forget Noahs Flood could have eroded half of the
seven-mile-long Niagara River gorge in a few
hours as the flood waters raced through the soft sediments.)
(6, p. 39; 7)

The rock encasing oil deposits could not withstand the pressure
for more than a few thousand years.
(2, p. 32; 3, p. 24; 5, p. 24; 6, p. 37; 7)

The size of the Mississippi River delta, divided by the rate
mud is being deposited, gives an age of
less than 30,000 years. (The Flood in Noahs day could have
washed out 80% of the mud there in a
few hours or days, so 4400 years is a reasonable age for the
delta.) (3, p. 23; 6, p. 38; 7)

The slowing spin of the earth limits its age to less than the
"billions of years" called for by the theory
of evolution. (3, p. 25; 7)

A relatively small amount of sediment is now on the ocean
floor, indicating only a few thousand years
of accumulation. This embarrassing fact is one of the reasons
why the continental drift theory is
vehemently defended by those who worship evolution. (1, p. 155;
6, p. 28; 7)

The largest stalactites and flowstone formations in the world
could have easily formed in about 4400
years. (5, p. 27; 6, p. 39; 7)

The Sahara desert is expanding. It easily could have been
formed in a few thousand years. See any
earth science textbook.

The oceans are getting saltier. If they were billions of years
old, they would be much saltier than they
are now. (7; 9, p. 26; 10, p. 37)

Ice cores at the south pole and Greenland have a maximum depth
of 10-14,000 feet. The aircraft that
crash-landed in Greenland in 1942 and excavated in 1990 were
under 263 feet of ice after only 48
years. This indicates all of the ice could have accumulated in
4400 years. (7)

Evidence from Biology

The current population of earth (5.5 billion souls) could
easily be generated from eight people
(survivors of the Flood) in less than 4000 years. (1, p. 167;
3, p. 27; 6, p. 41; 7)

The oldest living coral reef is less than 4200 years old. (6,
p. 39; 7)

The oldest living tree in the world is about 4300 years old.
(6, p. 40; 7)

Another factor to consider: The genetic load in man is
increasing. Geneticists have cataloged nearly
1300 genetic disorders in the human race. It is certainly
reasonable to believe that the human race
was created perfect from the hand of the Creator but has been
going downhill as a result of our
disobedience to the laws established by the Creator and the
increased radiation from the sun. The
Bible teaches that we live in a sin-cursed world as a result of
Adams sin.

Evidence from History

The oldest known historical records are less than 6000 years
old. (1, p. 160)

Many ancient cultures have stories of an original creation in
the recent past and a worldwide Flood.
Nearly 300 of these Flood legends are now known.

Biblical dates add up to about 6000 years.

The following Bible verses tell when "the beginning" was:

In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. (Gen.
1:1)

Moses because of the hardness of your hearts permitted you to
put away your wives: but from the
beginning it was not so. (Mt. 19:8)

But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and
female. (Mk. 10:6)

In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and
the Word was God. (Jn. 1:1)

That which was from the beginning, which we have seen with
our eyes and our hands have handled,
of the Word of life. (1 Jn. 1:1)

He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth
from the beginning. (1 Jn. 3:8)

For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since
the beginning of the world to this time. (Mt.
24:21)

Ye are of your father the devil.... He was a murderer from
the beginning. (Jn. 8:44)

That the blood of all the prophets, which was shed from the
foundation of the world, may be required
of this generation; from the blood of Abel. (Lk. 11:50, 51)

And, Thou, Lord, in the beginning hast laid the foundation of
the earth. (Heb. 1:10)

For in six days the Lord made heaven and the earth, the sea,
and all that in them is. (Ex. 20:11)

Since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they
were from the beginning of the creation. (2
Pet. 3:4)

The works were finished from the foundation of the world. For
God did rest the seventh day from all
his works. (Heb. 4:3, 4)

For in those days shall be affliction, such as was not from
the beginning of the creation which God
created to this time. (Mk. 13:19)

Have ye not known? have ye not heard? hath it not been told
you from the beginning? Have ye not
understood from the foundations of the earth? (Is. 40:21)

Who hath wrought and done it, calling the generations from
the beginning? I the Lord am he. (Is.
41:4)

Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning
made them male and female? (Mt.
19:4)

For the invisible things of him from the creation of the
world are clearly seen, being understood by
the things that are made. (Ro. 1:20)

Those who believe the earth is billions of years old will
typically try to discredit one or two of these
evidences and then mistakenly think that they have successfully
proven the entire list wrong. This is
not logical, of course. Each evidence stands independently: it
only takes one to prove the earth is
young. The burden of proof is on the evolutionists if they
expect all taxpayers to fund the teaching of
their religion in the school system. Many who believe in
evolution are great at "straining at a gnat, and
swallowing a camel" (Mt. 23:24).

Evolutionists love to assume uniformitarian processes. Many of
the preceding evidences follow the
same logic evolutionists use all the time in dealing with
carbon dating, strata formation, genetic drift,
etc.

It is interesting to read the ramblings of nay-sayers like
Scott, Matson, Babinski, etc. as they try to
answer theses evidences for a youg universe. See how many times
they use words like: we believe,
perhaps, could have, there is some reason to believe, etc.
Evolutionists may need billions of years to
make people believe a rock can turn into a rocket scientist,
but that time just isnt available.

Sources
1 Morris, Henry M. Scientific Creationism. El Cajon, Calif.:
Master Books, April 1985.
2 McLean, G. S.; McLean, Larry; Oakland, Roger. The Bible
Key to Understanding the Early Earth.
Oklahoma City, Okla.: Southwest Radio Church, 1987.
3 Huse, Scott M. The Collapse of Evolution. Grand Rapids,
Mich.: Baker Book House, 1983.
4 Ackerman, Paul D. Its a Young World After All. Grand
Rapids, Mich.: Baker Book House, 1986.
5 Blick, Edward F. A Scientific Analysis of Genesis.
Oklahoma City, Okla.: Hearthstone Publ. Ltd.,
1991.
6 Petersen, Dennis R. Unlocking the Mysteries of Creation.
South Lake Tahoe, Calif.: Christian
Equippers International, 1987.
7 Hovind, Kent E. Creation Seminar, Parts 1-7 (most items
referenced onscreenavailable from
Creation Science Evangelism, 29 Cummings Road, Pensacola, Fla.
32503).
8 Wysong, R. L. The Creation-Evolution Controversy. Midland,
Mich.: Inquiry Press, 1976.
9 Baker, Sylvia. Bone of Contention. Creation Science
Foundation Ltd., Sunnybank, Queensland
4109 Australia: 1990.
10 Moore, John N. Questions and Answers on
Creation-Evolution. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker
Book House, 1977.
11. Brown, Walt. In the Beginning--available from CSE
************************************************************

Ikzelf kom er nog even geen wijs uit

Moet hier even over nadenken

Weet iemand wat te zeggen over het bovenstaande stuk tekst Heb ik ergens van de Google Nieuwsgroep geplukt.