NWS Nieuws & Achtergronden
Discussieer hier diepgaander over de actualiteiten.
Aha, Bellingcat. Gefinancierd door dezelfde dubieuze partijen als de Witte Helmen, de werkelijke boosdoeners.quote:Op vrijdag 24 mei 2019 23:26 schreef Montagui het volgende:
Fake war? Of toch niet....
https://www.bellingcat.co(...)pen-source-evidence/
Scratch a liberal and you will find a fascist
Noem je mij nou dubieus?quote:
[..]
Aha, Bellingcat. Gefinancierd door dezelfde dubieuze partijen als de Witte Helmen, de werkelijke boosdoeners.
En de witte helmen heb ik nog nooit gefinancierd.
“To destroy a people you must first sever their roots.”
Nadat een eerste OPCW wetenschapper al heeft verklaard dat het zeer onwaarschijnlijk is dat de gascilinders vanuit een helicopter zijn gegooid, is er nu een tweede die zegt dat er ter plekke geen sporen van chloorgas zijn gevonden. Heel gek, nieuws is al vijf dagen oud maar ik kan er nergens in de media iets over vindenquote:OPCW Whistleblower Panel on the Douma attack of April 2018
Today WikiLeaks publishes a statement made by a panel that listened to testimony and reviewed evidence from a whistleblower from the OPCW (Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons) last week. To accompany this statement, Wikileaks is also publishing a previously leaked engineering assessment of the alleged chemical attack in Douma, Syria on April 7th last year. This assessment was omitted in the final report by the OPCW, which does not support its findings.
WikiLeaks editor Kristinn Hrafnsson took part in the panel to review the testimony and documents from the OPCW whistleblower. He says: “The panel was presented with evidence that casts doubt on the integrity of the OPCW. Although the whistleblower was not ready to step forward and/or present documents to the public, WikiLeaks believes it is now of utmost interest for the public to see everything that was collected by the Fact Finding Mission on Douma and all scientific reports written in relation to the investigation.
We call out to people within the OPCW to leak these documents securely to us via wikileaks.org/#submit” One of the panel members was Dr José Bustani, the first Director-General of the OPCW, who concluded that: “The convincing evidence of irregular behaviour in the OPCW investigation of the alleged Douma chemical attack confirms doubts and suspicions I already had. I could make no sense of what I was reading in the international press. Even official reports of investigations seemed incoherent at best. The picture is certainly clearer now, although very disturbing”
In support of the OPCW’s original objectives, the panel called upon the organisation to re-establish its credibility and legitimacy by allowing ‘all inspectors who took part in the Douma investigation to come forward and report their differing observations in an appropriate forum of the States Parties to the Chemical Weapons Convention’
Scratch a liberal and you will find a fascist
|
|
