Screenshots van text? Is redpilled terug ?quote:Op zondag 9 december 2018 01:24 schreef ExtraWaskracht het volgende:
[ afbeelding ]
[ afbeelding ]
Goed, nog voor het Steele dossier had de FBI dus onderzoek naar 4 mensen in de Trump campagne.
En echt Nintex, het was allang bekend dat een onderdeel van de FBI Trump geholpen had ... het zou alleen goed zijn als daar ook strafrechtelijk eens wat mee zou gebeuren.
Ja idd maar Strzok etc. van bias beschuldigen vonden de Reps een stuk belangrijkerquote:Op zondag 9 december 2018 01:24 schreef ExtraWaskracht het volgende:
[ afbeelding ]
[ afbeelding ]
Goed, nog voor het Steele dossier had de FBI dus onderzoek naar 4 mensen in de Trump campagne.
En echt Nintex, het was allang bekend dat een onderdeel van de FBI Trump geholpen had ... het zou alleen goed zijn als daar ook strafrechtelijk eens wat mee zou gebeuren.
Sowieso, wat is er met hem en bv. mensen als zomerindebol gebeurd?quote:Op zondag 9 december 2018 01:31 schreef Fir3fly het volgende:
[..]
Screenshots van text? Is redpilled terug ?
Druk, druk, druk met de zaken zo aan het einde van het jaar. Heeft niets met de midterms van doen.quote:Op zondag 9 december 2018 01:35 schreef ExtraWaskracht het volgende:
[..]
Sowieso, wat is er met hem en bv. mensen als zomerindebol gebeurd?
Je ziet trouwens ook mensen als Nintex en Refragmental minder posten hier na de midterms.
twitter:SethAbramson twitterde op zondag 09-12-2018 om 01:28:53 1/ Comey said clearly that he "saw no evidence of [personal or political] bias" in the work of those assigned to the Trump counterintel investigation. We'll see if he's able to say the same thing about the NYC field office of the FBI and its investigation of Hillary Clinton. reageer retweet
Ah ok, maar we kunnen wel samen vast stellen dat je ongelijk hebt gekregen toch? En ook dat het een blue wave was ... althans, ik weet niet goed hoe je het grootste popular vote verschil sinds ... eh ... een eeuw ofzo (?) moet typeren.quote:Op zondag 9 december 2018 01:38 schreef Nintex het volgende:
[..]
Druk, druk, druk met de zaken zo aan het einde van het jaar. Heeft niets met de midterms van doen.
over bias gesproken...twitter:Isikoff twitterde op zondag 09-12-2018 om 00:57:16 Exclusive: Before Trump tapped Bill Barr to be his new AG, he reached out to him for another job: his defense lawyer. @SkullduggeryPod @YahooNews @dklaidman https://t.co/kY9z41rJAf reageer retweet
https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-18-156A3.pdfquote:On top of this, roughly half a million comments were filed from Russian e-mail addresses.
Ik zie ook geen motief voor het Kremlin, lijkt me dat ze belangrijkere prioriteiten hebben dan net neutraliteit in de VS.quote:The Most Damaging Election Disinformation Campaign Came From Donald Trump, Not Russia
[..]
However, global adversaries like the Russians aren't the only actors who can use flooding and confidence attacks. US actors can use just the same techniques. Indeed, they can arguably use them better, since they have a better understanding of US politics, more resources, and are far more difficult for the government to counter without raising First Amendment issues.
For example, when the Federal Communication Commission asked for comments on its proposal to get rid of "net neutrality," it was flooded by fake comments supporting the proposal. Nearly every real person who commented was in favor of net neutrality, but their arguments were drowned out by a flood of spurious comments purportedly made by identities stolen from porn sites, by people whose names and email addresses had been harvested without their permission, and, in some cases, from dead people. This was done not just to generate fake support for the FCC's controversial proposal. It was to devalue public comments in general, making the general public's support for net neutrality politically irrelevant. FCC decision making on issues like net neutrality used to be dominated by industry insiders, and many would like to go back to the old regime.
[..]
twitter:emptywheel twitterde op zondag 09-12-2018 om 00:46:56 Comey makes a point virtually everyone gets wrong: there was an investigation into RU, and an investigation into Trump's folks. https://t.co/NCochrUgHf https://t.co/PQaxnpeGCM reageer retweet
twitter:vermontgmg twitterde op zondag 09-12-2018 om 01:06:05 This is a really important point by @emptywheel, often overlooked by GOP critics. The original FBI Russia probe was meant to *PROTECT* the Trump campaign, to protect against Russians trying to penetrate it. The horror arrived when the FBI realized Trump wanted the help. https://t.co/tHensH1K24 reageer retweet
quote:As reporters pored over the transcript on Saturday, seemingly bizarre exchanges emerged.
Sixty pages into Friday’s hearing, New York congressman and the likely judiciary chairman Jerrold Nadler raised a striking claim made by Trump about Comey’s relationship with Mueller, his predecessor as FBI director.
“On 5 September,” Nadler said, “President Trump brought up special counsel Mueller in an interview with the Daily Caller, stating: ‘And he’s Comey’s best friend, and I could give you a hundred pictures of him and Comey hugging and kissing each other. You know he’s Comey’s best friend.’”
Nadler asked: “Are you best friends with Robert Mueller?”
Comey replied that though he admired “the heck out of the man”, he did not know his phone number or the names of his children.
“I think I had a meal once alone with him in a restaurant,” he said. “I like him … I’m an associate of his who admires him greatly. We’re not friends in any social sense.”
Nadler said he would not “ask whether you’ve ever hugged and kissed him”.
“A relief to my wife,” Comey said.
In the very first line of questioning, about text messages between two now former FBI staffers, which Republicans have said portray anti-Trump bias, the oversight chairman, Trey Gowdy, quoted a message about the margin an agent said Hillary Clinton “should win by” and asked: “In the course of human history, has anyone won an election 100 million to zero, to your knowledge?”
Comey replied: “I don’t mean to be facetious. I can’t speak to Stalin’s re-election or Mao Tse-tung re-election campaigns.”
Gowdy said: “100 million to zero is a lot.”
“Sure,” said Comey. “I’m not trying to be facetious, but I remember as a student the vote in Soviet Russia was 99.9% to …”
Interrupting, Gowdy said: “We are going to get to Russia in a little bit. We’ll get to Russia in a little bit.”
Bron
Hm, dit zou wel eens de verklaring kunnen zijn waaom we maar niks horen over dat onderzoek:quote:Op zondag 9 december 2018 01:24 schreef ExtraWaskracht het volgende:
[ afbeelding ]
[ afbeelding ]
Goed, nog voor het Steele dossier had de FBI dus onderzoek naar 4 mensen in de Trump campagne.
En echt Nintex, het was allang bekend dat een onderdeel van de FBI Trump geholpen had ... het zou alleen goed zijn als daar ook strafrechtelijk eens wat mee zou gebeuren.
twitter:SethAbramson twitterde op zondag 09-12-2018 om 05:06:25 38/ So all that said, I'll make a somewhat controversial point: that we may not have heard the end of this, because when IG Horowitz said he was going to deal with Giuliani in a separate report that report never happened. Do I think he was lying? No. What I *wonder* is whether... reageer retweet
twitter:SethAbramson twitterde op zondag 09-12-2018 om 05:07:34 39/ ...Mueller or Rosenstein or someone else asked Horowitz to *hold off* on issuing a report for the same reason Comey can't talk about certain things: because it could negatively impact the Mueller investigation. IOW, we don't *know* Giuliani won't be in Mueller's final report. reageer retweet
twitter:SethAbramson twitterde op zondag 09-12-2018 om 05:08:42 40/ I've already said that *4 people* involved in the Trumplandia conspiracy—Prince, Trump Jr., Flynn, and Bannon—are also involved in the Russia investigation, so isn't it actually pretty reasonable to think that Mueller asked Horowitz to stand down? I guess we'll find out. /end reageer retweet
quote:The U.S. Is Paying More Than It Bargained for in the Yemen War
The Pentagon says that “errors in accounting” mean Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates have not been properly charged for refueling.
President Donald Trump, who repeatedly complains that the United States is paying too much for the defense of its allies, has praised Saudi Arabia for ostensibly taking on Iran in the Yemen war. It turns out, however, that U.S. taxpayers have been footing the bill for a major part of the Saudi-led campaign, possibly to the tune of tens of millions of dollars. (Atlantic).
Als je deze baan aanneemt ben je hoe dan ook een volslagen idioot.quote:Op zondag 9 december 2018 23:19 schreef Fir3fly het volgende:
Dat is echt een volslagen idioot, nog erger dan die Nunes .
Sean Hannity? Are you fucking kidding me?quote:Op maandag 10 december 2018 00:28 schreef Nintex het volgende:
Ayers is ook weg inderdaad. Tja wie nu, Mark Meadows, Hope Hicks, Sean Hannity?
Misschien iemand die er al werkt promoveren. Wie zal het zeggen.
quote:
Rupert Murdoch of iemand van zijn clan?quote:Op maandag 10 december 2018 00:28 schreef Nintex het volgende:
Ayers is ook weg inderdaad. Tja wie nu, Mark Meadows, Hope Hicks, Sean Hannity?
Misschien iemand die er al werkt promoveren. Wie zal het zeggen.
twitter:realDonaldTrump twitterde op maandag 10-12-2018 om 12:46:11 “Democrats can’t find a Smocking Gun tying the Trump campaign to Russia after James Comey’s testimony. No Smocking Gun...No Collusion.” @FoxNews That’s because there was NO COLLUSION. So now the Dems go to a simple private transaction, wrongly call it a campaign contribution,... reageer retweet
What did Trump smocke this morning?twitter:realDonaldTrump twitterde op maandag 10-12-2018 om 13:00:00 ....which it was not (but even if it was, it is only a CIVIL CASE, like Obama’s - but it was done correctly by a lawyer and there would not even be a fine. Lawyer’s liability if he made a mistake, not me). Cohen just trying to get his sentence reduced. WITCH HUNT! reageer retweet
Trump heeft dit vaker zo gespeld, hij denkt echt dat je smoking als smocking spelt.quote:Op maandag 10 december 2018 13:12 schreef Ulx het volgende:twitter:realDonaldTrump twitterde op maandag 10-12-2018 om 12:46:11 “Democrats can’t find a Smocking Gun tying the Trump campaign to Russia after James Comey’s testimony. No Smocking Gun...No Collusion.” @FoxNews That’s because there was NO COLLUSION. So now the Dems go to a simple private transaction, wrongly call it a campaign contribution,... reageer retweetWhat did Trump smocke this morning?twitter:realDonaldTrump twitterde op maandag 10-12-2018 om 13:00:00 ....which it was not (but even if it was, it is only a CIVIL CASE, like Obama’s - but it was done correctly by a lawyer and there would not even be a fine. Lawyer’s liability if he made a mistake, not me). Cohen just trying to get his sentence reduced. WITCH HUNT! reageer retweet
Hij spelt het ook twee keer zo in 1 tweet. De man heeft gewoon niet zulke goede woorden.quote:Op maandag 10 december 2018 13:57 schreef westwoodblvd het volgende:
[..]
Trump heeft dit vaker zo gespeld, hij denkt echt dat je smoking als smocking spelt.
Dat is niet waar, hij heeft de beste worden.quote:Op maandag 10 december 2018 14:00 schreef Ludachrist het volgende:
[..]
Hij spelt het ook twee keer zo in 1 tweet. De man heeft gewoon niet zulke goede woorden.
Natuurlijk heeft hij de beste woorden. Hij is geen smuk.quote:Op maandag 10 december 2018 14:02 schreef heywoodu het volgende:
[..]
Dat is niet waar, hij heeft de beste worden.
Forum Opties | |
---|---|
Forumhop: | |
Hop naar: |