[AMV] Amerikaanse politiek #511 The president has trade war-powers

quote:

Op vrijdag 1 juni 2018 14:01 schreef crystal_meth het volgende:

[..]

Je vergeet de andere centrale, het Kemper Project.
5 miljard over budget, en nu overgeschakeld op aardgas. https://arstechnica.com/i(...)s-coal-gasification/

zie ook: https://www.theguardian.c(...)a-kemper-power-plant

twitter:

CNBCnow twitterde op vrijdag 01-06-2018 om 14:30:08 BREAKING: US economy added 223K jobs in May vs. 188K expectedhttps://t.co/efwkZHL6E1 reageer retweet

quote:

Op vrijdag 1 juni 2018 14:43 schreef Ulx het volgende:

twitter:

CNBCnow twitterde op vrijdag 01-06-2018 om 14:30:08 BREAKING: US economy added 223K jobs in May vs. 188K expectedhttps://t.co/efwkZHL6E1 reageer retweet

[ afbeelding ]

twitter:

realDonaldTrump twitterde op vrijdag 01-06-2018 om 15:18:21 Canada has treated our Agricultural business and Farmers very poorly for a very long period of time. Highly restrictive on Trade! They must open their markets and take down their trade barriers! They report a really high surplus on trade with us. Do Timber & Lumber in U.S.? reageer retweet

quote:

Op vrijdag 1 juni 2018 15:05 schreef nostra het volgende:

[..]

Wat verbazingwekkend na die tweet van vanochtend. Wat hem overigens verboden is om te doen, maar goed, regels zijn voor Trump slechts suggesties natuurlijk.

quote:

Op vrijdag 1 juni 2018 15:23 schreef Ulx het volgende:

twitter:

realDonaldTrump twitterde op vrijdag 01-06-2018 om 15:18:21 Canada has treated our Agricultural business and Farmers very poorly for a very long period of time. Highly restrictive on Trade! They must open their markets and take down their trade barriers! They report a really high surplus on trade with us. Do Timber & Lumber in U.S.? reageer retweet

[ afbeelding ]

quote:

Basically, the USTR is counting the same goods twice. For example, a Chinese washing machine that passes through the port of Vancouver on its way to the United States is being counted in both the U.S. trade deficit with China and in the U.S. goods deficit with Canada.

The volume of pass-through goods being added to real Canadian exports in the USTR's math is about US$75 billion. That's roughly equal to the entire GDP of Kenya.

The last round of NAFTA talks that ended last week in Montreal provided Canada with more evidence that Lighthizer and the Trump administration don't feel bound by the rules of good-faith negotiations.

Lighthizer couched his statement last week in words more diplomatic than those he used at his meeting with his U.S. and Canadian counterparts in October.

But once again, jaws dropped in the room when Lighthizer began to criticize what he claimed was Canada's enormous surplus in goods with the United States.

"Using Canadian statistics," he said, "Canada has an over $87 billion U.S.-dollar surplus with the United States. To put this in perspective, that figure is equal to approximately 5.7 per cent of Canada's GDP.

"Now, I ask Canadians, because we're in Canada, is it not fair for us to wonder whether this imbalance could in part be caused by the rules of NAFTA? Would Canada not ask this same question if the situation were reversed?"

quote:

Op vrijdag 1 juni 2018 15:51 schreef crystal_meth het volgende:

[..]

Weer een leugen, Canada heeft een klein surplus wat goederen betreft, een deficit als je diensten meetelt. Maar de U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer haalde in februari misleidende cijfers aan tijdens de NAFTA onderhandelingen:

[..]

http://www.cbc.ca/news/po(...)it-numbers-1.4524824
Ze kunnen onmogelijk zo onwetend zijn, dat is een opzettelijke leugen.

quote:

Op vrijdag 1 juni 2018 15:51 schreef crystal_meth het volgende:

[..]

Weer een leugen, Canada heeft een klein surplus wat goederen betreft, een deficit als je diensten meetelt. Maar de U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer haalde in februari misleidende cijfers aan tijdens de NAFTA onderhandelingen:

[..]

http://www.cbc.ca/news/po(...)it-numbers-1.4524824
Ze kunnen onmogelijk zo onwetend zijn, dat is een opzettelijke leugen.

quote:

Op vrijdag 1 juni 2018 16:00 schreef westwoodblvd het volgende:

[..]

We hebben het wel over de man die nadat het hem 5 keer was uitgelegd nog niet begreep waarom Duitsland niet gewoon op eigen houtje een handelsakkoord kom sluiten met de VS, hè.

quote:

Op vrijdag 1 juni 2018 15:50 schreef Ulx het volgende:
[ afbeelding ]

[ afbeelding ]

[ afbeelding ]

Produkten waarmee Canada de VS terugpakt.

quote:

Op vrijdag 1 juni 2018 16:20 schreef nostra het volgende:

[..]

Bijzonder bureaucratisch toch altijd, dat soort schedules. 'Other fruit purées other than banana purées', 'candles and the likes not including those for birthdays'. Maar goed, 16,6 miljard dus. Harde bewoordingen ook van de Canadese minister van defensie.

quote:

Op vrijdag 1 juni 2018 16:20 schreef nostra het volgende:

[..]

Bijzonder bureaucratisch toch altijd, dat soort schedules. 'Other fruit purées other than banana purées', 'candles and the likes not including those for birthdays'. Maar goed, 16,6 miljard dus. Harde bewoordingen ook van de Canadese minister van defensie.

quote:

Donald Trump is deliberately forcing millions of Americans into financial ruin, cruelly depriving them of food and other basic protections while lavishing vast riches on the super-wealthy, the United Nations monitor on poverty has warned.

Philip Alston, the UN special rapporteur who acts as a watchdog on extreme poverty around the world, has issued a withering critique of the state of America today. Trump is steering the country towards a “dramatic change of direction” that is rewarding the rich while punishing the poor by blocking access even to the most meager necessities.

“This is a systematic attack on America’s welfare program that is undermining the social safety net for those who can’t cope on their own. Once you start removing any sense of government commitment, you quickly move into cruelty,” Alston told the Guardian.

Millions of Americans already struggling to make ends meet faced “ruination”, he warned. “If food stamps and access to Medicaid are removed, and housing subsidies cut, then the effect on people living on the margins will be drastic.”

Asked to define “ruination”, he said: “Severe deprivation of food and almost no access to healthcare”.

SPOILER

Om spoilers te kunnen lezen moet je zijn ingelogd. Je moet je daarvoor eerst gratis Registreren. Ook kun je spoilers niet lezen als je een ban hebt.

quote:

The economy is good. Stock market is up. Lot of jobs. Best unemployment we’ve had in many, many decades, actually. And we’re going to Dallas. We’re going to Houston. And we’re going to have a little fun today.

https://www.whitehouse.go(...)rce-one-departure-2/

quote:

Trump meets with families affected by Texas shooting

HOUSTON (AP) — Seeking to comfort grieving families and shaken survivors, President Donald Trump spent more than an hour privately Thursday with some of those impacted by a Texas mass school shooting that killed 10 and wounded more than a dozen on May 18.

(..)

Rhonda Hart, whose 14-year-old daughter, Kimberly Vaughan, was killed at the school, told The Associated Press that Trump repeatedly used the word ‘wacky’ to describe the shooter and the trench coat he wore. She said she told Trump, “Maybe if everyone had access to mental health care, we wouldn’t be in the situation.”

Hart, an Army veteran, said she also suggested employing veterans as sentinels in schools. She said Trump responded, “And arm them?” She replied, “No,” but said Trump “kept mentioning” arming classroom teachers. “It was like talking to a toddler,” Hart said.

Bron: AP

quote:

Op vrijdag 1 juni 2018 16:25 schreef martijnde3de het volgende:
[ afbeelding ]

Bron: Zogby

[ afbeelding ]

Bron: Ramussen

quote:

Op vrijdag 1 juni 2018 19:26 schreef Monolith het volgende:

[..]

Rasmussen heeft een enorme bias, maar volgens mij weet je dat zelf ook wel.
Peilingen voor 2020 lijken me nogal zinloos op het moment.

quote:

Op vrijdag 1 juni 2018 19:26 schreef Monolith het volgende:

[..]

Rasmussen heeft een enorme bias, maar volgens mij weet je dat zelf ook wel.
Peilingen voor 2020 lijken me nogal zinloos op het moment.

quote:

Op vrijdag 1 juni 2018 19:38 schreef Wombcat het volgende:

[..]

Extreem zinloos. Je weet nog niet eens wie de kandidaten zijn.

quote:

Op vrijdag 1 juni 2018 07:04 schreef Ulx het volgende:

[..]

De Koch Brothers zijn dus getriggerde socialistische libtards.

twitter:

Sarah_Boxer twitterde op vrijdag 01-06-2018 om 20:42:02 "You people will have to travel because you'll be in Singapore June 12," @realDonaldTrump tells press after mtg with NK leader reageer retweet

quote:

Illegal border crossings remained high in May despite Trump’s crackdown

The number of migrants attempting to cross illegally into the United States remained high in May, according to administration officials and Border Patrol agents, an early indication that “zero tolerance” measures separating parents from their children and President Trump’s deployment of National Guard troops have not had an immediate deterrent effect.

The Department of Homeland Security is expected to publish its closely watched monthly arrest totals in coming days, and Trump administration officials are bracing for a new eruption from the president. He has treated the statistics as a gauge for the success of his hard-line immigration policies, and when border arrests fell to historic lows in the months after his inauguration last year, Trump touted the decrease as a personal triumph.

Since then, migration trends have reversed. In March and again in April, border arrests exceeded 50,000, the highest monthly totals of Trump’s presidency, sending him into fits of rage, aides say. Trump unloaded on DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen during a Cabinet meeting May 9, scorching her for nearly 30 minutes over the spike in illegal crossings while demanding she “close” the border.

Bron: WaPo

quote:

Op vrijdag 1 juni 2018 16:25 schreef martijnde3de het volgende:
[ afbeelding ]

Bron: Zogby

[ afbeelding ]

Bron: Ramussen

quote:

Op vrijdag 1 juni 2018 21:40 schreef Pietverdriet het volgende:

[..]

Heerlijk dat bij Ophra niemand not sure is

quote:

Op vrijdag 1 juni 2018 23:29 schreef Nintex het volgende:

twitter:

Channel4News twitterde op vrijdag 01-06-2018 om 21:25:31 Donald Trump says his letter from Kim Jong-un was "a very nice letter".Eight minutes later, he says he hasn't opened it yet. https://t.co/ZOgqODlsY7 reageer retweet

Speciaal voor Monolith.

quote:

Op vrijdag 1 juni 2018 21:40 schreef Pietverdriet het volgende:

[..]

Heerlijk dat bij Ophra niemand not sure is

quote:

Op zaterdag 2 juni 2018 00:47 schreef Monolith het volgende:
Was deze al voorbij gekomen?
https://www.npr.org/secti(...)utm_content=20180531

Illinois heeft een oud amendement geratificeerd, waardoor er nu nog maar één staat nodig is voor de ratificatie-eis.

quote:

Op zaterdag 2 juni 2018 01:07 schreef Nintex het volgende:
[ afbeelding ]

Wat een grote brief

quote:

Op zaterdag 2 juni 2018 01:07 schreef Nintex het volgende:
[ afbeelding ]

Wat een grote brief

twitter:

ScottMStedman twitterde op zaterdag 02-06-2018 om 02:30:32 WSJ: The White House is planning a Trump-Putin summit: https://t.co/duHAjVDQW7 reageer retweet

quote:

Op zaterdag 2 juni 2018 02:43 schreef AnneX het volgende:
De envelop is open !?

En de koreaan weet: jasje dicht als je staat. ( open als je zit).
Sorry, ik vind het zo proleterig.

Verder...of het door het lef gedrag van trump komt, of door pompeo ...ik schreef eerder, dat ik mijn petje zou afnemen, als trump een ontmoeing zou fiksen....tot dusver: pet af.

Verder is en blijft het zg. beleid een zootje, in de eerste plaats voor de U.S. plus voor de wereld.

quote:

Op zaterdag 2 juni 2018 01:07 schreef Nintex het volgende:
[ afbeelding ]

Wat een grote brief

quote:

Op zaterdag 2 juni 2018 01:14 schreef westwoodblvd het volgende:

[..]

Trump helemaal glunderend. Kim weet wel hoe hij Trump moet bespelen.

quote:

Op zaterdag 2 juni 2018 01:07 schreef Nintex het volgende:
[ afbeelding ]

Wat een grote brief

quote:

Op zaterdag 2 juni 2018 07:51 schreef Eyjafjallajoekull het volgende:

[..]

[ afbeelding ]



Yes, very nice BIG letter, very BIGLY. Look how big. YUGE in fact. So nice.

Kim had een gouden enveloppe moeten geven, dan zat Trump nu al aan tafel met hem.

quote:

Op zaterdag 2 juni 2018 07:51 schreef Eyjafjallajoekull het volgende:

[..]

[ afbeelding ]



Yes, very nice BIG letter, very BIGLY. Look how big. YUGE in fact. So nice.

Kim had een gouden enveloppe moeten geven, dan zat Trump nu al aan tafel met hem.

quote:

Op zaterdag 2 juni 2018 08:35 schreef Janneke141 het volgende:

[..]

Doet een beetje aan de Postcodeloterij denken. Die mensen krijgen dan zo'n enorme cheque, want anders geloven ze niet dat het veel is.

quote:

Op zaterdag 2 juni 2018 08:37 schreef Szura het volgende:

[..]

[ afbeelding ]

quote:

Op zaterdag 2 juni 2018 08:37 schreef Szura het volgende:

[..]

[ afbeelding ]

quote:

Op zaterdag 2 juni 2018 08:37 schreef Szura het volgende:

[..]

[ afbeelding ]

quote:

Op zaterdag 2 juni 2018 10:46 schreef clumsy_clown het volgende:
Normaal hou ik er niet van dat hier zoveel plaatjes worden gepost maar deze stond net op Reddit en...sjees...



Ik weet dat dit outliers zijn, maar toch is de groep die Trump als een soort Messias ziet groter dan ik me kan voorstellen. De religieuze aanbidding van een politicus zoals dat in de VS gebeurt is eng. Ik kan me geen enkel ander Westers land bedenken waar dit soort shit gebeurt.

quote:

Op zaterdag 2 juni 2018 11:10 schreef westwoodblvd het volgende:

[..]

Er zijn meer evangelicals dan je denkt die werkelijk denken dat Trump door God gekozen is. Hebben Exodus over het gouden kalf zeker niet gelezen. De blinde adoratie waar Trump op kan rekenen onder bepaalde groepen in de samenleving is inderdaad bijzonder angstaanjagend.

quote:

Op zaterdag 2 juni 2018 11:19 schreef vipergts het volgende:

[..]

Wel een veteraan, die zijn zowat heilig.En die man denkt vast nog dat Trump wat voor hem doet.

quote:

Op zaterdag 2 juni 2018 11:28 schreef westwoodblvd het volgende:
Sherrod Brown (Dem senator in Ohio) staat 14 punten voor op zijn uitdager, in een staat die Trump met 9 punten won:

https://articles.clevelan(...)tter_impression=true

Goede presidentskandidaat lijkt mij.

quote:

Op zaterdag 2 juni 2018 11:28 schreef westwoodblvd het volgende:
Sherrod Brown (Dem senator in Ohio) staat 14 punten voor op zijn uitdager, in een staat die Trump met 9 punten won:

https://articles.clevelan(...)tter_impression=true

Goede presidentskandidaat lijkt mij.

Sen. Sherrod Brown blasts the GOP Tax cuts

quote:

Op zaterdag 2 juni 2018 12:51 schreef Monolith het volgende:

[..]

Brown staat vaak wel in de lijstjes van potentiële kandidaten. In die lijstjes staan types als Sanders / Biden / Warren vaak bovenaan, maar het lijkt interessanter om voor een wat jongere kandidaat te gaan.
Dan kom je vaak namen als Gillibrand, Harris, Booker en Brown tegen.

quote:

Op zaterdag 2 juni 2018 13:18 schreef Kijkertje het volgende:

[..]

Deze staat me nog helder voor de geest. Zijn passie was een verademing tussen alle andere speeches over de belastingverlaging.

Sen. Sherrod Brown blasts the GOP Tax cuts

Raw Video: N.Y. Rep Weiner's Anti-GOP Rant

quote:

Op zaterdag 2 juni 2018 13:43 schreef Euribob het volgende:

[..]

Raw Video: N.Y. Rep Weiner's Anti-GOP Rant

Gepassioneerde speeches in het Congres doen me altijd hier aan denken.

quote:

My first visit to the Oval Office came in October 1990, when I was a 35-year-old CIA officer. Iraqi President Saddam Hussein had invaded Kuwait two months before, and President George H.W. Bush wanted to discuss the implications of a U.S.-led military coalition that would ultimately push the Iraqis out.

I remember the nervousness I felt when I entered that room and met a president of the United States for the first time. By the time the meeting ended, his intellectual curiosity, wisdom, affability and intense interest in finding the best policy course to protect and promote U.S. interests were abundantly evident.

Over the next quarter-century, I returned to the Oval Office several hundred times during the administrations of Presidents Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and Barack Obama. The jitters that accompanied my first Oval Office visit dissipated over time, but the respect, awe and admiration I held for the office of the presidency and the incumbents never waned. The presidents I directly served were not perfect, and I didn’t agree with all of their policy choices. But I never doubted that each treated their solemn responsibility to lead our nation with anything less than the seriousness, intellectual rigor and principles that it deserved. Many times, I heard them dismiss the political concerns of their advisers, saying, “I don’t care about my politics, it’s the right thing to do.”

The esteem with which I held the presidency was dealt a serious blow when Donald Trump took office. Almost immediately, I began to see a startling aberration from the remarkable, though human, presidents I had served. Mr. Trump’s lifelong preoccupation with aggrandizing himself seemed to intensify in office, and he quickly leveraged his 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. address and his Twitter handle to burnish his brand and misrepresent reality.

Presidents throughout the years have differed in their approaches to policy, based on political platforms, ideologies and individual beliefs. Mr. Trump, however, has shown highly abnormal behavior by lying routinely to the American people without compunction, intentionally fueling divisions in our country and actively working to degrade the imperfect but critical institutions that serve us.

Although appalling, those actions shouldn’t be surprising. As was the case throughout his business and entertainment careers, Mr. Trump charts his every move according to a calculus of how it will personally help or hurt him. His strategy is to undercut real, potential and perceived opponents; his focus is to win at all costs, irrespective of truth, ethics, decency and — many would argue — the law. His disparagement of institutions is designed to short-circuit legitimate law enforcement investigations, intelligence assessments and media challenges that threaten his interests. His fear of the special counsel’s work is especially palpable, as is his growing interest in destroying its mandate.

For more than three decades, I observed and analyzed the traits and tactics of corrupt, incompetent and narcissistic foreign officials who did whatever they thought was necessary to retain power. Exploiting the fears and concerns of their citizenry, these demagogues routinely relied on lies, deceit and suppression of political opposition to cast themselves as populist heroes and to mask self-serving priorities. By gaining control of intelligence and security services, stifling the independence of the judiciary and discrediting a free press, these authoritarian rulers followed a time-tested recipe for how to inhibit democracy’s development, retard individual freedoms and liberties, and reserve the spoils of corrupt governance for themselves and their ilk. It never dawned on me that we could face such a development in the United States.

On the international front, Mr. Trump pursues policies that are rooted in uninformed campaign promises, a determination to upend actions of his predecessors and an aversion to multilateral engagements. His ad hoc and frequently impulsive approach to national security is short-sighted and dangerous, as allies and partners are left uncertain about U.S. strategy and objectives.

The impact of the Trump presidency will be felt for many years to come. Most worrisome is that his use of falsehoods, his mean-spirited and malicious behavior, and his self-absorption will be emulated by many young Americans — indeed, young people globally — who look to the president of the United States as a role model.

The damage also will be felt by the millions of Americans who believe in Mr. Trump because of their concern about being left behind in a rapidly changing globalized world. These Americans have a legitimate gripe that politicians and political parties of all stripes have failed to deliver on the promise that America is the land of opportunity for all, irrespective of race, creed or place of residence. At a time when deep-seated fears of socioeconomic and cultural change need to be addressed honestly and without prejudice, Mr. Trump grandstands like a snake-oil salesman, squandering his formidable charisma and communication skills in favor of ego, selfishness and false promises.

Many have condemned my public criticism of Mr. Trump, arguing that as a former CIA director, I should bite my tongue. My criticisms, however, are not political; I have never been and will never be a partisan. I speak out for the simple reason that Mr. Trump is failing to live up to the standards that we should all expect of a president.

As someone who had the rare privilege of directly serving four presidents, I will continue to speak out loudly and critically until integrity, decency, wisdom — and maybe even some humility — return to the White House.

twitter:

realDonaldTrump twitterde op zaterdag 02-06-2018 om 14:06:47 “John Brennan, no single figure in American history has done more to discredit the intelligence community than this liar. Not only is he a liar, he’s a liar about being a liar.” Dan Bongino on @foxandfriends reageer retweet

twitter:

realDonaldTrump twitterde op zaterdag 02-06-2018 om 14:40:48 ...."$17 million spent, it's a scam Investigation. Americans are being worked. We now know there was Russian collusion, with Russians and the Democrats. The Mueller team is stacked with anti-Trumpers, who actually represented Clinton people (& gave $'s to Crooked H)." Dan Bongino reageer retweet

twitter:

GMSarli twitterde op zaterdag 02-06-2018 om 14:41:19 @realDonaldTrump Cost of Mueller's investigation: $17,000,000 "I want a parade!": $50,000,000 Trump's golfing trips: $83,000,000 "The Wall": $25,000,000,000New debt from Republican tax bill: $1,500,000,000,000 reageer retweet

quote:

Op zaterdag 2 juni 2018 14:56 schreef Falco het volgende:
Inmiddels is het 22 dagen geleden dat Melania Trump in het openbaar verscheen. Zorgelijk .

quote:

Op zaterdag 2 juni 2018 14:56 schreef Falco het volgende:
Inmiddels is het 22 dagen geleden dat Melania Trump in het openbaar verscheen. Zorgelijk .

quote:

Op zaterdag 2 juni 2018 15:32 schreef vigen98 het volgende:

[..]

Hij is al jaren een senator uit Ohio dus zoveel nieuws is dit niet.

quote:

Op zaterdag 2 juni 2018 15:35 schreef vigen98 het volgende:

[..]

Zucht... Je doet alsof de GOP aan het verliezen is omdat een senator die al sinds 2007 een senator is van Ohio dik aan kop staat in de peilingen. Nou wat een verassing

quote:

Op zaterdag 2 juni 2018 02:43 schreef AnneX het volgende:

Verder...of het door het lef gedrag van trump komt, of door pompeo ...ik schreef eerder, dat ik mijn petje zou afnemen, als trump een ontmoeing zou fiksen....tot dusver: pet af.

quote:

Op zaterdag 2 juni 2018 15:56 schreef Knipoogje het volgende:

[..]

Je maakt hier een denkfout. Juist Kim heeft een gesprek gefixt. NK probeert al een decennium een gesprek met de president te fixen om voor vol aangezien te worden maar alle voorgangers van Trump weigerden. Trump trapte er als eerste in in zijn zucht naar succes en spektakel.

quote:

Op zaterdag 2 juni 2018 14:37 schreef Kijkertje het volgende:
Stukje van Joh Brennan:

John Brennan: I will speak out until integrity returns to the White House

John Brennan served as director of the Central Intelligence Agency from March 2013 to January 2017.


[..]

[ afbeelding ]

Deze werd 10 min later gedelete en vervangen door

twitter:

realDonaldTrump twitterde op zaterdag 02-06-2018 om 14:06:47 “John Brennan, no single figure in American history has done more to discredit the intelligence community than this liar. Not only is he a liar, he’s a liar about being a liar.” Dan Bongino on @foxandfriends reageer retweet

twitter:

realDonaldTrump twitterde op zaterdag 02-06-2018 om 14:40:48 ...."$17 million spent, it's a scam Investigation. Americans are being worked. We now know there was Russian collusion, with Russians and the Democrats. The Mueller team is stacked with anti-Trumpers, who actually represented Clinton people (& gave $'s to Crooked H)." Dan Bongino reageer retweet

twitter:

GMSarli twitterde op zaterdag 02-06-2018 om 14:41:19 @realDonaldTrump Cost of Mueller's investigation: $17,000,000 "I want a parade!": $50,000,000 Trump's golfing trips: $83,000,000 "The Wall": $25,000,000,000New debt from Republican tax bill: $1,500,000,000,000 reageer retweet

quote:

Op zaterdag 2 juni 2018 15:43 schreef vigen98 het volgende:

[..]

Omdat het anders nutteloos is om bij te zeggen dat het een staat is waar Trump +9 in de peilingen stond.

quote:

Op zaterdag 2 juni 2018 14:56 schreef Falco het volgende:
Inmiddels is het 22 dagen geleden dat Melania Trump in het openbaar verscheen. Zorgelijk .

quote:

Op zaterdag 2 juni 2018 17:13 schreef vigen98 het volgende:

[..]

Context met welk doel?

quote:

Op zaterdag 2 juni 2018 17:18 schreef Tijger_m het volgende:

[..]

Waarom, het is niet alsof ze iets nuttigs deed behalve kopietjes maken van andermans teksten.

quote:

Op zaterdag 2 juni 2018 15:43 schreef vigen98 het volgende:

[..]

Omdat het anders nutteloos is om bij te zeggen dat het een staat is waar Trump +9 in de peilingen stond.

quote:

A lawyer tapped to lead a task force at the Environmental Protection Agency overseeing cleanups at the nation’s most polluted places worked until recently for a top chemical and plastics manufacturer with a troubled legacy of creating some of those toxic sites.

Steven D. Cook has been named as the new chair of the Superfund Task Force, which EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt created last year to revamp how the agency oversees cleanups at the more than 1,300 toxic sites.

Before beginning work in February as deputy assistant administrator for EPA’s Office of Land and Emergency Management, Cook served more than 20 years as in-house corporate counsel for LyondellBasell Industries — one of the world’s largest plastics, chemicals and refining companies.

EPA records show that LyondellBasell and its subsidiaries are listed as being potentially responsible for at least three dozen Superfund polluted sites.

An analysis by The Associated Press shows that nearly half the political appointees hired at EPA under President Donald Trump have industry ties. Of more than 60 EPA hires tracked by the AP over the last year, about one-third worked as registered lobbyists or lawyers for chemical manufacturers, fossil fuel producers or other EPA-regulated companies.

Trump promised as a presidential candidate to drain the swamp in Washington. An executive order signed two weeks after his inauguration bars former lobbyists and corporate lawyers from participating in any matter they worked on for private clients within two years of going to work for the government.

SPOILER

Om spoilers te kunnen lezen moet je zijn ingelogd. Je moet je daarvoor eerst gratis Registreren. Ook kun je spoilers niet lezen als je een ban hebt.

twitter:

realDonaldTrump twitterde op zaterdag 02-06-2018 om 19:43:07 There was No Collusion with Russia (except by the Democrats). When will this very expensive Witch Hunt Hoax ever end? So bad for our Country. Is the Special Counsel/Justice Department leaking my lawyers letters to the Fake News Media? Should be looking at Dems corruption instead? reageer retweet

quote:

President Trump’s lawyers have for months quietly waged a campaign to keep the special counsel from trying to force him to answer questions in the investigation into whether he obstructed justice, asserting that he cannot be compelled to testify and arguing in a confidential letter that he could not possibly have committed obstruction because he has unfettered authority over all federal investigations.

In a brash assertion of presidential power, the 20-page letter — sent to the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, and obtained by The New York Times — contends that the president cannot illegally obstruct any aspect of the investigation into Russia’s election meddling because the Constitution empowers him to, “if he wished, terminate the inquiry, or even exercise his power to pardon.”

[Read the annotated letter here.]

Mr. Trump’s lawyers fear that if he answers questions, either voluntarily or in front of a grand jury, he risks exposing himself to accusations of lying to investigators, a potential crime or impeachable offense.

Mr. Trump’s broad interpretation of executive authority is novel and is likely to be tested if a court battle ensues over whether he could be ordered to answer questions. It is unclear how that fight, should the case reach that point, would play out. A spokesman for Mr. Mueller declined to comment.

“We don’t know what the law is on the intersection between the obstruction statutes and the president exercising his constitutional power to supervise an investigation in the Justice Department,” said Jack Goldsmith, a Harvard Law School professor who oversaw the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel during the Bush administration. “It’s an open question.”

SPOILER

Om spoilers te kunnen lezen moet je zijn ingelogd. Je moet je daarvoor eerst gratis Registreren. Ook kun je spoilers niet lezen als je een ban hebt.

quote:

Op zaterdag 2 juni 2018 21:03 schreef Kijkertje het volgende:
Gisteren haalde hij de NYT nog aan voor de jobs-cijfers vandaag behoren ze weer tot de fake news media

twitter:

realDonaldTrump twitterde op zaterdag 02-06-2018 om 19:43:07 There was No Collusion with Russia (except by the Democrats). When will this very expensive Witch Hunt Hoax ever end? So bad for our Country. Is the Special Counsel/Justice Department leaking my lawyers letters to the Fake News Media? Should be looking at Dems corruption instead? reageer retweet

Trump’s Lawyers, in Confidential Memo, Argue to Head Off a Historic Subpoena

[..]

quote:

Op zaterdag 2 juni 2018 21:25 schreef crystal_meth het volgende:

[..]

Een tweet verstuurd voordat het artikel van de NY Times verscheen...

twitter:

steve_vladeck twitterde op zaterdag 02-06-2018 om 20:48:43 It's not exactly confidence inspiring on the part of @realDonaldTrump's lawyers that their statutory (as opposed to constitutional) analysis is focused on the _wrong_ federal obstruction-of-justice statute—18 U.S.C. § 1505 instead of 18 U.S.C. § 1512:https://t.co/4ZZ2jQ0Qrs https://t.co/EmKbvB25ES reageer retweet

twitter:

SethAbramson twitterde op zaterdag 02-06-2018 om 22:27:53 In Trump's "God Manifesto," he asserts his right to cancel--at his pleasure--any federal law enforcement investigation into his own actions, the actions of his family, or the actions of his associates. It is, in short, the bald claim that he and his are beyond the reach of the law. reageer retweet

quote:

Did exactly 4,645 people die in Hurricane Maria? Nope.

(..)

The Harvard study offers only an estimate – a midpoint along a broad range of possibilities. It is not based on death records, only estimates of deaths from people who were interviewed in a survey.

In effect, the researchers took one number – 15 deaths identified from a survey of 3,299 households – and extrapolated that to come up with 4,645 deaths across the island. That number came with a very large caveat, clearly identified in the report, but few news media accounts bothered to explain the nuances.

(..)

There have been several attempts already to estimate the actual death toll. Here’s a sampling:

The New York Times calculated 1,052 deaths through October.
The Center for Investigative Reporting calculated 985 through October.
University of Puerto Rico-Mayagüez professors calculated 822, with a 95 percent confidence range that the total was somewhere between 605 and 1,039.
Pennsylvania State University professors calculated excess deaths of about 500 in September, or a total of 1,085 if the same pattern held in October. That estimate was based on six weeks of mortality records.
A Latino USA analysis, using updated data from Puerto Rico’s Department of Health, calculated 1,194 excess deaths in September and October.
Notice a consistent pattern? All of the estimates are roughly around 1,000 deaths, which is still about 15 times higher than the official count.

These figures are also based on actual data, not estimates, though researchers have been stymied in obtaining complete November and December data because the government halted access until the completion of the formal report ordered by the government.

(..)

In response to questions, the researchers posted a document that includes this question: Does your study say that 4,645 died? The answer: “No. We provide a 95% confidence interval of 793 to 8,498, and 4,645 falls in the middle of this range.”

Bron: WaPo

quote:

Op zaterdag 2 juni 2018 17:13 schreef vigen98 het volgende:

[..]

Context met welk doel?

twitter:

realDonaldTrump twitterde op vrijdag 01-06-2018 om 15:18:21 Canada has treated our Agricultural business and Farmers very poorly for a very long period of time. Highly restrictive on Trade! They must open their markets and take down their trade barriers! They report a really high surplus on trade with us. Do Timber & Lumber in U.S.? reageer retweet

twitter:

kylegriffin1 twitterde op zondag 03-06-2018 om 00:00:03 Perrin Beatty, head of the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, on this Trump tweet: "The tweet is no more intelligible than the administration’s trade policy is." https://t.co/vR1AhevIR6 https://t.co/uvrBquHAdg reageer retweet

quote:

Op zaterdag 2 juni 2018 21:25 schreef crystal_meth het volgende:

[..]

Een tweet verstuurd voordat het artikel van de NY Times verscheen...

twitter:

kylegriffin1 twitterde op zondag 03-06-2018 om 02:05:10 Fox News claims they exclusively obtained a letter the New York Times reported on hours earlier and actually obtained exclusively. https://t.co/Gxrf0hIvj3 reageer retweet

A secret memo written by President Trump's legal team has been leaked

quote:

The president's lawyer Rudy Giuliani threatened a legal battle with special counsel Robert Mueller if he attempts to subpoena Donald Trump.

"If Mueller tries to subpoena us, we're going to court," Giuliani told ABC News.

His latest comments come on the heels of the publication of a 20-page confidential letter sent by Trump's lawyers to Mueller arguing that the president cannot legally obstruct justice in the Russia investigation due to his position as "chief law enforcement officer."

"It remains our position that the President's actions here, by virtue of his position as the chief law enforcement officer, could neither constitutionally nor legally constitute obstruction because that would amount to him obstructing himself, and that he could if he wished, terminate the inquiry, or even exercise his power to pardon if he so desired," reads the letter dated January 29, which was first obtained and reported by the New York Times.

Although Giuliani was not on the legal team at the time of the letter, he confirmed the contents of the letter to ABC News and said it was delivered to the special counsel in January.

He told ABC News the legal strategy outlined in the letter remains in effect.

Lawyers for Trump and a spokesman for the special counsel declined to comment to ABC News.

SPOILER

Om spoilers te kunnen lezen moet je zijn ingelogd. Je moet je daarvoor eerst gratis Registreren. Ook kun je spoilers niet lezen als je een ban hebt.

Echoing Trump, Giuliani accused the special counsel of the leak of the letter, saying that Mueller should have put out a statement condemning it and that he should investigate his team. However, there's no evidence that the letter leaked to the New York Times came from members of the special counsel.

Trump's lawyers also acknowledge for the first time his involvement in dictating that infamous statement about the Trump Tower meeting in 2016, where Trump campaign officials, including his son and son-in-law met with a Russian lawyer who was offering negative information on Hillary Clinton.

"You have received all of the notes communications and testimony indicating that the President dictated a short but accurate response to the New York Times article on behalf of his son, Donald Trump, Jr."

The letter also argues that there is no need for the president to sit for an interview, as the lawyers assert the special counsel has all the information he could possibly need.

"The records and testimony we have, pursuant to the President's directive, already voluntarily provided to your office allow you to delve into the conversations and actions that occurred in a significant and exhaustive manner, including but not limited to the testimony of the President's interlocutors themselves," the letter says. "In light of these voluntary offerings, your office clearly lacks the requisite need to personally interview the President."

Trump's lawyers say that the investigation has interfered with the president's "ability to both govern domestically and conduct foreign affairs," adding "This encumbrance has been only compounded by the astounding public revelations about the corruption within the FBI and Department of Justice which appears to have let to the alleged Russia collusion investigation and the establishment of the Office of Special Counsel in the first place."

John Cohen, the former acting undersecretary for intelligence at the Department of Homeland Security, called the letter "highly unusual." He stepped down in 2014.

"It is highly unusual and extraordinarily unsettling that the lawyer(s) representing the president of the United States would send an official memorandum to a special counsel of DOJ alleging that leadership of the FBI and DOJ is/was corrupt," Cohen told ABC News. "This type of communique has only one purpose and that is to undermine the credibility of those investigating Russia's efforts to engage in an ongoing attack against the U.S. While it may advance the president's political and legal strategy, I fear that it plays into Russia's efforts, which seek to weaken America by undermining the credibility of our national security and law enforcement institutions."

quote:

"You have received all of the notes, communications and testimony indicating that the President dictated a short but accurate response to the New York Times article on behalf of his son, Donald Trump, Jr.," the letter said, according to The New York Times, which published a copy of it. "His son then followed up by making a full public disclosure regarding the meeting, including his public testimony that there was nothing to the meeting and certainly no evidence of collusion."

quote:

Op zondag 3 juni 2018 03:52 schreef Kijkertje het volgende:
En een niet onbelangrijke passage uit de brief:

Trump lawyers say he 'dictated' statement on Trump Tower meeting, contradicting past denials

[..]

quote:

Op zondag 3 juni 2018 10:12 schreef westwoodblvd het volgende:

[..]

De hele post is bij elkaar gelogen, klopt niks van, is dus ook niet te bewijzen.

quote:

Op zondag 3 juni 2018 10:44 schreef Monolith het volgende:

[..]

Dat soort trolletjes.
Gewoon lekker negeren.

Het lijkt erop dat de zetel van McCain niet verkiesbaar is in deze midterms:
https://www.politico.com/(...)-deadline-gop-614165

quote:

In May, prime-time viewership for the cable news networks was down overall except for Fox News, which grew 6% from the same period last year. CNN had the biggest declines, down a full 25%. Among viewers 25-54, Fox News was up slightly (+2%) while MSNBC fell significantly (-21%) and CNN dropped by more than a third (-34%).

quote:

Op zondag 3 juni 2018 11:08 schreef Nintex het volgende:
Interessante kijkcijfers. CNN verliest 25% van haar kijkers tijdens prime-time en van de belangrijkste groep kijkers zelfs 34%
https://www.forbes.com/sites/markjoyella/2018/05/30/fox-news-steamrolls-cable-news-competition-with-big-win-in-may-ratings/#7583a9253c74

[..]

Het lijkt erop dat de constante negatieve stroom van berichtgeving van CNN mensen niet meer zo kan boeien nu de werkloosheid historisch laag is.

quote:

Op zondag 3 juni 2018 11:29 schreef westwoodblvd het volgende:

[..]

Haha, is dat gewoon weer iets wat je er zelf bij verzint? Dat dit iets met werkeloosheid te maken heeft?

twitter:

statedeptspox twitterde op zondag 03-06-2018 om 02:05:05 My favorite picture of the week: @SecPompeo shows North Korean delegation the NYC skyline, including the #freedomtower (It was KYC’s first trip to America. ) https://t.co/rLmaGgPOGN reageer retweet

quote:

Op zondag 3 juni 2018 11:33 schreef Nintex het volgende:

[..]

Wat zou een andere reden kunnen zijn dat CNN uit gaat in de Amerikaanse huiskamers?

quote:

Op zondag 3 juni 2018 11:33 schreef Nintex het volgende:

[..]

Wat zou een andere reden kunnen zijn dat CNN uit gaat in de Amerikaanse huiskamers?

quote:

Op zondag 3 juni 2018 11:08 schreef Nintex het volgende:
Interessante kijkcijfers. CNN verliest 25% van haar kijkers tijdens prime-time en van de belangrijkste groep kijkers zelfs 34%
https://www.forbes.com/sites/markjoyella/2018/05/30/fox-news-steamrolls-cable-news-competition-with-big-win-in-may-ratings/#7583a9253c74

[..]

Het lijkt erop dat de constante negatieve stroom van berichtgeving van CNN mensen niet meer zo kan boeien nu de werkloosheid historisch laag is.

quote:

Op zondag 3 juni 2018 11:33 schreef Nintex het volgende:

[..]

Wat zou een andere reden kunnen zijn dat CNN uit gaat in de Amerikaanse huiskamers?

quote:

Op zondag 3 juni 2018 11:45 schreef Belabor het volgende:

[..]

Dit is een momentopname in mei, Nontexje. Voor hetzelfde geld schieten de ratings komende maand gemiddeld weer met 20% omhoog. Kan prima aan het aanbod van CNN liggen.

Die valse causaliteit-vlieger gaat hier niet op.

quote:

Op zondag 3 juni 2018 15:18 schreef Nintex het volgende:

[..]

CNN is al tijden in vrije val. De verwachting was dat door alle schandaaltjes Fox News beschadigd zou worden, maar de kijker is juist positief verrast door de nieuwe anchors die er nooit waren gaan zitten als O Reilly e.d. er nog hadden rond gelopen.

Is het goed praten van slechte kijkcijfers van CNN inmiddels ook onderdeel van TDS?

twitter:

realDonaldTrump twitterde op zondag 03-06-2018 om 15:34:19 ....Paul Manafort came into the campaign very late and was with us for a short period of time (he represented Ronald Reagan, Bob Dole & many others over the years), but we should have been told that Comey and the boys were doing a number on him, and he wouldn’t have been hired! reageer retweet

quote:

Op zondag 3 juni 2018 15:36 schreef Nintex het volgende:

twitter:

realDonaldTrump twitterde op zondag 03-06-2018 om 15:34:19 ....Paul Manafort came into the campaign very late and was with us for a short period of time (he represented Ronald Reagan, Bob Dole & many others over the years), but we should have been told that Comey and the boys were doing a number on him, and he wouldn’t have been hired! reageer retweet

Trump gooit Manafort onder de bus.

quote:

Op zondag 3 juni 2018 15:36 schreef Nintex het volgende:

twitter:

realDonaldTrump twitterde op zondag 03-06-2018 om 15:34:19 ....Paul Manafort came into the campaign very late and was with us for a short period of time (he represented Ronald Reagan, Bob Dole & many others over the years), but we should have been told that Comey and the boys were doing a number on him, and he wouldn’t have been hired! reageer retweet

Trump gooit Manafort onder de bus.

quote:

Op zondag 3 juni 2018 15:52 schreef Ulx het volgende:
https://edition-m.cnn.com(...)robertson/index.html


Aardig opiniestuk waarin de auteur stelt dat Trump voor een deal met Little Rocket Man gaat die vergeleken met de Iran deal slechter is voor de VS.

So much voor de Dealmaker-in-Chief.

quote:

Op zondag 3 juni 2018 17:29 schreef vipergts het volgende:

[..]

Zolang Trump maar blijft herhalen dat het een goede deal is gaan mensen het vanzelf geloven

quote:

Op zondag 3 juni 2018 17:35 schreef Ulx het volgende:

[..]

Dat betwijfel ik dit keer. Iran had geen nukes.

quote:

Op zondag 3 juni 2018 17:35 schreef Ulx het volgende:

[..]

Dat betwijfel ik dit keer. Iran had geen nukes.

quote:

Op zondag 3 juni 2018 18:13 schreef Vis1980 het volgende:

[..]

NK geen Moslims.

quote:

Trump’s ambassador to Germany says he wants to ‘empower’ European conservatives

Richard Grenell, President Trump’s new ambassador to Germany, said in a new interview that he wants to “empower” conservative leaders in Europe.

“I absolutely want to empower other conservatives throughout Europe, other leaders,” Grenell told Breitbart. “I think there is a groundswell of conservative policies that are taking hold because of the failed policies of the left.”

quote:

Op zondag 3 juni 2018 19:23 schreef crystal_meth het volgende:

[..]

http://thehill.com/homene(...)-to-empower-european

quote:

Op zondag 3 juni 2018 19:23 schreef crystal_meth het volgende:

[..]

http://thehill.com/homene(...)-to-empower-european

quote:

Op zondag 3 juni 2018 19:23 schreef crystal_meth het volgende:

[..]

http://thehill.com/homene(...)-to-empower-european

quote:

Op zondag 3 juni 2018 19:35 schreef westwoodblvd het volgende:

[..]

Die man is toch diplomaat, geen missionaris? Begrijpt hij wel wat zijn taak inhoudt?

quote:

Op zondag 3 juni 2018 18:22 schreef Whiskers2009 het volgende:

[..]

Iraniers zijn sjiieten. Terroristische aanslagen worden vooralsnog vooral gepleegd door soennieten. En de VS is gewoon vriendjes met S-A.

quote:

Op zondag 3 juni 2018 19:23 schreef crystal_meth het volgende:

[..]

http://thehill.com/homene(...)-to-empower-european

quote:

Op zondag 3 juni 2018 20:16 schreef Nintex het volgende:

[..]

Let freedom reign and the bells of liberty toll again across the old world.

quote:

Op zondag 3 juni 2018 20:16 schreef Nintex het volgende:

[..]

Let freedom reign and the bells of liberty toll again across the old world.

quote:

Op zondag 3 juni 2018 20:16 schreef Nintex het volgende:

[..]

Let freedom reign and the bells of liberty toll again across the old world.

quote:

Op zondag 3 juni 2018 20:31 schreef Whiskers2009 het volgende:

[..]

Freedom? Onder conservatievelingen? Voor de witte man wellicht..

quote:

Op zondag 3 juni 2018 19:23 schreef crystal_meth het volgende:

[..]

http://thehill.com/homene(...)-to-empower-european

SPOILER

Om spoilers te kunnen lezen moet je zijn ingelogd. Je moet je daarvoor eerst gratis Registreren. Ook kun je spoilers niet lezen als je een ban hebt.

twitter:

ShimonPro twitterde op zondag 03-06-2018 om 23:31:38 Melania Trump will not travel with the President to the G7 world leaders summit next week In Quebec, Canada, nor will she accompany him to the Singapore summit on June 12th with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. She did attend the G7 summit last year in Italy. @KateBennett_DC reageer retweet

quote:

Op zondag 3 juni 2018 23:48 schreef westwoodblvd het volgende:

twitter:

ShimonPro twitterde op zondag 03-06-2018 om 23:31:38 Melania Trump will not travel with the President to the G7 world leaders summit next week In Quebec, Canada, nor will she accompany him to the Singapore summit on June 12th with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. She did attend the G7 summit last year in Italy. @KateBennett_DC reageer retweet

Ik zie, ik zie wat jij niet ziet, en het is een echtscheiding.

quote:

Op zondag 3 juni 2018 23:48 schreef westwoodblvd het volgende:

twitter:

ShimonPro twitterde op zondag 03-06-2018 om 23:31:38 Melania Trump will not travel with the President to the G7 world leaders summit next week In Quebec, Canada, nor will she accompany him to the Singapore summit on June 12th with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. She did attend the G7 summit last year in Italy. @KateBennett_DC reageer retweet

Ik zie, ik zie wat jij niet ziet, en het is een echtscheiding.

twitter:

kylegriffin1 twitterde op maandag 04-06-2018 om 00:10:38 Rudy Giuliani now says that Trump could have shot James Comey and still couldn’t be indicted for it."In no case can he be subpoenaed or indicted ... I don’t know how you can indict while he’s in office. No matter what it is." https://t.co/lz88ABbpbR reageer retweet

twitter:

kylegriffin1 twitterde op maandag 04-06-2018 om 00:15:11 Norm Eisen, Obama White House ethics lawyer: "I think the legally correct answer is, as usual, the opposite of Giuliani’s answer." https://t.co/QDTdD5Tj3h reageer retweet

quote:

Op maandag 4 juni 2018 00:24 schreef Kijkertje het volgende:

twitter:

kylegriffin1 twitterde op maandag 04-06-2018 om 00:10:38 Rudy Giuliani now says that Trump could have shot James Comey and still couldn’t be indicted for it."In no case can he be subpoenaed or indicted ... I don’t know how you can indict while he’s in office. No matter what it is." https://t.co/lz88ABbpbR reageer retweet

twitter:

kylegriffin1 twitterde op maandag 04-06-2018 om 00:15:11 Norm Eisen, Obama White House ethics lawyer: "I think the legally correct answer is, as usual, the opposite of Giuliani’s answer." https://t.co/QDTdD5Tj3h reageer retweet

quote:

Op maandag 4 juni 2018 00:24 schreef Kijkertje het volgende:

twitter:

kylegriffin1 twitterde op maandag 04-06-2018 om 00:10:38 Rudy Giuliani now says that Trump could have shot James Comey and still couldn’t be indicted for it."In no case can he be subpoenaed or indicted ... I don’t know how you can indict while he’s in office. No matter what it is." https://t.co/lz88ABbpbR reageer retweet

twitter:

kylegriffin1 twitterde op maandag 04-06-2018 om 00:15:11 Norm Eisen, Obama White House ethics lawyer: "I think the legally correct answer is, as usual, the opposite of Giuliani’s answer." https://t.co/QDTdD5Tj3h reageer retweet

quote:

Op maandag 4 juni 2018 07:45 schreef Ulx het volgende:

[..]

Met andere woorden: mijn kompanen hoeven geen deal te sluiten. Papa Trump komt ze wel redden.

Hoog spel wat ze spelen. Zou je het risico nemen als je Cohen of Manafort bent?

quote:

Op zondag 3 juni 2018 21:31 schreef J.B. het volgende:

[..]

NOS heeft het ook opgepikt:

Ambassadeur VS in Duitsland wil conservatieve stromingen in Europa helpen

http://nos.nl/l/2234910

Waar bemoeit die gast zich mee, laat die onzin in je eigen land

quote:

Op maandag 4 juni 2018 08:30 schreef KoosVogels het volgende:

[..]

Overigens kun je Merkel en de CDU met de beste wil van de wereld niet links noemen. Dus wat dat betreft heeft de beste man al z'n zin.

quote:

Op maandag 4 juni 2018 09:32 schreef KoosVogels het volgende:
Dat hele gedoe rondom Daniels vind ik persoonlijk dan ook een enorme non-issue. Lekker interessant dat die Trump een pornoster heeft geneukt en zwijggeld heeft betaald. Dat vind ik het minst kwalijke wat hij heeft gedaan.

quote:

Op maandag 4 juni 2018 09:38 schreef Refragmental het volgende:

[..]

Ik ben het zowaar met je eens.

quote:

Op maandag 4 juni 2018 09:43 schreef Chewie het volgende:
Het enige interessante aan die Stormy zaak is hoe het zwijggeld betaald is en bij geen nieuws of andere idioterieën vanuit het Witte Huis is het vrij logisch dat er minder aandacht voor deze zaak is.

En deze zaak toont weer eens de hypocrisie van de evangelicals aan.