abonnement bol.com Unibet Coolblue
pi_173548661
quote:
1s.gif Op zaterdag 2 september 2017 17:15 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:

[..]

I see the power of an example is still beyond your mental grasp.

We could also customise the wrecking ball and empty beercan/fence analogies if you like.

One very small , hollow , thin aluminium ball and the other a hollow , much larger , thicker , steel ball.
We could then test the strength of the balls against a garden fence (made of chicken wire for example) and see which ball would cause and sustain the most significant damage.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
  zaterdag 2 september 2017 @ 19:30:26 #202
450551 ChrisCarter
Ti Ta Toverland
pi_173548774
Zolang je elementaire natuurkunde niet lijkt te begrijpen maakt elke vergelijking die je poneert niet echt uit.
  zaterdag 2 september 2017 @ 19:31:56 #203
279682 theguyver
Sidekick van A tuin-hek!
pi_173548819
quote:
0s.gif Op zaterdag 2 september 2017 19:02 schreef Tingo het volgende:

[..]

Apart from the engines and landing gear,they most certainly are, in comparison to an enormous steel building.
Aircraft are far from being solid objects are they?
En het wtc ook niet een massief stuk metaal!, zelfde geld voor het empire state building en toch kan een veel kleiner vliegtuig gigantisch veel schade toebrengen!
je kan duidelijk zien dat metalen balken compleet krom zijn!

empire state building, in aanbouw!


Ook het frame van deze was grotendeels metaal.
En op de fotos zien we duidelijk een gigantische ravage.

Dus een 767 kan niet voor elkaar krijgen wat een veel kleinere b25 wel kan!


Leg mij even uit wat daar de logica van is?

Iemand???
Er staat nog een vraag voor u open!!
  zaterdag 2 september 2017 @ 19:33:52 #204
47122 ATuin-hek
theguyver's sidekick!
pi_173548863
quote:
0s.gif Op zaterdag 2 september 2017 19:25 schreef Tingo het volgende:

[..]

We could also customise the wrecking ball and empty beercan/fence analogies if you like.

One very small , hollow , thin aluminium ball and the other a hollow , much larger , thicker , steel ball.
We could then test the strength of the balls against a garden fence (made of chicken wire for example) and see which ball would cause and sustain the most significant damage.
And that's a mistake on your part. One being more efficient than the other doesn't mean that the less efficient one does no damage at all.
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
pi_173551749
quote:
0s.gif Op zaterdag 2 september 2017 19:18 schreef Tingo het volgende:

[..]

Ze zijn zeer fraglel in vergelijking met 'n enorme staal gebouw.
In sommige gevallen ook zeer fragiel tegen 'n vogel van 4 of 5 kg toch?
Die vogel overleeft het?
Groepsimmuniteit mag wel het resultaat zijn, maar niet het doel... - Vallon
  zaterdag 2 september 2017 @ 22:17:24 #206
279682 theguyver
Sidekick van A tuin-hek!
pi_173552202
quote:
1s.gif Op zaterdag 2 september 2017 21:59 schreef Wantie het volgende:

[..]

Die vogel overleeft het?
als een vogel dat doet.. Wat doet dan een vliegtuig tegen een gebouw..? Vogel vs aluminium..
Er staat nog een vraag voor u open!!
pi_173557198
quote:
0s.gif Op zaterdag 2 september 2017 19:33 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:

[..]

And that's a mistake on your part. One being more efficient than the other doesn't mean that the less efficient one does no damage at all.
But I didn't say that.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
pi_173557505
quote:
0s.gif Op zondag 3 september 2017 09:55 schreef Tingo het volgende:

[..]

But I didn't say that.
You implied that
Groepsimmuniteit mag wel het resultaat zijn, maar niet het doel... - Vallon
pi_173557536
quote:
0s.gif Op zaterdag 2 september 2017 19:25 schreef Tingo het volgende:

[..]

We could also customise the wrecking ball and empty beercan/fence analogies if you like.

One very small , hollow , thin aluminium ball and the other a hollow , much larger , thicker , steel ball.
We could then test the strength of the balls against a garden fence (made of chicken wire for example) and see which ball would cause and sustain the most significant damage.
Maar waarom maakt het dan verschil of de bal 10m2 aan kippengaas raakt of 100m2?
Groepsimmuniteit mag wel het resultaat zijn, maar niet het doel... - Vallon
  zondag 3 september 2017 @ 10:33:07 #210
47122 ATuin-hek
theguyver's sidekick!
pi_173557753
quote:
0s.gif Op zondag 3 september 2017 09:55 schreef Tingo het volgende:

[..]

But I didn't say that.
So you finally admit that aluminium can damage steel? :o
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
pi_173558961
quote:
0s.gif Op zondag 3 september 2017 10:33 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:

[..]

So you finally admit that aluminium can damage steel? :o
I've never said it wouldn't so there's nothing to admit.
You're trying to put words in my mouth again.
This is one of the reasons why it's pointless trying to discuss anything with you.
You either don't read my posts properly or you do it deliberately so you can appear as if you are right. Probably both.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
  zondag 3 september 2017 @ 11:46:42 #212
47122 ATuin-hek
theguyver's sidekick!
pi_173558994
quote:
0s.gif Op zondag 3 september 2017 11:44 schreef Tingo het volgende:

[..]

I've never said it wouldn't.
You're trying to put words in my mouth again.
This is one of the reasons why it's pointless trying to discuss anything with you.
You either don't read my posts properly or you do it deliberately so you can appear as if you are right. Probably both.
Well yes, that is pretty much exactly what followed from several of your statements over the years. Aluminium not being able to go through steel for example.
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
pi_173559068
quote:
1s.gif Op zondag 3 september 2017 11:46 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:

[..]

Well yes, that is pretty much exactly what followed from several of your statements over the years. Aluminium not being able to go through steel for example.
No.You haven't been reading my posts properly.
'Going through' and superficial damage are two completely different things.
The way you try and twist peoples words is quite desperate and a bit irritating.It's a sign of ignorance not intelligence.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
pi_173559165
quote:
0s.gif Op zondag 3 september 2017 11:50 schreef Tingo het volgende:

[..]

No.You haven't been reading my posts properly.
'Going through' and superficial damage are two completely different things.
The way you try and twist peoples words is quite desperate and a bit irritating.It's a sign of ignorance not intelligence.
De vleugels zijn niet door het staal gegaan. Dus die discussie is sowieso onzin.
Maar aluminium kan dus staal beschadigen, wat betekent dat als een aluminium voorwerp voldoende massa en snelheid heeft, deze voldoende potentiële energie kan bevatten om een stalen kolom te vernielen.
Groepsimmuniteit mag wel het resultaat zijn, maar niet het doel... - Vallon
  zondag 3 september 2017 @ 12:18:10 #215
47122 ATuin-hek
theguyver's sidekick!
pi_173559451
quote:
0s.gif Op zondag 3 september 2017 11:50 schreef Tingo het volgende:

[..]

No.You haven't been reading my posts properly.
'Going through' and superficial damage are two completely different things.
The way you try and twist peoples words is quite desperate and a bit irritating.It's a sign of ignorance not intelligence.
No they are not, just a difference in magnitude.
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
pi_173560343
quote:
1s.gif Op zondag 3 september 2017 10:17 schreef Wantie het volgende:

[..]

You implied that
No. I've always made it very clear that there would be slight damage to the perimeter walls of the buildings, but the 'plane' would not penetrate the building through the steel girders.
You're as notorious as Garden Fence for trying to put words in peoples' mouths.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
pi_173560354
Ziet er wel fragiel uit.
Ryanair planes' wings collide at Dublin Airport
https://www.rte.ie/news/2014/1007/650519-ryanair-dublin-airport/

It shouldn't take much imagination to understand what would happen to such a fragile vehicle if it were to collide with a number of steel girders.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
pi_173560404
quote:
0s.gif Op zondag 3 september 2017 13:16 schreef Tingo het volgende:
Ziet er wel fragiel uit.
Ryanair planes' wings collide at Dublin Airport
https://www.rte.ie/news/2014/1007/650519-ryanair-dublin-airport/
Irrelevant.
Conscience do cost.
  zondag 3 september 2017 @ 13:20:04 #219
450551 ChrisCarter
Ti Ta Toverland
pi_173560429
quote:
0s.gif Op zondag 3 september 2017 13:16 schreef Tingo het volgende:
Ziet er wel fragiel uit.
Ryanair planes' wings collide at Dublin Airport
https://www.rte.ie/news/2014/1007/650519-ryanair-dublin-airport/

It shouldn't take much imagination to understand what would happen to such a fragile vehicle if it were to collide with a number of steel girders.
Stop nou eens met beweren dat vliegtuigen fragiel zouden zijn. Dat is gewoon totale onzin.
  zondag 3 september 2017 @ 13:21:26 #220
47122 ATuin-hek
theguyver's sidekick!
pi_173560456
quote:
0s.gif Op zondag 3 september 2017 13:15 schreef Tingo het volgende:

[..]

No. I've always made it very clear that there would be slight damage to the perimeter walls of the buildings, but the 'plane' would not penetrate the building through the steel girders.
You're as notorious as Garden Fence for trying to put words in peoples' mouths.
Which is just a difference in magnitude. You just lack the knowledge and the will to obtain that knowledge to realise that.
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
pi_173560565
quote:
0s.gif Op zondag 3 september 2017 13:15 schreef Tingo het volgende:

[..]

No. I've always made it very clear that there would be slight damage to the perimeter walls of the buildings, but the 'plane' would not penetrate the building through the steel girders.
You're as notorious as Garden Fence for trying to put words in peoples' mouths.
Tja, je geeft dus toe dat aluminium schade jan aanrichten.
Dan is het een kwestie van berekenen hoeveel potentiële energie het vliegtuig bevatte toen het de toren raakte en hoeveel nodig is om de stalen kolommen voldoende te beschadigen.
Groepsimmuniteit mag wel het resultaat zijn, maar niet het doel... - Vallon
pi_173560573
quote:
10s.gif Op zondag 3 september 2017 13:20 schreef ChrisCarter het volgende:

[..]

Stop nou eens met beweren dat vliegtuigen fragiel zouden zijn. Dat is gewoon totale onzin.
Aircraft engineers aren't even allowed to walk on the wings without extreme caution.
In comparison to a huge steel building they are extremely fragile.
Dat jij denkt dat 't 'gewoon totale onzin' vindt, niet mijne probleem is.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
pi_173560591
quote:
0s.gif Op zondag 3 september 2017 13:16 schreef Tingo het volgende:
Ziet er wel fragiel uit.
Ryanair planes' wings collide at Dublin Airport
https://www.rte.ie/news/2014/1007/650519-ryanair-dublin-airport/

It shouldn't take much imagination to understand what would happen to such a fragile vehicle if it were to collide with a number of steel girders.
Tja, iedereen kan fantaseren.
Maar het gaat hier niet om je inbeeldingsvermogen
Groepsimmuniteit mag wel het resultaat zijn, maar niet het doel... - Vallon
pi_173560606
quote:
0s.gif Op zondag 3 september 2017 13:29 schreef Tingo het volgende:

[..]

Aircraft engineers aren't even allowed to walk on the wings without extreme caution.
In comparison to a huge steel building they are extremely fragile.
Dat jij denkt dat 't 'gewoon totale onzin' vindt, niet mijne probleem is.
De vleugels zijn niet door het staal gegaan.
Dus dat punt is niet relevant
Groepsimmuniteit mag wel het resultaat zijn, maar niet het doel... - Vallon
  zondag 3 september 2017 @ 13:32:18 #225
47122 ATuin-hek
theguyver's sidekick!
pi_173560623
quote:
0s.gif Op zondag 3 september 2017 13:29 schreef Tingo het volgende:

[..]

Aircraft engineers aren't even allowed to walk on the wings without extreme caution.
In comparison to a huge steel building they are extremely fragile.
Dat jij denkt dat 't 'gewoon totale onzin' vindt, niet mijne probleem is.
The control surfaces are fragile, the wings are not.
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
abonnement bol.com Unibet Coolblue
Forum Opties
Forumhop:
Hop naar:
(afkorting, bv 'KLB')