Hij is er al langer mee bezig zo blijkt uit zijn emails, Podesta is een groot voorstander van disclosure, en op zijn laatste werkdag in het witte huis zette hij via Twitter de ufo's in het daglicht:quote:Dear John Podesta:
As we move into the last half of 2014, the need for extraterrestrial
disclosure intensifies. Thank you for your kind consideration and response
to my email.
This 4 July weekend I will meet with President Obama’s friend, Ambassador
Hamamoto, at the US Mission in Geneva during their Independence Day
Celebration. While in Geneva I will also speak at the UN and the European
Space Agency regarding why we must move forward with disclosure and
specific programs such as manned moon missions, since some scientists and
others are calling for moon colonization due to what they perceive is
happening on Earth.
John, with this email I am requesting a conversation with you and President
Obama regarding the next steps in extraterrestrial disclosure for the
benefit of our country and our planet.
Fifty years ago Battelle, Brookings and RAND studies on UFOs convinced the
government to remove knowledge of the extraterrestrial presence from the
citizens of our country. These organizations advised with their best
information. However, today much, if not most, of the extraterrestrial
reality they examined is known by our citizens. These organizations'
resultant strategies and policies of 50 years ago no longer hold
credibility or benefit.
Five decades of UFO information have dramatically shifted the public
awareness of an extraterrestrial presence. And yet, our government is
still operating from outdated beliefs and policies. These are detrimental
to trust in government transparency, science, religion, and responsible
citizenry embracing the next step in our country’s space travel and
research.
Three disclosure issues are prominent: 1) planet sustainability via next
generation energies such as zero point energy, 2) galactic travel and
research undertaken as an advanced species aware of the extraterrestrial
presence, not as uninformed explorers who revert to colonialism and
destruction and 3) the example of a confident, engaged government who
respectfully regards the wisdom and intellect of its citizens as we move
into space.
I respectfully receive your response to my request for conversation on
disclosure.
Warmest Regards,
Edgar D. Mitchell, ScD
Chief Science Officer & Founder, Quantrek
Apollo 14 astronaut
6th man to walk on the Moon
Er zijn 39 emails van of aan Podesta die over disclosure gaan, en nog 91 die over UFO's gaan.quote:It was the tweet heard round the worlds. On John Podesta's last day at the White House on February 13th, the longtime Presidential counselor, who is likely to chair a 2016 Hillary Clinton campaign, dashed off a confession that lit the blogosphere with thousands of retweets and comments: "Finally, my biggest failure of 2014: Once again not securing the #disclosure of the UFO files."
Amerika lijkt de goede kant op te gaan,...quote:To: john.podesta@gmail.com
Date: 2015-03-06 16:17
Subject: - DSP program
John -
Just tuck this in your UFO files for future reference.
One of the government programs that collects hard data on unidentified
flying objects is the USAF DSP satellite program.
I can add a little insight to rumors published on the web. While I was never
fully briefed into the DSP operation directly, I was introduced to them as
the US prepared for Operation Desert Shield and Desert Storm. On occasion, I
had lunch with a few of them in the cafeteria of a highly classified
organization in El Segundo, CA. No one could get into the cafeteria without
TS/SCI clearances, so this was not "lightweight group of gossipers." One of
these times, a member of that group was really excited - said they'd just
picked up Fastwalker (I assumed that same day). He described how it entered
our atmosphere from "deep space" (origin actually unknown, of course, but
from the backside of the satellite) and zipped by the DSP satellite pretty
closely on its way to earth. Not only was it going very fast but it made a
30 degree course correction (turn) which means it did not have a ballistic
(free fall) reentry trajectory that a meteorite might have. So, it was under
some sort of control - although whether it was "manned" or just "robotic"
there's no way to tell.
Although its now 24 years later, one factoid makes me think the USAF is
still collecting information on these Fastwalkers. Reading the current
official USAF "DSP Fact Sheet" there is this line near the end: In addition,
researchers at The Aerospace Corporation have used DSP to develop portions
of a hazard support system that will aid public safety in the future.
http://www.losangeles.af.(...)actsheet.asp?id=5323
Also, much of the information on this site is accurate although I do not
know the author or his sources:
http://ufodigest.com/shadowmag/extra/topsecret.html
Somewhere within that USAF program office is many year's worth of Fastwalker
data. If someone were to collect and analyze it, patterns will emerge that
provide information about the various types of craft and their destinations,
which would add substantiation to eyewitness claims on the ground about UFO
activity. Furthermore, it would be interesting to understand the dates of
these appearances - is there a certain time of the every year they swarm in
(which might indicate a resource mining operation) or might there be a
correlation with major events on earth, (such as the detonation of the
first atomic bomb at White Sands in 1945 although no DSP's existed to
provide any info on that particular event)?
Regards,
Bob Fish
Is het echt zo onduidelijk dat de bron een email is ?quote:Op donderdag 1 juni 2017 15:27 schreef ChrisCarter het volgende:
Voeg nou eens de bron van je OP toe... we blijven het niet herhalen.
We hebben je nu al verschillende keren gevraagd om een bron bij je topic te plaatsen maar je doet het gewoon niet.quote:Op donderdag 1 juni 2017 15:31 schreef 2600 het volgende:
[..]
Is het echt zo onduidelijk dat de bron een email is ?
Daadwerkelijk zo ontvangen, is bevestigd door Podesta zelf.
De mail is na openbaring door verschillende media overgenomen, en uitgebreid besproken, .. is dat wat je zoekt ?
quote:Op donderdag 1 juni 2017 15:23 schreef 2600 het volgende:
Trump die roept dat er bommen zijn gebruikt op 9/11, en top-ambtenaren die disclosure mogelijk willen maken.
Bron officiele email account van John Podesta in het witte huis.quote:Op donderdag 1 juni 2017 15:35 schreef Lavenderr het volgende:
[..]
We hebben je nu al verschillende keren gevraagd om een bron bij je topic te plaatsen maar je doet het gewoon niet.
Dus bron erbij of het topic wordt gesloten.
We zijn duidelijk. Topic openen is bron erbij zetten. Je doet dat categorisch niet.quote:Op donderdag 1 juni 2017 15:31 schreef 2600 het volgende:
[..]
Is het echt zo onduidelijk dat de bron een email is ?
Daadwerkelijk zo ontvangen, is bevestigd door Podesta zelf.
De mail is na openbaring door verschillende media overgenomen, en uitgebreid besproken, .. is dat wat je zoekt ?
kan dit verder in FB ? beetje zonde om het topic te beginnen met twijfels, juist als de info authentiek en geverifieerd is.
...zucht.quote:Op donderdag 1 juni 2017 15:35 schreef ChrisCarter het volgende:
Je snapt best wat er bedoeld wordt. Deze info heb je van een site/sites vandaan. Alleen heb je die niet erbij vermeld. Dat is wel de bedoeling. Doe dat dan ook gewoon.
Verwacht je nu het wachtwoord van de email account van Edgar Mitchell of zo?quote:Op donderdag 1 juni 2017 15:39 schreef Lavenderr het volgende:
[..]
We zijn duidelijk. Topic openen is bron erbij zetten. Je doet dat categorisch niet.
FIOA n.a.v. wikileaks.quote:Op donderdag 1 juni 2017 15:43 schreef budvar het volgende:
Van welke site heb je dit afgeplukt dan? Of heeft Podesta dit zelf naar jou gemaild?
Forum Opties | |
---|---|
Forumhop: | |
Hop naar: |