WESTMINSTER PEDORING DOSSIER IN UK KWIJT
Het is hierboven al genoemd door controlaltdelete in de reportage 60 seconds, maar hier een wat uitgebreidere versie.
In 1984 is een dossier aan de UK overheid overgedragen met betrekking tot een pedoring binnen het UK politieke systeem.
Het is onduidelijk waar het dossier op dit moment is, zonder daadwerkelijk behandeld te zijn. In de tussentijd waren al 140 documenten ervan kwijtgeraakt.
Later is een panel samenggesteld (2013-2015) inzake dit dossier.
Background[edit]
Between 1981 and 1985 Dickens campaigned against a suspected paedophile ring he claimed to have uncovered that was connected to trading child pornography.[6] In 1981, Dickens named the former senior diplomat, civil servant and MI6 operative, Sir Peter Hayman, as a paedophile in the House of Commons, using parliamentary privilege, and asked why Hayman had not been jailed after the discovery on a bus of violent pornography.[6]
In 1983, Dickens claimed there was a paedophile network involving "big, big names - people in positions of power, influence and responsibility" and threatened to name them in the Commons.[6] The next year, he campaigned for the banning of the pro-paedophile activism group of which Hayman was a member, the Paedophile Information Exchange.[6]
On 29 November 1985, Dickens said in a speech to the Commons that paedophiles were "evil and dangerous" and that child pornography generated "vast sums". He further claimed that: "The noose around my neck grew tighter after I named a former high-flying British diplomat [Hayman] on the Floor of the House. Honourable Members will understand that where big money is involved and as important names came into my possession so the threats began. First, I received threatening telephone calls followed by two burglaries at my London home. Then, more seriously, my name appeared on a multi-killer's hit list".[7]
Dossier[edit]
Dickens gave his 40-page dossier to the Home Secretary, Leon Brittan, in a 30-minute meeting in 1984.[6] A second copy of the dossier was reported to have been given to the Director of Public Prosecutions, Thomas Hetherington.[8]
Dickens described the dossier as having the potential to "blow the lid off" the lives of notable child abusers.[1][9] It included details on eight prominent figures, and was reported to have contained the name of a former Conservative MP who had been found with child pornography videos, against whom no arrests or charges were brought.[1][10] Dickens told his son, Barry, that the dossier was "explosive".[9]
Dickens had asked Brittan in 1983 to investigate the diplomatic and civil services and the royal court at Buckingham Palace over claims of paedophilia.[11] Dickens said that he was "going to give him [Brittan] a glimpse inside my private files, where people have written to me with information."[11]
Op dit moment wordt een onafhankelijk onderzoek gedaan door een politiecommissie.
In March 2015, it was announced that the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) would "manage" an investigation that was already being conducted by the London Metropolitan Police's Directorate of Professional Standards into claims of "high-level corruption of the most serious nature" over four decades, including 16 allegations that the Met had covered up historical child sex offences because of the involvement of MPs and police officers.[29] Scotland Yard said it had voluntarily referred the allegations, which arose from investigation ‘Operation Fairbank' launched in 2012, to the IPCC. The allegations being considered by the IPCC relate to the period between 1970 and 2005 and include failures to properly investigate child sex abuse offenses; the halting of an investigation relating to the abuse of young men in Dolphin Square, near Westminster because "officers were too near prominent people"; and that a Houses of Parliament document was found at a paedophile's address which linked "highly-prominent individuals" - including MPs and senior police officers - to a paedophile ring, but that no further action was taken.[30]
The IPCC will also consider claims that a child sex abuse victim's account was altered to remove the name of a senior politician, and that surveillance of a child abuse ring was curtailed because of "high-profile people being involved".[30] Shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper said: "Given the gravity of the crimes being investigated, it is worrying that this is not a fully independent investigation. Instead the Met will lead this work with oversight from the IPCC. Surely this should be done by an independent investigator or, at the very least an alternate force".[29]
However, Labour MP Simon Danczuk, who had been calling for such an inquiry, told the BBC: "We are on the cusp of finding out exactly what went on in the 70s and 1980s and, I'm sorry to say, I think it will be shown that senior politicians were involved in abuse and there was a cover up. I think that's inevitable now".[30] The BBC also reported that former Daily Mirror crime correspondent Jeff Edwards, who stated he was told by a detective in the 1980s that an investigation into paedophiles was closed on the orders of a senior politician, had recently been contacted by the police. He told the BBC: "I think this was a cynical cover up. There was no doubt in their minds the way they would deal with this was simply to expunge it from the record. As far as they were concerned they could make it go away forever".[30]
Zie wikipedia artikel
https://en.wikipedia.org/(...)le_dossier#AftermathEn de volgende videos:
(ik vind de vorm niet top maar het punt wat gemaakt wordt is wel van belang - men spreekt constant over 'historisch kindermisbruik - alsof het niet meer relevant is, en zegt openlijk dat geen verder onderzoek meer nodig is)
Enzovoorts.