Hoe zou het nog erger kunnen?quote:Op maandag 23 januari 2017 08:52 schreef Typisch het volgende:
[..]
Obama, man van het volk en transparantie.
Niet dat Trump een haar beter gaat zijn. Waarschijnlijk nog erger qua massa surveillance e.d.
Hangt er van af, denk ik. De protesten op vrijdag misschien, die op zaterdag niet.quote:Op maandag 23 januari 2017 08:49 schreef Kaneelstokje het volgende:
Ik lees net dat de 230 mensen die gearresteerd zijn bij de protesten een straf kunnen krijgen tot 10 jaar.
Dit dankzij een regel die Obama vorig jaar heeft ingevoerd.
De kandidaten voor voor het voorzitterschap van de Dem. partij waren trouwens druk met iets anders, via reporter New York Times:quote:Op maandag 23 januari 2017 01:35 schreef Tweek het volgende:
[..]
Alsof Sanders over 4 jaar mee gaat doen. Daarnaast was het een Women March, daar had Clinton best kunnen opduiken en wat zeggen. Trump klaagt toch overal over.
Oh en Romney hebben we niet gezien deze campagne? McCain is ook gestopt met de politiek? Paul Ryan is niet de speaker of the house? etc.
twitter:maggieNYT twitterde op zondag 22-01-2017 om 23:10:33 During largest grassroots movement Dems have had in years, most of the candidates to be chair were at an exclusive donor retreat. reageer retweet
http://www.politico.com/s(...)t-bureaucrats-234019quote:Revenge of the bureaucrats
Federal workers fume over Trump's vows to freeze hiring and shrink the government.
President Donald Trump is setting himself up for a messy clash with the country’s 2.1 million federal employees as his administration quietly preps plans to cut the size of the government workforce.
As one of his first acts, Trump is expected to sign an executive order this week freezing most federal hiring. His team is also fine-tuning plans to shrink several agencies focused on domestic policy, according to sources close to the transition.
Now, though, the president is about to find out how much power these maligned workers have to slow or even short-circuit his agenda.
Disgruntled employees can leak information to Capitol Hill and the press, and prod inspectors general to probe political appointees. They can also use the tools of bureaucracy to slow or sandbag policy proposals — moves that can overtly, or passive aggressively, unravel a White House’s best-laid plans.
“The government is a place where it is easier to keep something from getting done, than it is to actually do something,” said Robert Shea, an official in George W. Bush’s Office of Management and Budget. “All of the work that the new administration wants to get accomplished will depend on the speed and productivity of the federal workforce.”
The Trump personnel team led by Kay Coles James and Linda Springer, both also Bush alumni, has broad goals to reduce the size of domestic agencies while slightly bolstering the defense workforce, say sources close to the transition. Aides are also mulling a process, known as “reduction in force,” that would allow the new administration to skirt the civil service’s complicated rules for hiring and firing.
The easiest way to make such reductions might be through budget cuts to each agency, which would be outlined in Trump’s first budget proposal this spring, say former senior government human resources officials who did not have first-hand knowledge of the administration’s plans. The Trump team did not respond to requests for comment.
The reality is it’s far harder to shrink the federal workforce than it is to slash staff at, say, the Trump Organization. Thousands of federal workers belong to powerful unions that can mobilize their representatives in Congress. And almost two thirds of them work for defense and security-related agencies, according to the nonpartisan Partnership for Public Service — areas of the government that Trump promised not to touch during the campaign.
Ostracizing the massive federal workforce comes with its own political perils. The vast majority — about 85 percent — are based outside of Washington, D.C., meaning Trump could anger workers all over the country, including in key battleground states.
Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan tried to reduce the size of the workforce with hiring freezes. But despite isolated victories, such as Reagan’s vanquishing of the air traffic controllers union, most of those efforts failed to produce lasting change. The first two years of Reagan’s presidency saw a reduction in federal jobs, but they actually increased over the course of his tenure.
And contrary to Republican claims, the number of federal workers actually dropped during Obama's eight years in office, according to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Unions representing federal workers are already railing against Trump's proposals — and they are counting on whistleblower laws to protect employees who raise red flags about his administration's activities.
“Clearly, they have the right to speak up and speak out,” Jeffrey David Cox, the national president of the American Federation of Government Employees, the largest federal employee union, said of federal workers. “They have First Amendment rights.”
A massive reduction in the federal workforce could also result in a greater reliance on contractors, which could cost taxpayers even more money, Cox said. “If President Trump is serious about draining the swamp, he’d certainly take a stance against big contractors,” he added.
Cox, like others interviewed for this story, noted that most career federal employees are used to the political changing of the guard and they take their role as nonpartisan government overseers seriously.
“Federal employees get up and go to work and they do what they’re told to do,” he said. “They don’t drive the train. They stoke the furnace. ...They keep the train on the track.”
Another federal employee put it this way: “You give your absolute best opinion and then, absent unethical or illegal behavior, if it’s decided there’s a better way, then OK, you work with that too.”
Still, many federal workers admit they are freaked out — demoralized by their portrayal as part of the DC “swamp” and anxious about being asked to dismantle rules and regulations they’ve labored over for years.
“What I am hearing from federal employees is a degree of apprehension that I have not heard since the Reagan transition,” said Jeffrey Neal, who ran human resources for Homeland Security’s 190,000 employees in the last job of his 33-year-long government career.
"For some of them, it’s PTSD — 'Oh my God, is that what we’re going back to?'" said one former Obama administration official. “They’re scared.”
Federal workers are also concerned that Trump may get support for gutting civil service protections from the Republican-controlled Congress. House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) is pushing a legislative package that would make it easier to fire federal workers, among other things. And House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) has said he broadly supports overhauling civil service rules.
Earlier this month, House Republicans quietly resurrected an 1876 rule that would allow them — with the sign-off of a majority of both the House and Senate — to use spending legislation to reduce the salary of an individual government employee, a move that infuriated union members.
“They’re basically creating an environment of fear within the government,” one career federal worker told POLITICO. “In creating that culture of fear, it’s probably going to suppress some of the people from standing up to the administration.”
Faced with an uncertain future, some career civil servants are debating whether to stick around.
“If they’re close to retirement, they’ll probably just leave,” said a career EPA employee.
That employee expects those who stay to fight actions they deem ill-advised or illegal by quietly providing information of what is happening inside their agencies to advocacy groups and the media.
“It was very typical during the Reagan administration for somebody to stick something in a manila envelope and take it to the Post Office and mail something to the National Wildlife Federation,” the employee said.
But one career Justice Department employee, who came aboard during the Obama era, said that no civil service workers have left for other jobs yet. “The job market for Democrats in D.C. is really tight now,” the DOJ worker said. “I don’t know how many people in my office are staying because they don’t have anywhere to go.”
Even without an adversarial White House, the federal government would face a nearly unprecedented brain drain. Two-thirds of career employees in senior leadership positions are eligible for retirement in the next few years, and by 2018, 30 percent of all career federal employees will be eligible, according to a 2015 GAO report.
Former political appointees said career service workers offer invaluable government experience to a new administration.
"You want to know what they know,” said Lisa Brown, who served as the White House staff secretary at the beginning of the Obama administration. “You want them to come to you and say, ‘we’ve tried this before and here’s why it didn’t work.
When Obama took office, career employees walked Obama’s political appointees through key rules and procedures on everything from disaster relief to sending nominations to the Senate.
"None of us knew how that worked,” she said. We would have totally bollixed that up."
twitter:moorehn twitterde op maandag 23-01-2017 om 13:12:45 Day 3 of a Trump presidency: generals may be wondering if it's time for America's first military coup.… https://t.co/PQz9TWBGaj reageer retweet
Hij kan het prima waarmaken, maar dan moeten het VK en Zweden hem laten gaan.quote:Op maandag 23 januari 2017 00:39 schreef Tweek het volgende:
[..]
Ah interessant.
Dus Assange heeft iets beloofd wat hij niet waar kon maken, vervolgens wel de overwinning geclaimed?
Oh, something cyber related..ja, want cyber is hard!quote:Op maandag 23 januari 2017 14:09 schreef antiderivative het volgende:
Volgens een Rep. connectie zijn dit de onderwerpen van de Executive Orders die in de pijplijn zitten, via Axios:
• Look for a possible hiring freeze at executive branch
• 5-year lobbying ban on transition and administration officials
• Mexico City policy, which prevents foreign NGOs from getting U.S. family planning money if they provide abortions with non-U.S. funds. (It's already illegal to use U.S dollars on abortions.)
• Task the Defense Secretary and joint chiefs to come up with plan to eviscerate ISIS
• Report on readiness, and something cyber security related
• Border/immigration: Something on sanctuary cities, expand E-Verify, an extreme vetting proposal
• Trade: Withdraw from TPP and a thorough review of NAFTA
What else we're hearing: The Mexico City executive order could come as soon as today. Also, watch for dozens of EPA executive orders coming down the pike. Says a Trump source: "EPA has clean water-related and some 30,000 foot regulatory ones lined up [immediately]...We have dozens for the EPA...Starting Monday through the month of February. We have to roll them out gradually."
--
We zullen zien.
Zou Sean Spicer nu wel vragen gaan beantwoorden?quote:Op maandag 23 januari 2017 14:41 schreef Ludachrist het volgende:
1:30 weer een press briefing, dat is toch wel het hoogtepuntje van de dag zolang Spicer er zit.
Over de laatste:quote:Op maandag 23 januari 2017 14:09 schreef antiderivative het volgende:
Volgens een Rep. connectie zijn dit de onderwerpen van de Executive Orders die in de pijplijn zitten, via Axios:
• Look for a possible hiring freeze at executive branch
• 5-year lobbying ban on transition and administration officials
• Mexico City policy, which prevents foreign NGOs from getting U.S. family planning money if they provide abortions with non-U.S. funds. (It's already illegal to use U.S dollars on abortions.)
• Task the Defense Secretary and joint chiefs to come up with plan to eviscerate ISIS
• Report on readiness, and something cyber security related
• Border/immigration: Something on sanctuary cities, expand E-Verify, an extreme vetting proposal
• Trade: Withdraw from TPP and a thorough review of NAFTA
What else we're hearing: The Mexico City executive order could come as soon as today. Also, watch for dozens of EPA executive orders coming down the pike. Says a Trump source: "EPA has clean water-related and some 30,000 foot regulatory ones lined up [immediately]...We have dozens for the EPA...Starting Monday through the month of February. We have to roll them out gradually."
--
We zullen zien.
twitter:JDiamond1 twitterde op maandag 23-01-2017 om 13:55:39 NEWS: President Trump to withdraw from TPP today via executive action, a senior WH official tells me. reageer retweet
Wat denk je zelf?quote:Op maandag 23 januari 2017 14:43 schreef Mystikvm het volgende:
[..]
Zou Sean Spicer nu wel vragen gaan beantwoorden?
Ik denk niet dat die man ooit een vraag gaat beantwoorden. Die is aangenomen om zijn bagger over de pers uit te storten, en daarna loopt hij weer weg.quote:
Dat lijkt mij een bijzonder nauwkeurige inschatting van zijn functie-omschrijving, inderdaad.quote:Op maandag 23 januari 2017 14:45 schreef Mystikvm het volgende:
[..]
Ik denk niet dat die man ooit een vraag gaat beantwoorden. Die is aangenomen om zijn bagger over de pers uit te storten, en daarna loopt hij weer weg.
Elon Musk komt net aan, hij zal dus ook onderdeel van deze specifieke groep worden.quote:Op maandag 23 januari 2017 13:50 schreef antiderivative het volgende:
agenda voor vandaag:
[ afbeelding ]
o.a. Andrew Liveris (CEO Dow Chemical Company) komt langs. Hij gaat overigens een "advisory panel on manufacturing" leiden waarin verschillende CEO's plaats gaan nemen. Vergelijkbaar met de andere specifieke groepen die er al waren waarin o.a. CEO's van Google, Tesla, GM etc. Trump adviseren.
quote:Op maandag 23 januari 2017 14:41 schreef Ludachrist het volgende:
1:30 weer een press briefing, dat is toch wel het hoogtepuntje van de dag zolang Spicer er zit.
+quote:Op maandag 23 januari 2017 13:50 schreef antiderivative het volgende:
agenda voor vandaag:
[ afbeelding ]
o.a. Andrew Liveris (CEO Dow Chemical Company) komt langs. Hij gaat overigens een "advisory panel on manufacturing" leiden waarin verschillende CEO's plaats gaan nemen. Vergelijkbaar met de andere specifieke groepen die er al waren waarin o.a. CEO's van Google, Tesla, GM etc. Trump adviseren.
Tja, ambtenaren zullen er alles aan doen om hun baan te behouden en er voor te zorgen dat er nog meer bijkomen.quote:Op maandag 23 januari 2017 13:48 schreef Monolith het volgende:
De strijd tussen het kabinet van Trump en de federale ambtenaren gaat ook nog wel een interessante worden de komende vier jaar.
http://www.politico.com/s(...)t-bureaucrats-234019
Generaals zijn ook afhankelijk van de politieke waan van de dag.quote:Op maandag 23 januari 2017 14:38 schreef Tijger_nootje het volgende:
Oh, en dezelfde incompetente generals (Trump uitspraak) kunnen nu ineens wel een plan opstellen wat ISIS onderuit haalt? Leuk.
net op CNBC live vanuit de 'boardroom' in het witte huis, statement van Trump met de CEO's aan tafel. Er werden wat cijfers genoemd, maar deregulation is op de agenda (75% slash), lagere belastingen en de productie moet in de VS gebeuren anders komt er een flinke tax.quote:Op maandag 23 januari 2017 15:30 schreef antiderivative het volgende:
[..]
+
Elon Musk (Founder, CEO, SpaceX, Tesla)
Kevin Plank (Founder, CEO, Chairman of Under Armour)
Mark Fields (President, CEO of Ford Motor Company)
Michael Dell (Founder, CEO of Dell Technologies)
Jeff Fettig (CEO, Chairman of Whirlpool)
Alex Gorsky (CEO of Johnson & Johnson)
Marillyn Hewson (Chairwoman, President, CEO of Lockheed Martin)
Klaus Kleinfeld (Chairman, CEO of Arconic)
Mario Longhi (CEO of United States Steel)
Mark Sutton (Chairman, CEO of the International Paper Board)
Wendell Weeks (Chairman, CEO of Corning)
zijn nu aanwezig
Mooi daar gaan bedrijven erg blij mee zijn. Dan kunnen die landen de bijbehorende draconische IP wetten weer afschaffen. Die beschermden toch vooral VS bedrijven.quote:Op maandag 23 januari 2017 14:43 schreef antiderivative het volgende:
[..]
Over de laatste:twitter:JDiamond1 twitterde op maandag 23-01-2017 om 13:55:39 NEWS: President Trump to withdraw from TPP today via executive action, a senior WH official tells me. reageer retweet
Dat laatste lijkt me een vrij willekeurige aanname, maar dat niemand staat te springen om vrijwillig mee te werken aan zijn of haar eigen ontslag lijkt me niet zo bijzonder. Ook niet specifiek iets voor ambtenaren.quote:Op maandag 23 januari 2017 15:47 schreef bluemoon23 het volgende:
[..]
Tja, ambtenaren zullen er alles aan doen om hun baan te behouden en er voor te zorgen dat er nog meer bijkomen.
Forum Opties | |
---|---|
Forumhop: | |
Hop naar: |