abonnement Unibet Coolblue
pi_142734646
quote:
Lance Armstrong geeft gevecht met USADA op

De Amerikaanse ex-wielrenner Lance Armstrong heeft het gevecht met het Amerikaanse antidopingagentschap USADA opgegeven. Dat meldt persbureau AP. Maandag werd de klacht van de zevenvoudige tourwinnaar tegen USADA afgewezen door een rechtbank in Austin (Texas).
'In ieders leven komt een moment dat je tegen jezelf moet zeggen: genoeg is genoeg. Voor mij is dat moment nu gekomen.' Met die woorden begint Armstrong een verklaring waarom hij de strijd tegen USADA is gestopt.

De 40-jarige Amerikaan zegt helemaal klaar te zijn met alle 'nonsens' die het dopingagentschap over hem heeft verspreid. 'De strijd heeft een enorme tol geëist van mijn gezin en mijn werk voor mijn foundation. Ik ben helemaal klaar met die onzin.'

Armstrong beschuldigde het USADA van schending van zijn grondwettelijke recht op een eerlijk proces. Hij noemde het onderzoek van het agentschap 'een ongefundeerde heksenjacht'. Maar die aanklacht werd maandag door rechter Sam Sparks afgewezen.

Tourzeges

Volgens het antidopingagentschap heeft Armstrong jarenlang doping gebruikt, al werd hij nooit betrapt. De ex-wielrenner, die nu aan triatlons deelneemt, riskeert een levenslange schorsing. Hij kan ook zijn zeven tourzeges kwijtspelen.

Ook Johan Bruyneel, de voormalige ploegleider van Armstrong, moet zich voor het USADA komen verantwoorden. Zowel ploegleider als renner ontkennen elke betrokkenheid.
quote:
Armstrong won't fight USADA charges

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) - Lance Armstrong said Thursday night he is finished fighting a barrage of drug charges from the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency, putting his unprecedented string of seven Tour de France titles at risk along with his legacy as one of the greatest cyclists in history.

The decision sets up a likely lifetime ban from the sport and the possibility that Armstrong will be stripped of his signature achievement - the extraordinary run of Tour titles he won from 1999-2005.

Armstrong, who retired last year, declined to enter arbitration - his last option - because he said he was weary of fighting accusations that have dogged him for years. He has consistently pointed to the hundreds of drug tests that he has passed as proof of his innocence.

"There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now," Armstrong said in a statement sent to The Associated Press. He called the USADA investigation an "unconstitutional witch hunt."

"I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in winning my seven Tours since 1999," he said. "The toll this has taken on my family and my work for our foundation and on me leads me to where I am today - finished with this nonsense."

USADA will almost certainly treat Armstrong's decision as an admission of guilt, and hang the label of drug cheat on an athlete who was a hero to thousands for overcoming life-threatening testicular cancer and for his foundation's support for cancer research.

The agency can impose a lifetime ban and recommend Armstrong be stripped of his titles. That would put the question in the hands of the International Cycling Union, which has disputed USADA's authority to pursue the investigation and Tour de France officials, who have had a prickly relationship with Armstrong over the years.

Armstrong insisted his decision is not an admission of drug use, but a refusal to enter an arbitration process he believes is improper and unfair to athletes facing charges.

"USADA cannot assert control of a professional international sport and attempt to strip my seven Tour de France titles," he said. "I know who won those seven Tours, my teammates know who won those seven Tours, and everyone I competed against knows who won those seven Tours."

USADA maintains that Armstrong has used banned substances as far back as 1996, including the blood-booster EPO and steroids as well as blood transfusions - all to boost his performance.

The 40-year-old Armstrong walked away from the sport in 2011 without being charged following a two-year federal criminal investigation into many of the same accusations he faces from USADA. The federal probe was closed in February, but USADA announced in June it had evidence Armstrong used banned substances and methods - and encouraged their use by teammates. The agency also said it had blood tests from 2009 and 2010 that were "fully consistent" with blood doping.

Included in USADA's evidence were emails written by Armstrong's former U.S. Postal Service teammate Floyd Landis, who was stripped of his 2006 Tour de France title after a positive drug test. Landis' emails to a USA Cycling official detailed allegations of a complex doping program on the team.

USADA also said it had 10 former Armstrong teammates ready to testify against him. Other than suggesting they include Landis and Tyler Hamilton, both of whom have admitted to doping offenses, the agency has refused to say who they are or specifically what they would say.

"There is zero physical evidence to support (the) outlandish and heinous claims. The only physical evidence here is the hundreds of (doping) controls I have passed with flying colors," Armstrong said.

Armstrong sued USADA in Austin, where he lives, in an attempt to block the case and was supported by the UCI, the sport's governing body. A judge threw out the case on Monday, siding with USADA despite questioning the agency's pursuit of Armstrong in his retirement.

"USADA's conduct raises serious questions about whether its real interest in charging Armstrong is to combat doping, or if it is acting according to less noble motives," such as politics or publicity, U.S. District Judge Sam Sparks wrote.

Now the ultra-competitive Armstrong has done something virtually unthinkable for him: He has quit before a fight is over.

"Today I turn the page. I will no longer address this issue, regardless of the circumstances. I will commit myself to the work I began before ever winning a single Tour de France title: serving people and families affected by cancer, especially those in underserved communities," Armstrong said.

Armstrong could have pressed his innocence in USADA's arbitration process, but the cyclist has said he believes most people have already made up their minds about whether he's a fraud or a persecuted hero.

It's a stunning move for an athlete who built his reputation on not only beating cancer, but forcing himself through grueling offseason workouts no one else could match, then crushing his rivals in the Alps and the Pyrenees.

Although he had already been crowned a world champion and won individual stages at the Tour de France, Armstrong was still relatively unknown in the U.S. until he won the epic race for the first time in 1999. It was the ultimate comeback tale: When diagnosed with cancer, doctors had given him less than a 50 percent chance of survival before surgery and brutal cycles of chemotherapy saved his life.

Armstrong's riveting victories, his work for cancer awareness and his gossip-page romances with rocker Sheryl Crow, fashion designer Tory Burch and actress Kate Hudson made him a figure who transcended sports.

His dominance of the Tour de France elevated the sport's popularity in America to unprecedented levels. His story and success helped sell millions of the "Livestrong" plastic yellow wrist bracelets, and enabled him to enlist lawmakers and global policymakers to promote cancer awareness and research. His Lance Armstrong Foundation has raised nearly $500 million since its founding in 1997.

Created in 2000, USADA is recognized by Congress as the official anti-doping agency for Olympic sports in the United States. Its investigators joined U.S. agents during the federal probe, and USADA chief executive Travis Tygart had dismissed Armstrong's lawsuit as an attempt at "concealing the truth." He said the agency is motivated by one goal - exposing cheaters in sport.

Others close to Armstrong were caught up in the charges: Johan Bruyneel, the coach of Armstrong's teams, and three members of the medical staff and a consultant were also charged. Bruyneel is taking his case to arbitration, while two medical team staffers and consulting doctor Michele Ferrari didn't formally contest the charges and were issued lifetime ban by USADA. Ferrari later said he was innocent.

In a sport rife with cheaters, Armstrong has been under constant suspicion since the 1990s from those who refused to believe he was a clean rider winning cycling's premier event against a field of doped-up competition.

He had tense public disputes with USADA, the World Anti-Doping Agency, some former teammates and assistants and even Greg LeMond, the first American to win the Tour de France.

Through it all, Armstrong vigorously denied any and all hints, rumors and direct accusations he was cheating. He had the blazing personality, celebrity and personal wealth needed to fight back with legal and public relations battles to clear his name - and he did, time after time.

Armstrong won his first Tour at a time when doping scandals had rocked the race. He was leading the race when a trace amount of a banned anti-inflammatory corticosteroid was found in his urine; cycling officials said he was authorized to use a small amount of a cream to treat saddle sores.

After Armstrong's second victory in 2000, French judicial officials investigated his Postal Service team for drug use. That investigation ended with no charges, but the allegations kept coming.

Armstrong was criticized for his relationship with Ferrari, who was banned by Italian authorities over doping charges in 2002. Former personal and team assistants accused Armstrong of having steroids in an apartment in Spain and disposing of syringes that were used for injections.

In 2004, a Dallas-based promotions company initially refused to pay him a $5 million bonus for winning his sixth Tour de France because it wanted to investigate allegations raised by media in Europe. Testimony in that case included former teammate Frankie Andreu and his wife, Betsy, saying Armstrong told doctors during his 1996 cancer treatments that he had taken a cornucopia of steroids and performance-enhancing drugs.

Two books published in Europe, "L.A. Confidential" and "L.A. Official," also raised doping allegations and, in 2005, French magazine L'Equipe reported that retested urine samples from the 1999 Tour showed EPO use.

Armstrong fought every accusation with denials and, in some cases, lawsuits against the European media outlets that reported them.

But he showed signs that he was tiring of the never-ending questions. Armstrong retired (for the first time) in 2005 and almost immediately considered a comeback before deciding to stay on the sidelines, in part, because he didn't want to keep answering doping questions.

"I'm sick of this," Armstrong said in 2005. "Sitting here today, dealing with all this stuff again, knowing if I were to go back, there's no way I could get a fair shake - on the roadside, in doping control, or the labs."

But three years later, Armstrong was 36 and itching to ride again. He came back to finish third in the 2009 Tour de France.

Armstrong raced in the Tour again in 2010, under the cloud of the federal criminal investigation. Early last year, he quit the sport for good, but made a brief return as a triathlete until the USADA investigation shut him down.

During his sworn testimony in the dispute over the $5 million bonus, Armstrong said he wouldn't take performance enhancing drugs because he had too much to lose.

"(The) faith of all the cancer survivors around the world. Everything I do off the bike would go away, too," Armstrong said then. "And don't think for a second I don't understand that. It's not about money for me. Everything. It's also about the faith that people have put in me over the years. So all of that would be erased."
Officiële statement Lance Armstrong

USADA notice letter aan Armstrong, Bruyneel en co.

USADA verklaring wat betreft de zaak Armstrong en zijn overtredingen.

Readoned decision van het WADA

appendixen met onder andere volledige rennersverklaringen
pi_142734677
quote:
0s.gif Op vrijdag 25 juli 2014 22:44 schreef Mexicanobakker het volgende:

[..]

Klöden?
Sastre
  Redactie Sport vrijdag 25 juli 2014 @ 22:54:46 #3
274204 crew  Mexicanobakker
pi_142734711
quote:
0s.gif Op vrijdag 25 juli 2014 22:53 schreef TargaFlorio het volgende:

[..]

Sastre
Die haalde toch geen podium indertijd?
[i]Put me on a pedestal and I'll only disappoint you
Tell me I'm exceptional and I promise to exploit you
Give me all your money and I'll make some origami honey
I think you're a joke but I don't find you very funny[/i]
pi_142734771
quote:
0s.gif Op vrijdag 25 juli 2014 22:54 schreef Mexicanobakker het volgende:

[..]

Die haalde toch geen podium indertijd?
Je hebt gelijk, dat was pas in 2006 dat de Spanjaard op het podium stond.
  Redactie Sport vrijdag 25 juli 2014 @ 22:57:35 #5
274204 crew  Mexicanobakker
pi_142734815
quote:
0s.gif Op vrijdag 25 juli 2014 22:56 schreef TargaFlorio het volgende:

[..]

Je hebt gelijk, dat was pas in 2006 dat de Spanjaard op het podium stond.
Maar goed, ook Klöden is natuurlijk in verband gebracht met doping door die transfusie met Sinkewitz
[i]Put me on a pedestal and I'll only disappoint you
Tell me I'm exceptional and I promise to exploit you
Give me all your money and I'll make some origami honey
I think you're a joke but I don't find you very funny[/i]
  vrijdag 25 juli 2014 @ 22:58:22 #6
396222 meneerfiets
Voormalig wielerexpert
pi_142734843
Waarom zouden we nog over deze lul praten :') .
pi_142734852
quote:
0s.gif Op vrijdag 25 juli 2014 22:57 schreef Mexicanobakker het volgende:

[..]

Maar goed, ook Klöden is natuurlijk in verband gebracht met doping door die transfusie met Sinkewitz
Dan weet ik het niet.
pi_142734892
quote:
14s.gif Op vrijdag 25 juli 2014 22:43 schreef Sloggi het volgende:

[..]

Er is maar één renner die op het podium is geëindigd in de Armstrong-jaren die nooit betrokken is geweest bij een dopingzaak.
Wie dan?
  Redactie Sport vrijdag 25 juli 2014 @ 22:59:47 #9
274204 crew  Mexicanobakker
pi_142734898
quote:
0s.gif Op vrijdag 25 juli 2014 22:58 schreef TargaFlorio het volgende:

[..]

Dan weet ik het niet.
Misschien Escartin, maar die zat in dat ene jaar toch bij Kelme?
[i]Put me on a pedestal and I'll only disappoint you
Tell me I'm exceptional and I promise to exploit you
Give me all your money and I'll make some origami honey
I think you're a joke but I don't find you very funny[/i]
pi_142734993
quote:
0s.gif Op vrijdag 25 juli 2014 22:59 schreef Mexicanobakker het volgende:

[..]

Misschien Escartin, maar die zat in dat ene jaar toch bij Kelme?
Jep

In die docu zag ik nog wat beelden van Escartin. Mollema heeft vele videobanden van hem bekeken. _O-
  Redactie Sport vrijdag 25 juli 2014 @ 23:03:03 #11
274204 crew  Mexicanobakker
pi_142735031
quote:
0s.gif Op vrijdag 25 juli 2014 23:02 schreef TargaFlorio het volgende:

[..]

Jep

In die docu zag ik nog wat beelden van Escartin. Mollema heeft vele videobanden van hem bekeken. _O-
Hopelijk niet voor de tijdrit van morgen. :D
[i]Put me on a pedestal and I'll only disappoint you
Tell me I'm exceptional and I promise to exploit you
Give me all your money and I'll make some origami honey
I think you're a joke but I don't find you very funny[/i]
  vrijdag 25 juli 2014 @ 23:03:57 #12
396222 meneerfiets
Voormalig wielerexpert
pi_142735063
Zo hebben ze Kurt Van De Wouver zijn Tour De France-overwinning afgepakt :( .
  Redactie Sport vrijdag 25 juli 2014 @ 23:05:51 #13
274204 crew  Mexicanobakker
pi_142735132
Wie waren ook alweer de 'rechtmatige' winnaars in 99-05 als je iedereen die ooit een dopingschorsing, bekentenis of allegatie heeft gehad schrapt? :D
[i]Put me on a pedestal and I'll only disappoint you
Tell me I'm exceptional and I promise to exploit you
Give me all your money and I'll make some origami honey
I think you're a joke but I don't find you very funny[/i]
  vrijdag 25 juli 2014 @ 23:06:54 #14
396222 meneerfiets
Voormalig wielerexpert
pi_142735169
quote:
0s.gif Op vrijdag 25 juli 2014 23:05 schreef Mexicanobakker het volgende:
Wie waren ook alweer de 'rechtmatige' winnaars in 99-05 als je iedereen die ooit een dopingschorsing, bekentenis of allegatie heeft gehad schrapt? :D
Kurt Van De Wouwer alvast in 99'. Hij werd 11-de :') .
pi_142735190
quote:
0s.gif Op vrijdag 25 juli 2014 23:05 schreef Mexicanobakker het volgende:
Wie waren ook alweer de 'rechtmatige' winnaars in 99-05 als je iedereen die ooit een dopingschorsing, bekentenis of allegatie heeft gehad schrapt? :D
Dan moet je waarschijnlijk gaan kijken buiten de top 100.
pi_142735984
quote:
13s.gif Op vrijdag 25 juli 2014 22:58 schreef meneerfiets het volgende:
Waarom zouden we nog over deze lul praten :') .
Misschien omdat hij de beste wielrenner aller tijden is?
pi_142736607
quote:
0s.gif Op vrijdag 25 juli 2014 23:27 schreef Tja..1986 het volgende:

[..]

Misschien omdat hij de beste wielrenner aller tijden is?
http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eddy_Merckx
  vrijdag 25 juli 2014 @ 23:47:10 #18
396222 meneerfiets
Voormalig wielerexpert
pi_142736719
quote:
0s.gif Op vrijdag 25 juli 2014 23:27 schreef Tja..1986 het volgende:

[..]

Misschien omdat hij de beste wielrenner aller tijden is?
Is ie niet :') .

Met Doping kan ik ook 7x de Tour winnen :') .
  Redactie Sport vrijdag 25 juli 2014 @ 23:47:24 #19
274204 crew  Mexicanobakker
pi_142736725
[i]Put me on a pedestal and I'll only disappoint you
Tell me I'm exceptional and I promise to exploit you
Give me all your money and I'll make some origami honey
I think you're a joke but I don't find you very funny[/i]
  Redactie Sport vrijdag 25 juli 2014 @ 23:47:35 #20
274204 crew  Mexicanobakker
pi_142736734
quote:
0s.gif Op vrijdag 25 juli 2014 23:47 schreef meneerfiets het volgende:

[..]

Is ie niet :') .

Met Doping kan ik ook 7x de Tour winnen :') .
Haha, nee.
[i]Put me on a pedestal and I'll only disappoint you
Tell me I'm exceptional and I promise to exploit you
Give me all your money and I'll make some origami honey
I think you're a joke but I don't find you very funny[/i]
  vrijdag 25 juli 2014 @ 23:47:42 #21
396222 meneerfiets
Voormalig wielerexpert
pi_142736740
quote:
0s.gif Op vrijdag 25 juli 2014 23:27 schreef Tja..1986 het volgende:

[..]

Misschien omdat hij de beste wielrenner aller tijden is?
quote:
Renners komen en renners gaan enkel Eddy die blijft bestaan. :)
  vrijdag 25 juli 2014 @ 23:48:46 #22
396222 meneerfiets
Voormalig wielerexpert
pi_142736772
quote:
0s.gif Op vrijdag 25 juli 2014 23:47 schreef Mexicanobakker het volgende:

[..]

Haha, nee.
Klopt, Armstong was een misschien één van de grotere talenten,maar toch voor mij is hij een klootzak,of is hij jouw held? :')
  Redactie Sport vrijdag 25 juli 2014 @ 23:49:53 #23
274204 crew  Mexicanobakker
pi_142736808
quote:
0s.gif Op vrijdag 25 juli 2014 23:48 schreef meneerfiets het volgende:

[..]

Klopt, Armstong was een misschien één van de grotere talenten,maar toch voor mij is hij een klootzak,of is hij jouw held? :')
Nee.
[i]Put me on a pedestal and I'll only disappoint you
Tell me I'm exceptional and I promise to exploit you
Give me all your money and I'll make some origami honey
I think you're a joke but I don't find you very funny[/i]
  vrijdag 25 juli 2014 @ 23:51:14 #24
396222 meneerfiets
Voormalig wielerexpert
pi_142736863
quote:
0s.gif Op vrijdag 25 juli 2014 23:49 schreef Mexicanobakker het volgende:

[..]

Nee.
Wat is jouw mening hierover dan?
  Redactie Sport vrijdag 25 juli 2014 @ 23:52:29 #25
274204 crew  Mexicanobakker
pi_142736916
Ik had al niets met Armstrong tijdens zijn carrière. Hij probeerde te hard de held en de redder te zijn, en ik had meer met de down-to-earth Ullrich of Beloki.

Maar het was bijna een doel om Armstrong te veroordelen, zelfs al leken ze geen bewijs te hebben. Al is het voor mannen als Landis, Andreu en LeMond wel prettig.
[i]Put me on a pedestal and I'll only disappoint you
Tell me I'm exceptional and I promise to exploit you
Give me all your money and I'll make some origami honey
I think you're a joke but I don't find you very funny[/i]
abonnement Unibet Coolblue
Forum Opties
Forumhop:
Hop naar:
(afkorting, bv 'KLB')