BNW Brave New World
Samenzwering, verborgen agenda's en geheime geschiedenis. De zoektocht naar de wereld die achter de façade van alledag ligt.
Ja- for more reasons than one!quote:Op dinsdag 6 januari 2015 09:53 schreef kalinhos het volgende:
Je begrijpt niet waar je op reageert Tingo.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Alle info over de mensen die bij deze rechtszaak betrokken zijn:
Who’s Who In The Dzhokhar Tsarnaev Trial
BOSTON — More than 18 months after two bombs went off at the 2013 Boston Marathon finish line, killing three people and injuring more than 260 others, the trial of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev is set to begin Jan. 5, 2015, in U.S. District Court in Boston. Below is a look at the defendant, various people connected to the bombing suspect and those who will take part in his trial.
http://www.wbur.org/2015/(...)bombing-trial-bios#6
Who’s Who In The Dzhokhar Tsarnaev Trial
BOSTON — More than 18 months after two bombs went off at the 2013 Boston Marathon finish line, killing three people and injuring more than 260 others, the trial of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev is set to begin Jan. 5, 2015, in U.S. District Court in Boston. Below is a look at the defendant, various people connected to the bombing suspect and those who will take part in his trial.
http://www.wbur.org/2015/(...)bombing-trial-bios#6
ALLE info? Werkelijk? Da's een hoop hoor!quote:
Vraagje: is dit "alle info" van het MSMverhaal of dat van de BNW-waarheid?
Die MSNBC-link die je "shut up and watch this" een paar maanden geleden hier postte heb ik ook al eens gefileerd.
Helaas zonder enige reactie van jou, die trots zwaaide met "die goeie docu"...
The only limit is your own imagination
Ik ben niet gelovig aangelegd en maak daarin geen onderscheid tussen dominees, imams, scharenslieps, autohandelaren, politici en massamedia
Waarom er geen vliegtuig in het WTC vloog
Ik ben niet gelovig aangelegd en maak daarin geen onderscheid tussen dominees, imams, scharenslieps, autohandelaren, politici en massamedia
Waarom er geen vliegtuig in het WTC vloog
'Alle info over de mensen die bij deze rechtszaak betrokken zijn'.quote:Op donderdag 8 januari 2015 20:35 schreef El_Matador het volgende:
[..]
ALLE info? Werkelijk? Da's een hoop hoor!
Vraagje: is dit "alle info" van het MSMverhaal of dat van de BNW-waarheid?
Die MSNBC-link die je "shut up and watch this" een paar maanden geleden hier postte heb ik ook al eens gefileerd.
Helaas zonder enige reactie van jou, die trots zwaaide met "die goeie docu"...
Waar heb je last van? Vanwaar dat agressieve posten?
Nou nou, ze post alleen maar een link over de rechtzaak..quote:
[..]
ALLE info? Werkelijk? Da's een hoop hoor!
Vraagje: is dit "alle info" van het MSMverhaal of dat van de BNW-waarheid?
Die MSNBC-link die je "shut up and watch this" een paar maanden geleden hier postte heb ik ook al eens gefileerd.
Helaas zonder enige reactie van jou, die trots zwaaide met "die goeie docu"...
Waarvan er genoeg info in het nieuws komt zo te zien.
Getuigen aanklagers de verdediging rechters etc..
Er staat nog een vraag voor u open!!
Accused Boston Marathon Bomber Severely Injured In Prison, May Never Walk Or Talk Again
Okay, i just got rick rolled
Het is een website in de categorie De Speld.
Okay, i just got rick rolled
Het is een website in de categorie De Speld.
SPOILEROm spoilers te kunnen lezen moet je zijn ingelogd. Je moet je daarvoor eerst gratis Registreren. Ook kun je spoilers niet lezen als je een ban hebt.
[ Bericht 25% gewijzigd door schommelstoel op 20-01-2015 11:52:31 (rick rolled) ]You have to stop the Q-tip when there's resistance!
Nou dat maakt 't wat makkelijker om de hele stomme verhaal te blijve faken.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Hij faket gewoon dat hij niet kan lopen. Nepvent.
Curiosity cultured the cat
Hoge dames vangen veel wind
Whadda ya hear! Whadda ya say!
What is any ocean but a multitude of drops?
Hoge dames vangen veel wind
Whadda ya hear! Whadda ya say!
What is any ocean but a multitude of drops?
Niet verder gelezen. 100% dat dit verhaal niet waar is. Dit leest als een bericht van Speld.quote:
Accused Boston Marathon Bomber Severely Injured In Prison, May Never Walk Or Talk Again
Infamous Boston Marathon bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, 21, was the victim of an “unfortunate accident” yesterday at Ft. Devens Detention Center in Massachusetts, just weeks after his high-profile trial began, according to warden Paul Jacobson.
Corrections officers reportedly found the alleged terror suspect face down in a pool of his own blood in his cell; a banana peel was found on the floor nearby.
-edit-
Disclaimer van empirenews:
Speld-variant dus.quote:About / Disclaimer
Empire News is intended for entertainment purposes only. Our website and social media content uses only fictional names, except in cases of public figure and celebrity parody. Any other use of real names is accidental and coincidental.
http://empirenews.net/about-disclaimer/
Je kon wel eens gelijk hebben.quote:Op dinsdag 20 januari 2015 11:42 schreef Terecht het volgende:
[..]
Niet verder gelezen. 100% dat dit verhaal niet waar is. Dit leest als een bericht van Speld.
Hasbro To Produce Jesus, Muhammad Action Figure Line
You have to stop the Q-tip when there's resistance!
Ik zag het net ja, was waarschijnlijk iets te snel met het bericht hier te plaatsen.quote:
[..]
Niet verder gelezen. 100% dat dit verhaal niet waar is. Dit leest als een bericht van Speld.
-edit-
Disclaimer van empirenews:
[..]
Speld-variant dus.
Vandaar dat ik ook vroeg of er anderen waren die de website kende.
Wel apart om te zien dat iemand hier er gelijk induikt met zijn visie
You have to stop the Q-tip when there's resistance!
No plea deal likely in Boston Marathon bombing case
The focus of the Boston Marathon bombing trial figures to be as much on what punishment Dzhokhar Tsarnaev could face as on his responsibility for the attack.
With testimony expected to start later this month, the Justice Department has given no indication it is open to any proposal from the defense to spare Tsarnaev's life, pushing instead toward a trial that could result in a death sentence for the 21-year-old defendant.
In a deadly terror case that killed three people, including a child, and jolted the city, there may be little incentive for prosecutors who believe they have incontrovertible evidence to negotiate away their ability to seek the maximum penalty possible.
"There would be now, in my judgment, no reason for the government to reverse course and not let 12 citizens decide if the death penalty is appropriate," said Larry Mackey, a former Justice Department prosecutor involved in the case of Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh, who was executed in 2001.
The prospect of a death sentence, a rare punishment in the federal system, raises the stakes of a trial that will revisit in gory detail the 2013 attack that also injured more than 260. Should the jury find Tsarnaev guilty, it would then decide in a separate penalty phase whether he should be sentenced to death. Jury selection is underway and the judge has said he hopes to begin testimony on Jan. 26.
Only three federal inmates, including McVeigh, have been put to death since 2001. Recent botched executions at the state level have placed the practice under scrutiny, with President Barack Obama directing the Justice Department last year to investigate how the death penalty is applied across the nation.
Despite his own personal reservations about the death penalty, Attorney General Eric Holder says the government is committed to seeking that punishment for Tsarnaev. Prosecutors have cited factors including a "lack of remorse," the evident premeditation involved in the attack and allegations that Tsarnaev also killed an MIT police officer after the bombing that left an 8-year-old boy dead.
"The nature of the conduct at issue and the resultant harm compel this decision," Holder said in a statement last January.
There has been no indication the government has wavered in that decision, even though one of Tsarnaev's lawyers, Judy Clarke, has gotten prosecutors to spare the lives of multiple high-profile killers, including Unabomber Ted Kaczynski, Olympic Park bomber Eric Rudolph and Jared Loughner, who killed six people and wounded former U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords.
But there's also no predicting how a trial will play out, including whether a conviction would result in a death sentence — particularly in liberal Massachusetts, which abolished its state death penalty in 1984. In a bid to save his life, defense lawyers may hope to cast Tsarnaev as an impressionable young man pressured into participating in the attack by his older brother, Tamerlan, who died after a firefight with police days after the bombing.
Gerald Zerkin, a Virginia defense lawyer who represented Sept. 11 conspirator Zacarias Moussaoui, who is now serving a life sentence, said there are obvious benefits for the government to accept a plea in death penalty cases, including to reduce the uncertainty of a trial and to spare victims and their loved ones from reliving the horrific facts of a case.
"You can get a resolution that is life without parole, and you could do it for a lot less money, a lot less time, a lot fewer resources" and without "re-traumatizing victims," Zerkin said.
Rob Owen, a professor who runs a death penalty case clinic at Northwestern University, said a death sentence will result in years of legal appeals whereas a guilty plea would presumably help the case fade faster from public attention.
But with the trial's opening arguments projected for later this month, any window for a deal to spare Tsarnaev's life has likely closed and there's little reason for the government to entertain the possibility, Mackey said.
"The calculus was done, I'm sure in this case, the day after the bombing, when people were faced full-front with the ugly scenario left on the streets of Boston," he said.
http://news.yahoo.com/see(...)trial-170405424.html
The focus of the Boston Marathon bombing trial figures to be as much on what punishment Dzhokhar Tsarnaev could face as on his responsibility for the attack.
With testimony expected to start later this month, the Justice Department has given no indication it is open to any proposal from the defense to spare Tsarnaev's life, pushing instead toward a trial that could result in a death sentence for the 21-year-old defendant.
In a deadly terror case that killed three people, including a child, and jolted the city, there may be little incentive for prosecutors who believe they have incontrovertible evidence to negotiate away their ability to seek the maximum penalty possible.
"There would be now, in my judgment, no reason for the government to reverse course and not let 12 citizens decide if the death penalty is appropriate," said Larry Mackey, a former Justice Department prosecutor involved in the case of Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh, who was executed in 2001.
The prospect of a death sentence, a rare punishment in the federal system, raises the stakes of a trial that will revisit in gory detail the 2013 attack that also injured more than 260. Should the jury find Tsarnaev guilty, it would then decide in a separate penalty phase whether he should be sentenced to death. Jury selection is underway and the judge has said he hopes to begin testimony on Jan. 26.
Only three federal inmates, including McVeigh, have been put to death since 2001. Recent botched executions at the state level have placed the practice under scrutiny, with President Barack Obama directing the Justice Department last year to investigate how the death penalty is applied across the nation.
Despite his own personal reservations about the death penalty, Attorney General Eric Holder says the government is committed to seeking that punishment for Tsarnaev. Prosecutors have cited factors including a "lack of remorse," the evident premeditation involved in the attack and allegations that Tsarnaev also killed an MIT police officer after the bombing that left an 8-year-old boy dead.
"The nature of the conduct at issue and the resultant harm compel this decision," Holder said in a statement last January.
There has been no indication the government has wavered in that decision, even though one of Tsarnaev's lawyers, Judy Clarke, has gotten prosecutors to spare the lives of multiple high-profile killers, including Unabomber Ted Kaczynski, Olympic Park bomber Eric Rudolph and Jared Loughner, who killed six people and wounded former U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords.
But there's also no predicting how a trial will play out, including whether a conviction would result in a death sentence — particularly in liberal Massachusetts, which abolished its state death penalty in 1984. In a bid to save his life, defense lawyers may hope to cast Tsarnaev as an impressionable young man pressured into participating in the attack by his older brother, Tamerlan, who died after a firefight with police days after the bombing.
Gerald Zerkin, a Virginia defense lawyer who represented Sept. 11 conspirator Zacarias Moussaoui, who is now serving a life sentence, said there are obvious benefits for the government to accept a plea in death penalty cases, including to reduce the uncertainty of a trial and to spare victims and their loved ones from reliving the horrific facts of a case.
"You can get a resolution that is life without parole, and you could do it for a lot less money, a lot less time, a lot fewer resources" and without "re-traumatizing victims," Zerkin said.
Rob Owen, a professor who runs a death penalty case clinic at Northwestern University, said a death sentence will result in years of legal appeals whereas a guilty plea would presumably help the case fade faster from public attention.
But with the trial's opening arguments projected for later this month, any window for a deal to spare Tsarnaev's life has likely closed and there's little reason for the government to entertain the possibility, Mackey said.
"The calculus was done, I'm sure in this case, the day after the bombing, when people were faced full-front with the ugly scenario left on the streets of Boston," he said.
http://news.yahoo.com/see(...)trial-170405424.html
De grens tussen parodie en wat we zijn vertelt is realiteit wordt dunner.quote:
[..]
Ik zag het net ja, was waarschijnlijk iets te snel met het bericht hier te plaatsen.
Vandaar dat ik ook vroeg of er anderen waren die de website kende.
Wel apart om te zien dat iemand hier er gelijk induikt met zijn visie
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
-weg-quote:
Doodstraf voor één rookbommetje, zou toch wat wezen!
[ Bericht 14% gewijzigd door Lavenderr op 20-01-2015 13:18:18 ]
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Things to Know About the Boston Marathon Bombing Trial
Jury selection in the federal death penalty trial of Boston Marathon bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev is going slower than expected. Here's what you need to know as the trial enters its third week:
THE CASE:
Tsarnaev, 21, is charged in a deadly terror attack on the 2013 Boston Marathon. Two pressure-cooker bombs placed near the finish line killed three people, including an 8-year-old boy, and injured more than 260. Prosecutors say Tsarnaev and his older brother, Tamerlan, planted and detonated the bombs in retaliation for U.S. wars in Muslim countries. Tamerlan Tsarnaev died in a shootout with police several days after the bombings.
JURY SELECTION:
Individual questioning of prospective jurors began last week, and Judge George O'Toole Jr. originally said he would question 40 people each day. But only 34 people were questioned during the first two days. More than 1,350 people have filled out juror questionnaires.
Prospective jurors are called into the courtroom in groups of about 20 and given initial instructions from the judge. O'Toole has told potential jurors that they will decide whether Tsarnaev lives or dies. Seventeen of the 30 charges against Tsarnaev are capital crimes punishable by death. Tsarnaev sits at a large table, surrounded by his lawyers and across the table from prosecutors. The judge sits near the prospective jurors and does most of the questioning. The judge has been allowing prosecutors and Tsarnaev's lawyers to ask follow-up questions.
THE DEFENDANT:
Tsarnaev's curly hair was long and unkempt during the first phase of jury selection. He also had a scruffy beard. When individual questioning started, Tsarnaev had a haircut, and his beard was neatly trimmed. He spent much of the time looking down and drawing on a legal pad and occasionally looked at jurors as they were questioned.
PROSPECTIVE JURORS:
Many of the 34 people questioned so far do not appear likely to be picked for the jury. Some have expressed strong opposition to the death penalty and said they could not impose it under any circumstances. Others have said the predicted three- to four-month trial would be a serious financial hardship. Still others said they have not formed an opinion about Tsarnaev's guilt and would be willing to consider both life in prison or the death penalty if he is convicted.
Some people had poignant responses that could keep them off the jury. One woman choked back tears when she spoke of Martin Richard, the 8-year-old Dorchester boy who was killed in the attack. A man said his wife is an intensive care nurse who treated people injured in the bombing. A woman said her husband is a state trooper and she would find it difficult to be impartial, given that Tsarnaev is also accused of killing an Massachusetts Institute of Technology police officer.
WHAT'S NEXT:
On Tuesday, the judge will bring in another group of prospective jurors for individual questioning. The process will continue each day until a group of 60 to 70 people have been qualified as potential jurors. After that, Tsarnaev's lawyers and prosecutors will be allowed to eliminate some people from juror consideration without stating a reason. A panel of 12 jurors and six alternates will be chosen. The judge has said he hopes to begin testimony on Jan. 26.
http://abcnews.go.com/US/(...)mbing-trial-28325785
Jury selection in the federal death penalty trial of Boston Marathon bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev is going slower than expected. Here's what you need to know as the trial enters its third week:
THE CASE:
Tsarnaev, 21, is charged in a deadly terror attack on the 2013 Boston Marathon. Two pressure-cooker bombs placed near the finish line killed three people, including an 8-year-old boy, and injured more than 260. Prosecutors say Tsarnaev and his older brother, Tamerlan, planted and detonated the bombs in retaliation for U.S. wars in Muslim countries. Tamerlan Tsarnaev died in a shootout with police several days after the bombings.
JURY SELECTION:
Individual questioning of prospective jurors began last week, and Judge George O'Toole Jr. originally said he would question 40 people each day. But only 34 people were questioned during the first two days. More than 1,350 people have filled out juror questionnaires.
Prospective jurors are called into the courtroom in groups of about 20 and given initial instructions from the judge. O'Toole has told potential jurors that they will decide whether Tsarnaev lives or dies. Seventeen of the 30 charges against Tsarnaev are capital crimes punishable by death. Tsarnaev sits at a large table, surrounded by his lawyers and across the table from prosecutors. The judge sits near the prospective jurors and does most of the questioning. The judge has been allowing prosecutors and Tsarnaev's lawyers to ask follow-up questions.
THE DEFENDANT:
Tsarnaev's curly hair was long and unkempt during the first phase of jury selection. He also had a scruffy beard. When individual questioning started, Tsarnaev had a haircut, and his beard was neatly trimmed. He spent much of the time looking down and drawing on a legal pad and occasionally looked at jurors as they were questioned.
PROSPECTIVE JURORS:
Many of the 34 people questioned so far do not appear likely to be picked for the jury. Some have expressed strong opposition to the death penalty and said they could not impose it under any circumstances. Others have said the predicted three- to four-month trial would be a serious financial hardship. Still others said they have not formed an opinion about Tsarnaev's guilt and would be willing to consider both life in prison or the death penalty if he is convicted.
Some people had poignant responses that could keep them off the jury. One woman choked back tears when she spoke of Martin Richard, the 8-year-old Dorchester boy who was killed in the attack. A man said his wife is an intensive care nurse who treated people injured in the bombing. A woman said her husband is a state trooper and she would find it difficult to be impartial, given that Tsarnaev is also accused of killing an Massachusetts Institute of Technology police officer.
WHAT'S NEXT:
On Tuesday, the judge will bring in another group of prospective jurors for individual questioning. The process will continue each day until a group of 60 to 70 people have been qualified as potential jurors. After that, Tsarnaev's lawyers and prosecutors will be allowed to eliminate some people from juror consideration without stating a reason. A panel of 12 jurors and six alternates will be chosen. The judge has said he hopes to begin testimony on Jan. 26.
http://abcnews.go.com/US/(...)mbing-trial-28325785
-weg-
[ Bericht 36% gewijzigd door Fogel op 21-01-2015 18:16:56 (gebruik feedback voor commentaar op moderatie) ]
[ Bericht 36% gewijzigd door Fogel op 21-01-2015 18:16:56 (gebruik feedback voor commentaar op moderatie) ]
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Ja en Jeffrey and Carlos lived happily ever after ....after selling lots of books.quote:
Doodstraf voor één rookbommetje, zou toch wat wezen!
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
ik weet niet of deze al gepost is, maar dit lijkt me toch wel een wtf/case closed momentje...quote:
wie deze crap nog gelooft wordt of betaald, of is ongeïnformeerd, of is brainwashend beyond repair..
imho.
Huig
ja wat dan..?quote:Op donderdag 22 januari 2015 00:08 schreef Terecht het volgende:
Maar wat nu als je betaald, ongeinformeerd én gehersenspoeld bent? Of betaald ongeinformeerd?
Huig
Zeg jij het maar. Jij gelooft immers niet in die crap dus ben je niet betaald (= eerlijk en onbevlekt), niet ongeinformeerd (= geinformeerd) en niet onherstelbaar gehersenspoeld (= je bent een zelfstandige denker). Het kan dus welhaast niet anders dan dat jij een denkbeest bent die antwoord op deze vraag weet. Orwell de eerlijke, onbevlekte, geinformeerde zelfstandige denker.quote:
Dankje wel!quote:
[..]
ik weet niet of deze al gepost is, maar dit lijkt me toch wel een wtf/case closed momentje...
wie deze crap nog gelooft wordt of betaald, of is ongeïnformeerd, of is brainwashend beyond repair..
imho.
Ik heb wat meer van peekay gezien.Hij heeft 'n beetje wat ranty,aggressief manier om z'n punten te maken,maar dit is weer 'n goeie.
En nee ik snap 't ook niet hoe mensen kunnen die MSM crap blijven geloven.
[ Bericht 2% gewijzigd door Tingo op 22-01-2015 00:45:13 ]
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
ben misschien een hele gekke jongen, maar begin me iets van 'evidence' te showen..quote:
[..]
Zeg jij het maar. Jij gelooft immers niet in die crap dus ben je niet betaald (= eerlijk en onbevlekt), niet ongeinformeerd (= geinformeerd) en niet onherstelbaar gehersenspoeld (= je bent een zelfstandige denker). Het kan dus welhaast niet anders dan dat jij een denkbeest bent die antwoord op deze vraag weet. Orwell de eerlijke, onbevlekte, geinformeerde zelfstandige denker.
bijv : footage van meer dan 12 kinderen, die uit de school komen
http://www.thehoya.com/remember-sandy-hook/
hahaha..wie gelooft deze crap…?
gene rosen
Huig
Ik weet niet hoor Orwell, eerlijke onbevlekte geinformeerde zelfstandige denker, maar kwam jij in post #94 niet aanzetten met bewijs? Een smoking gun nog wel, gevalletje case closed. Laten we het daar dan over hebben, in plaats van Sandy Hook erbij te betrekken.quote:
[..]
ben misschien een hele gekke jongen, maar begin me iets van 'evidence' te showen..
-knip-
Een eerste vraag is alvast wat je met deze smoking gun hebt gedaan. Ben je er al mee naar journalisten/media/aanklagers/overheden geweest? Heb je al een actie op poten gezet waarin je pleit voor een nieuw onderzoek? Ben je momenteel een boek aan het schijven waarin je je bevindingen uit de doeken doet (zoals de verscheidene onderzoekers bij het ronde huis hebben gedaan)?
| Forum Opties | |
|---|---|
| Forumhop: | |
| Hop naar: | |